Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Risk Prediction Error Coding in Orbitofrontal Neurons

Martin O'Neill and Wolfram Schultz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2013, 33 (40) 15810-15814; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4236-12.2013
Martin O'Neill
Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfram Schultz
Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Risk prediction error. A, B, Task design. An initial ocular fixation spot predicts the overall risk, derived from the overall reward probability distribution (maroon arrow in B). The subsequent appearance of one of the risk cues defines the current risk for each trial. Each risk cue predicts an equiprobable (p = 0.5 each), high or low amount of liquid reward delivered after saccadic eye movement to the cue location. Thus, each risk cue indicates current risk (defined as standard deviation of each specific reward probability distribution) (blue arrows in B). The risk prediction error on any given trial is the specific risk indicated by the risk cue for the current trial minus the predicted, overall risk indicated by the fixation spot common for all trials (red arrows in B). C, Actual measures used. D, Behavioral responses. As risk increased, both monkeys showed an increasing preference for the risky cues compared with the safe cue (which had an outcome that equaled the expected value of the risky cues). Thus, the monkeys showed risk preference. Data points show mean percentage preference. Error bars show SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Orbitofrontal neurons code risk prediction error. A, Single neuron examples. Smoothed histograms show responses from two example neurons coding risk prediction error with positive slope (left) and negative slope (right). B, Population responses. Smoothed histograms show averaged population responses from all neurons coding risk prediction error with positive slopes (left) and negative slopes (right). Gray bars indicate the time windows for analysis. C, Regressions on risk prediction error. Data points show mean firing rates averaged from all neurons during the shaded periods in B. Error bars show SEM. D, SRCs from linear regressions on neurons with significant positive betas (left) and negative betas (right) for RiPE at cue presentation. E, Scatterplot of CPDs for neurons with significant correlation coefficients for risk prediction error (red dots), risk (blue dots), and both (green dots) at cue presentation (left). R2 values from single linear regressions with risk prediction error and subjective value prediction errors as regressors (right).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (40)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 40
2 Oct 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Prediction Error Coding in Orbitofrontal Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Risk Prediction Error Coding in Orbitofrontal Neurons
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2013, 33 (40) 15810-15814; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4236-12.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Risk Prediction Error Coding in Orbitofrontal Neurons
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2013, 33 (40) 15810-15814; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4236-12.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.