Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Amplified Cold Transduction in Native Nociceptors by M-Channel Inhibition

Irina Vetter, Alexander Hein, Simon Sattler, Sabine Hessler, Filip Touska, Elisangela Bressan, Andres Parra, Ulrich Hager, Andreas Leffler, Stepana Boukalova, Matthias Nissen, Richard J. Lewis, Carlos Belmonte, Christian Alzheimer, Tobias Huth, Viktorie Vlachova, Peter W. Reeh and Katharina Zimmermann
Journal of Neuroscience 16 October 2013, 33 (42) 16627-16641; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1473-13.2013
Irina Vetter
1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia,
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Hein
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
6Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Sattler
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
3Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-14220 Prague, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Hessler
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filip Touska
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
3Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-14220 Prague, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisangela Bressan
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andres Parra
4Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernandez-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Hager
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Leffler
5Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stepana Boukalova
3Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-14220 Prague, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Nissen
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Lewis
1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Belmonte
4Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernandez-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Alzheimer
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Huth
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viktorie Vlachova
3Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-14220 Prague, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter W. Reeh
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharina Zimmermann
2Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Topically applied camphor elicits a sensation of cool, but nothing is known about how it affects cold temperature sensing. We found that camphor sensitizes a subpopulation of menthol-sensitive native cutaneous nociceptors in the mouse to cold, but desensitizes and partially blocks heterologously expressed TRPM8 (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 8). In contrast, camphor reduces potassium outward currents in cultured sensory neurons and, in cold nociceptors, the cold-sensitizing effects of camphor and menthol are additive. Using a membrane potential dye-based screening assay and heterologously expressed potassium channels, we found that the effects of camphor are mediated by inhibition of Kv7.2/3 channels subtypes that generate the M-current in neurons. In line with this finding, the specific M-current blocker XE991 reproduced the cold-sensitizing effect of camphor in nociceptors. However, the M-channel blocking effects of XE991 and camphor are not sufficient to initiate cold transduction but require a cold-activated inward current generated by TRPM8. The cold-sensitizing effects of XE991 and camphor are largest in high-threshold cold nociceptors. Low-threshold corneal cold thermoreceptors that express high levels of TRPM8 and lack potassium channels are not affected by camphor. We also found that menthol—like camphor—potently inhibits Kv7.2/3 channels. The apparent functional synergism arising from TRPM8 activation and M-current block can improve the effectiveness of topical coolants and cooling lotions, and may also enhance TRPM8-mediated analgesia.

Introduction

Camphor is a ketone originally isolated from the Cinnamomum camphora tree with a penetrating characteristic odor and pungently aromatic taste. It has a long-standing medicinal use as an ingredient in analgesic creams and cooling lotions, and is used for its scent as flavoring in India and Europe. It belongs to the group of plant-derived natural compounds, such as capsaicin, menthol, zingerone, and others, that act on members of the family of thermosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (Xu et al., 2006). These receptors are purported to be involved in the conversion of thermal information into electrical signals (Clapham and Miller, 2011).

Camphor exerts agonist and desensitizing effects on TRPV1 (TRP subfamily V, member 1) that may account for its pungency, counterirritant, and analgesic effects (Xu et al., 2005). In addition, camphor is an agonist at the keratinocyte warm sensor TRPV3, which may mediate sensitization to warming of the skin (Green, 1990; Moqrich et al., 2005) and is a potent blocker of the noxious cold and irritant receptor TRPA1 (Xu et al., 2005; Macpherson et al., 2006; Karashima et al., 2009). Nevertheless, the scent and taste of camphor impart an after-sense of coolness, rather similar to that of menthol, and when topically applied to the skin it produces a feeling of cooling (Green, 1990; Sweetman, 2004). The mechanism of how camphor affects cold temperature sensing is unknown.

Cold sensing is mediated by specialized thermoreceptive and nociceptive nerve endings, some of which are equipped with the menthol receptor TRPM8 (McKemy et al., 2002; Peier et al., 2002), an essential cold sensor in mice (Bautista et al., 2007; Colburn et al., 2007; Dhaka et al., 2007). Low-threshold cold thermoreceptors are mechanoinsensitive and abundant in the trigeminal territory (i.e., in the cornea of the eye), where they feature ongoing impulse activity at resting temperature (34–35°C) and respond vigorously to small temperature reductions (<0.5°C) as a result of high TRPM8 expression (Parra et al., 2010). TRPM8 is also present in cutaneous nociceptive and thermoreceptive nerve endings. Mechanoinsensitive skin thermoreceptors share some of the characteristics of low-threshold corneal thermoreceptors, but display a much broader range of activation thresholds (37–17°C; Zimmermann et al., 2011), likely reflecting a diverging ion channel composition and function.

Apart from transducing inward currents, cold-induced closure of outward potassium channels, like K2P, contributes to cold-induced depolarization (Reid and Flonta, 2001; Viana et al., 2002; Noël et al., 2009), because it increases membrane resistance and reduces the effective voltage change required to excite sensory nerve endings (Zimmermann et al., 2007). In addition, KV1 family potassium channels are coexpressed with TRPM8 and contribute to the setting of the temperature threshold in cultured trigeminal and somatic neurons (Madrid et al., 2009; Teichert et al., 2012).

To gain novel insight into cold transduction mechanisms, we investigated the molecular mechanism of how camphor induces sensitization to cooling. We used extracellular and patch-clamp electrophysiology in combination with transgenic mice, calcium imaging, and a high-throughput FLIPR Tetra-based screening assay and present the first evidence of an involvement of KV7.2/3 channels, which form the neuronal M-current, in the suprathreshold amplification of TRPM8-dependent cold transduction in cutaneous cold nociceptors.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

C57BL/6J mice (16 females and 37 males), TRPV1−/− (5 females and 8 males), TRPM8−/− (16 males), heterozygous TRPM8EGFPf/+ mice (6 males), and TRPM8+/+ age-matched littermates (14 males) weighing between 18 and 32 g were killed by 100% CO2. Animals were conventionally genotyped using commercially available primers (Metabion). TRPV1−/− mice were congenic to and matched with C57BL/6/J and were a gift from J.B. Davis (GSK, Harlow, UK). The primer sequences were for wt CAT GGC CAG TGA GAA CAC CAT GG and AGC CTT TTG TTC TTG GCT TCT CCT; and for the knock-out allele CCG GTG CCC TGA ATG AAC T and AAG ACC GGC TTC CAT CCG A. TRPM8−/− and TRPM8EGFPf/+ were donated by A. Patapoutian and A. Dhaka (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). TRPM8 transgenic mice were from N4F3 (n = 4) and N5F1-F6 (n = 12) generation, and littermates of the N5F1/F5 generation were matched as a control. The primer sequences were 5′-GGG ATG TCA TAG TGC TGA AAG for the wild-type allele, and 5′-CCG GGT GCT GCC CAT AGT ACC for the knock-out allele.

Single-fiber recordings.

The isolated skin-saphenous nerve preparation and single-fiber recording technique were used as previously described (Zimmermann et al., 2009). The skin was kept under laminar superfusion of carbogen-gassed synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF). Receptive fields of identified mechanosensitive C-fibers were characterized with von Frey filaments and with respect to thermal responsiveness (heating and cooling). Therefore, the receptive fields were isolated from the surrounding fluid with an aluminum or Teflon ring (volume, 300–400 μl), and kept continuously perfused with camphor, menthol, capsaicin, retigabine, XE991, or combinations of those at a rate of 10 ml/min at 30°C. To apply prewarmed solutions as well as heat and cold stimuli, we used custom-made countercurrent temperature exchange application system (Zimmermann et al., 2009). Heat ramps were ramp shaped rising from a bath temperature of 30°C and reached 49 ± 1.4°C (mean ± SD) within 20 s (average of >50 individual stimuli). The cold stimuli lasted 60 s and consisted of two phases, a first dynamic (30–12°C) and a second static phase (12–10°C), each lasting 30 s. The cooling stimulus was linear during the first 7.5 s where the cooling rate reached a maximum of 1.5°C/s. The criterion for assigning heat responsiveness to a fiber was a discharge of at least 2 spikes. The criterion for assigning cold responsiveness to a fiber was adjusted to a discharge of at least 3 spikes due to the longer cold ramp (30 s). The noxious cold threshold was considered as the first spike discharged during cooling. Chemical sensitization to cold was considered when the magnitude of the response (number of spikes) and/or the peak discharge increased by >1.5-fold, in combination with a constant or decreased threshold temperature. The characteristics and treatments of the 200 recorded C-fibers are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Synopsis of C-fibers: characteristics of fiber populations

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Synopsis of C-fibers: treatment with cooling compounds menthol and camphor or M-channel modulators XE991 and retigabine

Transfection procedure.

Recombinant TRPM8 (rTRPM8; 0.5 μg/μl) was transiently transfected in HEK293T cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method or using Nanofectin (PAA Laboratories). A reporter plasmid (CD8-pih3m, 1 μg) was cotransfected to allow identification of transfected cells by Immunobeads (anti-CD-8 Dynabeads, Dynal Biotech). HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin 100 U/ml, HEPES 25 mm, fetal bovine serum 10% (Invitrogen), and taurine 3 mm (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C and 5% CO2. After the transfection procedure, cells were kept in culture dishes (35 mm) and used for patch-clamp experiments within 2–3 d. Plasmid DNA of recombinant K2P channels (TRESK, TRAAK, TREK1, and TREK2) and KV7 channels (KV7.2 and KV7.3) were transfected using Nanofectin (PAA Laboratories) or Fugene HD (Roche). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were plated on 96-well plates, 384-well plates, or glass coverslips as required and used 12∼24 h after plating.

DRG culture.

Adult mice were killed by CO2 inhalation. DRGs from all spinal levels were removed and incubated in 0.6 mg/ml collagenase (type XI, Sigma) and 3 mg/ml protease (Sigma) for 40 min at 37°C in DMEM. The ganglia were then gently triturated, and neurons were plated onto borosilicate glass coverslips, which had been treated with poly-d-lysine (0.1 mg/ml for 30 min) and cultured (37°C, 5% CO2 in air) in serum-free TNB-100 basal medium (Biochrom AG), supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, and 100 ng/ml nerve growth factor-7S (Alomone Labs). Recordings were made after ∼24 h in culture.

Patch-clamp electrophysiology.

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were conducted at room temperature (∼21°C) with an Axopatch 200B amplifier and the pClamp 10 software (both Molecular Devices) installed on a conventional PC. Patch-clamp pipettes with a final resistance of 1.5–3 MΩ were fabricated with borosilicate capillary glass (TW150F-3, World Precision Instruments). Currents were sampled at 2–5 kHz and filtered at 1 kHz. Voltage-clamp recordings were made on HEK293T cells and on small and medium-sized DRG neurons from a holding potential of −60 mV. Current-clamp recordings were made on small- and medium-sized DRG neurons from TRPM8EGFPf/+ neurons and nonfluorescent neurons, only including cells with a resting potential negative to −47 mV. Only one cell per dish (HEK293T cells) or coverslip (DRG neurons) was used. The standard extracellular solution contained the following (in mm): NaCl 140, KCl 3, CaCl2 1, MgCl2 1, HEPES 10, and glucose 20, adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH. The pipette solution for current-clamp experiments contained the following (in mm): K-Gluconate 135, NaCl 4, MgCl2 3, Na-GTP 0.3, Na2-ATP 2, EGTA 5, and HEPES 5, adjusted to pH 7.25 with KOH. The internal solution for recording of K2P channels in HEK cells contained the following (in mm): KCl 150, MgCl2 3, HEPES 10, and EGTA 5, adjusted to pH 7.2 with KOH. The thermal stimuli were delivered using a multichannel, gravity-driven perfusion system incorporating rapid-feedback temperature control and consisted of heating (to ∼45°C) and respective cooling (to ∼15–10°C) of the test solution were applicable (Dittert et al., 2006).

Recordings of KV7.2, KV7.3, and TRPM8.

HEK293T cells were plated on 3.5 cm dishes 1 d before transfection with Nanofectin (PAA Laboratories) according to the manufacturer's protocol using 1 μg of cDNA of human KV7.2 and KV7.3, and human TRPM8 and 0.5 μg of eGFP. Transfected cells were identified 2 d after transfection by using an inverted fluorescent microscope (Axiovert 40, Zeiss) combined with a fiber optic-coupled light source (UVICO, Rapp OptoElectronic). Whole-cell recordings were performed at room temperature (∼21°C) using an Axopatch 700B amplifier in conjunction with a Digidata 1322A interface and pClamp 10.3 software (all from Molecular Devices/MDS Analytical Technologies). Experiments were started 3 min after whole-cell access was obtained. Borosilicate glass electrodes (Biomedical Instruments) were pulled on a DMZ-Universal Puller (Zeitz) and had a tip resistance in bath solution of 2.8–4.0 MΩ. Series resistance compensation was ≥75%. For brief perfusion (1 s), menthol was pressure ejected at 1 bar (PDES-02T, npi Electronic) through a pipette that was positioned in close proximity to the recorded cell. For longer perfusion of menthol, we used a gravity-driven Y-tube application system. The internal solution contained the following (in mm): K-gluconate 135, HEPES 5, MgCl2 3, EGTA 5, Na2ATP 2, Na3GTP 0.3, and NaCl 4, adjusted to pH of 7.25 with KOH. External solution was composed of the following (in mm): NaCl 145, KCl 4, MgCl2 2, CaCl2 2, HEPES 10, and d-glucose 10, adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH. Puffer pipettes were filled with external solution and 50 μm menthol. To determine EC50 values, dose–response data were fitted to a logistic (Boltzmann) equation of the following form: Embedded Image where A1 and A2 are the upper and the lower asymptotes, respectively, EC50 is the half-blocking concentration, and p is a power factor. Data were analyzed using pClamp 10.3 and Origin Pro9.0G Software (Origin Lab Corp.).

FLIPR Ca2+ and membrane potential blue dye assay.

To assess changes in membrane potential or intracellular Ca2+ using the FLIPR Tetra (Molecular Devices) plate reader, cells were plated at a density of 10,000 cells/well on 384-well black-walled imaging plates (Corning) 24 h before the assay. Cells were loaded with blue membrane potential dye or Calcium 4 No-wash dye (Molecular Devices) in standard extracellular solution for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. Changes in membrane potential or Ca2+ responses were measured using a cooled CCD camera (membrane potential: excitation, 510–545 nm; emission, 515–575 nm; Ca2+ responses: excitation, 470–495 nm; emission, 515–575 nm) for 300 s after the addition of menthol, XE991, retigabine, or camphor. Raw fluorescence data were analyzed using Screenworks 3.1.1.4 (Molecular Devices) and fitted using GraphPad Prism (version 4.00). The dose–response data were fitted to a four-parameter Hill equation with variable Hill slope of the following form: Embedded Image where A1 and A2 represent the maximal and minimal values.

Calcium microfluorimetry.

Calcium imaging experiments were performed as previously described (Babes et al., 2010). Dissociated mouse DRG neurons or HEK293T cells transiently transfected with rTRPM8 were plated on poly-d-lysine-coated glass coverslips and loaded with Fura-2AM (3 μm) supplemented with 0.02% pluronic acid (both from Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2 dissolved in extracellular solution followed by a 15 min washout. Ratiometric calcium imaging was performed on an Olympus IX71 inverse microscope with an 20× or 10× objective at 35°C (DRGs) and ambient temperature (recombinant TRPM8). Fura-2AM was excited at 340 and 380 nm with a Polychrome V monochromator (Till Photonics). Images were exposed for 2 ms and acquired at a rate of 1/s with a 12-bit CCD camera (Imago Sensicam QE, Till Photonics). Data were recorded and further analyzed using TILLvisION 4.0.1.3 software (Till Photonics). To assess Ca2+ responses to cold and chemical stimulation, a software controlled six-channel gravity-driven common-outlet system was used (Dittert et al., 2006). DRGs were selected for cold sensitivity and were characterized for TRP channel expression by application of menthol (250 μm). Recombinant TRPM8 was superfused with 100 μm menthol. Cells were considered responsive to a stimulus when the ratio increased by at least 20% over baseline. In HEK293T cells, ionomycin (2 μm) was applied to the cells at the end of the experiment.

Corneal nerve terminal impulse recordings.

Recordings were performed as previously described (Parra et al., 2010). Animals were killed by exposure to CO2. Eyes were carefully removed and placed in a glass with physiological saline solution for 30 min at room temperature and bubbled with carbogen. The optic nerve and associated tissues were drawn into a suction tube at the bottom of the recording chamber, and the eye was continuously perfused (1 ml/min) with carbogen-gassed physiological saline solution of the following composition (in mm): NaCl 128, KCl 5, NaH2PO4 1, NaHCO3 26, CaCl2 2.4, MgCl2 1.3, and glucose 10. The bath temperature was kept constant ∼34°C using a custom-designed Peltier device. To record extracellular nerve terminal impulse (NTI) activity, a suction glass pipette (tip diameter, ∼50 μm) filled with the same physiological saline was applied to the surface of the corneal epithelium and a ground Ag/AgCl pellet was placed inside the recording chamber. Signals were recorded using an AC amplifier (Neurolog NL104, Digitimer Ltd) with the gain set to 2k and the bandpass to 0.1 Hz. Data capture was performed with the CED 1401 interface and the Spike2 6.0 software (Cambridge Electronic Design). Cold thermoreceptor endings were identified by their characteristic ongoing, often regular, low-frequency impulse activity at 34°C, which increased during cooling and silenced in response to warming. Ongoing NTI activity at 34°C was recorded for at least 1 min before cooling. Basal mean ongoing activity (impulses per 1 s) was calculated during the 30 s preceding the onset of a 30 s ramp-like temperature drop to 20°C at a rate of 0.65 ± 0.02°C/s. This protocol was repeated after exposure to camphor. Cooling thresholds are temperature values in degree Celsius at which NTI frequency increased to a value that was the mean NTI frequency, measured during the 10 s period that preceded the onset of a cooling ramp, plus three times its SD. Peak frequency values are the maximal impulse per second rate of NTI frequency during the cooling ramp. The slope (Δ rate/Δ temperature; impulses per second per degree Celsius) is the slope of the line between the firing frequency at the cooling threshold and the peak frequency per second value, related to the temperature in degrees Celsius.

Compounds.

Camphor, menthol, XE991 [10,10-bis (4-pyridinyl-methyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone], and capsaicin were purchased from Sigma. Retigabine was purchased from Alomone Labs. Camphor was used at a final concentration of 1, 2, or 10 mm, diluted from a 2 m stock in ethanol. Menthol was dissolved in ethanol and kept deep frozen at 10 mm until dissolved in SIF to 50 μm, 100 μm, 250 μm, or 0.5 mm. Capsaicin was dissolved in ethanol to a concentration of 10 mm and stored deep frozen until used at a concentration of 1 μm. XE991 was found to be unstable in frozen stock and in solution. Therefore, stock was prepared fresh from powder at 10 mm using DMSO before each experiment and kept refrigerated. For each recording, a new solution at a final concentration of 10 or 100 μm was prepared from the refrigerated stock. The same procedure was followed for retigabine, which was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mm and used at a final concentration of 50 μm.

Statistical analysis.

Unless otherwise stated, the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used for intraindividual comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. For analysis, Statistica version 6 (StatSoft) was used. All data in figures are expressed as the mean ± SEM; in tables, they are expressed as SE.

Results

Camphor boosts cold transduction in cutaneous nerve endings with functional TRPM8

We attempted to characterize the subpopulations of sensory neurons that are camphor sensitive using the isolated mouse skin-nerve preparation (Zimmermann et al., 2009). We applied camphor focally to the receptive field of sensory nerve endings to record the propagated action potentials in response to cooling. We found that 2 mm camphor sensitized 25–30% of mechanosensitive C-fibers strikingly to cold (Fig. 1); a 2 mm dose is likely to be a medicinally relevant concentration, because camphor used in ointments and other topical preparations is present at up to 11%, which may correspond to several hundred millimolar camphor intracutaneously (Xu et al., 2005). Because camphor was previously identified as a TRPV1 agonist (Xu et al., 2005), we included recordings from TRPV1-deficient animals (Davis et al., 2000). We found similar cold-sensitizing effects in both genotypes (Fig. 1C–F); the cold sensitization of camphor became manifest in a several-fold increase in cold-activated action potential discharge and was accompanied by a large rise in peak firing frequency and a drop in activation threshold by 5°C (Fig. 1C–E). The camphor-induced sensitization to cold was partially reversible within 5 min of washout, and repeated applications produced comparable responses (Fig. 1A). Remarkably, camphor sensitized less than half of the cold-sensitive nociceptors to cold (∼40%), and mostly C-Mechano-Cold (CMC) fibers (Table 1; Fig. 1B). Cold transduction in CMC fibers depends on TRPM8, because we previously demonstrated that these fibers are lacking in TRPM8-deficient mice (Zimmermann et al., 2011). In addition, camphor induced novel pronounced responsiveness to cold in some of the thermoinsensitive nociceptors [C-Mechano (CM); Table 1; Fig. 1B].

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Camphor boosts cold transduction in a subpopulation of nociceptors. A, Original recording from a cold nociceptor showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to camphor application and cooling from 30°C to 10°C. Camphor 2 mm superfused 5 min after a control cold stimulus sensitizes a menthol- and capsaicin-sensitive fiber to cooling. Interstimulus interval and drug wash-in was 5 min. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and temperature thresholds of activation. Note the shift in activation threshold induced by camphor. Inset, Average spike shape. Calibration: 0.5 ms, 200 μV. B, Four-way distribution describing the percentage of mechanosensitive C-fibers of each subclass sensitized to cold by camphor (CM, temperature-insensitive nociceptor, n = 12/26; CMC, cold nociceptor, n = 6/10); CMCH, multimodal nociceptor, n = 1/9; CMH, polymodal nociceptor, n = 1/21); all, n = 20/66). C–E, Quantification of the sensitization of camphor to cold: increase in response magnitude counted as action potentials (APs) per 60 s of cold stimulus (white bars: wild type, 7.6 ± 4.5–41.8 ± 11.6, p < 0.004; striped bars: TRPV1−/−, 5.9 ± 3.1–48.3 ± 13.2; p < 0.008, Wilcoxon test; no difference between genotypes, U test; C) and peak firing frequency (open circles: wild type, 1.1 ± 0.7–4.9 ± 1.4 spikes/s; crossed circles: TRPV1−/−, 0.5 ± 0.3–7.2 ± 2.8 spikes/s; p < 0.008, Wilcoxon test; no difference between genotypes, U test; D], and rise in threshold temperature in sensitized cold-sensitive units [open rectangles: wild type, 17.7 ± 1.5°C–22.1 ± 1.8°C (only CMCH, n = 4); crossed rectangles: TRPV1−/−, 15.5 ± 0.9°C–24.3 ± 1.8°C (only CMC, n = 3), significant for pooled population, p < 0.03, Wilcoxon test; no difference between genotypes, U test; E]. F, Averaged histogram summarizing the cold responses of all sensitized nociceptors in bins of 4 s (n = 20) for TRPV1−/− (striped white and black bars) and TRPV1+/+ (blank white and black bars), camphor 2 mm induced sensitization to cold in one-third of the treated fibers (TRPV1+/+, n = 11/38; and TRPV1−/−, n = 9/28). TRPV1+/+ were congenic to C57BL/6. Lower trace, Temperature time course.

To elucidate the molecular mechanism of the cold-sensitizing effects of camphor, we first compared cold sensitization by camphor with menthol and determined equipotent concentrations and the overlap of camphor- and menthol-sensitive fibers. Expectedly and similar to camphor, menthol sensitized to cold (Fig. 2), and likewise the sensitization (to 50 μm) consisted in a several-fold increase in the magnitude of the cold response, a large rise in peak firing frequency, and a large drop in threshold temperature, depending on the concentration (using 50 and 500 μm; Fig. 2D–F). Like camphor, this effect was largely reversible (Fig. 2A) and mainly affected CMC, but also some of the CM nociceptors, where de novo responsiveness to cold occurred. Polymodal [C-Mechano-Heat (CMH)] or multimodal nociceptors [C-Mechano-Cold-Heat (CMCH)] were not affected (Table 1, Fig. 2B). In contrast to previous patch-clamp reports from cultured rat DRG neurons (Reid et al., 2002), where all neurons with cold-activated inward current were menthol sensitive, and with calcium imaging (Babes et al., 2004; Bautista et al., 2006), where the majority (∼70%) of cold-sensitive cells displayed menthol sensitivity, menthol sensitized only 30% of the murine native cold-sensitive terminals (Fig. 2B, CMC and CMCH). Remarkably, the higher concentration of menthol (500 μm) not only led to a greater and more dynamic activation by cooling, but also to a greater inactivation (adaptation) during the second, static, period of cold stimulation (Fig. 2A,C). Accordingly, the difference between both menthol concentrations reached significance only during the falling phase of temperature when the cooling rate was maximal (−1.5°C/s, from 30°C to 20°C; Fig. 2C, inset). Comparing camphor and menthol, we found that 50 μm (menthol) and 2 mm (camphor) produced not only a very similar pattern of cold sensitization (Fig. 2C), but were equipotent in all three measures of sensitization (Fig. 2D–F, red projections; data pooled from both genotypes TRPV1−/− and TRPV1+/+), magnitude of cold response, peak discharge, and shift in threshold temperature.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cold sensitization by camphor overlaps with sensitivity to menthol. A, Original recording from a temperature-insensitive nociceptor showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to menthol application and cooling. Menthol produced de novo, partly reversible, reproducible, and concentration-dependent sensitization to cold. Interstimulus interval and drug wash-in was 5 min. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and temperature thresholds of activation. B, Four-way distribution describing the percentage of mechanosensitive C-fibers of each subclass sensitized to cold by menthol (CM, temperature-insensitive nociceptor, n = 3/5; CMC, cold nociceptor, n = 3/5; CMCH, multimodal nociceptor, n = 1/9; CMH, polymodal nociceptor, n = 1/5; all, n = 8/24; red area: fibers sensitized to cold by camphor projected from Figure 1B). C, Averaged histogram (1 s bins, three-point adjacent averaging) comparing cold-sensitizing effects of menthol (closed blue circles, 50 μm; open blue circles, 500 μm) and camphor (red closed circles, pooled data from both genotypes in Fig. 1F); control. Note that a higher concentration of menthol leads to greater dynamic activation and inactivation (adaptation) by cooling. Inset, Stimulus response diagram (APs/°C) for the first linear 7.5 s of the cold stimulus (1.5°C/s, corresponding to the time interval defined by dotted lines in lower trace). The difference between both menthol concentrations was significant during the falling phase of temperature (asterisks represent p < 0.04, Wilcoxon test). D–F, Quantification of menthol sensitization to cold: increase in response magnitude (control, 4.4 ± 2.0; 50 μm, 38.1 ± 6.3; 500 μm, 71.3 ± 15.5; n = 8/8/7; p = 0.01 and p = 0.09, Wilcoxon test; D) and in peak firing frequency (control, 0.7 ± 0.4; 50 μm, 5.0 ± 1.1; 500 μm, 14.1 ± 2.8 spikes/s; n = 8/8/7; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, Wilcoxon test; E), and a rise in threshold temperature (control, 14.4 ± 1.5°C; 50 μm, 23.2 ± 1.6°C; 500 μm, 26.1 ± 1.6°C; n = 8/8/7; p = 0.03 and p = 0.09, respectively, Wilcoxon test; F). Solid symbols represent the mean. Note that camphor 2 mm and menthol 50 μm produce equipotent cold-sensitizing effects in all three measures of sensitization (red projections in D–F represent pooled data from both genotypes shown in Fig. 1C–E).

Camphor transiently activates, desensitizes, and blocks TRPM8

We tested next whether camphor modulates cold transduction by directly targeting the menthol receptor TRPM8. Therefore, we heterologously expressed rTRPM8 in HEK293T cells and used calcium microfluorimetry. Using the FLIPR Tetra plate reader to measure stimulus-induced activity of rTRPM8-expressing cells, we found that camphor, in contrast to menthol, rapidly activated and then desensitized TRPM8-mediated Ca2+ responses within 1 min of application (data not shown). Using conventional calcium imaging, we confirmed a TRPM8-activating effect and also found that application of camphor resulted in profound desensitization of the receptor. This desensitization was mild following short (15 s) applications of camphor (Fig. 3A) but was predominant with longer application periods, and it manifested only as homologous, not as heterologous, desensitization (to menthol). A 5 min lasting application of camphor—as performed in our skin-nerve experiments—desensitized the receptor within <1 min and reduced the amplitude of the calcium response to a second camphor application by 95% (Fig. 3B). We obtained these results also for recombinant human TRPM8 (data not shown). Using 2 mm, the camphor-activated calcium increase was blocked in the presence of the TRPM8 antagonist BCTC 10 μm, and it was absent in nontransfected HEK293T cells and in calcium-free external solution (data not shown). In whole-cell recordings, a comparable TRPM8-activating effect was not observed at physiologically relevant holding potentials. Camphor was without effect on cold-activated (Icold) TRPM8 currents. Icold reached an average peak amplitude of 273 ± 73 pA, and 2 mm camphor had no effect (Icold 304 ± 78 pA). The response of TRPM8 displayed a strong outward rectification during voltage ramps (500 ms) from −100 to +150 mV (Voets et al., 2004). Only at very positive potentials (+140 mV) did camphor (2 mm) have a small potentiating effect of 15% (n = 7, p = 0.02; Fig. 3C). In contrast, camphor partially blocked inward currents through TRPM8 when the channel was activated by menthol (Fig. 3D). At 25°C, 2 mm camphor inhibited the peak current by ∼70% (data not shown). When combined with cold, camphor (2 mm) partly inhibited the menthol-induced potentiation of the cold-activated current, but in steady state the amplitude of the current was not further reduced. At 15°C, inhibition of peak Icold potentiated by 50 μm menthol reached ∼60% and was reversible (Fig. 3D). One likely reason for the lack of a discrete inward current in whole-cell mode may be the comparatively weak TRPM8 agonism of camphor, with menthol exhibiting an EC50 of 0.027 mm, in contrast to camphor with 1.1 mm (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Camphor exerts mixed agonist and antagonist effects on recombinant rTRPM8. A, B, Average response of HEK293T cells (n = 100) transiently transfected with rTRPM8 and submitted to repetitive short (three consecutive applications of 15 s each, numbered 1–3; A) and one longer (5 min followed by 15 s) stimulation with camphor (2 mm; red) or menthol (100 μm; blue; B); bar charts on the right illustrate the area under the curve (AUC) of consecutive responses. Menthol was applied after camphor applications to test for heterologous desensitization (red, but not blue lines). Black lines, Control menthol responses. Note that long application of camphor-induced potent homologous but not heterologous desensitization. C, Cold-activated inward currents in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with rTRPM8. Camphor applied alone or in combination with a cold stimulus had no effect on the cold-induced current through TRPM8. Icold through TRPM8 reached an average peak amplitude of 273 ± 73 pA (n = 8; cold-stimulus to ∼10°C) and of 304 ± 78 pA in the presence of camphor (n = 8; p > 0.05, Student's paired t test). Right trace, TRPM8 activation at 24°C displays a strong outward rectification during voltage ramps (500 ms) from −100 to +150 mV (lower trace); the effect of camphor 2 mm was very small. D, The 2 mm camphor partially blocked cold-activated currents of heterologously expressed TRPM8 when sensitized by 50 μm menthol. The camphor-induced inhibition of the cold-activated and menthol-sensitized peak current reached ∼60% (n = 6). E, Concentration–response relationship of camphor (EC50, 1.1 mm) and menthol (EC50, 0.027 mm) in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with rTRPM8 using conventional calcium imaging; asterisk signifies p < 0.001 using unpaired t test. F, Effect of camphor on cold responses (2 min) of cold- and menthol-sensitive (me) cultured mouse DRG neurons loaded with Fura-2AM. Camphor applied after a control cold stimulus reduced the cold-activated calcium signal of the second cold stimulus by 53% (red line; mean of n = 14, p = 0.006, Wilcoxon test). Repeated superfusion with cooled extracellular solution reduced the calcium signal of the second cold stimulus in menthol-sensitive cells by 16% (dotted black line; mean of n = 8 cells, p = 0.025, Wilcoxon test). Bar chart (right) compares AUC for cold-activated calcium signal of first and second cold responses. Red arrowhead, Some of the cells showed a rapid and transient calcium increase upon camphor application.

We next tested the effect of camphor using calcium microfluorimetry in cultured DRGs of C57BL/6 mice loaded with Fura-2AM, and we observed both transient rapid activating and blocking effects. First, DRG cultures were screened for cold sensitivity, then the effect of camphor on the cold-activated calcium increase was evaluated. Cells were subsequently treated with menthol (Fig. 3F) and capsaicin (data not shown). Similar to the results in transiently transfected HEK293T cells, and as previously described, camphor had a mild and transient activating effect in a small number of neurons, which mainly affected cells that were also activated by 1 μm capsaicin (Xu et al., 2005); since some of these neurons were also sensitive to menthol, this transient activation could also reflect a transient activation of TRPM8 (Fig. 3F, arrowhead). In menthol-sensitive cells, camphor showed a blocking effect on the cold-activated calcium influx. When two repeated cold stimuli were applied, and the second stimulus was applied in the presence of camphor, the blocking effect reached 53% (p = 0.006, n = 14; Fig. 3F), but two repeated control cold stimuli showed a significant decline of the cold-activated calcium signal of 16% (p = 0.025; n = 8; Fig. 3F).

We assumed that the activating effect of camphor on TRPM8 was too weak and transient to explain the cold-sensitizing effects of camphor in the native nociceptors. In the presence of menthol and at cold temperatures, the blocking effect of camphor on TRPM8 was incomplete (Fig. 3C), and the amplitude of the remaining cold-activated TRPM8 current is large enough to allow for sufficient cold-activated generator potentials and propagated action potentials in the nociceptive terminals (Fig. 1). Therefore, we assumed that in nerve terminals camphor may act independently of TRPM8. We next tested whether coadministration of camphor and menthol results in a summation of cold-sensitizing effects.

Menthol and camphor sensitize to cold via independent mechanisms

C-fibers with previous cold sensitization by either camphor or menthol were tested for cross sensitivity to the respective other compound. First, we analyzed the combined effect of camphor and menthol at equipotent doses (2 mm and 50 μm; Fig. 2). Menthol coapplied with camphor significantly increased the camphor-induced cold sensitization in all three measures of sensitization, magnitude of cold response, peak discharge, and shift in threshold temperature (n = 10; Fig. 4A–D). Nevertheless, the effect of the combination of the compounds appeared to be slightly less than additive. On one hand, this may be due to the desensitizing and partial blocking effect of camphor on TRPM8. Of more importance in terminal nerve endings could be the fact that strong sensitization also entails adaptation and/or desensitization, a phenomenon that we have previously described for capsaicin (St. Pierre et al., 2009). This would certainly result in reduced peak discharge and magnitude of responses. Therefore, in a second experiment we applied camphor 2 mm after application of menthol at a saturating dose of 500 μm, which induces adaptation and desensitization, as demonstrated in Figure 2, A and C. With this combination, we found similar potentiating effects of both compounds, which led to activation of all treated terminals at 30°C bath temperature (n = 6; Fig. 4E–H). These results suggest that the underlying mechanisms of action of both compounds are independent.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Camphor and menthol sensitize to cold via independent mechanisms. A–D, Camphor (2 mm)-induced sensitization to cooling is increased by subsequent coapplication of menthol (50 μm). A, Original recording from a temperature-insensitive nociceptor (CM) showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to cooling after application of camphor (2 mm) and an equipotent dose of menthol (50 μm). Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and threshold temperature of activation. B–D, Quantification of the synergistic effect of menthol on the camphor-induced cold sensitization: increase in response magnitude (82.1 ± 18.3–102.2 ± 18.5; p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test; B); increase in peak discharge (10.0 ± 2.4–16.6 ± 4.0 spikes/s, p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test; C); and rise in temperature threshold (22.1 ± 1.6°C–25.2°C±1.3; p = 0.046, Wilcoxon test; D). Bold dotted lines: average of n = 10, dotted arrow: representative sample shown in A. E–H, Cold sensitization induced by a saturating dose of menthol is further increased by coapplication of camphor (2 mm). E, Original recording from a cold nociceptor showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to cooling after application of menthol (500 μm) and camphor (2 mm). Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and threshold temperature of activation. F–H, Quantification of the synergistic effect of camphor on the menthol-induced cold sensitization: increase in response magnitude (71.8 ± 19.6–92.1 ± 24.1; p = 0.1, Wilcoxon test; F) and peak discharge (13.8 ± 3.3–22.7 ± 4.9 spikes/s, p = 0.04, Wilcoxon test; G), and rise in temperature threshold (27.4 ± 1.1°C–29.3 ± 0.4°C; p = 0.1, Wilcoxon test; H). Bold dotted lines, Average of n = 6; dotted arrow, representative sample shown in E.

To find out more about the molecular mechanism of action of camphor in the fibers, we next used the patch-clamp technique in current-clamp mode on cold-sensitive cultured DRG neurons as a model. Cold sensitivity is present only in a small fraction of DRG neurons in the mouse (∼10%). Therefore, we identified cold-sensitive DRG neurons by using DRG preparations from heterozygous TRPM8EGFPf/+ mice (Dhaka et al., 2008). In fluorescent small-sized neurons (ø16.6 ± 1.64 μm), a cooling step from 30°C to 10°C repeatedly produced a large cold-activated voltage change of 39 ± 2.7 mV and triggered action potentials at a threshold temperature of 23.9 ± 1.1°C (Fig. 5A). In these neurons, camphor (2 mm) reduced the number of action potential discharges in the falling phase of the cooling step by almost half (Fig. 5B). There was no change in the activation threshold of the neurons after camphor application (23.8 ± 1.1°C). This reversible reduction in action potential discharge may be due to a camphor-induced hyperpolarizing shift in sodium channel voltage dependence, which may result in reduced channel availability at depolarized potentials due to inactivation (Xu et al., 2005). The effect of camphor was also tested on five cold-insensitive neurons where camphor had no effect at any temperature applied. An effect of camphor on the excitability of DRG neurons was then investigated by measuring rheobase current. Therefore depolarizing current pulses of 1000 ms duration and increasing intensity were injected into the cells. Camphor induced a pronounced and reversible decrease in rheobase by ∼31% (Fig. 5C), which is in agreement with an increase in excitability. One likely explanation for this effect is reduced background potassium conductance. The effects of camphor on voltage-gated outward currents were monitored using 300 ms steps from −80 to +60 mV applied at 10 mV intervals from a holding potential of −60 mV. Camphor inhibited potently and reversibly the outward current in DRGs by 48–53% at positive potentials. This current is contributed by voltage-gated potassium channels of different types (Fig. 5D,E).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Camphor blocks potassium channels. A, Top, Representative current-clamp recording from a cultured TRPM8-positive and cold-sensitive DRG neuron of a TRPM8EGFPf/+ mouse. Application of camphor did not induce action potential discharge, but caused partial reduction of the number of discharged action potentials during cooling (control, 116 spikes per cold stimulation; camphor, 77; wash, 106). The cold-activated voltage change and the temperature of activation were unchanged (22, 22.2, and 22.8°C, respectively). Middle trace, Temperature time course. Bottom, Expanded first and second cold response. B, Camphor reduced the cold response (action potentials discharge during the falling phase of the cold stimulus) in all TRPM8-expressing cells (n = 5; p = 0.04 Wilcoxon test). C, Camphor reversibly decreased rheobase current, resulting in an increased excitability (n = 5). Current injections in 10 pA steps and of a length of 1000 ms were applied (64 ± 9.8, 44 ± 9.3, and 70 ± 15 pA, respectively; n = 5, p = 0.04, Wilcoxon test). D, Potassium currents activated by depolarizing voltage pulses from −80 to +60 mV from a holding potential of −60 mV in a cultured DRG neuron. Sodium currents were blocked with 700 nm TTX. E, I–V relationship of potassium currents recorded in DRG neurons; the camphor-induced blocking effect could be washed out and reached ∼50% at positive voltages (p < 0.05, t test). F, HEK293T cells transiently expressing the K2P channels TRESK, TRAAK, TREK1, and TREK2, and KV7.2 and KV7.3 were loaded with membrane potential dye, and the relative change in fluorescence was measured using a FLIPR Tetra plate reader and is shown as change relative to baseline. G, Stimulation with camphor caused a concentration-dependent change in fluorescence in HEK293T cells transiently expressing TRESK (open diamonds; EC50 = 8.57 mm) or KV7.3 (open up-pointing triangles; EC50 = 9.38 mm). Cells expressing KV7.2 (open down-pointing triangles; EC50 = 1.92 mm) were most sensitive to camphor, while there was no effect in untransfected HEK cells (closed diamonds).

Kv7.2 potassium channels are sensitive to block by camphor and menthol

To identify types of background and voltage-gated potassium channels blocked by camphor, we used a FLIPR Tetra-based screening assay where K2P potassium channels and Kv7 subtypes were heterologously expressed in HEK293T cells and loaded with membrane potential dye. In this assay, the overall change in membrane potential is translated into a change in fluorescence. Of all K2P channels present in DRGs, we chose those that were modulated by temperatures, which includes TREK1, TREK2, and TRAAK (Kang et al., 2005; Alloui et al., 2006; Noël et al., 2009), and the most widely expressed K2P channel in mouse DRGs, TRESK (Kang and Kim, 2006; Dobler et al., 2007). Kv7.2 and Kv7.3 channels were included because they have profound influence on nociceptor excitability. Subtypes coassemble to form the M-current, which is present in nociceptors and has a threshold of activation near resting membrane potential (−60 mV) (Schroeder et al., 1998; Wang et al., 1998; Linley et al., 2008; Passmore et al., 2012). In this assay, Kv7.2 was most sensitive to camphor with an EC50 of 1.9 mm; TRESK and Kv7.3 were much less sensitive to block by camphor (EC50 of 8.6 and 9.4 mm, respectively; Fig. 5F,G). To validate the membrane potential assay, we next tested the effect of camphor on potassium channels in patch-clamp experiments. Indeed, heterologously expressed Kv7.2 proved to be most sensitive to camphor, and half-maximal block was attained with 500 μm camphor. Heteromultimers were less sensitive and required 1.42 mm camphor for half-maximal block. The K2P channel most sensitive to block by camphor was TRESK, requiring 10.6 mm camphor for half-maximal block (Fig. 6A,C). TREK1, TREK2, and TRAAK were insensitive to lower concentrations of camphor. Overall, the membrane potential assay yielded approximately comparable results, and is therefore a convenient and fast method for target screening on potassium channels.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Camphor and menthol inhibit KV7.2/KV7.3 channels. A, Sample trace of KV7.2 in response to the indicated voltage step protocol showing block by camphor and washout. B, Outward currents mediated by KV7.2/KV7.3 channels of HEK293T cells were dose dependently and reversibly inhibited by increasing concentrations of menthol (3–1000 μm). Holding potential, 0 mV. C, Blocking effect of camphor (red) on different K+ channels depicted as fitted average. KV7.2/3 (red circles): IC50 = 1.42 ± 0.20 mm; minimum, 15.18 ± 3.77%; Hill coefficient, 0.88 ± 0.07 (n = 9). KV7.2 (down-pointing triangles): IC50 = 0.53 ± 0.11 mm; minimum, 2.76 ± 1.56%; Hill coefficient, 0.70 ± 0.02 (n = 12). KV7.3 (up-pointing triangles) was least affected by camphor (n = 4). TRESK (rhombs): IC50 = 10.62 ± 3.62 mm; minimum, 11.35 ± 4.65%; Hill coefficient, 0.79 ± 0.07 (n = 9). Relative inhibition of KV7.2/KV7.3 outward current by menthol (blue circles) was plotted as a function of menthol concentration. A logistic equation was fitted to the dose–response data, yielding an EC50 of 298 μm (n ≥ 10 for each data point). D, Menthol (50 μm) had synergistic effects on TRPM8 and KV7.2/KV7.3 channels cotransfected in HEK293T cells. At each command potential, a brief pulse of menthol (50 μm) was spritzed onto the recorded cells. Menthol-induced inward currents resulted predominantly from TRPM8 activation and KV7.2/KV7.3 inhibition at hyperpolarized and depolarized potentials, respectively. E, I–V relationships were calculated from experiments of D immediately before menthol application (black circles) and during peak menthol effect (open circles). Currents were normalized to their maximal amplitude before spritzing menthol (n = 9). All error bars indicate SEM.

We next asked whether menthol exerts a similar effect on KV7 channels. HEK293T cells were voltage-clamped to 0 mV at room temperature to activate outward currents generated by transiently expressed heteromeric KV7.2/7.3 channels. When applied under these conditions, increasing concentrations of menthol (3–1000 μm) produced apparent inward current responses of increasing amplitudes that resulted from the dose-dependent inhibition of KV7.2/7.3 channels (Fig. 6B). From the dose–response relationship depicted in Figure 6C, we calculated a half-maximal block of the outward current at 289 μm, thus yielding an EC50 value for menthol that was considerably lower than that for camphor.

To investigate a synergistic action of menthol on cold-sensing effectors, we cotransfected KV7.2/KV7.3 channels with TRPM8. Starting from a holding potential of −80 mV, HEK cells were depolarized stepwise in 10 mV increments. At each command potential, a 0.5 s pulse of menthol (50 μm) was spritzed onto the cell. At hyperpolarized potentials, activation by menthol of TRPM8 gave rise to a transient inward current that decreased as the command potentials became less negative, thereby reducing the driving force. As command potentials were made more depolarized, the effect of menthol grew in size, now reflecting its blocking action on KV7.2/7.3 channels, as shown above (Fig. 6D). These data demonstrate that, with its simultaneous effect on TRPM8 and KV7.2/7.3 channels, menthol is capable of providing increased transducing inward current over the entire voltage range (Fig. 6E). To investigate whether block of these KV potassium channels is relevant for the cold-sensitizing effect of camphor and menthol, we next applied XE991, a specific blocker of KV7 channels, to receptive fields of CMC fibers in skin-nerve preparations.

Like camphor, M-current blocker XE991 amplifies cold transduction

The effect of XE991 was recently analyzed in the rat skin-nerve preparation, but only with respect to modulation of heat sensing. In this study, application of XE991 sensitized A-fibers to heat and induced ongoing activity at bath temperature, while no effect on C-fibers was found (Passmore et al., 2012). The EC50 for XE991 lies in the low-micromolar range, and we used 10 μm, corresponding to the EC80 for heterologously expressed KV7.2 and KV7.3 (Wang et al., 1998) or the EC60 for acutely dissociated DRGs (Rose et al., 2011). Subsequently and in the same fibers, we also applied 100 μm, because the IC50 for KV7.5 subtypes, which potentially dominate in C-fibers according to a recent report (King and Scherer, 2012), is much higher with 60–70 μm (Schroeder et al., 2000). After washout of XE991, each fiber was tested with menthol or camphor for cross-sensitization to cold. We specifically searched for mechanosensitive C-fibers with cold-sensitivity and found that 10 μm XE991 sensitized 7 of 10 CMC fibers to cold. All of the sensitized fibers increased their cold response further upon treatment with camphor or menthol (Fig. 7A,B). The sensitization to cold by XE991 occurred only in cold nociceptors (CMC fibers), not in multimodal nociceptors (CMCH: n = 2) or polymodal nociceptors (CMH: n = 3), but also in none of the thermoinsensitive units (CM: n = 3). This was in accordance with the subpopulations of fibers sensitized to cold by camphor and menthol (compare Figs. 1B, 2B, Table 2). The cold sensitization was independent of any direct effect of XE991 on TRPM8, because addition of XE991 on heterologously expressed TRPM8 at concentrations up to 100 μm neither activated TRPM8 nor inhibited responses evoked by addition of menthol (50 μm; using a FLIPR Tetra fluorescent Ca2+ assay; data not shown).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Kv7 channel modulators XE991 and retigabine have opposite effects on cold sensing in CMC fibers. A, Original recording showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to cooling and XE991 application. XE991 10 μm produced sensitization to cold in camphor-sensitive CMC fibers. Interstimulus interval and drug wash-in was 4 min. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and temperature thresholds of activation. B, Cold-sensitizing effect of subsequently applied 10 and 100 μm XE991 shown as an increase in magnitude of the cold response. XE991 10 μm increased the cold response by 2.7-fold, and 100 μm by 2.9-fold (n = 7, p = 0.06, t test). Camphor, applied after washout of XE991, increased the cold response by 4.2-fold over baseline (mean of n = 5 CMC fibers), which was significantly more than XE991 (vs 10 μm, p = 0.002; vs 100 μm, p = 0.03, t test). Block of KV7-channels by XE991 may explain ∼64–69% of the cold sensitization of camphor. C, Sensitization to cold by XE991 did not entail a decrease in temperature threshold (control, 16.0 ± 1.7°C; XE991, 18.0 ± 1.4°C (10 μm), 21.4 ± 1.2°C (100 μm); camphor, 22.8 ± 2.0°C; n = 8/8/7/5; *p = 0.02, t test). D, Original recording showing instantaneous discharge rates in response to cooling and combined application of menthol (50 μm) and retigabine or XE991. Interstimulus interval and drug wash-in was 4 min. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus and temperature thresholds of activation. E, Addition of 50 μm retigabine reversed menthol-induced cold sensitization in CMC fibers (reduction by 51%), while the addition of XE991 restored and further boosted the menthol effect (increase by 33%; n = 4–5; p < 0.007, t test); in contrast, repeated cold stimulation in the presence of menthol alone showed a progressive decline of the menthol-sensitized cold response by 15%, 21%, and 23%, respectively (n = 4; p > 0.05, t test). Error bars represent SEM.

There were some differences between the effects of XE991 and camphor: XE991 had no significant sensitizing effect on the activation threshold (Fig. 7C) and on the peak discharge of the cold nociceptors (not illustrated). XE991 shifted the threshold by 2.0 ± 1.8°C (mean ± SEM; n = 8 CMC fibers, p = 0.2, Wilcoxon test; camphor: 7.4 ± 1.3°C; n = 15 CMC fibers) and changed the peak discharge by 1.3 ± 1.4-fold (n = 8, p = 0.4, Wilcoxon test; camphor: 5.2 ± 0.6-fold). However, in accordance with a suprathreshold effect on cold transduction, XE991 significantly increased the mean discharge rate per second during the cold response from 0.7 ± 0.4 to 1.5 ± 0.9 spikes/s (n = 8, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon test; camphor: 1.0 ± 0.1–3.6 ± 0.3; n = 15 CMC fibers, p = 0.005; not illustrated). On average, the saturating 100 μm concentration of XE991 was almost equally effective as the 10 μm concentration (EC80 concentration at KV7.2 and 7.3), and produced a total increase in the magnitude of the cold response of 2.9 ± 0.4-fold (XE991 10 μm: 2.7 ±0.4-fold; Fig. 7B). However, on an individual basis, four of seven fibers showed further increased sensitization upon exposure to 100 μm XE991: the magnitude of their cold response increased by an additional 30% (compared with 10 μm XE991), which possibly indicates that in particular fibers the recruitment of other KV7 channel subtypes, like KV7.5, occurs (Wang et al., 1998; King and Scherer, 2012). Together, XE991 was less effective than camphor, which amplified the cold response by 4.2 ± 0.5-fold (Fig. 7B). Nevertheless, from these results, block of M-current can explain more than half of the cold-sensitizing effect of camphor at 2 mm in mechanosensitive C-fibers (∼64–69%).

To estimate the extent of M-channel block contributing to menthol-activated cold responses, we used the potent M-channel opener retigabine in combination with menthol. Retigabine was previously shown to be effective in rescuing M-channel function from block (Linley et al., 2012), and thus might overcome menthol-induced inhibition of the M-current (Fig. 6B–E). We found that the sensitizing effect of menthol could be entirely reversed by the addition of retigabine at supramaximal concentration (50 μm), and that this effect was immediately reversed by superfusion with XE991 10 μm (Fig. 7D,E). Like XE991, retigabine neither activated TRPM8 nor inhibited responses evoked by the addition of menthol (50 μm; using a FLIPR Tetra fluorescent Ca2+ assay; data not shown).

Block of M-current is not sufficient to initiate cold transduction

So far, we have demonstrated that camphor, menthol, and the specific M-current blocker XE991 can produce cold sensitization, but only in CMC fibers, the fiber type that is absent in TRPM8-deficient mice, and in some menthol-sensitive CM fibers. This observation raises the question of whether the block of potassium channels, like the M-current, is sufficient to induce cold transduction in terminal nerve endings or whether the depolarization only amplifies a generator potential provided by cold-activated inward current. To answer this question, we analyzed cold sensitization by XE991 and camphor in TRPM8-deficient mice. In a large sample of TRPM8−/− fibers, camphor and XE991 failed to induce cold sensitization (n = 32 and n = 22, respectively). In contrast, in age- and sex-matched littermate control mice, the cold sensitization of camphor could be reproducibly induced in the same fiber subtypes as in C57BL/6 mice (n = 32; Fig. 8A,C; Table 2); similarly, the cold-sensitizing effect of XE991 was reproduced in two CMC fibers from TRPM8+/+ mice. In conclusion, in the case of camphor and XE991, block of potassium channels leads to a reduction of the voltage change across the membrane, which is insufficient to reach the action potential threshold. Nevertheless, it results in a considerable augmentation of the transduction current by TRPM8. This yields discharge of more action potentials and higher firing rates during cooling. Thus, XE991—in contrast to camphor—amplifies cold transduction mainly when cold transduction is activated and the threshold is exceeded, while camphor also exhibited a significant effect on the threshold and shifted it by >5°C to lower temperatures. This additional effect of camphor is similar to menthol (∼ 9°C shift) and may be mediated by TRPM8 agonism in combination with inhibitory effects on other potassium channel subtypes.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Cold sensitization by XE991 and camphor requires TRPM8. A, Averaged histogram of cold sensitization by XE991 10 μm in bins of 2 s in wild type (wt; black bars, n = 10 CMCH) and TRPM8−/− (white bars, n = 8). XE991 sensitization to cold was present in fibers from C57BL/6 (n = 8) and TRPM8+/+ (n = 2) but not in TRPM8−/− fibers. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus. Right, Bar chart summarizing XE991 sensitization to cold per 60 s cold stimulus in both genotypes (wt: 19.9 ± 4.5–40 ± 6.5; p = 0.02, t test; TRPM8−/−: 6.2 ± 1.1–2.7 ± 0.8). B, Correlation between activation threshold temperature of cold nociceptors (CMC) and cold sensitization by XE991 plotted as the fold increase in response magnitude (action potentials per cold stimulus of 60 s); dotted line, 0.95 confidence interval. C, Averaged histogram of cold sensitization by camphor in bins of 2 s recorded from TRPM8+/+ (black bars, n = 18 CMCH fibers) and TRPM8−/− (white bars, n = 10). The sensitization to cold of camphor was reproduced in wt but not in TRPM8-deficient fibers. Lower trace, Time course of cold stimulus. Right, Bar chart summarizing camphor sensitization to cold per 60 s cold stimulus in both genotypes (wt: 14.2 ± 4.3–37.6 ± 12.6; p = 0.08, t test; TRPM8−/−: 7.8 ± 1.6–6.1 ± 1.7. D, Correlation between activation threshold temperature of cold nociceptors and cold sensitization by camphor plotted as the fold increase in response magnitude (action potentials per cold stimulus of 60 s) for 15 CMC fibers. E, Mean firing frequency of corneal cold thermoreceptors from C57BL/6 mice in control solution (dotted line), in camphor 1 mm (black circles) and 10 mm (white circles). The figure displays the activity before (10 s) and during a dynamic cooling ramp from 34 to 20°C illustrated in the bottom trace. Inset, Mean slope (see Materials and Methods) of the change of frequency between the cooling threshold and the peak frequency versus temperature during dynamic cooling ramps (dotted line): 9.1 ± 1.7 versus camphor 1 mm (black circles) 8.8 ± 3.1 impulses/s/°C and 10 mm (white circles) 0.5 ± 0.3 impulses/s/°C; n = 7; paired t test: p = 0.003). Errors bars represent the SEM. F, Mean activity, shown as impulses per second at 34°C, is increased by the application of camphor 1 mm for 3.4 min, while the maximum response during a dynamic cooling ramp is attenuated or blocked after application of camphor 1 or 10 mm, respectively. Ongoing activity: 3.7 ± 1.2 impulses/s (control) vs 7.5 ± 1.9 impulses/s at 1 mm (n = 7) and 3.4 ± 1.2 impulses/s at 10 mm (n = 10); paired t test, p = 0.003 and p = 0.5, respectively; peak frequency: 56.9 ± 6.7 impulses/s (control) versus 38.0 ± 5.6 impulses/s at 1 mm and 8 ± 4.4 impulses/s at 10 mm; n = 7; paired t test, p = 0.01 and p = 0.004, respectively. Errors bars represent the SEM.

Equilibrium of Kv7 channels and TRPM8 receptors in somatic cold nociceptors

Previously, potassium channels of the KV1 family were identified to play a crucial role in the setting of the activation threshold of cultured cold-sensitive trigeminal neurons, and their expression was reported to form equilibrium with TRPM8 expression. This equilibrium is functionally conferred by inverse correlations between the threshold temperature of activation of the cold-sensitive neurons and KV1 current density (negative correlation) and TRPM8 current density (positive correlation; Madrid et al., 2009). We next investigated whether in somatic cold nociceptors a similar inverse relationship exists for KV7 channel availability and temperature threshold of activation of the cold nociceptors. In extracellular skin-nerve recordings, we have no means to determine KV7 channel density as current density, but it may be indirectly derived from the magnitude of the cold-sensitizing effect achieved by inhibitors XE991 and camphor. Figure 8, B and D, illustrates that, similar to the published findings in the trigeminal system, the fibers with the highest temperature threshold showed the largest amplification of their cold response on camphor or XE991 application, while fibers with threshold close to resting temperature (30°C) showed little increase in their cold response after treatment with either compound.

In contrast to the cold nociceptors in the skin, low-threshold corneal cold thermoreceptors show an extremely high sensitivity to small temperature decreases (Parra et al., 2010). TRPM8 is essential, and a lack of KV1 potassium channels is a characteristic feature of these particular receptors and is evidenced by a lack of effect of potassium channel blockers like 4-AP (100 μm) on the cooling threshold (Madrid et al., 2009; Parra et al., 2010). In these fibers, superfusion of camphor (1 mm) led to a transient activation at bath temperature and a decrease in the dynamic cooling response, much like the effect of camphor on heterologously expressed TRPM8 (Fig. 8E,F). In contrast, higher concentrations (10 mm) fully blocked the cold response. These effects may be explained by transient agonism, partial block, and desensitization of TRPM8.

Discussion

Specialized thermosensitive nerve endings in the skin are endowed with a large variety of ion channels to detect a broad range of cold temperatures. In this study, we identify for the first time a functional synergism between KV7 potassium channels forming the M-current and TRPM8-activated cold sensing in cutaneous cold nociceptor nerve endings. In detail, we show that camphor, a natural compound with promiscuous effects on various TRPs, mediates its psychophysically measurable effect of sensitization to cooling by modulating TRPM8-dependent cold transduction in nociceptors via block of KV7 channels. In addition, menthol proved to be an even more potent M-channel blocker. In accordance with these findings, inhibition of KV7 by the specific M-current blocker XE991 resulted in sensitization of TRPM8-dependent cold transduction, while the M-channel enhancer retigabine attenuated cold transduction. Neither camphor nor XE991 modulates cold transduction in TRPM8-deficient fiber types or fibers from TRPM8-deficient mice. The differential effects of camphor in cultured DRG cell bodies (reduction of cold-activated responses) and terminal nerve endings (potent sensitization to cold) suggest important differences between both models.

In nerve terminals, as expected, menthol dramatically increased the cold-induced action potential discharge and induced a shift in temperature activation threshold by almost 9°C at 50 μm, but induced firing at 30°C only at very high concentration. Thereby the effects of menthol in the terminals directly reflect observations from current measurements of heterologously expressed TRPM8: depending on the expression level, cold-activated currents are of small amplitude, but can undergo a large increase following chemical sensitization (Peier et al., 2002). Camphor induced a similar sensitization to cold in an equally large proportion of cutaneous terminals as menthol, affecting the same subpopulation of mechanosensitive C-fibers. In contrast, its effects on heterologously expressed rat and human TRPM8 were notably different from menthol and rather complex: camphor induced a brief activation, but was a far weaker agonist than menthol, and activation was regularly followed by desensitization. These actions on recombinant TRPM8 contrast the profound and menthol-like cold-sensitizing effects of camphor in cold nociceptors. Apart from that, camphor seemed to partly inhibit agonist-activated TRPM8: it blocked the menthol-activated current through the recombinant channel, but had much less blocking influence on the cold-induced current of recombinant TRPM8 or the cold-activated Ca2+ increase and action potential firing of TRPM8-expressing cultured DRGs. In fact, a weak blocking effect of camphor on recombinant TRPM8 was previously mentioned (Vogt-Eisele et al., 2007), and the effects of camphor on TRPV1 are similar: rapid activation is followed by profound desensitization (Xu et al., 2005; Marsakova et al., 2012). In fact, in the nerve terminals the potent cold-sensitizing action of camphor seemed to require more than weak TRPM8 agonism, because coapplication of equipotent concentrations of camphor and menthol produced additive effects, and even cold sensitization by a saturating concentration of menthol was further enhanced by camphor.

The most obvious effect of camphor in cultured DRGs was a block of potassium outward currents

Potassium channel block is already a recognized principle to explain part of the cold-induced increase in membrane resistance, which partly depends on leak channels of the K2P channel family. The most widely expressed K2P channel in murine DRG neurons, TRESK (Kang and Kim, 2006; Dobler et al., 2007) was only weakly blocked by camphor as measured in our membrane potential assay and confirmed in patch-clamp experiments (block of ∼20% at 2 mm). Other K2P channels, like TREK1, TREK2, and TRAAK, undergo cooling-dependent closure, but were not affected by camphor. Nevertheless, the small effect on TRESK may contribute to the cold sensitization and synergize with the genuine effects of cooling.

In nociceptive neurons, KV7 channel subtypes form the non-inactivating M-current, which affects the neuronal resting membrane potential. Inhibition of the M-current is pronociceptive and occurs under inflammatory conditions conveyed, for example, by mediators coupling to phospholipase C (Linley et al., 2008, 2012). Modulation of M-current directly affects membrane excitability in all types of neurons, which is documented by inherited loss-of-function mutations within M-channel genes (KV7.1–KV7.5). In case of KV7.2, this result in peripheral nerve hyperexcitability states and benign familial neonatal seizures (Miceli et al., 2012). Indeed, excess topical exposure or accidental ingestion of camphor in children can result in tonic-clonic seizures (Love et al., 2004).

De novo cold sensitivity in cutaneous nociceptors may be a sign of high M-channel activity

A remarkable finding of the present study was that menthol as well as camphor induced de novo cold responsiveness in a large proportion (45–60%) of mechanosensitive C-fibers. These units have functional cold transducers, but the cold-activated generator potential is too small to reach the threshold for action potential generation. When cooling is combined with menthol or camphor, the generator potential increases and cold-sensitivity becomes apparent. De novo cold sensitivity may be a sign for a particularly high M-channel activity, which in case of menthol (or camphor) application is attenuated and contributes to the sensitized cold response. This coherence is also in line with our finding that application of the M-channel enhancer retigabine dramatically reduced menthol-sensitized cold responses in CMC fibers. These particular types of nociceptors may undergo recruitment under pathophysiological conditions (e.g., in response to contact with an endogenous agonist or sensitizer), like bradykinin is one in recruiting heat responsiveness (Reeh and Pethö, 2000) and causing M-channel block (Linley et al., 2012).

Remarkably, from all cold-sensitive units treated with menthol, only one-third were sensitized to cold. The remaining cold-sensitive units either rely on another cold-transducing mechanism enabling the inward current for the generator potential or are TRPM8 positive, but suffer desensitization (Cliff and Green, 1996; Rohács et al., 2005). In this respect, we also observed mixed sensitizing and desensitizing effects with the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin when applied to receptive fields (St. Pierre et al., 2009).

Functional synergism between KV7 channels and TRPM8-dependent cold transduction

The finding that XE991, a selective blocker of KV7 channels, induced potent cold sensitization in the same camphor- and menthol-sensitive TRPM8-expressing fibers, but not in other types of fibers, suggests that the contribution of KV7 channels to enhanced cold transduction is specific to TRPM8-expressing pathways.

In contrast to camphor, XE991 was less effective but still more than doubled cold responses when used at the EC80. The cold-sensitizing effect of camphor was quantified using 2 mm, which represents the EC50 in KV7 heteromultimers (KV7.2/KV7.3), although KV7.2 was determined to be more sensitive with an EC50 of 0.5 mm. The blocking effect of menthol on KV7.2 was larger, with an EC50 of 0.29 mm. Referring to the increase in the magnitude of the cold response induced by XE991, block of KV7 channels may explain approximately two-third of the cold-sensitizing effects of camphor and certainly some of the cold-sensitizing effects of menthol in terminal nerve endings. The remaining cold-sensitizing effect of camphor should be mediated by other ion channels, which may include the K2P channel TRESK.

In general, block of the M-current is induced by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and depletion of membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), which can occur independent of each other (Gamper et al., 2005; Linley et al., 2008). In cold nociceptors, Ca2+ is provided directly through cold-activated TRPM8, and usually, sustained opening of TRPM8 results in PIP2 depletion and decreased activity or adaptation of the cold sensors (Rohács et al., 2005; Daniels et al., 2009; Yudin et al., 2011). This is also applicable to the peripheral endings, where the highest concentration of menthol induced strongest adaptation. Inhibition of M-current could thus be a direct consequence of sustained TRPM8 activation by cold and could counteract TRPM8 desensitization enabling a sustained generator potential and a higher density of discharged action potentials. This view is supported by the observation that both camphor and XE991 required TRPM8 activation to induce sensitization to cold, and that XE991 alone had almost no effect on the temperature threshold of activation.

In this respect, our finding of a negative correlation between the magnitude of the cold-sensitizing effect achieved by M-channel inhibitors and the temperature threshold of activation of cold nociceptors (Fig. 8B,D) may not be explained solely by opposite levels of KV7 channel availability. In fact, a similar relationship would be apparent if expression levels of TRPM8 receptors and KV7 channels were matched, and KV7 block contingent on TRPM8 activation. In this scenario, high TRPM8 activity would always confer high state of KV7 block and vice versa. The finding that camphor- and XE991-induced sensitization is entirely absent in TRPM8-deficient mice is in line with the finding that cold sensitization is absent in any non-TRPM8-expressing fiber type. The conclusion is clear. Block of KV7 can provide considerable amplification of cold transduction, but is too weak to initiate cold transduction without cold-activated TRPM8.

Our study highlights some exquisite differences between cultured sensory cell bodies and cutaneous nerve terminals and shows that the effect of a multiple-target drug like camphor is tightly linked to the ion channel expression profile of the target tissue. This notion is illustrated in particular by the contrasting effects of camphor in low-threshold corneal cold thermoreceptors, where it exerts transient activating and blocking effects due to the exquisitely high expression of TRPM8 (Parra et al., 2010). Last but not least, the recent identification of functional M-channels in keratinocytes and their contribution to ATP release may additionally explain some of the sensitization of camphor to warming of the skin (Mandadi et al., 2009; Reilly et al., 2013).

Taken together, combinations of TRPM8 agonists and locally active M-channel blockers would be a plausible strategy to increase the effectiveness of topical coolants or potentially of cooling- or TRPM8-agonist-mediated analgesia (Liu et al., 2013). Our findings may also shed light on mechanisms of cold allodynia where a pathological state of hyperexcitability can be generated through a block of potassium channels and/or an enhancement of sodium channels (Roza et al., 2006; Eberhardt et al., 2012; Vetter et al., 2012; Deuis et al., 2013).

Footnotes

  • We thank John B. Davis, GlaxoSmithKline, Harlow, UK, for donation of the breeding pairs of TRPV1−/− mice; and A. Dhaka and A. Patapoutian for breeding pairs of TRPM8−/− mice. rTRPM8 cDNA was provided by David Julius (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA); and hTRPM8 cDNA was a kind gift from Thomas Voets (K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium); TRESK cDNA (Egenberger et al., 2010) was provided by Erhard Wischmeyer and Frank Döring (Department of Physiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany); and KV7.2 and KV7.3 cDNA (Schroeder et al., 1998) was provided by Thomas Jentsch (Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Max Delbrück Center, Berlin, Germany). TRAAK, TREK1, and TREK2 cDNA was provided by Florian Lesage (CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, France). Iwona Izydorczyk, Annette Kuhn, and Jana Schramm provided expert technical assistance with tissue culture and animal breeding/genotyping. Funding for this project was obtained through the German Research Council (DFG): Zi1172/1-1 (K.Z.), Zi1172/2-1 (K.Z., P.W.R.) and KFO130/TP7 (P.W.R.), the Dr Ernst und Anita Bauer-Foundation (S.S.), the Erika Giehrl-Foundation (F.T.), the STAEDTLER Foundation (K.Z., P.W.R.), the Australian Research Council ARC LIEF grant for the FLIPR TETRA (R.J.L.), a National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant (I.V.), and the Go8 Australia-Germany Joint Research Co-operation Scheme (I.V., K.Z.).

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Katharina Zimmermann, Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. katharina.zimmermann{at}fau.de

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alloui A,
    2. Zimmermann K,
    3. Mamet J,
    4. Duprat F,
    5. Noël J,
    6. Chemin J,
    7. Guy N,
    8. Blondeau N,
    9. Voilley N,
    10. Rubat-Coudert C,
    11. Borsotto M,
    12. Romey G,
    13. Heurteaux C,
    14. Reeh P,
    15. Eschalier A,
    16. Lazdunski M
    (2006) TREK-1, a K+ channel involved in polymodal pain perception. EMBO J 25:2368–2376, doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601116, pmid:16675954.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Babes A,
    2. Zorzon D,
    3. Reid G
    (2004) Two populations of cold-sensitive neurons in rat dorsal root ganglia and their modulation by nerve growth factor. Eur J Neurosci 20:2276–2282, doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03695.x, pmid:15525269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Babes A,
    2. Fischer MJ,
    3. Reid G,
    4. Sauer SK,
    5. Zimmermann K,
    6. Reeh PW
    (2010) Electrophysiological and neurochemical techniques to investigate sensory neurons in analgesia research. Methods Mol Biol 617:237–259, doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_19, pmid:20336427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bautista DM,
    2. Jordt SE,
    3. Nikai T,
    4. Tsuruda PR,
    5. Read AJ,
    6. Poblete J,
    7. Yamoah EN,
    8. Basbaum AI,
    9. Julius D
    (2006) TRPA1 mediates the inflammatory actions of environmental irritants and proalgesic agents. Cell 124:1269–1282, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.023, pmid:16564016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bautista DM,
    2. Siemens J,
    3. Glazer JM,
    4. Tsuruda PR,
    5. Basbaum AI,
    6. Stucky CL,
    7. Jordt SE,
    8. Julius D
    (2007) The menthol receptor TRPM8 is the principal detector of environmental cold. Nature 448:204–208, doi:10.1038/nature05910, pmid:17538622.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Clapham DE,
    2. Miller C
    (2011) A thermodynamic framework for understanding temperature sensing by transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19492–19497, doi:10.1073/pnas.1117485108, pmid:22109551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Cliff MA,
    2. Green BG
    (1996) Sensitization and desensitization to capsaicin and menthol in the oral cavity: interactions and individual differences. Physiol Behav 59:487–494, doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02089-6, pmid:8700951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Colburn RW,
    2. Lubin ML,
    3. Stone DJ Jr.,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Lawrence D,
    6. D'Andrea MR,
    7. Brandt MR,
    8. Liu Y,
    9. Flores CM,
    10. Qin N
    (2007) Attenuated cold sensitivity in TRPM8 null mice. Neuron 54:379–386, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.017, pmid:17481392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Daniels RL,
    2. Takashima Y,
    3. McKemy DD
    (2009) Activity of the neuronal cold sensor TRPM8 is regulated by phospholipase C via the phospholipid phosphoinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem 284:1570–1582, doi:10.1074/jbc.M807270200, pmid:19019830.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Davis JB,
    2. Gray J,
    3. Gunthorpe MJ,
    4. Hatcher JP,
    5. Davey PT,
    6. Overend P,
    7. Harries MH,
    8. Latcham J,
    9. Clapham C,
    10. Atkinson K,
    11. Hughes SA,
    12. Rance K,
    13. Grau E,
    14. Harper AJ,
    15. Pugh PL,
    16. Rogers DC,
    17. Bingham S,
    18. Randall A,
    19. Sheardown SA
    (2000) Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia. Nature 405:183–187, doi:10.1038/35012076, pmid:10821274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Deuis JR,
    2. Zimmermann K,
    3. Romanovsky AA,
    4. Possani LD,
    5. Cabot PJ,
    6. Lewis RJ,
    7. Vetter I
    (2013) An animal model of oxaliplatin-induced cold allodynia reveals a crucial role for Na1.6 in peripheral pain pathways. Pain 154:1749–1757, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.032, pmid:23711479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dhaka A,
    2. Murray AN,
    3. Mathur J,
    4. Earley TJ,
    5. Petrus MJ,
    6. Patapoutian A
    (2007) TRPM8 is required for cold sensation in mice. Neuron 54:371–378, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.024, pmid:17481391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Dhaka A,
    2. Earley TJ,
    3. Watson J,
    4. Patapoutian A
    (2008) Visualizing cold spots: TRPM8-expressing sensory neurons and their projections. J Neurosci 28:566–575, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3976-07.2008, pmid:18199758.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dittert I,
    2. Benedikt J,
    3. Vyklický L,
    4. Zimmermann K,
    5. Reeh PW,
    6. Vlachová V
    (2006) Improved superfusion technique for rapid cooling or heating of cultured cells under patch-clamp conditions. J Neurosci Methods 151:178–185, doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.07.005, pmid:16129494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Dobler T,
    2. Springauf A,
    3. Tovornik S,
    4. Weber M,
    5. Schmitt A,
    6. Sedlmeier R,
    7. Wischmeyer E,
    8. Döring F
    (2007) TRESK two-pore-domain K+ channels constitute a significant component of background potassium currents in murine dorsal root ganglion neurones. J Physiol 585:867–879, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145649, pmid:17962323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Eberhardt MJ,
    2. Filipovic MR,
    3. Leffler A,
    4. de la Roche J,
    5. Kistner K,
    6. Fischer MJ,
    7. Fleming T,
    8. Zimmermann K,
    9. Ivanovic-Burmazovic I,
    10. Nawroth PP,
    11. Bierhaus A,
    12. Reeh PW,
    13. Sauer SK
    (2012) Methylglyoxal activates nociceptors through transient receptor potential channel A1 (TRPA1) J Biol Chem 287:28291–28306, doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.328674, pmid:22740698.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Egenberger B,
    2. Polleichtner G,
    3. Wischmeyer E,
    4. Döring F
    (2010) N-linked glycosylation determines cell surface expression of two-pore-domain K+ channel TRESK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 391:1262–1267, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.056, pmid:20006580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gamper N,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Shapiro MS
    (2005) Structural requirements for differential sensitivity of KCNQ K+ channels to modulation by Ca2+/calmodulin. Mol Biol Cell 16:3538–3551, doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0849, pmid:15901836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Green BG
    (1990) Sensory characteristics of camphor. J Invest Dermatol 94:662–666, doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12876242, pmid:2324522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kang D,
    2. Kim D
    (2006) TREK-2 (K2P10.1) and TRESK (K2P18.1) are major background K+ channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 291:C138–C146, doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00629.2005, pmid:16495368.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kang D,
    2. Choe C,
    3. Kim D
    (2005) Thermosensitivity of the two-pore domain K+ channels TREK-2 and TRAAK. J Physiol 564:103–116, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.081059, pmid:15677687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Karashima Y,
    2. Talavera K,
    3. Everaerts W,
    4. Janssens A,
    5. Kwan KY,
    6. Vennekens R,
    7. Nilius B,
    8. Voets T
    (2009) TRPA1 acts as a cold sensor in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1273–1278, doi:10.1073/pnas.0808487106, pmid:19144922.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. King CH,
    2. Scherer SS
    (2012) Kv7.5 is the primary Kv7 subunit expressed in C-fibers. J Comp Neurol 520:1940–1950, doi:10.1002/cne.23019, pmid:22134895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Linley JE,
    2. Rose K,
    3. Patil M,
    4. Robertson B,
    5. Akopian AN,
    6. Gamper N
    (2008) Inhibition of M current in sensory neurons by exogenous proteases: a signaling pathway mediating inflammatory nociception. J Neurosci 28:11240–11249, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2297-08.2008, pmid:18971466.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Linley JE,
    2. Pettinger L,
    3. Huang D,
    4. Gamper N
    (2012) M channel enhancers and physiological M channel block. J Physiol 590:793–807, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223404, pmid:22155935.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Liu B,
    2. Fan L,
    3. Balakrishna S,
    4. Sui A,
    5. Morris JB,
    6. Jordt SE
    (2013) TRPM8 is the principal mediator of menthol-induced analgesia of acute and inflammatory pain. Pain doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.043, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.043, pmid:23820004, Advance online publication. Retrieved September 16, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Love JN,
    2. Sammon M,
    3. Smereck J
    (2004) Are one or two dangerous? Camphor exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 27:49–54, doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.02.010, pmid:15219304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Macpherson LJ,
    2. Hwang SW,
    3. Miyamoto T,
    4. Dubin AE,
    5. Patapoutian A,
    6. Story GM
    (2006) More than cool: promiscuous relationships of menthol and other sensory compounds. Mol Cell Neurosci 32:335–343, doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2006.05.005, pmid:16829128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Madrid R,
    2. de la Peña E,
    3. Donovan-Rodriguez T,
    4. Belmonte C,
    5. Viana F
    (2009) Variable threshold of trigeminal cold-thermosensitive neurons is determined by a balance between TRPM8 and Kv1 potassium channels. J Neurosci 29:3120–3131, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4778-08.2009, pmid:19279249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Mandadi S,
    2. Sokabe T,
    3. Shibasaki K,
    4. Katanosaka K,
    5. Mizuno A,
    6. Moqrich A,
    7. Patapoutian A,
    8. Fukumi-Tominaga T,
    9. Mizumura K,
    10. Tominaga M
    (2009) TRPV3 in keratinocytes transmits temperature information to sensory neurons via ATP. Pflugers Arch 458:1093–1102, doi:10.1007/s00424-009-0703-x, pmid:19669158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Marsakova L,
    2. Touska F,
    3. Krusek J,
    4. Vlachova V
    (2012) Pore helix domain is critical to camphor sensitivity of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 channel. Anesthesiology 116:903–917, doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318249cf62, pmid:22314297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. McKemy DD,
    2. Neuhausser WM,
    3. Julius D
    (2002) Identification of a cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in thermosensation. Nature 416:52–58, doi:10.1038/nature719, pmid:11882888.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Miceli F,
    2. Vargas E,
    3. Bezanilla F,
    4. Taglialatela M
    (2012) Gating currents from Kv7 channels carrying neuronal hyperexcitability mutations in the voltage-sensing domain. Biophys J 102:1372–1382, doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.02.004, pmid:22455920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Moqrich A,
    2. Hwang SW,
    3. Earley TJ,
    4. Petrus MJ,
    5. Murray AN,
    6. Spencer KS,
    7. Andahazy M,
    8. Story GM,
    9. Patapoutian A
    (2005) Impaired thermosensation in mice lacking TRPV3, a heat and camphor sensor in the skin. Science 307:1468–1472, doi:10.1126/science.1108609, pmid:15746429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Noël J,
    2. Zimmermann K,
    3. Busserolles J,
    4. Deval E,
    5. Alloui A,
    6. Diochot S,
    7. Guy N,
    8. Borsotto M,
    9. Reeh P,
    10. Eschalier A,
    11. Lazdunski M
    (2009) The mechano-activated K+ channels TRAAK and TREK-1 control both warm and cold perception. EMBO J 28:1308–1318, doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.57, pmid:19279663.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Parra A,
    2. Madrid R,
    3. Echevarria D,
    4. del Olmo S,
    5. Morenilla-Palao C,
    6. Acosta MC,
    7. Gallar J,
    8. Dhaka A,
    9. Viana F,
    10. Belmonte C
    (2010) Ocular surface wetness is regulated by TRPM8-dependent cold thermoreceptors of the cornea. Nat Med 16:1396–1399, doi:10.1038/nm.2264, pmid:21076394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Passmore GM,
    2. Reilly JM,
    3. Thakur M,
    4. Keasberry VN,
    5. Marsh SJ,
    6. Dickenson AH,
    7. Brown DA
    (2012) Functional significance of M-type potassium channels in nociceptive cutaneous sensory endings. Front Mol Neurosci 5:63, doi:10.3389/fnmol.2012.00063, pmid:22593734.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Peier AM,
    2. Moqrich A,
    3. Hergarden AC,
    4. Reeve AJ,
    5. Andersson DA,
    6. Story GM,
    7. Earley TJ,
    8. Dragoni I,
    9. McIntyre P,
    10. Bevan S,
    11. Patapoutian A
    (2002) A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli and menthol. Cell 108:705–715, doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00652-9, pmid:11893340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Reeh PW,
    2. Pethö G
    (2000) Nociceptor excitation by thermal sensitization—a hypothesis. Prog Brain Res 129:39–50, doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(00)29004-3, pmid:11098680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Reid G,
    2. Flonta M
    (2001) Cold transduction by inhibition of a background potassium conductance in rat primary sensory neurones. Neurosci Lett 297:171–174, doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01694-3, pmid:11137755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Reid G,
    2. Babes A,
    3. Pluteanu F
    (2002) A cold- and menthol-activated current in rat dorsal root ganglion neurones: properties and role in cold transduction. J Physiol 545:595–614, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024331, pmid:12456837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Reilly JM,
    2. Telezhkin V,
    3. Passmore GM,
    4. Marsh SJ,
    5. Brown DA
    (2013) Kv7/M-type potassium channels in rat skin keratinocytes. Pflugers Arch 465:1371–1381, doi:10.1007/s00424-013-1276-2, pmid:23592175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Rohács T,
    2. Lopes CM,
    3. Michailidis I,
    4. Logothetis DE
    (2005) PI(4,5)P2 regulates the activation and desensitization of TRPM8 channels through the TRP domain. Nat Neurosci 8:626–634, doi:10.1038/nn1451, pmid:15852009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Rose K,
    2. Ooi L,
    3. Dalle C,
    4. Robertson B,
    5. Wood IC,
    6. Gamper N
    (2011) Transcriptional repression of the M channel subunit Kv7.2 in chronic nerve injury. Pain 152:742–754, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.028, pmid:21345591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Roza C,
    2. Belmonte C,
    3. Viana F
    (2006) Cold sensitivity in axotomized fibers of experimental neuromas in mice. Pain 120:24–35, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.006, pmid:16359794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Schroeder BC,
    2. Kubisch C,
    3. Stein V,
    4. Jentsch TJ
    (1998) Moderate loss of function of cyclic-AMP-modulated KCNQ2/KCNQ3 K+ channels causes epilepsy. Nature 396:687–690, doi:10.1038/25367, pmid:9872318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Schroeder BC,
    2. Hechenberger M,
    3. Weinreich F,
    4. Kubisch C,
    5. Jentsch TJ
    (2000) KCNQ5, a novel potassium channel broadly expressed in brain, mediates M-type currents. J Biol Chem 275:24089–24095, doi:10.1074/jbc.M003245200, pmid:10816588.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. St. Pierre M,
    2. Reeh PW,
    3. Zimmermann K
    (2009) Differential effects of TRPV channel block on polymodal activation of rat cutaneous nociceptors in vitro. Exp Brain Res 196:31–44, doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1808-3, pmid:19404626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Sweetman SC
    (2004) Martindale: the complete drug reference (Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK).
  50. ↵
    1. Teichert RW,
    2. Raghuraman S,
    3. Memon T,
    4. Cox JL,
    5. Foulkes T,
    6. Rivier JE,
    7. Olivera BM
    (2012) Characterization of two neuronal subclasses through constellation pharmacology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12758–12763, doi:10.1073/pnas.1209759109, pmid:22778416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Vetter I,
    2. Touska F,
    3. Hess A,
    4. Hinsbey R,
    5. Sattler S,
    6. Lampert A,
    7. Sergejeva M,
    8. Sharov A,
    9. Collins LS,
    10. Eberhardt M,
    11. Engel M,
    12. Cabot PJ,
    13. Wood JN,
    14. Vlachová V,
    15. Reeh PW,
    16. Lewis RJ,
    17. Zimmermann K
    (2012) Ciguatoxins activate specific cold pain pathways to elicit burning pain from cooling. EMBO J 31:3795–3808, doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.207, pmid:22850668.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Viana F,
    2. de la Peña E,
    3. Belmonte C
    (2002) Specificity of cold thermotransduction is determined by differential ionic channel expression. Nat Neurosci 5:254–260, doi:10.1038/nn809, pmid:11836533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Voets T,
    2. Droogmans G,
    3. Wissenbach U,
    4. Janssens A,
    5. Flockerzi V,
    6. Nilius B
    (2004) The principle of temperature-dependent gating in cold- and heat-sensitive TRP channels. Nature 430:748–754, doi:10.1038/nature02732, pmid:15306801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Vogt-Eisele AK,
    2. Weber K,
    3. Sherkheli MA,
    4. Vielhaber G,
    5. Panten J,
    6. Gisselmann G,
    7. Hatt H
    (2007) Monoterpenoid agonists of TRPV3. Br J Pharmacol 151:530–540, doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707245, pmid:17420775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Wang HS,
    2. Pan Z,
    3. Shi W,
    4. Brown BS,
    5. Wymore RS,
    6. Cohen IS,
    7. Dixon JE,
    8. McKinnon D
    (1998) KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science 282:1890–1893, doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1890, pmid:9836639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Blair NT,
    3. Clapham DE
    (2005) Camphor activates and strongly desensitizes the transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 channel in a vanilloid-independent mechanism. J Neurosci 25:8924–8937, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2574-05.2005, pmid:16192383.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Delling M,
    3. Jun JC,
    4. Clapham DE
    (2006) Oregano, thyme and clove-derived flavors and skin sensitizers activate specific TRP channels. Nat Neurosci 9:628–635, doi:10.1038/nn1692, pmid:16617338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Yudin Y,
    2. Lukacs V,
    3. Cao C,
    4. Rohacs T
    (2011) Decrease in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels mediates desensitization of the cold sensor TRPM8 channels. J Physiol 589:6007–6027, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.220228, pmid:22005680.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Zimmermann K,
    2. Leffler A,
    3. Babes A,
    4. Cendan CM,
    5. Carr RW,
    6. Kobayashi J,
    7. Nau C,
    8. Wood JN,
    9. Reeh PW
    (2007) Sensory neuron sodium channel Nav1.8 is essential for pain at low temperatures. Nature 447:855–858, doi:10.1038/nature05880, pmid:17568746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Zimmermann K,
    2. Hein A,
    3. Hager U,
    4. Kaczmarek JS,
    5. Turnquist BP,
    6. Clapham DE,
    7. Reeh PW
    (2009) Phenotyping sensory nerve endings in vitro in the mouse. Nat Protoc 4:174–196, doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.223, pmid:19180088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Zimmermann K,
    2. Lennerz JK,
    3. Hein A,
    4. Link AS,
    5. Kaczmarek JS,
    6. Delling M,
    7. Uysal S,
    8. Pfeifer JD,
    9. Riccio A,
    10. Clapham DE
    (2011) Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 5 (TRPC5) is a cold-transducer in the peripheral nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:18114–18119, doi:10.1073/pnas.1115387108, pmid:22025699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (42)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 42
16 Oct 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Amplified Cold Transduction in Native Nociceptors by M-Channel Inhibition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Amplified Cold Transduction in Native Nociceptors by M-Channel Inhibition
Irina Vetter, Alexander Hein, Simon Sattler, Sabine Hessler, Filip Touska, Elisangela Bressan, Andres Parra, Ulrich Hager, Andreas Leffler, Stepana Boukalova, Matthias Nissen, Richard J. Lewis, Carlos Belmonte, Christian Alzheimer, Tobias Huth, Viktorie Vlachova, Peter W. Reeh, Katharina Zimmermann
Journal of Neuroscience 16 October 2013, 33 (42) 16627-16641; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1473-13.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Amplified Cold Transduction in Native Nociceptors by M-Channel Inhibition
Irina Vetter, Alexander Hein, Simon Sattler, Sabine Hessler, Filip Touska, Elisangela Bressan, Andres Parra, Ulrich Hager, Andreas Leffler, Stepana Boukalova, Matthias Nissen, Richard J. Lewis, Carlos Belmonte, Christian Alzheimer, Tobias Huth, Viktorie Vlachova, Peter W. Reeh, Katharina Zimmermann
Journal of Neuroscience 16 October 2013, 33 (42) 16627-16641; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1473-13.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Bmal1 Modulates Striatal cAMP Signaling and Motor Learning
  • Activation of dopamine D1 receptors at the axon initial segment-like process of retinal AII amacrine cells modulates action potential firing
  • Cell type-dependent short-term plasticity and dopaminergic modulation of sensory synapses onto mouse superficial dorsal horn neurons
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.