Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

A Small Molecule TrkB Ligand Reduces Motor Impairment and Neuropathology in R6/2 and BACHD Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease

Danielle A. Simmons, Nadia P. Belichenko, Tao Yang, Christina Condon, Marie Monbureau, Mehrdad Shamloo, Deqiang Jing, Stephen M. Massa and Frank M. Longo
Journal of Neuroscience 27 November 2013, 33 (48) 18712-18727; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1310-13.2013
Danielle A. Simmons
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadia P. Belichenko
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tao Yang
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Condon
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Monbureau
2Behavioral and Functional Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neurosciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehrdad Shamloo
2Behavioral and Functional Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neurosciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deqiang Jing
3Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Massa
4Department of Neurology and Laboratory for Computational Neurochemistry and Drug Discovery, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94121
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank M. Longo
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    LM22A-4 activates TrkB and its associated downstream signaling in striatum of R6/2 mice. Representative Western blots of striatal homogenates from 11- to 12-week-old WT or R6/2 mice treated with vehicle (Veh) or LM22A-4 (LM-4) for 7 weeks. For all quantitation, n = 8–10 mice/group were used and values were normalized to the WT Veh group run on the same gel. Immunobands from one mouse per group and corresponding densitometric group analyses are shown. A–D, Full-length TrkB levels (A) and its phosphorylation (p) at tyrosine residues Y705 (B), Y515 (C), and Y817 (D) are depicted. Samples from each mouse were run in three to four replicates. TrkB levels were lower in striatum of R6/2 mice relative to WTs (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh) regardless of LM-4 treatment. TrkB phosphorylation (pTrkB) at Y705 (**p ≤ 0.01 vs WT Veh), but not Y515 or Y817, was decreased in Veh-treated R6/2 mice compared with WTs. LM-4 inhibited the reduction in Y705 phosphorylation (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh). LM-4 also increased phosphorylation at Y515 in WT mice (#p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh; two-tailed Student's t test). E–G, Western blots showing phosphorylation of AKT (E), ERK (F), and PLCγ (G), the three main downstream signaling pathways of TrkB. Samples from each mouse were run in four to six replicates. Phosphorylation of AKT, PLCγ, and ERK was decreased in Veh-treated R6/2 mice compared with WTs (**p ≤ 0.01 and ***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh). LM-4 prevented the deficits in AKT and PLCγ (+p ≤ 0.05 and ++p ≤ 0.01 vs R6/2 Veh) but not ERK phosphorylation. H, Western blot showing phosphorylation of CREB at Ser133. Samples from each mouse were run in duplicate. pCREB was reduced by 36 ± 10% in R6/2 mice given Veh (*p < 0.05 vs WT Veh; two-tailed Student's t test) and LM-4 prevented this decrease (+p < 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh; two-tailed Student's t test); there was also an increase in pCREB in the WT LM-4 group that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07 vs WT Veh). I, Western blot showing mBDNF protein levels in striatum. Samples from each mouse were run in triplicate. mBDNF levels are reduced in striatum of R6/2 Veh mice (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh) and this difference was attenuated by LM-4 treatment (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh; two-tailed Student's t test). For all analyses, results are expressed as the mean ± SEM and, for comparison purposes, some nonadjacent lanes of Western blots were moved together and separated by spaces. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post hoc testing, unless otherwise noted.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    LM22A-4 reduces diffuse and aggregated huntingtin in nuclei of striatal and cortical neurons of R6/2 mice. A, Representative photomicrographs showing nuclear huntingtin immunostaining in striatum of R6/2 mice treated with vehicle (Veh; top) or LM22A-4 (LM-4; bottom). Diffuse huntingtin immunostaining was lighter and surrounded the huntingtin aggregates (arrows), which appeared smaller and less numerous in R6/2 mice given LM-4 (n = 9 mice) compared with those given Veh (n = 7 mice). Scale bar, 5 μm. Quantitative analyses of a sample field (0.063 mm2) in striatum (Str) and cortex (Cx) of one section per mouse confirmed these observations. B, The total area, number, and intensity of nuclei containing diffuse huntingtin staining decreased with LM-4 treatment in both brain areas (+p ≤ 0.05, ++p ≤ 0.01, and +++p ≤ 0.001 vs R6/2 veh). C, The total area occupied by huntingtin aggregates was reduced in Str and Cx due to a decrease in aggregate number and size (+p ≤ 0.05, ++p ≤ 0.01, and +++p ≤ 0.001 vs R6/2 veh). Results are normalized to the R6/2 vehicle group and expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with a two-tailed Student's t test.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Huntingtin transcript levels and striatal atrophy are not affected by LM22A-4 in R6/2 mice. A, Data from qRT-PCR using primers recognizing both human and mouse huntingtin (htt) are shown (n = 2 for WTs and 3–4 R6/2 mice/group). Htt RNA levels were calculated and normalized to the internal control (GAPDH) and then expressed relative to the WT vehicle (Veh) group. Relative levels of htt transcript are increased in R6/2 striatum (***p = 0.001 vs WTs) and are not altered by LM22A-4 (LM-4). B, The volume of the striatum was significantly decreased in the Veh-treated R6/2 mice compared with the WTs (*p ≤ 0.05). LM-4 treatment did not prevent striatal atrophy in R6/2 mice (n = 9 mice/group). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post hoc testing.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Decreases in striatal DARPP-32 levels are ameliorated by LM22A-4 in R6/2 mice. A, Representative DARPP-32 immunostaining in striatum of WT (left) and R6/2 mice (right) treated with vehicle (Veh; top) or LM22A-4 (LM-4; bottom) is shown. Scale bar, 80 μm. The immunostaining appeared lighter, especially in the neuropil, in R6/2 mice given Veh (n = 10) compared with the WT veh (n = 12), WT LM-4 (n = 10) and R6/2 LM-4 (n = 13) groups. B, Quantitative analyses showed that the decrease in area occupied by DARPP-32 immunostained cells and processes in Veh-treated R6/2 mice (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh) was prevented with LM-4 treatment (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh). The area occupied by the immunostained cells and processes was expressed as a percentage of the total area analyzed and normalized by the WT Veh group. C, Representative Western blot of striatal homogenates from 11- to 12-week-old WT or R6/2 mice treated with Veh or LM-4 shows that DARPP-32 protein levels are decreased in the R6/2 Veh group compared with WTs (***p ≤ 0.001) and that LM-4 ameliorated this deficit (+p ≤ 0.05; two-tailed Student's t test). Immunobands from two mice per group are shown. For quantitation, samples from each mouse (n = 8–10 mice/group) were run in triplicate, values were normalized to the WT Veh group, and runs for each mouse were averaged. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA and Newman–Keuls post hoc test, unless otherwise noted.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Degeneration of neurites from parvalbuminergic interneurons in R6/2 striatum is prevented by LM22A-4. A, Reconstructed drawings from Neurolucida tracings of PV-immunostained interneurons in striatum. Scale bar, 10 μm. B, Quantitative analyses showed that the decrease in area occupied by PV-immunostained neurons and neurites seen in vehicle (Veh)-treated R6/2 mice (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh) was prevented with LM22A-4 (LM-4) treatment (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh; n = 9/group). The area occupied by the immunostained cells and processes was expressed as a percentage of the total area analyzed and normalized by the WT Veh group. C, R6/2 mice given Veh had a higher percentage of soma that lacked PV-stained neurites than WT mice (*p ≤ 0.05) and LM-4 prevented this deficit (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh). D, E, PV-stained neurites of R6/2 vehicle mice also had reduced volumes on branch orders 1–4 (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh) and were shorter on branch orders 3–4, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. LM-4 increased the volume and length of the PV-stained neurites (+p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post hoc testing.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Inflammation is decreased by LM22A-4 in the R6/2 striatum. Immunostaining for IBA-1, a microglial marker, is shown in the striatum of a vehicle (Veh)-treated WT (top left) and R6/2 (top right) mouse, and an LM22A-4 (LM-4)-treated R6/2 mouse (bottom left). Scale bar, 80 μm. Quantitation showed that the area occupied by IBA-1 immunostaining increased significantly in Veh-treated R6/2 mice compared with WT mice (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh) and that LM-4 ameliorated this effect (+p ≤ 0.05; n = 9/group). The area occupied by the immunostained cells and processes was expressed as a percentage of the total area analyzed and normalized by the WT Veh group. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with an ANOVA and Newman–Keuls post hoc test.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    LM22A-4 prevents dendritic spine loss on R6/2 striatal MSNs. A, Reconstructed drawings from Neurolucida tracings of one dendritic tree of Golgi-stained MSNs in striatum. Scale bar, 10 μm. B, Spines on the fourth dendritic branch of MSNs from each of the four experimental groups are shown. Scale bar, 2.5 μm. C, Spine density on dendrites of MSNs was reduced in vehicle (Veh)-treated R6/2 mice (n = 7–9 mice/group; **p ≤ 0.01 vs WT Veh). This decrease was prevented by LM22A-4 (LM-4) on each branch order examined (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh and +p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh; two-tailed Student's t tests; left graph) and this protective effect was particularly evident when data from branch orders 2–5 were combined (+++p < 0.001 vs R6/2 Veh; right graph). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post hoc testing.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Effects of LM22A-4 on body weight, life span, and motor performance in R6/2 mice. A, Body weights of vehicle (Veh)-treated R6/2 mice were significantly less than WT mice given Veh or LM22A-4 (LM-4) starting at 7 weeks of age (fourth treatment week) and progressively decreased with aging. This decline was delayed by LM-4 treatment from the fifth to seventh treatment weeks (n = 35–37 mice/group).***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh and +p ≤ 0.05 vs R6/2 Veh, two-way RM-ANOVA, with Bonferroni post-testing. B, Kaplan–Meier analysis curve showing that LM-4 does not affect survival of R6/2 mice (n = 10/group). C, Time to descend a vertical pole was longer for Veh-treated R6/2 mice than WTs (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh); LM-4 decreased descent time in R6/2 mice (++p ≤ 0.01 vs R6/2 Veh; n = 18/group). D, Hanging duration was shorter for R6/2 mice given Veh than WTs (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh); LM-4-treated R6/2 mice remained hanging longer than R6/2 Veh mice (+++p ≤ 0.001; n = 9–10/group). E, Rotarod performance was impaired in R6/2 mice (*p ≤ 0.05 and ***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh) and was not affected by LM-4 treatment (n = 19–20/group). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with an ANOVA and Newman–Keuls post hoc test, unless otherwise noted.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Mature BDNF levels are decreased while TrkB levels are unaltered in striatum of 8-month-old BACHD mice. Representative Western blots from BACHD mice (treated for 6 months beginning at 2 months of age) showing striatal protein levels of (A) mBDNF (∼14–15 kDa) and (B) TrkB. Immunobands from one mouse per group and corresponding densitometric analyses are shown. Corresponding tubulin immunobands from the stripped and reprobed blots are shown at the bottom of each gel panel. For quantitation, samples from each mouse (n = 5–9 mice/group) were run in duplicate, values were normalized to the WT vehicle group, and runs for each mouse were averaged. mBDNF protein levels are lower in striatum of vehicle-treated BACHD mice compared with WTs (*p ≤ 0.05). Striatal levels of TrkB were unaltered in BACHD mice. LM22A-4 (LM-4) did not significantly affect mBDNF or TrkB levels. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, and, for comparison purposes, some nonadjacent lanes of Western blots were moved together and separated by spaces. Statistical significance was determined with an ANOVA with a Newman–Keuls post hoc test.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    LM22A-4 ameliorates degeneration of striatal DARPP-32 neurites in BACHD mice. A, DARPP-32 immunostaining in striatum of WT (left) and BACHD mice (right) treated with vehicle (Veh; top) or LM22A-4 (LM-4; bottom) is shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. The neurites of DARPP-32-stained neurons (A, arrows) of BACHD mice tend to have a smaller surface area (B) and shorter length (C) than those of WT mice (n = 8–9 mice/group; ANOVA p = 0.04, F = 3.24; p = 0.07, Student's t test WT Veh vs BACHD Veh). Treating BACHD mice with LM-4 significantly increased the surface area and length of the neurites containing DARPP-32 (++p = 0.005 and +++p = 0.001 vs BACHD veh, two-tailed Student's t tests).

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    LM22A-4 prevents deficits in dendritic spines of BACHD striatal MSNs. A, Reconstructed drawings from Neurolucida tracings of one dendritic tree of Golgi-stained MSNs in striatum of WT (left) and BACHD mice (right) treated with vehicle (Veh; top) or LM22A-4 (LM-4; bottom). Scale bar, 10 μm. B, Spine density of MSNs was reduced in Veh-treated BACHD mice on dendritic branch orders 3–5 (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh, ANOVA and Newman–Keuls post hoc test, right graph) particularly on third and fourth orders (*p ≤ 0.05 vs WT Veh, Student's t test, left graph); this reduction was prevented by LM-4 (+p ≤ 0.04 vs BACHD Veh, Student's t test; n = 9–10/group). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12.

    Effects of LM22A-4 on motor performance and body weight in BACHD mice. A, Distance traveled during the first 10 min in an activity chamber was decreased in vehicle (Veh)-treated BACHD mice compared with WT mice (*p ≤ 0.05). This hypoactivity was prevented by LM22A-4 (LM-4) treatment (+p ≤ 0.05 vs BACHD Veh; n = 12–15/group). B, Downward climbing was also impaired in BACHD Veh mice (***p ≤ 0.001 vs WT Veh); LM-4 improved descent time of BACHD mice on the vertical pole test (+p ≤ 0.05 vs BACHD Veh; n = 15–22/group). C, Deficits in rotarod performance were seen at 5 (Test 2) and 8 (Test 3) months of age (both **p ≤ 0.01 vs WT Veh), but not at 2 months (Test 1); LM-4 had no effect on performance on this test (n = 15–22/group). D, Body weight was not affected by LM-4 treatment in WT or BACHD mice (n = 15–22/group). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post hoc testing.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (48)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 48
27 Nov 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Small Molecule TrkB Ligand Reduces Motor Impairment and Neuropathology in R6/2 and BACHD Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Small Molecule TrkB Ligand Reduces Motor Impairment and Neuropathology in R6/2 and BACHD Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease
Danielle A. Simmons, Nadia P. Belichenko, Tao Yang, Christina Condon, Marie Monbureau, Mehrdad Shamloo, Deqiang Jing, Stephen M. Massa, Frank M. Longo
Journal of Neuroscience 27 November 2013, 33 (48) 18712-18727; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1310-13.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
A Small Molecule TrkB Ligand Reduces Motor Impairment and Neuropathology in R6/2 and BACHD Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease
Danielle A. Simmons, Nadia P. Belichenko, Tao Yang, Christina Condon, Marie Monbureau, Mehrdad Shamloo, Deqiang Jing, Stephen M. Massa, Frank M. Longo
Journal of Neuroscience 27 November 2013, 33 (48) 18712-18727; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1310-13.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Threonine-53 Phosphorylation of Dopamine Transporter Dictates κ-Opioid Receptor-Mediated Locomotor Suppression, Aversion, and Cocaine Reward
  • Brain Topological Changes in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Associations with Amyloid Stages
  • The Functional Anatomy of Nociception: Effective Connectivity in Chronic Pain and Placebo Response
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.