Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2013, 33 (5) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Loss of 4E-BP2 Does Not Increase Translation Universally

Israeli Ran, Christos G. Gkogkas, Cristina Vasuta, Maylis Tartas, Arkady Khoutorsky, et al.

(see pages 1872–1886)

Memory formation requires synthesis of new proteins to modify synaptic structure. In the absence of plasticity-inducing stimulation, protein translation is repressed at hippocampal synapses by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein-2 (4E-BP2), which prevents ribosome assembly on mRNAs. During the late phase of long-term potentiation (L-LTP), the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylates 4E-BP2, which causes 4E-BP2 to dissociate from its targets, allowing protein synthesis to proceed. In mice lacking 4E-BP2, the basal amplitude and frequency of AMPAergic miniature EPSCs is elevated and LTP can be induced with minimal stimulation, but normal induction protocols fail to induce L-LTP. Ran et al. extend these findings, showing that 4E-BP2 knock-out increased dendritic spine density and eliminated the mTOR dependence of L-LTP. Interestingly, loss of 4E-BP2 did not increase translation of all synaptic proteins: translation of AMPA receptor subunits GluA1 and GluA2 increased, but translation of NMDA receptor subunits, the postsynaptic density scaffolding protein PSD-95, and the activity-regulated protein Arc were unaffected.

Embedded Image Systems/Circuits

Neuronal Synchrony in V1 Varies with Task Demands

Nirmala Ramalingam, Justin N. J. McManus, Wu Li, and Charles D. Gilbert

(see pages 1773–1789)

Neurons in primary visual cortex are tuned to visual features such as orientation; i.e., their responses depend on the orientation of lines and edges in their receptive fields. But responses to a given stimulus are influenced by the visual context, task demands, and attention. To investigate these influences, Ramalingam et al. presented monkeys with stimuli consisting of a central line segment flanked by two parallel and two collinear segments, and they recorded responses of neurons encoding the center segment as animals performed tasks requiring attention to either the parallel or the collinear flanks. The position of parallel flanks modulated responses to the central segment more when the task required attention to those flanks than when the task required attention to the collinear pair, and vice versa. Task-dependent modulation did not appear to result from enhancement or suppression of firing in neurons encoding flanking segments, but rather from changes in the synchrony of firing between neurons encoding the center bar and those encoding the flanks.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Cognitive

Attention Rapidly Enhances Responses in Human Auditory Cortex

Sandra Da Costa, Wietske van der Zwaag, Lee M. Miller, Stephanie Clarke, and Melissa Saenz

(see pages 1858–1863)

Studies of visual attention indicate that attention to a particular feature modulates the responses of neurons tuned to that feature. For example, red-tuned neurons fire more if the animal is looking for red stimuli than if the animal is looking for blue stimuli. Studies in rats and ferrets have suggested that auditory attention has similar effects on neuronal response properties. Data from Da Costa et al. support this hypothesis. After high-resolution (1.5 mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to map frequency tuning in human primary auditory cortex, subjects were presented with simultaneous sequences of low- and high-frequency tones, one in each ear. Subjects were asked to switch their attention repeatedly from one tone to the other. As attention shifted, the magnitude of fMRI signals rapidly changed in areas of auditory cortex tuned to each tone: responses in areas tuned to a tone were greater when subjects' attended to that tone than when subjects attended to the nonpreferred tone.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Increasing Rod Numbers Reduces Remodeling after Cone Loss

Carole J. Saade, Karen Alvarez-Delfin, and James M. Fadool

(see pages 1804–1814)

In retinitis pigmentosa, rods degenerate, leading to night blindness and constriction of the visual field. Loss of rods results in remodeling of retinal circuitry, and after extensive rod loss, cones begin to degenerate. Rods outnumber cones 20:1 in the human retina, but cones predominate in the retina of larval zebrafish. A mutation (Xops:mCFPq13) that causes rod loss in larval zebrafish does not lead to secondary loss of cones; but a mutation that causes primary cone loss (pde6cw59) causes secondary rod degeneration. Additionally, Saade et al. found that bipolar cell processes projected ectopically in pde6cw59 larvae, but not in Xops:mCFPq13 larvae. Interestingly, as pde6cw59 larvae mature, rods continue to be born, and later-born rods survive; ectopic processes were not found in these fish. Similarly, introducing a mutation that increases rod generation in pde6cw59 larvae not only increased rod survival but also reduced remodeling of bipolar cell dendrites. These data suggest that maintaining photoreceptor density not only increases their viability, but also can prevent circuit remodeling.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

ON bipolar cell axons (green) extend ectopically into the ganglion cell (red) layer after cone degeneration in zebrafish larvae. See the article by Saade et al. for details.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 5
30 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2013, 33 (5) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2013, 33 (5) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Systems/Circuits
    • Behavioral/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.