Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Systems/Circuits

Stress Switches Cannabinoid Type-1 (CB1) Receptor-Dependent Plasticity from LTD to LTP in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis

Christelle Glangetas, Delphine Girard, Laurent Groc, Giovanni Marsicano, Francis Chaouloff and François Georges
Journal of Neuroscience 11 December 2013, 33 (50) 19657-19663; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3175-13.2013
Christelle Glangetas
1UMR 5297 CNRS, Institut Interdisciplinaire de NeuroScience, Development and Adaptation of Neuronal Circuits, Bordeaux F-33076, France,
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Delphine Girard
1UMR 5297 CNRS, Institut Interdisciplinaire de NeuroScience, Development and Adaptation of Neuronal Circuits, Bordeaux F-33076, France,
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Groc
1UMR 5297 CNRS, Institut Interdisciplinaire de NeuroScience, Development and Adaptation of Neuronal Circuits, Bordeaux F-33076, France,
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Marsicano
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
3INSERM, U862, Neurocentre Magendie, Pathophysiology of Neuronal Plasticity, Bordeaux F-33076, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Chaouloff
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
3INSERM, U862, Neurocentre Magendie, Pathophysiology of Neuronal Plasticity, Bordeaux F-33076, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Georges
1UMR 5297 CNRS, Institut Interdisciplinaire de NeuroScience, Development and Adaptation of Neuronal Circuits, Bordeaux F-33076, France,
2Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux F-33076, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The 10 Hz mPFC stimulation has opposite effects on aBNST plasticity in control and stressed anesthetized mice. A, Time line of experiment. B, Stimulation and recording protocol. C, Histological controls of stimulation (mPFC, lesion at arrow) and recording (aBNST, blue spot at arrow) sites. Scale bar, 1 mm. D, E, Graphs illustrating the effects of stress on basal activity frequency (D) and cortical excitation strength (E). F, Kinetic (left) and quantification (right) of the mean percentage change (±SEM) in mPFC-evoked spike probability, normalized to the baseline, after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation (at t0) in control and stressed mice. G, Typical PSTHs and associated rasters illustrate responses of aBNST neurons before and after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation in control (left) and stressed mice (right). Stimulus at t0 (gray lines). Bin width, 1 ms. Representative electrophysiological traces in insets. H, Quantification of basal firing activity of aBNST neurons (mean ± SEM) before and 35–40 min after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation in control and stressed mice. I, Time line of experiment. J, Kinetic (left) and quantification (right) of the mean percentage change (±SEM) in mPFC-evoked spike probability, normalized to the baseline, after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation (at t0) in stressed mice pretreated with RU486 or vehicle. N = number of mice; n = number of neurons. *indicates significant differences between control and stress groups; + indicates significant differences between baseline (before) and 35–40 min after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation. +p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Numbers in brackets of histogram bars refer to the number of aBNST neurons recorded. The same nomenclature is used for all figure legends.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    CB1+/+ and CB1−/− mice displayed a similar response to stress. A–F, Effect of acute stress on Fos-immunoreactive neurons in PVN, mPFC, and aBNST of control and stressed CB1+/+ or CB1−/− mice. A, C, E, Histograms showing the density of Fos-positive neurons after an acute stress in CB1+/+ and CB1−/− mice. PVN and mPFC displayed the expected enhancement of stress-induced cellular activation in CB1+/+ but also in CB1−/− mice. Stress-induced Fos staining was similar in CB1+/+ and CB1−/− mice. B, D, F, Representative micrographs of immunostained sections for Fos of the PVN (B), mPFC (D), and aBNST (F). Note that no stress-induced Fos activation was observed in the aBNST of CB1+/+ or CB1−/− mice (E, F). + indicates significant differences between control and stress groups. +p < 0.05, ++p < 0.01. Scale bars: B, 0.4 mm; D, 0.2 mm; F, 0.6 mm. ac, Anterior commissure; PL, prelimbic cortex; IL, infralimbic cortex; cc, corpus callosum; Ov, oval nucleus; aBNSTv, ventral part of aBNST; dBNSTd, dorsal part of aBNST; 3V, third ventricle. Numbers in brackets of histogram bars refer to the number of mice used.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Neuroplastic changes in the aBNST depend on CB1-Rs activation. A, B, Kinetic (left) and quantification (right) of the mean percentage change (±SEM) in mPFC-evoked spike probability, normalized to the baseline, after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation (at t0) in control and stressed CB1+/+ or CB1−/− mice. C–F, Graphs illustrating the effects of stress and/or 10 Hz mPFC stimulation on basal activity frequency (C, E, F) and cortical excitation strength (D). See Figure 1 legend for nomenclature.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    CB1-Rs that control LTD and LTP are located in the aBNST on mPFC terminals. A, Stimulation and recording protocol. B, The CB1-R antagonist AM251 (60 nl, 1 μm) or vehicle was infused into the aBNST before 10 Hz mPFC stimulation in stressed mice. Kinetic (left) and quantification (right) of the mean percentage change (±SEM) in mPFC-evoked spike probability, normalized to the baseline, after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation (at t0) after vehicle (VEH) or AM251 infusion in the aBNST of stressed mice. C, D, Kinetic (left) and quantification (right) of the mean percentage change (±SEM) in mPFC-evoked spike probability, normalized to the baseline, after 10 Hz mPFC stimulation (at t0) in control and stressed Glu-CB1+/+(C) or Glu-CB1−/−(D) mice. See Figure 1 legend for nomenclature.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (50)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 50
11 Dec 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stress Switches Cannabinoid Type-1 (CB1) Receptor-Dependent Plasticity from LTD to LTP in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Stress Switches Cannabinoid Type-1 (CB1) Receptor-Dependent Plasticity from LTD to LTP in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis
Christelle Glangetas, Delphine Girard, Laurent Groc, Giovanni Marsicano, Francis Chaouloff, François Georges
Journal of Neuroscience 11 December 2013, 33 (50) 19657-19663; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3175-13.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Stress Switches Cannabinoid Type-1 (CB1) Receptor-Dependent Plasticity from LTD to LTP in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis
Christelle Glangetas, Delphine Girard, Laurent Groc, Giovanni Marsicano, Francis Chaouloff, François Georges
Journal of Neuroscience 11 December 2013, 33 (50) 19657-19663; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3175-13.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • corticosterone
  • endocannabinoid
  • in vivo
  • LTD
  • LTP

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • Modulation of dopamine neurons alters behavior and event encoding in the nucleus accumbens during Pavlovian conditioning
  • Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples decrease during physical actions including consummatory behavior in immobile rodents
  • Specializations in amygdalar and hippocampal innervation of the primate nucleus accumbens shell
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.