Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

A Sensory-Labeled Line for Cold: TRPM8-Expressing Sensory Neurons Define the Cellular Basis for Cold, Cold Pain, and Cooling-Mediated Analgesia

Wendy M. Knowlton, Radhika Palkar, Erika K. Lippoldt, Daniel D. McCoy, Farhan Baluch, Jessica Chen and David D. McKemy
Journal of Neuroscience 13 February 2013, 33 (7) 2837-2848; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1943-12.2013
Wendy M. Knowlton
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
2Neuroscience Graduate Program,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radhika Palkar
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
2Neuroscience Graduate Program,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika K. Lippoldt
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
3Neurobiology Graduate Program, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel D. McCoy
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
4Molecular and Computational Biology Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farhan Baluch
2Neuroscience Graduate Program,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Chen
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David D. McKemy
1Neurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences,
2Neuroscience Graduate Program,
3Neurobiology Graduate Program, and
4Molecular and Computational Biology Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Development of the Trpm8DTR mouse line. A, A complementary DNA transgene for the simian DTR, a GFP fusion protein, was inserted into the trpm8 BAC clone at sequences corresponding to the second coding exon. B, Transgene expression (GFP-expression) in TG and DRG neurons. C, DTR-expressing central projections (green) were localized to the outermost lamina of the dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord and did not overlap with those binding to IB4 (red). D, Immunolabeling revealed no transgene expression in non-peptidergic neurons that bind IB4.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Selective ablation of TRPM8-expressing sensory neurons. A, Schematic of the TRPM8 neuron ablation protocol. Adult mice, both Trpm8DTR (DTR) and control littermates (WT), were given two intraperitoneal injections of 50 μg/kg DTx, which selectively ablated only targeted neurons (green cells). B, One week after injection of a single dose of DTx, the expression of TRPM8 transcripts was reduced to 12.6 ± 3.8% of control and then to 0.18 ± 0.04% if two injections were performed (n = 5, #p < 0.0001), as measured by qPCR. GFP-like immunoreactivity was abolished in Trpm8DTR mice injected with DTx (D) compared with vehicle-injected Trpm8DTR mice (C) or control Trpm8GFP mice (E) subjected to the same DTx injection protocol as in D. F, Comparative analysis of RNA transcripts isolated from control and ablated DRG was performed by microarray and plotted as the fold reduction (log10) in expression between the two conditions. Dashed line indicates the 1.5-fold reduction threshold for significant reduction in expression.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Ablation of TRPM8 afferents abolishes acute cold behaviors. A, Evaporative cooling induced by application of a droplet of acetone to the hindpaw evokes stereotyped behaviors from wild-type, un-injected Trpm8DTR, and control mice as determined on a 5-point score scale (see Materials and Methods; Knowlton et al., 2011). The response scores of Trpm8−/− and ablated mice were significantly reduced from control to 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.2 ± 0.1 (n = 12, ***p < 0.001), respectively, and were not different from one another (p > 0.05). B, Intraperitoneal icilin injections (50 mg/kg body weight) induced robust wet-dog shakes in control but were absent in both Trpm8−/− and ablated mice (*p < 0.05 each compared with control). The latency to nocifensive flinching (C) and licking/wringing (D) behaviors of the forepaw when mice were placed on a 0°C metal plate was recorded. The average latency to flinch and licks in control mice was 6.2 ± 2.1 and 21.3 ± 2.5 s, respectively (n = 6), and similar to that observed in wild-type and Trpm8DTR mice (p > 0.05). Latencies of Trpm8−/− and ablated mice were significantly higher compared with control at 58.0 ± 7.9 s (n = 10) and 69.8 ± 15.0 s (n = 10) for flinching, respectively, and 72.9 ± 15.4 and 98.5 ± 17.1 s for licking, respectively (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Dashed line marks the standard 60 s cutoff time point.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Mouse mobility on the two-temperature choice assay is altered in absence of TRPM8 channels and neurons. A, The MouseChaser tracking software was developed to analyze mouse movement on the two-temperature choice assay. Screen capture from software after annotation of video with position of mouse. The red square is an estimate of the mouse's position with the yellow diamond marking the center of which the x and y coordinates are logged over the course of the video. B, Movements of wild-type mice in the two-temperature choice chamber, with the control surface held constant at 30°C and the test at temperatures from 10 to 50°C, were monitored over a 5 min period. Pseudocolored exploration plots show qualitatively equal activity on both surfaces set to 30°C, with reduced movement to and on the test surface as it was either heated or cooled. C, Comparative analysis of mobility from noxious cold (5°C) to noxious heat (45°C) for control, Trpm8−/−, and ablated mice. D, Avoidance of the test surface was measured as the number of times the animal crossed between surfaces, with control mice showing decreased mobility as the temperature deviated from 30°C. Both Trpm8−/− and ablated mice avoided noxious heat but, unlike controls, did not avoid 20 versus 30°C (**p < 0.01, n = 6–12). Trpm8−/− mice did avoid cold as temperatures dropped below 20°C but not to the same extent as control mice (*p < 0.05). However, ablated mice showed no avoidance behaviors until test plate temperatures of 5°C. E, Preference for warmth was determined by quantifying the time spent on the 30°C surface, with all genotypes showing strong preference for warmth over painful heat (p < 0.001 compared with test at 30°C). Control and Trpm8−/− mice showed warm preference at temperatures ≤15°C (p < 0.001 compared with test at 30°C), whereas ablated animals showed no preference between 10 and 20°C (p > 0.05 compared with test at 30°C) and moderate preference at 5°C (p < 0.01 compared with test at 30°C). Preference behaviors for ablated mice were different from control and Trpm8−/− animals at all temperatures below 20°C (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Heat, mechanical, and proprioceptive behaviors do not require TRPM8 neurons. Latencies to hindpaw flinching on a hotplate were the same at (A) 48°C and (B) 52°C in all genotypes tested (p > 0.05, n = 6–12). C, Mildly noxious mechanical stimulation of the hindpaw with the electronic von Frey apparatus yielded similar paw-withdrawal thresholds in all genotypes (n = 6–12, p > 0.05). D, Dynamic stroke of the hindpaw with a puffed-up cotton swab yielded similar response frequencies in both control and ablated mice (n = 8–11, p > 0.05). E, The average maximum grip strengths were similar across all genotypes, as was the latency to drop from an accelerating rotarod (F) (n = 6–27, p > 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    TRPM8 neuron ablation selectively diminishes inflammation- and nerve injury-induced cold allodynia. A, Inflammation significantly increased ipsilateral, but not contralateral, response scores to evaporative cooling in control mice by 2 d after CFA injection (n = 10). Both Trpm8−/− (n = 6) and ablated mice (n = 10) showed significantly lower sensitization compared with controls (***p < 0.001) but were significantly increased over baseline and the contralateral side (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in sensitization between Trpm8−/− and ablated mice (p > 0.05). B, After induction of irritation to the sciatic nerve (CCI), control mice showed an increase in ipsilateral scores, whereas contralateral scores remained unchanged (n = 8). Both Trpm8−/− and ablated mice (n = 8 each) showed significantly lower sensitization compared with controls and were significantly increased over baseline and the contralateral side (p < 0.01). Unlike CFA, ablated mice showed a significant increase in nocifensive behaviors compared with control mice (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). In both the CFA (C) and CCI (D) models, the significant (p < 0.001) decrease in latencies to hindpaw lift from a radiant heat source were identical between all genotypes tested (p > 0.05). Similarly, mechanical thresholds were increased on the ipsilateral side (p < 0.001) but were indistinguishable (p > 0.05) between all genotypes before and after injury in both pain models (E, F).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Mice lacking TRPM8 or neurons are deficient in cooling-induced analgesia. A, In a neuropathic pain model (CCI), control mice exhibited increased sensitivity to mechanical stimuli that was temporally alleviated by cooling the affected paw (17°C for 5 min). Before cooling [baseline (BL)], ipsilateral thresholds were significantly lowered from that recorded contralateral (p < 0.001). After cooling, ipsilateral thresholds were significantly increased over baseline (3.8 ± 0.3 g at baseline compared with 7.1 ± 0.4 g at 5 min after cooling; ***p < 0.001) and indistinguishable from contralateral thresholds (7.7 ± 0.5 g at baseline compared with 7.3 ± 0.3 g at 5 min after cooling, #p > 0.05). Trpm8−/− (B) and ablated (C) mice showed decreased ipsilateral mechanical thresholds in the CCI model (p < 0.001) similar to controls and were unaffected by cooling.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Model for TRPM8 neuronal function. Our data suggest the presence of TRPM8 neurons that mediate innocuous cool (green) and likely provide inhibitory input, either through spinal inhibitory interneurons (yellow) or directly to nociceptors (pink) to induce cooling analgesia. Cold nociceptors (blue) likely also express TRPM8 and provide input on noxious cold temperatures that drive thermal-avoidance behaviors.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (7)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 7
13 Feb 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Sensory-Labeled Line for Cold: TRPM8-Expressing Sensory Neurons Define the Cellular Basis for Cold, Cold Pain, and Cooling-Mediated Analgesia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Sensory-Labeled Line for Cold: TRPM8-Expressing Sensory Neurons Define the Cellular Basis for Cold, Cold Pain, and Cooling-Mediated Analgesia
Wendy M. Knowlton, Radhika Palkar, Erika K. Lippoldt, Daniel D. McCoy, Farhan Baluch, Jessica Chen, David D. McKemy
Journal of Neuroscience 13 February 2013, 33 (7) 2837-2848; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1943-12.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
A Sensory-Labeled Line for Cold: TRPM8-Expressing Sensory Neurons Define the Cellular Basis for Cold, Cold Pain, and Cooling-Mediated Analgesia
Wendy M. Knowlton, Radhika Palkar, Erika K. Lippoldt, Daniel D. McCoy, Farhan Baluch, Jessica Chen, David D. McKemy
Journal of Neuroscience 13 February 2013, 33 (7) 2837-2848; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1943-12.2013
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Mechanisms of Dominant Electrophysiological Features of Four Subtypes of Layer 1 Interneurons
  • Activity-dependent Nr4a2 induction modulates synaptic expression of AMPA receptors and plasticity via a Ca2+/CRTC1/CREB pathway
  • Alternative splicing of the flip/flop cassette and TARP auxiliary subunits engage in a privileged relationship that fine-tunes AMPA receptor gating
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.