Published eLetters
Guidelines
As a forum for professional feedback, submissions of letters are open to all. You do not need to be a subscriber. To avoid redundancy, we urge you to read other people's letters before submitting your own. Name, current appointment, place of work, and email address are required to send a letter, and will be published with your review. We also require that you declare any competing financial interests. Unprofessional submissions will not be considered or responded to.
Jump to comment:
- Re:Response to Caiati and coauthors' articleShow More
Dr. Premzl has questioned the lack of citation of his work in our paper (Caiati et al., 2013). We are very familiar with his work and his contribution in the field of bioinformatics of prion proteins. Indeed, one of us has recently published a work (Poggiolini and Legname, 2012) where his contribution was rightly acknowledged. We believe however, that in the context of the present work his references are not relevant. We h...
Competing Interests: None declared. - Response to Caiati and coauthors' articleShow More
The function of prion protein PrP has been elusive. One major contribution to this problem is the hypothesis that relates PrP and synaptic plasticity. The hypothesis was first proposed by Premzl and colleagues (Premzl et al., 2005). The hypothesis was additionally strengthened by arguments of Premzl and Gamulin (Premzl and Gamulin, 2007). These research articles have been cited cumulatively >50 times at present. It i...
Competing Interests: None declared.