Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

The Good, the Bad, and the Just: Justice Sensitivity Predicts Neural Response during Moral Evaluation of Actions Performed by Others

Keith J. Yoder and Jean Decety
Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2014, 34 (12) 4161-4166; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4648-13.2014
Keith J. Yoder
1Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Decety
1Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
2Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4648-13.2014
PubMed 
24647937
Published By 
Society for Neuroscience
History 
  • Received November 1, 2013
  • Revision received January 23, 2014
  • Accepted February 10, 2014
  • First published March 19, 2014.
  • Version of record published March 19, 2014.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/344161-06$15.00/0

Author Information

  1. Keith J. Yoder1 and
  2. Jean Decety1,2
  1. 1Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
  2. 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60637
View Full Text

Author contributions

  1. Author contributions: J.D. designed research; J.D. and K.J.Y. performed research; J.D. and K.J.Y. analyzed data; J.D. and K.J.Y. wrote the paper.

Disclosures

    • Received November 1, 2013.
    • Revision received January 23, 2014.
    • Accepted February 10, 2014.
  • This study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health R01 Grant 1R01MH087525-01A2 and grants from the John Templeton Foundation (The Science of Philanthropy Initiative and Wisdom Research) to J.D.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Jean Decety, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5801 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637. decety{at}uchicago.edu

Online Impact

 

Article usage

Select a custom date range for the past year
E.g., 2023-02-01
to
E.g., 2023-02-01

Article usage: January 2018 to January 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 20182719816
Feb 20184710433
Mar 20183812347
Apr 20183015131
May 20184113030
Jun 20182512220
Jul 20181211529
Aug 2018308423
Sep 20182910235
Oct 20183013129
Nov 2018229225
Dec 20182913842
Total 20183601490360
Jan 20191111035
Feb 20193210938
Mar 2019279331
Apr 2019238229
May 2019228422
Jun 2019298533
Jul 2019285619
Aug 2019296514
Oct 2019206723
Nov 2019278030
Dec 2019165627
Total 2019264887301
Jan 2020187620
Feb 20202812638
Mar 2020236824
May 2020327732
Jun 20203410625
Jul 20203211430
Aug 2020378626
Sep 20203210018
Oct 20204812728
Nov 2020519438
Dec 20203910537
Total 20203741079316
Jan 2021407320
Feb 20214712161
Mar 20213712743
Apr 20214513731
May 20215315641
Jun 20213110737
Jul 20213616543
Aug 20213010126
Sep 2021227321
Oct 20214813246
Nov 20215011640
Dec 20214212640
Total 20214811434449
Jan 2022367123
Feb 20224911034
Mar 2022619639
Apr 2022529038
May 2022337831
Jun 2022347616
Jul 2022446222
Aug 2022225750
Sep 2022125741
Oct 2022246426
Nov 20229238
Dec 202213338
Total 2022389817336
Jan 2023246027
Total 2023246027
Total189257671789
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 12
19 Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Good, the Bad, and the Just: Justice Sensitivity Predicts Neural Response during Moral Evaluation of Actions Performed by Others
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Good, the Bad, and the Just: Justice Sensitivity Predicts Neural Response during Moral Evaluation of Actions Performed by Others
Keith J. Yoder, Jean Decety
Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2014, 34 (12) 4161-4166; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4648-13.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The Good, the Bad, and the Just: Justice Sensitivity Predicts Neural Response during Moral Evaluation of Actions Performed by Others
Keith J. Yoder, Jean Decety
Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2014, 34 (12) 4161-4166; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4648-13.2014
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dorsal striatum
  • dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • justice sensitivity
  • moral cognition
  • right TPJ

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.