Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 9 April 2014, 34 (15) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Noncompetitive NMDA Receptor Antagonist Blocks LTD in Mice

Walter E. Babiec, Ryan Guglietta, Shekib A. Jami, Wade Morishita, Robert C. Malenka, et al.

(see pages 5285–5290)

High-frequency stimulation of rodent hippocampus induces long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength, whereas low-frequency stimulation induces long-term depression (LTD). Both LTP and LTD require activation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), and a pervasive view has been that which form of plasticity is produced depends on the amount of Ca2+ influx through these receptors. Specifically, large Ca2+ influxes are thought to induce LTP, whereas small influxes induce LTD. This hypothesis recently received a major blow when it was reported that MK-801—an NMDAR antagonist that blocks the Ca2+ pore without blocking glutamate binding—failed to inhibit LTD in hippocampal slices from young rats, suggesting NMDARs induce LTD through a metabotropic rather than ionotropic mechanism. Wondering whether this phenomenon was limited to young animals, Babiec et al. examined the effect of MK-801 on LTD in adult mice. Unexpectedly, they found that MK-801 blocked LTD not only in adult mice, but also in young mice. Furthermore, MK-801 inhibited NMDAR-induced activation of downstream signaling pathways involved in LTD.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Low-frequency stimulation (during time indicated by bar) caused LTD of the field EPSP slope in mouse hippocampus (open circles). LTD was blocked by MK-801 (filled circles). See the article by Babiec et al. for details.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Reaching Becomes Bilateral When CST Axons Project Bilaterally

Najet Serradj, Sónia Paixão, Tomasz Sobocki, Mitchell Feinberg, Rüdiger Klein, et al.

(see pages 5211–5221)

EphrinB3, a guidance molecule expressed in the spinal cord midline, repels axons that express EphA4 receptors, including axons of spinal interneurons and axons descending in the corticospinal tract (CST) from primary motor cortex. When EphA4 is knocked out globally, both spinal interneuron and CST axons misproject bilaterally and mice locomote with a hopping rather than alternating-step gait. Locomotion is thought to be driven primarily by central pattern generators in the spinal cord, whereas goal-directed actions such as reaching or stepping over obstacles requires descending control. Therefore, Serradj et al. predicted that restricting EphA4 knockout to CST neurons would cause goal-directed actions to become bilateral, while sparing normal locomotion. This is what they found. In mice lacking EphA4 selectively in CST axons, only these axons projected bilaterally. Motor cortex stimulation often evoked bilateral muscle activation in these mice, and the mice were more likely than controls to hop over obstacles and to reach with both forelimbs rather than with one; but normal walking was unaffected.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Cognitive

Rats May Use Microvibrissae to Discriminate Textures

Praveen Kuruppath, Erez Gugig, and Rony Azouz

(see pages 5115–5120)

Rats have two sets of whiskers that they use for tactile discrimination. The better studied of these are the long macrovibrissae, which project to the barrel cortex. These whiskers actively sweep the environment to discern object shape, distance, and texture. Unlike macrovibrissae, the short microvibrissae present around the nose and mouth are not arranged in a neat grid, and they are relatively stationary—although they brush across surfaces when rats sweep their heads. Previous studies demonstrated that microvibrissae are used to discriminate the shapes of food items. Kuruppath et al. now provide evidence that microvibrissae can also be used to discriminate textures. The authors obtained multiunit recordings from areas of somatosensory cortex that represent the frontobuccal whisker pad while they stimulated rats' microvibrissae with different grades of sandpaper. They found that the firing rates of individual neurons increased along with the paper coarseness to an extent that could support texture discriminations.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

NMDA Receptor Levels Are Reduced in Down's Syndrome Model

Gurjinder Kaur, Ajay Sharma, Wenjin Xu, Scott Gerum, Melissa J. Alldred, et al.

(see pages 5099–5106)

Down's syndrome (DS) is caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21. DS phenotypes are thought to result from increased dosage and consequent overexpression of genes and noncoding RNAs present on this chromosome, as well as from epigenetic alterations. These changes have downstream effects on the expression and activity of proteins encoded on other chromosomes. The molecular bases for abnormal brain development and cognitive deficits in DS can be studied in mice in which parts of chromosome 16—which contains many of the same genes as human chromosome 21—are duplicated. Such mice have reduced hippocampal volume, abnormal dendritic spines, altered synaptic plasticity, and learning deficits. Several studies have suggested that an imbalance of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission underlies cognitive deficits in these mice. Kaur et al. complement these studies by showing that the Ts2 mouse model of DS has deficits in both learned and innate hippocampus-dependent tasks, along with reductions in hippocampal glutamate levels, NMDA receptor expression, and LTP.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (15)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 15
9 Apr 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 9 April 2014, 34 (15) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 9 April 2014, 34 (15) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.