Abstract
Ribbon-type presynaptic active zones are a hallmark of excitatory retinal synapses, and the ribbon organelle is thought to serve as the organizing point of the presynaptic active zone. Imaging of exocytosis from isolated retinal neurons, however, has revealed ectopic release (i.e., release away from ribbons) in significant quantities. Here, we demonstrate in an in vitro mouse retinal slice preparation that ribbon-independent release from rod bipolar cells activates postsynaptic AMPARs on AII amacrine cells. This form of release appears to draw on a unique, ribbon-independent, vesicle pool. Experimental, anatomical, and computational analyses indicate that it is elicited by a significant, global elevation of intraterminal [Ca2+] arising following local buffer saturation. Our observations support the conclusion that ribbon-independent release provides a read-out of the average behavior of all of the active zones in a rod bipolar cell's terminal.
Introduction
Glutamatergic sensory neurons that signal via graded potentials (e.g., retinal bipolar cells and cochlear and vestibular hair cells) exhibit specialized presynaptic active zones (AZs) distinguished by synaptic ribbons (Matthews and Fuchs, 2010). These proteinaceous structures are thought to permit the high rates of exocytosis and vesicle replenishment required for tonic transmission in primary sensory structures like the retina and the cochlea, and, consequently, they have been the subjects of much study (Schmitz, 2009; Zanazzi and Matthews, 2009). Though it has been demonstrated that synchronized, stimulus-evoked exocytosis requires synaptic ribbons (Khimich et al., 2005; Buran et al., 2010; Snellman et al., 2011), imaging studies of retinal neurons (goldfish retinal Mb1 bipolar cells or salamander rods) have revealed that a significant number of vesicles undergo exocytosis at sites away from synaptic ribbons, and this ectopic release appears to be evoked with a slower time course than synchronized, ribbon-dependent exocytosis (Zenisek et al., 2003; Midorikawa et al., 2007; Zenisek, 2008; Chen et al., 2013). A limitation of these studies of ectopic release from isolated neurons, however, is their inability to determine whether such exocytosis results in neurotransmitter release at locations near postsynaptic receptors and therefore is physiologically relevant.
Here, we identified a new, physiologically relevant component of release from murine rod bipolar (RB) cells that activates postsynaptic AMPARs on AII amacrine cells. It arises slowly with a time course that depends on intraterminal Ca2+ buffer capacity, and it persists when the synaptic ribbon's function is eliminated by photoablation. Thus, this ribbon-independent release appears to reflect exocytosis from ectopic sites at some distance from synaptic ribbons, and we present anatomical (electron micrographic), computational (simulations of Ca2+ diffusion), and experimental (imaging of fluorescent Ca2+ indicators) evidence that ectopic release is evoked by a spatiotemporally averaged [Ca2+] signal that is likely to arise from buffer saturation elicited by Ca2+ influx from multiple ribbon-type AZs. These results indicate a potential signaling role for ectopic release of vesicles and have important implications for the role of the ribbon itself in neurotransmitter release.
Materials and Methods
Retinal slice recordings.
Slices of the retina (200 μm thickness) were prepared from the light-adapted retina isolated from a wild-type C57BL/6 mouse of either sex (4–8 weeks old) as described previously (Jarsky et al., 2010; Tian et al., 2010; Mehta et al., 2013). The Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Maryland and of Yale University approved all procedures involving animal use. A retina was isolated into bicarbonate buffered Ames' medium (Sigma) equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (Carbogen) at room temperature. For slice preparation, the retina was embedded in low-melting temperature agarose (Sigma type VIIA, 3% in a HEPES buffered saline), and slices were cut on a vibrating microtome (Leica) or placed on a 0.45 μm cellulose acetate/nitrate membrane filter (Millipore) and cut via a tissue chopper. Slices were stored in Carbogen-bubbled Ames' medium at room temperature until use.
Recordings were performed at near-physiological temperature (30−34°C). Retinal slices were superfused with either Carbogen-bubbled Ames' medium or a Carbogen-bubbled artificial CSF (ACSF) containing the following (in mm): 119 NaCl, 23 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 KCl, 1.1 CaCl2, 1.5 MgCl2, 2 sodium lactate, and 2 sodium pyruvate. Picrotoxin (100 μm), (1,2,5,6-Tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA; 50 μm), strychnine (0.5 μm), tetrodotoxin (TTX; 500 nm), 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (l-AP4; 2 μm), and niflumic acid (100 μm) were added to the ACSF to block GABAAR-, GABACR-, GlyR-, voltage-gated Na channel-, mGluR6-regulated channel-, and Ca2+-activated Cl channel-mediated currents, respectively. Drugs were obtained from Sigma or Tocris Bioscience (except for TTX, which is from Alomone Labs).
Pipettes were filled with the following (in mm): 95 Cs-methanesulfonate, 20 TEA-Cl, 1 4-AP, 10 HEPES, 8 Tris-Phosphocreatine, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.4 Na-GTP, and varying concentrations of EGTA or BAPTA, pH was adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH and osmolarity to ∼285 mOsm with sucrose. Voltage-clamp recordings were made from both RBs and AIIs. Generally, RB holding potential was −60 mV, AII holding potential was −80 mV, and membrane potentials were corrected for junction potentials of approximately −10 mV. Access resistances were <25 ΜΩ for RBs and <20 ΜΩ for AII amacrines and were compensated by 50–90%. Recordings were made using a single Multiclamp 700B amplifier. Synaptic transmission was elicited by stimulation of individual RBs at 20 s intervals. Recorded currents were low-pass filtered at 2–4 kHz and digitized at 10–20 kHz by an ITC-18 A/D board (InstruTech) controlled by software written in Igor Pro (WaveMetrics). Recorded Ca currents were leak subtracted off-line (P/4 protocol). Analysis was performed in Igor Pro. Differences between samples were assessed for significance using a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (called Wilcoxon test, below) for paired samples and a Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney two-sample rank test (called Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, below) for unpaired data. Significance was taken as p < 0.05. Data are illustrated as means ± SEM.
Imaging a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator.
RBs were recorded with pipette solutions containing the Ca2+-insensitive fluorescent tracer Alexa 594 hydrazide (0.02–0.1 mm); the low-affinity fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4FF (0.1 mm); and a nonfluorescent, high-affinity Ca2+ chelator (1 mm BAPTA or 0.5–10 mm EGTA). Imaging of Fluo-4FF signals was performed using either two-photon laser-scanning microscopy (2PLSM) or a high-speed camera and epifluorescence imaging. For the former, dyes were excited simultaneously using a pulsed infrared laser (Chameleon; Coherent) tuned to a 910 nm excitation wavelength, and emitted light was passed through a series of dichroic mirrors and filters (to separate Fluo-4FF and Alexa 594 fluorescence) and collected by GaAsP photomultipliers (Thorlabs). Collected data were analyzed using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012). For the latter, illumination for epifluorescence was performed using an X-Cite 120Q lamp (EXFO) with a 488 nm bandpass excitation filter set for imaging Fluo-4FF fluorescence or 590 bandpass filter set for imaging Alexa 594. Images were acquired at 90 Hz for 5 s with Andor iXon camera controlled by a Shutter driver VCM-D1 with 40× 0.80 NA water-immersion objective (Axioskop 2 FS plus microscope). Image stacks (16-bit TIFF files) were imported and analyzed using MetaMorph software.
Electron microscopic analysis.
A previously published dataset acquired using scanning block-face electron microscopy (SBEM) was analyzed (retina k0563; Briggman et al., 2011). Voxel dimensions were 12 × 12 × 25 nm (x, y, and z, respectively). RB terminals were identified as large, vesicle-containing structures within the innermost portion of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Presynaptic ribbons were identified as electron-dense structures surrounded by a halo of vesicles in the presynaptic portion of dyad synapses, and postsynaptic AII and A17 amacrine cells were identified in all cases. A17s made clear reciprocal synapses with RB terminals, and AIIs' dendrites were highly branched and contacted several adjacent RB terminals multiple times (Dacheux and Raviola, 1986; Raviola and Dacheux, 1987; Strettoi et al., 1990; Strettoi et al., 1992). Segmentation of identified RBs and AIIs was performed using ITK-SNAP (www.itksnap.org; Yushkevich et al., 2006), and surface meshes of reconstructed cells were assembled and rendered using ParaView, an open-source software package developed by Kitware and Sandia National Laboratories (www.paraview.org). The dimensions of ribbons were assessed using ParaView, and we measured a line drawn between the centers of neighboring ribbons to assess the spacing between ribbons. Here, we made the assumption, validated by observation of >200 ribbons, that lines drawn between nearest neighbors would not cross either the plasma membrane or mitochondria. RB terminal varicosity volumes were estimated by assuming that varicosities were approximately ellipsoid and by measuring the x-, y-, and z-axes intersecting the varicosities' centers (volume = 4/3*π*0.5*xyz).
Modeling intraterminal [Ca2+].
Changes in axon terminal [Ca2+] were simulated using CalC (http://web.njit.edu/∼matveev; Matveev et al., 2002). The terminal varicosity was taken to be a cube with a volume of 8 μm3 based on EM measurements. The terminal contained seven AZs (i.e., ribbons), with five sides of the cube containing one AZ and one side of the cube containing two AZs spaced 500 nm apart. AZs were modeled as point sources of Ca2+, and each AZ generated a Ca2+ flux equivalent to the current flowing through 2–5 Ca channels, each with a conductance (g) of 1.5 pS, the estimated single-channel conductance with external [Ca2+] = 1.1 mm (Jarsky et al., 2010). The initial ECa2+ was +130 mV, assuming internal resting [Ca2+] = 50 nm (Wan et al., 2010, 2012), and Erev was updated with each time step (optimized by the CalC simulator) based on the calculated internal [Ca2+]. Thus, the Ca current at any VM was given as follows: The center of the cube contained a mitochondrion approximated as a 1 μm3 cube (based on our determination that mitochondria occupied ∼12% of the varicosity volume). The remaining cube volume was filled with buffers EGTA, BAPTA, and Fluo4-FF at varying concentrations, and reaction schemes were modeled as noted in Table 1. Rate (kon and koff) and diffusion (D) constants (Graydon et al., 2011) were temperature corrected for simulations at physiological temperature assuming Q10 = 2.2 or 1.4, respectively (Santucci and Raghavachari, 2008).
For each time point, we calculated the global internal [Ca2+] as well as [Ca2+] at two points on the intracellular side of the “plasma membrane.” One of these points was on a cube face containing one AZ and was 250 nm from that AZ, and the other point was on a cube face containing two AZs and was equidistant (250 nm) from each. Simulations were run on a 600 node cluster running Ubuntu Linux.
Results
A delayed component of the EPSC recorded in AII amacrine cells
Exocytosis at sites away from synaptic ribbons (i.e., ectopic release) has been observed in isolated goldfish Mb1 bipolar cells by imaging vesicles labeled with FM1–43 following strong stimulation (Zenisek et al., 2003; Midorikawa et al., 2007; Zenisek, 2008). A limitation of these studies is that imaging alone cannot determine whether this ectopic release is physiologically relevant because the postsynaptic cells have been removed. Moreover, Mb1 bipolar cells represent a class of bipolar cells, unique to a subset of teleosts, with unusually large synaptic terminals and large calcium currents (Ishida et al., 1980; Heidelberger and Matthews, 1992; Tachibana et al., 1993), and it is unclear whether their behavior is representative of bipolar cells generally. Therefore, we turned to the mouse retinal slice preparation to determine whether ectopic release from RBs could be detected in AII amacrine cells by recording from synaptically coupled RBs and AIIs (Singer and Diamond, 2003).
Depolarization of an RB to −10 mV for 1–2 s evoked an EPSC that exhibited a slowly developing and decaying component in addition to the transient and sustained components described previously (Singer and Diamond, 2003; Fig. 1A). With presynaptic pipette solutions containing 2 mm EGTA or 1–2 mm BAPTA to approximate the endogenous buffer capacity of these neurons (Burrone et al., 2002; Singer and Diamond, 2003), this delayed EPSC first appeared after ∼100 ms of stimulation (the length of the longest depolarizing steps used in most published studies of transmission at this synapse) and resembled a delayed component of the EPSC that was observed, but not studied, in a previous study of synaptic transmission that used sustained depolarizations of the RB (Jarsky et al., 2011).
Both the transient and delayed components of the EPSC reflected Ca2+-dependent synaptic transmission at the synapses between the recorded RBs and AIIs: the entire EPSC was eliminated by GYKI 52466 (25 μm; n = 5), which blocks postsynaptic AMPARs, and by Cd2+ (200 μm; n = 4), which inhibits presynaptic Ca channels (Fig. 1A,B). These observations are consistent with the finding that Ca2+-dependent synaptic transmission at the RB-AII synapse is mediated by AMPARs exclusively (Singer and Diamond, 2003) and suggest that delayed release of glutamate activates synaptic AMPARs on AIIs.
Because AIIs are coupled electrically by gap junctions (Demb and Singer, 2012), we considered the possibility that the delayed component of the EPSC was a gap junction-mediated current arising from synaptically released glutamate acting on AMPARs on AIIs coupled to the recorded AII. To test this idea, we examined the effect of meclofenamic acid (MFA; 200 μm), a gap junction antagonist, on the evoked EPSCs. Control experiments demonstrated that MFA blocked electrical coupling between AIIs (Figure 1C1; Veruki and Hartveit, 2009). Meclofenamic acid did not affect the EPSCs (n = 5), indicating that the EPSCs reflected direct synaptic inputs to the recorded AIIs (Fig. 1C2).
Delayed release involves a unique vesicle pool and does not require functional presynaptic ribbons
It is notable that the waveform of the recorded EPSCs—the initial transient component followed by a delayed component—resembled the time course of transmitter release from dissociated Mb1 neurons observed by recording glutamate-evoked currents from reporter cells (Sakaba et al., 1997; von Gersdorff et al., 1998). It was suggested that the slowly developing component of glutamate release from Mb1 terminals reflected exocytosis of a recently mobilized vesicle pool distinct from the readily releasable vesicle pool (RRP; Sakaba et al., 1997). Therefore, we examined whether delayed release drew upon the RRP in RB terminals. To do this, we performed a cross-depletion experiment: delayed release was evoked with a voltage step of 1 s to −10 mV, and on alternate trials, this step was preceded by 50 ms by a voltage step of 10 ms to −10 mV (Fig. 2A; n = 8 paired recordings). This brief prepulse did not evoke delayed release and was sufficient to deplete the RRP (Singer and Diamond, 2006). Predictably, the prepulse significantly reduced the amplitude and integral of the transient component of the EPSC as summarized in Figure 2B (p = 0.007 by Wilcoxon test). It, however, had no effect on the delayed component (p = 0.3 by Wilcoxon test).
In goldfish Mb1 terminals, release from a secondary vesicle pool is potentiated by PKC activation (Minami et al., 1998). Therefore, we examined the effects of the PKC activator phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA; 200 nm) on delayed release and found that it failed to modulate either the transient or the delayed components of the EPSC (Fig. 2C): the ratio of the transient to the delayed current in the experimental condition normalized to that in the control condition was 1.16 ± 0.1 (n = 4; p = 0.09 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test).
Because the RRP comprises vesicles attached to presynaptic ribbons (Snellman et al., 2011), we hypothesized that delayed release, which does not involve exocytosis from the RRP, arose from sites away from the ribbons. To test this hypothesis, we photo-damaged the ribbons using fluorophore-assisted light inactivation (FALI; Jay, 1988; Snellman et al., 2011; Mehta et al., 2013) and examined the effect on evoked delayed release. Recorded RBs were filled with a fluorescein-conjugated peptide that binds to the synaptic ribbon protein, Ribeye (Zenisek et al., 2004). Presynaptic pipettes contained either 0.5 mm or 2 mm EGTA. After an equilibration period of 5 min, the retinal slice was subjected to bright illumination that generated local damage to the ribbon. After illumination, RBs were depolarized briefly (−10 mV, 3 × 30 ms at 10 s intervals) to deplete the cycling RRP.
Consistent with previous results (Snellman et al., 2011; Mehta et al., 2013), FALI dramatically reduced transient EPSCs evoked after the cycling RRP was depleted, and the exocytosis giving rise to the transient EPSCs never recovered (the integral of the first 10 ms of the EPSC was reduced by 83% for 0.5 mm EGTA and by 94.2% for 2 mm EGTA; Fig. 2D). Delayed release, however, was still prominent, albeit reduced, after FALI: the integral of the remainder of the EPSC was reduced by 42.9% for 0.5 mm EGTA and by 72.9% for 2 mm EGTA (Fig. 2D). Thus, it would seem that on the order of 25–50% of delayed release was mediated by a mechanism that does not require functional synaptic ribbons. Because some ribbon function remained after FALI (i.e., the transient EPSC was not eliminated completely), we believe that the contribution of ribbon-independent exocytosis to the delayed EPSC was likely at the lower end of this range.
To summarize the relative effects of FALI on the transient and delayed components of the EPSC, we plotted the ratio of the charge of the transient to the sustained component before and after FALI (Fig. 2E). The ratio was reduced significantly in cells loaded with 0.5 mm EGTA (p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; n = 10 control and 5 FALI pairs) or 2 mm EGTA (p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; n = 10 control and 5 FALI pairs). Control experiments performed in other recorded pairs confirmed that illumination of RBs that were not dialyzed with peptide-containing solution did not affect EPSCs recorded in AIIs (Snellman et al., 2011; Mehta et al., 2013).
Given the slow time course of delayed release and the relatively smooth appearance of delayed EPSCs (i.e., identifiable, fast synaptic currents generally were not observed riding on top of the slow inward current), we thought it important to confirm that the delayed EPSC did not reflect nonvesicular glutamate release. Glutamate transporters (Schwartz, 2002), TREK K channels, and Best1 Cl channels (Woo et al., 2012) have been shown to mediate nonvesicular glutamate release. Here, we found that delayed EPSCs were not affected by the glutamate transporter antagonist TBOA (100 μm; Fig. 3A; n = 12 pairs and p = 0.4 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test) or by the niflumic acid (100 μm), which generally was present in our external recording solution (see Materials and Methods) and which blocks TREK-mediated and Best1-mediated glutamate release.
The timing of delayed release is [Ca2+]-dependent
The preceding experimental observations lead to the conclusion that delayed release reflects exocytosis of vesicles from sites other than those at the base of the synaptic ribbon. Because most or all of the Ca channels at bipolar cell synapses are located on the presynaptic membrane at the base of the ribbon (Morgans et al., 2001; Berntson and Morgans, 2003; Zenisek et al., 2003, 2004), it would seem, then, that delayed release occurs at ectopic sites that are some distance from Ca channels. To eliminate the possibility that Ca2+ released from internal stores evoked delayed release, we examined the effects of thapsigargin (a sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor; bath applied), cyclosporin A (a mitochondrial transition pore blocker; bath applied), and adenophostin A (an IP3R agonist; included in the recording pipette) on the EPSCs. We found that none affected delayed release significantly (Fig. 3B–D; for thapsigargin, n = 5 pairs and p = 0.9 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; for cyclosporine A, n = 5 pairs and p = 0.8 by Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test; for adenophostin A, n = 6 pairs and p = 0.09 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test). Therefore, it appears that delayed release is evoked solely by Ca2+ influx through Ca channels proximate to the synaptic ribbon; we, however, cannot exclude the possibility of minor contributions from extrasynaptic Ca2+ channels.
To examine the [Ca2+] dependence of delayed release, we performed two experimental manipulations that altered either Ca2+ accumulation within or Ca2+ influx into the RB axon terminals. The intracellular buffer capacity of the RB terminal was altered to vary the magnitude of the intracellular [Ca2+] change. We observed that as [EGTA] was increased from 0.5 to 10 mm, or as [BAPTA] was increased from 1 to 2 mm, the onset of the delayed EPSCs evoked by voltage steps to −10 mV increased (Fig. 4A; differences between all groups are statistically significant; p < 0.005 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test). Varying [EGTA] or [BAPTA] had no effect on the amplitudes of the transient components of the EPSCs (Singer and Diamond, 2003); this is consistent with previous experimental observations and with both buffers' Ca2+-binding kinetics being too slow to affect [Ca2+] within 20–50 nm of Ca channels, the estimated distance between Ca channels and vesicles in the RRP (Naraghi and Neher, 1997; Neher, 1998; Singer and Diamond, 2003; Jarsky et al., 2010).
Next, we evoked delayed release with presynaptic voltage steps to varying potentials (−51 to −39 mV). We observed that the onset of the delayed EPSC became faster with increasing depolarization (Fig. 4B1; p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon test), indicating that increasing the number of open Ca channels sped delayed exocytosis. Additionally, this experiment demonstrated that delayed release was evoked at potentials within the physiological operating ranges of RBs (Berntson and Taylor, 2000; Euler and Masland, 2000; Jarsky et al., 2011).
Finally, we recorded from RBs in the perforated-patch configuration to avoid perturbing the endogenous buffer (Fig. 4B2). We found that the delayed EPSCs exhibited time courses and presynaptic voltage dependence similar to those evoked when the presynaptic terminal contained 1–2 mm EGTA or BAPTA, consistent with the finding that the endogenous buffer capacity of bipolar cell terminals is well approximated by 1 mm BAPTA (Burrone et al., 2002; Singer and Diamond, 2003).
Nonlinear [Ca2+] changes in RB terminals
The notion that delayed release occurs at sites away from Ca channels is supported as well by our observation that the time course of delayed release was similar in the presence of either EGTA or BAPTA (1–2 mm; Fig. 4). As both buffers have similar KD despite binding kinetics that differ by 150-fold, buffer capacity rather than buffer kinetics appears to govern delayed release (Naraghi and Neher, 1997; Neher, 1998). Thus, it is possible that the appearance of delayed release might have reflected local Ca2+ buffer saturation.
We tested this idea experimentally using 2PLSM to image a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator introduced into RB terminals. We used the low-affinity (KD = 9.7 μm) Ca2+ indicator Fluo4-FF (100 μm) to monitor Ca2+ changes in the terminals of RBs filled with an internal solution that included 1 mm BAPTA. The effective buffering power of Fluo4-FF is insignificant here given that BAPTA is 10 times more concentrated than Fluo-4FF and has an affinity for Ca2+ that is >50 times higher than that of Fluo-4FF (Naraghi and Neher, 1997; Neher, 1998).
When RBs were depolarized to −10 mV for 2 s, Fluo4-FF fluorescence increased nonlinearly over time (frames acquired at 48–60 Hz; every four to six frames were averaged to reduce noise, giving an effective rate of 8–15 Hz and an interframe interval of 66–125 ms). Initially, it rose quite slowly, but after a few hundred milliseconds, it changed quite rapidly increasing >10-fold during the depolarization (Fig. 5A–C). Presynaptic depolarization to −45 mV evoked similar, but smaller changes in Fluo-4FF fluorescence after a longer delay to the rapid rise: the delay was 179 ± 11 ms for steps to −10 mV and 264 ± 11 ms for steps to −45 mV (n = 35 observations from n = 14 cells; p < 0.007 by Wilcoxon test. Changes in Fluo-4FF fluorescence evoked by steps to −10 mV were, on average, 2.7 ± 0.2-fold higher than those evoked by steps to −45 mV (Fig. 5; n = 35 observations from n = 14 cells; p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon test). The fact that a low-affinity indicator generated large fluorescence signals indicated that [Ca2+] within the axon terminals rose globally and significantly—by 10- to 20-fold, assuming that we are observing the linear part of the Ca2+–Fluo-4FF binding relationship, at which the slope is 1 (Pologruto et al., 2004)—even in the presence of a high concentration of a strong buffer. The delayed time course of the change in Fluo-4FF fluorescence suggests that the buffer capacities of the terminals were saturated, even at physiological potentials, before Ca2+ began to bind to Fluo-4FF.
In some instances, it appeared as though the fluorescence signal plateaued before the end of the depolarization. Though this might reflect saturation of the indicator, we believe it is more likely that [Ca2+] within the terminal reached a steady-state concentration (see Ca2+ diffusion modeling and Fig. 8, below). We favor the latter possibility because (1) the KD of Fluo-4FF is 9.7 μm, so saturation would require unreasonably high [Ca2+] and (2) the maximal ΔF/F0 is only ∼20. Assuming a resting [Ca2+] of 50–100 nm (Wan et al., 2010, 2012), only 1% of the indicator would be bound at rest, and 10-fold or 20-fold increases in fluorescence still would be comfortably in the indicator's linear range (Pologruto et al., 2004).
As well, we noted that fluorescence changes were not uniform throughout the axon terminal structures. The RB axon terminal comprises a few distinct varicosities linked by branches of the axon, and Figure 5A shows the relative fluorescence changes (ΔF/F0) measured in individual varicosities and branches. Notably, the trial-to-trial timing of the nonlinear rise in Fluo4-FF fluorescence was consistent within individual varicosities but varied considerably between varicosities, even within the same cell (Fig. 5B,C). Thus, it would seem that there is significant heterogeneity in Ca2+ influx between RB axon terminal compartments.
To examine at higher resolution the timing of the Fluo-4FF signal, we varied the concentration of nonfluorescent Ca2+ buffer (EGTA 0.5–10 mm) and imaged changes in indicator fluorescence using a fast CCD camera (frame rate = 90 Hz; interframe interval = 11 ms; Fig. 5D). As illustrated in Figure 5, D and E, 2 s voltage steps to −10 mV (EGTA 2 mm; n = 32 varicosities from n = 17 cells) elicited changes in Fluo-4FF fluorescence that were similar to those observed previously (Fig. 5B). The timing of the fluorescence change varied between RBs and between varicosities within a single RB (Fig. 5E) and with EGTA concentration (Fig. 5F). In total, these results support the conclusion that local buffer saturation arising from sustained Ca2+ influx permits [Ca2+] within RB terminals to rise significantly. It is particularly notable that the onset of buffer saturation revealed by the rise in Fluo-4FF fluorescence corresponds closely to the onset of the delayed EPSC (Figs. 4, 5F).
Anatomical analyses of RB terminals
Together, the experiments described above support the hypothesis that delayed EPSCs arise after a global change in [Ca2+] following saturation of the terminals' buffer capacities evoked exocytosis of vesicles independent from synaptic ribbons. To determine whether the structure of the RB-AII synapse supports this hypothesis, we examined in detail the presynaptic organization of RB ribbon synapses by EM reconstruction of five RB axon terminals identified in a published dataset acquired using SBEM (retina k0563; Briggman et al., 2011). Briefly, RB terminals were identified as large, vesicle-filled processes in the inner IPL; synaptic ribbons within these terminals were visualized and their position as the presynaptic elements in dyad synapses was confirmed (Fig. 6A). One of the two postsynaptic processes was easily identifiable as belonging to an A17 amacrine cell, which makes a reciprocal inhibitory synapse onto the RB, making the other an AII dendrite (Dacheux and Raviola, 1986; Raviola and Dacheux, 1987). Figure 7 illustrates in detail the morphology of an RB varicosity and its postsynaptic elements.
The five reconstructed RB axon terminals are illustrated in Figure 6B. Ribbons were found within terminal varicosities, within the axonal terminal branches linking these varicosities, and within the main axon itself (Fig. 6C; Lauritzen et al., 2013; Tsukamoto and Omi, 2013). On average, a single RB axon terminal structure contained 53 ribbons (RBs 1–5 contained 65, 53, 35, 62, and 48 ribbons, respectively; mean ± SD = 53 ± 12 ribbons); this is close to the 55 ribbons per RB reported in a recently published study (Tsukamoto and Omi, 2013) and significantly higher than previous estimates of ∼40 ribbons per RB taken from EM reconstruction (Tsukamoto et al., 2001) and fluorescence microscopy (Singer et al., 2004).
The average ribbon length was 261 ± 75 nm (mean ± SD; n = 234 ribbons). We measured the distances between ribbons (taken as the center-to-center distance between a ribbon and its nearest neighbor). Inter-ribbon distances fell within a skewed, unimodal distribution that did not vary between cells: 50% of the ribbons were within 678 nm of their nearest neighbors, and 30% of the ribbons were within 500 nm of another ribbon (Fig. 6D). Because the inter-ribbon distances were measured center to center, the minimum distance between two ribbons is shorter than reported.
So that we could understand the structural basis of the heterogeneous [Ca2+] changes that we observed by imaging Fluo-4FF, we examined the terminal varicosities more closely (Fig. 6C). Both the volumes of the varicosities and the number of ribbons within each varied widely. The averaged varicosity volume was 8.7 ± 9.8 μm3, and, on average, a varicosity contained 7 ± 5 presynaptic ribbons (n = 21 distinct varicosities; mean ± SD). It is worth noting that because of fixation-induced swelling of the tissue, these volumes likely differ from those found in vivo. There was not a strong correlation between varicosity volume and ribbon number (Fig. 6E). We reconstructed the mitochondria within a subset of these varicosities and determined that mitochondria within the varicosity occupied 13.0 ± 2.5% of the volume; mitochondrial volume was not correlated with the number of ribbons in a varicosity, and, again, we note that these measurements are likely affected by unavoidable artifacts of chemical fixation (n = 10 varicosities).
Thus, our anatomical analysis indicated that the variability in varicosity volume and in the number of sites for Ca2+ entry into a given volume will cause depolarization-evoked changes in [Ca2+] to vary between varicosities, in keeping with our experimental observations (Fig. 5). Notably, vesicles were found close to the plasma membrane at locations in between ribbons throughout the axon terminal structures. This is illustrated in Figure 6F, in which the vesicles closest to ribbons (the SBEM resolution is insufficient to reveal protein tethers between the vesicles and the ribbons) are colored red and vesicles within ∼36 nm —a vesicle's diameter—of the plasma membrane and but not at ribbons are colored yellow. These yellow vesicles were apposed to the dendrites of AIIs that were postsynaptic to the terminal (Fig. 6F), suggesting that Ca2+ that reached these sites could encounter release-competent vesicles. The distribution of vesicles in an RB terminal varicosity relative to postsynaptic AIIs is illustrated as well in Figure 7 and in Movie 1, which display the anatomy of the RB terminal in more detail. We did not observe any larger structures like endosomes or lysosomes that would be indicative of compound vesicle fusion or another unconventional mode of synaptic transmission.
Estimating [Ca2+] changes evoked by presynaptic depolarization
To estimate how delayed release was related to intraterminal [Ca2+], we simulated using CalC (http://www.calciumcalculator.org; Matveev et al., 2002) the changes in [Ca2+] arising during our experiments. Briefly (see Materials and Methods for details), a presynaptic varicosity was modeled as a cube, 2 μm on each side (for a total volume of 8 μm3, close to the measured average varicosity volume; Fig. 6). The varicosity's mitochondria were modeled as a cube, 1 μm on each side, so that the mitochondrial volume was 12.5% of the total volume in keeping with our anatomical measurements (Fig. 8A). The cube representing the varicosity was filled with varying concentrations of diffusible buffers (including, in some cases, Fluo-4FF). Seven sites of Ca2+ entry, corresponding to the average number of presynaptic ribbons, were distributed over the surface, and Ca2+ influx at each entry site corresponded to the flux through two to five open Ca2+ channels, depending on the presynaptic VM (Jarsky et al., 2010). This range of open channels (2.5-fold variation) is in keeping with our observation that Fluo-4FF signals were 2.7 times larger at VM = −10 mV than at VM = −45 mV (Fig. 5A–C).
We began by simulating the change in [Ca2+] that would arise during a 2 s depolarization to −10 mV with 1 mm BAPTA and 0.1 mm Fluo4-FF present. We assumed that at this presynaptic potential, five Ca channels opened at each AZ (Jarsky et al., 2010). Because intraterminal [Ca2+] in the RB terminal appears to be controlled largely by a plasma membrane ATPase, likely PCMA2 (Krizaj et al., 2002; Wan et al., 2012), we included a high-affinity Ca2+ extrusion mechanism. The efficiency of the ATPase was set to provide for an ∼3-fold difference in Ca2+-bound Fluo4-FF between simulations in which two or five Ca channels opened, in keeping with the 2.7-fold variations observed in our Fluo4-FF imaging (Figs. 5A–C, 8B). The simulated changes in global [Ca2+] were not affected significantly by the addition of Fluo-4FF, mimicking our fluorescence imaging experiments (Figs. 5, 8C1).
As well, we estimated the [Ca2+] on various interior surfaces (corresponding to the cytoplasmic side of the presynaptic membrane) and found that mitochondria do not appear to present significant barriers to Ca2+ diffusion and that global [Ca2+] was an accurate representation of [Ca2+] near individual AZs (Fig. 8C2). We did not attempt to model diffusion barriers that were closer to the sites of Ca2+ entry because such barriers were not observed anatomically (Fig. 6). Synaptic ribbons in RB axon terminals extended ∼250 nm into the cytoplasm from the plasma membrane, making it impossible for mitochondria to be located any closer to the plasma membrane at presynaptic AZs. Additionally, although a role for synaptic ribbons themselves as diffusion barriers has been proposed for auditory hair cells, in which the ribbons are spheroids ∼200 nm in diameter (Graydon et al., 2011), it is extremely unlikely that synaptic ribbons in RB terminals serve as significant diffusion barriers: RB axon terminal synaptic ribbons are only 36–48 nm wide (3–4 pixels in our images).
Next, we simulated the changes in [Ca2+] that would arise during 2 s depolarizations to −10 mV for the various exogenous buffer concentrations examined experimentally (0.1–2 mm BAPTA and 0.5–10 mm EGTA; Fig. 8D). Initially, global [Ca2+] rose slowly, and then after a delay that increased with increasing buffer capacity, jumped rapidly to a plateau of ∼60 μm for all but the highest [buffer] conditions. The initial increase in global [Ca2+] occurred more rapidly with EGTA than with BAPTA because of BAPTA's faster binding of Ca2+ (Fig. 8D). These results indicate that Ca2+ influx into the RB terminal can saturate mobile Ca2+ buffers and elevate [Ca2+] into the 1–10 μm range that is thought to be sufficient to sustain exocytosis (Jarsky et al., 2010; see Rieke and Schwartz, 1996; Thoreson et al., 2004 for a discussion of photoreceptor ribbon synapses).
Next, we simulated the changes in global [Ca2+] that would arise as presynaptic membrane potential was varied through the physiological range and increasing numbers of channels opened at each AZ (Fig. 5). With 1 mm BAPTA in the simulated terminal, Ca2+ influx through two to five channels per AZ was simulated, with two channels per AZ open at −45 mV and three to five channels per AZ open at −10 mV, in keeping with published estimates (Jarsky et al., 2010; Fig. 8E). Examination of the simulated changes in global [Ca2+] revealed that the opening of only three channels per AZ (or a Ca current of ∼2–3 pA in a compartment with a volume of 8 μm3) was sufficient to elevate [Ca2+] to the low micromolar levels sufficient to evoke exocytosis in <500 ms. Together with the results of our simulations of PMCA efficiency, this result indicates that global [Ca2+] within the axon terminal structure is capable of rising quite quickly as a result of buffer saturation, even when relatively few channels open and when PMCA activity is substantial.
Of course, neither BAPTA nor EGTA is the endogenous buffer found in RBs in situ. Though the native buffer(s) in RBs is/are not known, calcium-binding protein (CaBP) 5 is likely to be a major one: it is expressed in RBs (Rieke et al., 2008), and RBs do not exhibit immunoreactivity for other well known Ca2+ buffers like parvalbumin, calretinin, and calbindin (Ghosh et al., 2004; Wässle et al., 2009). The kinetics of Ca2+ binding to CaBP5 are not characterized; those of the closely related protein, CaBP1, however, have been examined (Wingard et al., 2005). CaBP1 (like CaBP5) contains four Ca2+-binding, EF-hand domains, EF1–4 (Haeseleer et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2002). EF3–4 bind Ca2+ with weak cooperativity (Hill coefficient = 1.3) with a combined KD estimated to be 2.5 μm; EF1 has a much higher KD for Ca2+ binding (>100 μm), and Ca2+ does not bind detectably to EF2 (Wingard et al., 2005). Therefore, we simulated Ca2+ diffusion buffered by a simplified approximation of the endogenous Ca2+ buffer: a molecule with two independent binding sites, each with KD = 2.5 μm (see Table 1 for details). Thus, 1 mm of this “physiological” buffer molecule will act as 2 mm buffer.
As illustrated in Figure 8F, intraterminal [Ca2+] changes in the presence of this “physiological” buffer at concentrations thought to exist normally in ribbon-containing terminals (Roberts, 1994) were quite similar to those observed in simulations using BAPTA and EGTA. The results of this simulation are consistent with our assertion that delayed release depends primarily on intraterminal buffer capacity (Fig. 2).
Discussion
We identified a slow component of exocytosis from RBs that involved vesicles apart from the ribbon-associated RRP. These vesicles were released following large, global changes in intraterminal [Ca2+] observed by fluorescent indicator imaging. Computational modeling of presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics based on EM reconstruction supported the conclusion that physiologically relevant, ribbon-independent transmission occurs at RB synapses following saturation of endogenous Ca2+ buffers. Similarly, physiologically relevant buffer saturation has been observed at other synapses, e.g., the calyx of Held (Felmy et al., 2003; Habets and Borst, 2006).
Ca channel-release site coupling at ribbon synapses
Presynaptic Ca channels at ribbon synapses are located in the plasma membrane at the base of the ribbon (Roberts et al., 1990; Morgans et al., 2001; Berntson and Morgans, 2003; tom Dieck et al., 2005; Frank et al., 2010). In keeping with the notion that the ribbon serves to tether the RRP close to Ca channels (for review, see Moser et al., 2006; Matthews and Fuchs, 2010; Cho and von Gersdorff, 2012), the opening of single Ca channels in RB terminals controls exocytosis on millisecond timescales (Jarsky et al., 2010). This implies that [Ca2+] changes over spatially restricted “nanodomains” evoke neurotransmission from RBs (Jarsky et al., 2010); the existence of similar nanodomain release sites at other ribbon and conventional synapses also has been inferred (Stanley, 1993; Brandt et al., 2005; Keen and Hudspeth, 2006; Shahrezaei et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008; Bucurenciu et al., 2010; Graydon et al., 2011; Scimemi and Diamond, 2012).
Here, two experimental observations indicated that exocytosis over longer (>100 ms) timescales is regulated by global, rather than local, [Ca2+] changes arising from sustained Ca2+ influx. One, sustained presynaptic depolarizations, even to physiological potentials, evoked delayed EPSCs (Fig. 4). Delayed EPSCs were not dependent upon release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (Fig. 3), and the rates at which they developed varied with presynaptic buffer capacity but were independent of buffer kinetics (Fig. 4). In some respects, then, delayed release from RB terminals resembles a slow component of exocytosis from auditory hair cells, from which slow exocytosis of vesicles not originally associated with the RRP is driven by delayed elevation in [Ca2+] (Schnee et al., 2011). It is uncertain, though, whether slow exocytosis from hair cells contributes to auditory stimulus coding in auditory nerve fibers (Frank et al., 2010).
Two, delayed release persisted after ribbon function was eliminated by FALI (Fig. 2), and it was similar in the presence of fast and slow Ca2+ buffers (BAPTA and EGTA, respectively; Fig. 4). The former suggested that the vesicles underlying the delayed current might undergo exocytosis at sites distinct from ribbon-type AZs, though we cannot eliminate the possibility that a slow mode of exocytosis, driven by global [Ca2+] and unaffected by FALI, occurs at synaptic ribbons. The latter indicated that buffer capacity, not kinetics, governed exocytosis of the responsible vesicles and implied that delayed release was evoked by Ca2+ acting in the RB terminal at some distance from its sites of entry at the base of the ribbon (Naraghi and Neher, 1997; Neher, 1998).
Large, global [Ca2+] changes in RB terminals
Ca channels in RB terminals have low maximal open probabilities, and the endogenous buffer capacities of bipolar cell axon terminals are high (Burrone et al., 2002; Singer and Diamond, 2003; Jarsky et al., 2010). Thus, it would seem that global [Ca2+] changes generated by few open channels per AZ would be minimal. But, imaging of the low-affinity Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4FF indicated that sustained depolarizations, even at physiological potentials, generated intraterminal [Ca2+] sufficient to saturate strong buffers (Fig. 5): 10- to 20-fold increases in Fluo-4FF fluorescence were observed during prolonged depolarizations; this represents a 10- to 20-fold—or greater—increase in [Ca2+] (Pologruto et al., 2004). Assuming resting [Ca2+] ≈ 50–100 nm (Wan et al., 2010), such an increase would place intraterminal [Ca2+] in the low micromolar range required for neurotransmitter release from RBs (Jarsky et al., 2010).
Our model supports this interpretation of our observations. Notably, simulated buffer saturation (Fig. 8), the large change in Fluo-4FF fluorescence (Fig. 5), and the onset of delayed release (Fig. 4) developed with similar time courses. This correspondence indicated that a simple model was sufficient to describe the phenomenon at hand. In particular, we did not try to capture Ca2+ diffusion from a varicosity into an axon branch because in a whole RB, Ca2+ influx at AZs both in the varicosities and in the axon branches (Fig. 6) will occur simultaneously, thereby reducing or eliminating [Ca2+] gradients between compartments.
Finally, both numbers of AZs (Fig. 6) and Fluo-4FF signals (Fig. 5) varied between varicosities and did not depend on varicosity size. Thus, it seems possible that signaling from different RB varicosities is heterogeneous and, perhaps, that individual varicosities can signal independently; an evaluation of this idea, however, requires first determining whether different varicosities contact unique postsynaptic AIIs. It is notable, though, that heterogeneity in Ca2+ influx between ribbon-type AZs in cochlear hair cells has been observed and may contribute to differences in postsynaptic fiber responses (Frank et al., 2009).
Implications for understanding the role(s) of synaptic ribbons
The RRP at RB synapses comprises <10 vesicles, and a functional synaptic ribbon is a prerequisite for release from the RRP (Singer and Diamond, 2006; Zhou et al., 2006; Oltedal and Hartveit, 2010; Snellman et al., 2011). In keeping with the ribbon's role as an organizing site for exocytosis of cycling vesicles, capacitance measurements of the functional vesicle pool size at retinal ribbon synapses is correlated closely with the number of ribbon-associated vesicles determined from EM (von Gersdorff et al., 1996; Heidelberger, 1998; Heidelberger et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2006). Thus, it would appear that the vesicles that contribute to synaptic signaling should undergo exocytosis proximate to the ribbons on which they were primed.
Vesicles undergo final priming steps after associating with ribbons (Heidelberger, 1998; Heidelberger et al., 2002). When ribbon function is disrupted by FALI, although vesicles continue to associate with ribbons, synchronized exocytosis evoked by brief voltage steps (<100 ms) is abolished (Snellman et al., 2011). These findings support the notion that exocytosis occurs from the plasma membrane at the bases of the synaptic ribbons.
Here, we found that following FALI and the inhibition of transient EPSCs, delayed EPSCs persisted (Fig. 2). This finding does not eliminate the ribbon as a site of tonic exocytosis at ribbon synapses; indeed, transmission at retinal and cochlear ribbon synapses involves both transient and sustained release that is well described as originating from a single, ribbon-associated RRP (Singer and Diamond, 2006; Frank et al., 2010; Jarsky et al., 2011; Oesch and Diamond, 2011). Rather, we suggest that only the delayed component of the EPSCs reflected exocytosis of vesicles at sites away from ribbons, as has been observed by imaging the fluorescent vesicle marker FM1–43 in isolated teleost and amphibian retinal neurons (Zenisek et al., 2003; Midorikawa et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2013).
We believe that these sites are truly ectopic rather than conventional (i.e., not ribbon) synapses within the RB terminal because RBs have not been found to contain conventional presynaptic AZs (Raviola and Raviola, 1982; Dacheux and Raviola, 1986; Raviola and Dacheux, 1987; Strettoi et al., 1990; Tsukamoto et al., 2001; Tsukamoto and Omi, 2013). Additional evidence for this type of ectopic release comes from an EM study of mammalian rods that found “omega” profiles indicative of exocytosis on the presynaptic membrane away from the ribbon (Zampighi et al., 2011).
Although it is possible that the delayed EPSC arises from exocytosis of ribbon-associated vesicles that are driven into a releasable state by elevated intraterminal [Ca2+], two lines of experimental evidence argue against this being the primary mechanism underlying the phenomenon: (1) depletion of the RRP (presumably ribbon-associated) has no effect on the delayed EPSC (Fig. 2) and (2) the ribbon is fairly small, and most vesicles on it are within ∼200 nm of the plasma membrane, a distance over which BAPTA and EGTA would be expected to affect release differentially because of their different Ca2+ binding rates (Naraghi and Neher, 1997; Neher, 1998).
Together with results from experiments with turtle hair cells (Schnee et al., 2011), salamander photoreceptors (Chen et al., 2013), and goldfish bipolar cells (Midorikawa et al., 2007), our study provides evidence that synaptic ribbons are not required for exocytosis from neurons with ribbon-type presynaptic AZs. Notably, our results add to a growing body of evidence indicating that disruption of the AZ or of the function of proteins resident to it does not eliminate synaptic transmission entirely. For example, knock-outs of piccolo, bassoon, rim1, rim2, cast1, and cast2, proteins found near or within synaptic ribbons or conventional AZs, still exhibit synaptic transmission, albeit in a compromised manner (tom Dieck et al., 2005; Kaeser et al., 2009; Frank et al., 2010; Mukherjee et al., 2010; Han et al., 2011; Kantardzhieva et al., 2012). Interestingly, proteins essential for exocytosis (e.g., SNAREs) are found dispersed throughout the synaptic terminals of photoreceptor and bipolar cell terminals rather than concentrated specifically at synaptic ribbons (Morgans et al., 1996).
Footnotes
We thank J. Jiang for technical support; S. Ali, A. Ayala, P. Ghorbani, C. Hahn, J. Masison, A. Merrihew, N. Park, K. Sistani, and M. Yi for assistance with EM reconstruction; Victor Matveev for his help with CalC; and Greg Sullivan for access to the computing resources of the UMD Particle Astrophysics group. Supported by EY017836 to J.H.S.; by 014990 to D.Z.; and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K.L.B.). S.N. received support from a grant to the University of Maryland from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education Program.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to either of the following: David Zenisek, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, P.O. Box 208026, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8026, david.zenisek{at}yale.edu; or Joshua Singer, Department of Biology, University of Maryland, BPS 1210, College Park, MD 20742, jhsinger{at}umd.edu