Abstract
Genetic and pathological studies link α-synuclein to the etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), but the normal function of this presynaptic protein remains unknown. α-Synuclein, an acidic lipid binding protein, shares high sequence identity with β- and γ-synuclein. Previous studies have implicated synucleins in synaptic vesicle (SV) trafficking, although the precise site of synuclein action continues to be unclear. Here we show, using optical imaging, electron microscopy, and slice electrophysiology, that synucleins are required for the fast kinetics of SV endocytosis. Slowed endocytosis observed in synuclein null cultures can be rescued by individually expressing mouse α-, β-, or γ-synuclein, indicating they are functionally redundant. Through comparisons to dynamin knock-out synapses and biochemical experiments, we suggest that synucleins act at early steps of SV endocytosis. Our results categorize α-synuclein with other familial PD genes known to regulate SV endocytosis, implicating this pathway in PD.
Introduction
Strong genetic evidence links SNCA, the α-synuclein gene, to familial Parkinson's disease (PD; Devine et al., 2011; Houlden and Singleton, 2012). Furthermore, increased expression of α-synuclein is a risk factor for PD (Devine, 2011). α-Synuclein is also the main protein in Lewy bodies, the signature pathology of PD (Spillantini et al., 1997). Hence, α-synuclein is a prime therapeutic target for PD. It is therefore important to elucidate the physiological function of α-synuclein and understand the consequences of lowering α-synuclein levels for therapeutic purposes.
α-Synuclein along with β- and γ-synuclein constitute the synuclein protein family (Chandra, 2009). Synucleins have high sequence identity, especially in the N-terminal regions that bind acidic lipids. Synucleins are natively unfolded in solution, but adopt α-helical conformations on membranes (Chandra et al., 2003; Jao et al., 2004; Ferreon et al., 2009). Through these conformational changes, synucleins can sense and generate membrane curvature (Varkey et al., 2010; Pranke et al., 2011; Mizuno et al., 2012; Westphal and Chandra, 2013). Congruent with these biochemical properties, studies in model organisms have consistently shown that α-synuclein interferes with intracellular vesicle trafficking (Cooper et al., 2006; Scott and Roy, 2012). However, the pathways impacted differ in the various systems, making it difficult to determine the physiological function of α-synuclein. One possible explanation for these discrepancies is that these model systems lack endogenous α-synuclein, and overexpression leads to oligomerization and aberrant subcellular localization.
Synucleins are localized to synaptic vesicles (SVs) at presynaptic termini (Clayton and George, 1999), suggesting that synucleins may regulate the SV cycle. The major steps of the SV cycle include docking, priming, SV exocytosis, endocytosis, and refilling (Sudhof, 2004). Based on their biochemical characteristics, synucleins would be predicted to regulate SV exocytosis or endocytosis, the two steps that require membrane bending. Recently, the notion that α-synuclein promotes SNARE complex assembly during exocytosis has gained prominence (Burré et al., 2010, 2012). However, new biophysical studies question this hypothesis, as native α-synuclein either had no effect on SNARE-mediated vesicle fusion in vitro or regulated fusion by modulating properties of the lipid bilayer (Darios et al., 2010; Ninkina et al., 2012; DeWitt and Rhoades, 2013; Diao et al., 2013). Furthermore, α-synuclein oligomers inhibit SNARE-mediated fusion, indicating that the α-synuclein-SNARE interaction is possibly related to the pathological function of α-synuclein (Larsen et al., 2006; Choi et al., 2013).
In addition to SV exocytosis, previous studies have implied a number of roles for α-synuclein throughout the SV cycle (Bendor et al., 2013), including endocytosis (Ben Gedalya et al., 2009), SV pool size (Cabin et al., 2002), SV mobilization (Nemani et al., 2010), and even trafficking between synapses (Scott and Roy, 2012). Together, the precise synaptic function(s) of synucleins continues to be unclear. Additionally, several of these studies were done using overexpression of human α-synuclein, confusing what effects are related to the pathological versus physiological functions of α-synuclein. Here, we took a loss-of-function approach to elucidate the physiological function of synucleins (Greten-Harrison et al., 2010). We examined SV cycling in synuclein null neurons and show that synucleins preferentially regulate SV endocytosis.
Materials and Methods
Mice.
Generation and characterization of synuclein null (αβγ-Syn−/−) and DynDKO mice have been previously described (Ferguson et al., 2007; Greten-Harrison et al., 2010; Raimondi et al., 2011). DynDKO were a kind gift from Pietro De Camilli, Yale University. Mice were kept in accordance with an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved animal protocol. The breeding strategy for the αβγ-Syn−/− mice used in this study is as described previously (Greten-Harrison et al., 2010). All mice used in this study are on a C57BL/6J background; 2- to 3-month-old mice of either sex were used for the electrophysiology and biochemical experiments. The numbers of animals used are listed in the figure legends.
Live imaging.
vGlut-pHluorin (spH) was transfected (Amaxa) into hippocampal neurons prepared from P1 mouse brains at the time of plating and imaging was done 16–18 d in vitro (DIV). When indicated, we performed cotransfection with pCAGGS or synuclein-cherry-pCAGGS.
Imaging was essentially as described previously (Mani et al., 2007). Neurons were subjected to electrical field stimulation at 20 Hz using a Chamlide stimulation chamber (Live Cell Instrument) and imaged at 25°C in Tyrode's buffer (119 mm NaCl, 2.5 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 2 mm MgCl2, 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 30 mm glucose, 10 mm CNQX, and 50 mm APV) with or without 1 μm bafilomycin A, using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E microscope with a 60× Apo (1.49 NA) objective and an EMCCD iXon 897 (Andor Technologies) camera. For basal recordings, imaging was performed without stimulation in the absence of CNQX and APV. Images were analyzed in ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) by placing circular ROIs on synaptic boutons that were stably in focus and responded throughout all trials. For each individual experiment 50–90 synapses were analyzed, and their fluorescence was averaged over the time. Florescence was expressed as ΔF/F0 (the difference from the initial normalized fluorescence) or as ΔF/F0/Fmax (normalized to the maximum fluorescence after the stimulation). Decay constant (τ) was calculated by fitting a single exponential decay equation using GraphPad Prism.
Cholera toxin labeling.
Primary hippocampal neurons grown on coverslips were labeled with cholera toxin-HRP (CT-HRP; 10 μg/ml) in Tyrode's buffer for 5 min. Subsequently, the coverslips were (1) fixed immediately, (2) stimulated for 2 min by adding high K+ Tyrode's buffer (90 mm KCl) before fixing, or (3) allowed to recover poststimulation in presence of CT-HRP for 10 min before fixing. All incubations were done at 37°C. Fixation was performed for 1 h with 1.2% glutaraldehyde in 66 mm sodium cacodylate. CT–HRP labeling was developed by incubating in 0.1 m ammonium phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 0.4 mg/ml diaminobenzidine and 0.005% H2O2 for 15 min. Postfixation was done for 1 h in 1% OsO4 and1% KFe(CN)6–0.1 m sodium cacodylate. Neurons were stained overnight with 2% uranyl magnesium acetate, then dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations, and embedded in Epon. Samples were processed for imaging by standard procedures. Pictures were captured using a Phillip CM10 transmission electron microscope. Synapses (50–150) were analyzed for each condition and repeated using three independent cultures.
Hippocampal electrophysiology.
Transverse hippocampal slices (400 μm thick) from 3-month-old mice were cut on a DTK-2000 microslicer (Dosaka) in ice-cold cutting solution containing the following (in mm): 215 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 20 glucose, 26 NaHCO3, 1.6 NaH2PO4, 1 CaCl2, 4 MgSO4, and 4 MgCl2. After 10 min of incubation at room temperature, the cutting solution was exchanged for the artificial CSF (ACSF) containing 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 10 glucose, 26 NaHCO3, 1 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, and 1.3 MgSO4. Both cutting and ACSF solutions were saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2, pH 7.4. The slices recovered at room temperature for at least 1.5 h before recording. All experiments were performed at 25°C. Field EPSPs (fEPSPs) were obtained by placing the recording pipette (which contained 1 m NaCl) and the stimulating pipette (which was broken to ∼10 μm, and contained ACSF) in stratum radiatum, ∼200 μm from each other and 150 μm from the slice surface. Depletion/recovery fEPSPs were obtained in the presence of 1.0 Mg2+ and 4 mm Ca2+. Depletion and recovery plots (Fig. 4) were generated by normalizing responses to the peak amplitude of the fEPSP in the depletion train. Depletion data were best fit with a double-exponential function. Recovery data were best fit with a logarithmic function, with the equation y = (ln)mx + b, from which a slope (m) was generated for each slice.
Synaptic protein clustering quantification.
Hippocampal neurons 14–18 DIV were fixed using 4% sucrose, 4% PFA in PBS, pH 7.4. Fixed neurons were permeabilized (1% NP40, 0.5% BSA in PBS, 15 min), then quenched in 50 mm NH4Cl in PBS for 15 min to reduce autofluorescence, and blocked in 10% FBS, 0.5% BSA in PBS to reduce nonspecific binding. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 1 h each, at room temperature. Coverslips were washed in blocking buffer, mounted with Vectashield, and imaged by confocal microscopy, using the same parameters across genotypes. The clustering quantification was done using ImageJ as follows. First, the same threshold intensity was applied to all images and then a mask (area 1 μm2) was used to quantify puncta bigger than 1 μm2. After this processing, average fluorescence puncta size and number in control, DynKO, and αβγ-Syn−/− neurons were measured.
Clathrin-coated vesicle purification.
Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) were purified through a biochemical fractionation of wild-type mouse brains (Maycox et al., 1992; Blondeau et al., 2004).
SV purification and proteomic analysis.
SVs were purified from wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− mice brains (Huttner et al., 1983) and subject to quantitative proteomics (iTRAQ) as described previously (Zhang et al., 2012; Westphal and Chandra, 2013). Proteins whose levels were changed (± 1.5-fold) in αβγ-Syn−/− mice brains were considered further.
Immunoprecipitations.
Wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− synaptosomes were resuspended in cytosolic buffer (25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mm KAc, 2.5 mm MgAc, 1 mm DTT, and dextrose at 1 mg/ml). For unstimulated samples, this buffer was supplemented with Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail 3 (Sigma) at 1:100. Samples were stimulated with 90 mm KCl for 90 s at 37°C as indicated and then lysed with 0.5% Triton X-100. Samples were immunoprecipitated using standard procedures. Antibodies used were pre-immune serum and AP180 LP2D11 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Data analysis.
All analyses were done blind to genotype. Values shown are mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism. Student's two-tailed t test was used to determine statistical significance *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Results
Endocytic deficit in synuclein null neurons
As synucleins are SV-associated proteins, we directly monitored the trafficking of SVs with a pHluorin reporter (spH; Granseth et al., 2006) in dissociated hippocampal neurons from wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− mice. Before stimulation, the fluorescence of spH is quenched due to the acidic pH of the vesicle lumen (Granseth et al., 2006). Evoking exocytosis by electrical stimulation leads to dequenching of the spH signal upon exposure to the extracellular medium, followed by a decay in fluorescence due to ensuing endocytosis and re-acidification of vesicles. First, we stimulated wild-type neurons with sequential applications of 100 action potentials (APs), 300 AP, and 600 AP at 20 Hz (Fig. 1a, blue trace). The time between stimulation was set to 2 min to allow wild-type neurons to return to basal levels of fluorescence. When we used the same protocol to stimulate αβγ-Syn−/− neurons (Fig. 1a, green trace), the time interval was not sufficient for αβγ-Syn−/− neurons to reach steady state. We observed slow spH decay that caused the second and third stimulations to start at a higher level than that for wild-type neurons. We confirmed that this is due to slower kinetics of spH decay by normalizing the peak values of the 100 Hz trace (Fig. 1a, inset). We ruled out that these changes in spH signal are due to altered vesicle re-acidification by measuring its time course in wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− neurons upon a brief exposure to acidic medium (data not shown). We also observed that the peak fluorescence is greater in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons, indicating either enhanced exocytosis, impaired endocytosis, or both. Thus, even with a stimulation of 100 AP (20 Hz), we clearly observe a deficit in recycling kinetics in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons.
We examined if synucleins are regulating SV exocytosis, endocytosis, or both processes during this stimulation paradigm (100 AP, 20 Hz). Since exocytosis and endocytosis occur simultaneously during repetitive stimulation, we used the vesicular H+ATPase blocker, bafilomycin, which inhibits re-acidfication of SVs (Mani et al., 2007) to separate these processes. In the presence of bafilomycin, spH imaging monitors exocytosis only, and the difference in fluorescence intensity in the absence and presence of bafilomycin reflects the magnitude of endocytosis during stimulation (Fig. 1b–e). Figure 1, b–c, shows the average traces of wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− neurons in the presence and absence of bafilomycin. The calculated exocytic rate constant for wild-type (0.053 ± 0.008 ΔF/s) and αβγ-Syn−/− (0.049 ± 0.003 ΔF/s) neurons were similar (Fig. 1d–f). However, the endocytic rate for αβγ-Syn−/− neurons was markedly decreased (0.012 ± 0.002 ΔF/s for αβγ-Syn−/− vs 0.024 ± 0.006 ΔF/s for wild-type; p < 0.05; Fig. 1d–e,g). We also measured the total SV pool size by the total fluorescence reached upon alkalizing with NH4Cl and determined they were the same for both genotypes (Fig. 1h). Thus, synucleins regulate endocytosis during repetitive activity.
Post stimulus, fast exocytosis ends but compensatory endocytosis continues until a steady state of exocytosis–endocytosis is reached, as can be seen for wild-type neurons (Fig. 2a, blue symbols). To compare the rate of endocytosis after stimulation, we normalized the maximum fluorescence upon stimulation. The average time constant (τ) of the poststimulus fluorescence decay in wild-type neurons was 16.8 ± 1.4 s, consistent with previously published results (Fig. 2a; Granseth et al., 2006; Ferguson et al., 2007; Mani et al., 2007; Kwon and Chapman, 2011; Raimondi et al., 2011). However, τ values in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons were significantly greater (τ = 29.4 ± 2.7 s; p < 0.001), indicating slower SV endocytosis (Fig. 2a). A direct comparison of the endocytic time constants (τ) for wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− neurons is possible given the comparable fluorescence rise constant and the total SV pool size in both genotypes (Fig. 1f,h). Together, these findings indicate that endocytosis is impaired both during and after stimulation in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons.
Importantly, the observed defect in the rate of endocytosis was rescued by individually expressing members of the synuclein family (Fig. 2b; α-Syn τ = 20.4 ± 2.3 s, β-Syn τ = 20.0 ± 1.3 s, γ-Syn τ = 21.2 ± 2.6 s), suggesting they are functionally redundant, consistent with their high degree of sequence identity. Therefore, the synuclein protein family is needed to maintain the proper kinetics of endocytosis indicating that synucleins are regulatory endocytic proteins.
As an alternate approach to assess SV endocytosis, we labeled the plasma membrane of hippocampal neurons with CT-HRP and followed its internalization as a result of SV endocytosis by electron microscopy (Deák et al., 2004; Ferguson et al., 2007). An advantage of this approach is that it can distinguish different modes of SV endocytosis—clathrin-mediated endocytosis versus bulk endocytosis. Identification of which of these endocytic pathways are regulated by synucleins is informative to pinpoint the molecular steps regulated by these proteins. Wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− hippocampal cultures were treated with CT-HRP and subjected to the denoted stimulation and recovery protocol (Fig. 3a,b). First, we quantified the number of labeled endosomes as a measure of bulk endocytosis and found no significant difference (Fig. 3c), suggesting that synucleins only affect clathrin-mediated endocytosis, which has been validated as the physiologically relevant mode of retrieval in hippocampal synapses (Granseth et al., 2006; Balaji and Ryan, 2007). Ultrastructural quantification confirmed that αβγ-Syn−/− synapses have fewer CT-HRP-labeled SVs than wild-type synapses, both during (23.4%; p < 0.05) and after stimulation (41.8%; p < 0.001; Fig. 3d), consistent with the spH imaging data (Figs. 1, 2). αβγ-Syn−/− synapses also show a modest, albeit significant, decrease in labeled SVs at rest (wild-type 5.9 ± 0.5 vs αβγ-Syn−/− 3.5 ± 0.35; Fig. 3d). Analyses of mouse mutants for well established endocytic proteins also show a similar decrease in CT-HRP-labeled vesicles both at rest and upon stimulation (Ferguson et al., 2007; Milosevic et al., 2011), reinforcing the notion that synucleins share a similar function. We conclude that synucleins are required for efficient clathrin-mediated SV endocytosis during as well as after synaptic activity. This agrees with data from cell lines where α-synuclein was shown to promote receptor-mediated endocytosis, for example, of the transferrin receptor (Ben Gedalya et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2011; Kisos et al., 2014), a process which shares the same regulatory proteins and basic mechanisms of SV endocytosis.
Electrophysiological properties of synuclein null brains
What is the physiological significance of the endocytic defects in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons? To answer this question, we first evaluated the ability of wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− neurons to maintain neurotransmitter release upon sustained presynaptic activity (Chandra et al., 2004; Greten-Harrison et al., 2010). In acute hippocampal slices, Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapses were activated with a 300 pulse train (15 Hz; see Materials and Methods), resulting in nominally complete depression of synaptic transmission, a phenomenon likely due to depletion of SVs (Fig. 4a). Both the initial and secondary rates of depletion were faster in αβγ-Syn−/− than in wild-type mice (τ1 = 0.81 ± 0.17 vs 1.7 ± 0.15 s; p < 0.001; τ2 = 3.9 ± 0.3 v 5.8 ± 0.7 s; p < 0.05; Fig. 4a,b). This effect was small but significant, consistent with our observations that deletion of synucleins does not completely block SV endocytosis, but slows the process. To test whether αβγ-Syn−/− neurons also show deficits in recovery, the depletion train was immediately followed by a 20 pulse (2 Hz) stimulation paradigm. Here we observed that the initial rate of return toward baseline was slower in αβγ-Syn−/− than wild-type mice (wild-type, 1.8 ± 0.06, αβγ-Syn−/−, 1.3 ± 0.04; p < 0.0001; Fig. 4c,d). The time constant of the recovery phase was in αβγ-Syn−/− than in wild-type mice (6.3 ± 0.9 s vs 1.8 ± 0.06 s; p < 0.0001; Fig. 4c,d). Thus, as previously reported for loss-of-function mutants of endophilin, dynamin, and synaptojanin (Cremona et al., 1999; Ferguson et al., 2007; Mani et al., 2007; Milosevic et al., 2011), loss of synucleins also slows down recovery from depletion. It is noteworthy that synuclein single knock-outs (KOs) do not exhibit synaptic depression or impaired recovery (Chandra et al., 2004), supporting the conclusion that synucleins are functionally redundant and compensate for each other in SV endocytosis
Comparison of αβγ-Syn KO and dynamin 1, 3 KO synapses
Clathrin-mediated SV endocytosis is temporally organized into distinct steps—cargo recruitment by endocytic adaptors, membrane bending, bud invagination, bud neck scission by dynamins to generate a free CCV, and uncoating to release a nascent SV (Dittman and Ryan, 2009; Saheki and De Camilli, 2012). The sequential recruitment of endocytic proteins allows for vectorial occurrence of these reactions. Dynamin 1, 3 KO (DynDKO) synapses are arrested at the fission step and accumulate clathrin pits, many on tree-like membrane invaginations (Ferguson et al., 2007; Raimondi et al., 2011). These are detectable by immunofluorescence as clusters of endocytic proteins (Fig. 5a). To determine whether α-synuclein behaves similar to well characterized endocytic proteins, we immunostained control and DynDKO neurons for α-synuclein and clathrin. In control neurons, α-synuclein is enriched at synapses and has a punctate appearance, while clathrin is dispersed (Fig. 5a). In DynDKO neurons, α-synuclein puncta colocalize with clathrin (Fig. 5a) and the α-synuclein puncta size increases similar to those of clathrin (Fig. 5b). This is in marked contrast to other peripherally associated SV proteins such as Rab3a and synapsin, which are dispersed in DynDKO synapses due to sequestration of SV membranes in endocytic intermediates (Raimondi et al., 2011). These immunocytochemistry results affirm that α-synuclein behaves like an endocytic protein and is likely to act before action of dynamins.
Next we examined the accumulation of endocytic proteins in wild-type, αβγ-Syn−/−, and DynDKO neurons (Raimondi, 2011) by light and electron microscopy. Unlike in DynDKO, there was no discernible change in the pattern of endocytic proteins tested in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons (Fig. 5c–e). This is in line with our findings that endocytosis is slowed αβγ-Syn−/− neurons but not blocked like in DynDKO neurons. We also studied wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− synapses by electron microscopy and quantitated the number of CCVs at rest, after stimulation and recovery (Fig. 6a,b). The CCV number between wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− were similar, under the three conditions, with a tendency for increased CCVs in αβγ-Syn−/− synapses upon KCl stimulation. Regardless, there were 100-fold fewer CCVs in αβγ-Syn−/− than reported in the literature for DynDKO neurons and clathrin pits studded on tree-like invaginations were absent in αβγ-Syn−/− synapses (Fig. 6a,b;Ferguson et al., 2007; Raimondi et al., 2011). Thus αβγ-Syn−/− synapses do not phenocopy the ultrastructure of DynDKO synapses, but are similar to KOs of early endocytic proteins such as amphiphysin (Di Paolo et al., 2002).
PI(4,5)P2 levels are dramatically altered in late stage CCV uncoating mutants (Cremona et al., 1999; Yim et al., 2010). We measured PI(4,5)P2 levels in wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− synapses and found no differences between the two genotypes (Fig. 6e), affirming that synucleins do not act at late stages of SV endocytosis. Furthermore, biochemical purification of CCVs revealed that synucleins are not enriched in this fraction (Fig. 6c,d).Taken together, synucleins are likely to act before dynamin.
Biochemical analysis of endocytic function of synucleins
To obtain a biochemical understanding of how synucleins could participate in SV endocytosis, we examined the levels of prominent exocytic and endocytic proteins in synaptosomes derived from wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− brains (Fig. 6c). We did not see any changes for the exocytic proteins tested, similar to our published results for total brain proteins (Greten-Harrison et al., 2010). However, we observed increased levels for the heavy and light chains of clathrin and endophilins. The select increase in endophilins, but not FCHO, is consistent with our previous proteomic analysis of these mice (Westphal and Chandra, 2013). The increased levels of clathrin and endophilins may be compensatory for the slow endocytic rate in αβγ-Syn−/−. Intriguingly, we also observed decreased levels of AP180, a neuronal endocytic adaptor for the v-SNARE synaptobrevin 2 (Koo et al., 2011). AP180 was previously identified, along with AP2, as modifiers of α-synuclein function in an unbiased RNAi screen in Caenorhabditis elegans (Kuwahara et al., 2008).
As AP180 acts early in SV endocytosis before the action of dynamins, our quantitative immunoblotting results prompted us to test if AP180 binds synucleins (Fig. 6d,e). We performed immunoprecipitations from wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− synaptosomes at rest or after high K+ stimulation to increase endocytosis. We observed that AP180 interacts with α-synuclein weakly at rest and that binding was promoted by stimulation (Fig. 6d,e). This interaction was not direct, as recombinantly purified AP180 and α-synucleins did not bind each other (data not shown). Therefore, we tested if this interaction is mediated by synaptobrevin 2, which has been shown to bind both proteins (Burré et al., 2010; Koo et al., 2011). Interestingly, AP180, synaptobrevin 2 and α-synuclein can be immunoprecipitated together (Fig. 6d). The binding of synaptobrevin 2 to AP180 was independent of its interaction with α-synuclein, consistent with earlier studies that showed distinct regions on synaptobrevin 2 bind AP180 (31—68 aa of Syb2; (Koo et al., 2011) and α-synuclein (1–29 aa of Syb2; Burré et al., 2010). We next tested if sorting of synaptobrevin 2 is altered in αβγ-Syn−/− synapses. Wild-type and αβγ-Syn−/− brains were fractionated to purify SVs (Fig. 7b), and the SV proteomes were compared using unbiased quantitative proteomics (Westphal and Chandra, 2013). We observed that synaptobrevin 2 was significantly decreased in αβγ-Syn−/− SVs (Fig. 7b; αβγ-Syn−/− = 0.67 ± 0.05; wild-type = 1.00; p < 0.05, n = 3 experiments), though overall levels in synapses were unchanged (Fig. 7a). Altogether, these biochemical experiments suggest that synucleins may act transiently in membrane bending and cargo selection steps of SV endocytosis (Fig. 8).
Discussion
In this study, we directly demonstrate that synucleins are required for rapid and efficient clathrin-mediated SV endocytosis at the presynaptic terminal. αβγ-Syn−/− neurons showed defective SV endocytosis both during and after neuronal activity (Figs. 1⇑–3). The slower endocytosis observed in αβγ-Syn−/− neurons could be rescued by individually expressing α-, β-, or γ-synuclein (Fig. 2b), underscoring that regulation of SV endocytosis is a conserved function of the synuclein protein family. The endocytic deficits of αβγ-Syn−/− neurons have marked physiological consequences, which result in faster synaptic depression and a slow recovery of neurotransmission (Fig. 4). α-Synuclein localizes to endocytic clusters observed in DynDKO neurons (Ferguson et al., 2007; Raimondi et al., 2011; Fig. 5a), suggesting that synucleins act temporally before dynamins. Our biochemical experiments support this interpretation (Fig. 6) and indicate that synucleins act transiently to regulate the assembly of the synaptic endocytic machinery.
Biochemical and genetic interactions support an endocytic function for synucleins
The biochemical properties and interactions of synucleins are well suited to fulfill an early endocytic function. Synucleins, via their conserved N termini, bind acidic lipids, in particular PI(4,5)P2 (Narayanan and Scarlata, 2001), a property shared by many endocytic proteins (Di Paolo et al., 2002; Milosevic et al., 2011). Significantly, synucleins can sense/generate membrane curvature (Jensen et al., 2011; Westphal and Chandra, 2013) and the width of the membrane tubules generated by synucleins is consistent with the neck of clathrin-coated buds (Westphal and Chandra, 2013). Consequently synucleins, through their interactions with acidic lipids and AP180 (Fig. 7c,d), may be involved in coordination of membrane bending to initiate SV endocytosis. Previous studies on α-synuclein protein interactions also corroborate an endocytic role. In searches for potential α-synuclein interactors, binding to several early acting endocytic proteins have been reported. AP-2, AP-1, and clathrin were pulled down with a C-terminal construct of α-synuclein (Li et al., 2002) and clathrin was also pulled down with full-length α-synuclein (Jin et al., 2007). However, many additional synuclein protein interactors have been identified in different systems (Payton et al., 2001; Woods et al., 2007).
The genetic interactions of synucleins are also consistent with an endocytic function for synucleins. Transgenic overexpression of α-synuclein completely rescues the neurodegeneration and early lethality of CSPα KO, while deletion of synucleins exacerbates these phenotypes (Chandra et al., 2005). CSPα is a presynaptic co-chaperone for Hsc70. The CSPα/Hsc70 complex acts on SNAP-25 and dynamin 1 to facilitate the SV cycle (Sharma et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012), and CSPα KO neurons show both impaired SV exocytosis and endocytosis (Rozas et al., 2012). The CSPα KO/α-synuclein crosses indicate that α-synuclein is likely to act in either a SNAP-25-related (exocytic) or dynamin 1 (endocytic)-related pathway. The endocytic phenotypes of αβγ-Syn−/− neurons are congruent with the fact that CSPα regulates SV endocytosis via dynamin (Zhang et al., 2012). As previously noted, further support of an endocytic function for synucleins comes from a genetic modifier screen for α-synuclein function in C. elegans, which identified that SV endocytosis is the main pathway impacted and modifiers included AP180 and AP2 (Kuwahara et al., 2008).
Does α-synuclein work in SV endocytosis only?
While our data strongly suggest that synucleins are regulatory endocytic proteins, they do not rule out a role of synucleins in SV exocytosis. Deletion of synucleins does improve basal neurotransmission in young mice (Greten-Harrison et al., 2010; Anwar et al., 2011). Conversely, overexpression of α-synuclein across many systems consistently decreased neurotransmission (Larsen et al., 2006; Nemani et al., 2010). Therefore it is possible that α-synuclein works in both exocytosis and endocytosis. Paradoxically, the increase in basal synaptic transmission in αβγ-Syn−/− mice was not accompanied by an increase in release probability (Greten-Harrison et al., 2010). Based on these previous and present findings, we hypothesize two possible scenarios after considering the pathological and physiological functions of synucleins: (1) toxic α-synuclein oligomers (in both wild-type and transgenic overexpression) inhibit SNARE complex formation (Choi et al., 2013) and thus SV exocytosis, while native synucleins function in the endocytic arm of the SV cycle to facilitate endocytosis and (2) native synucleins, through their membrane bending properties and AP180/synaptobrevin 2 binding, are involved in exo–endo coupling. Both of these scenarios are consistent with the fact the genetic interaction of α-synuclein with CSPα, as CSPα binds both SNAP-25 and dynamin and facilitates exo–endo coupling. The findings that VAMP/synaptobrevin 2 is essential for fast synaptic-vesicle endocytosis (Deák et al., 2004) and that AP180 is an endocytic adaptor for sorting of SNAREs (Koo et al., 2011) also support these hypotheses. Further detailed genetic and biochemical experiments are needed to distinguish between these possibilities. Regardless, these data point to synucleins acting at the earliest steps of the endocytic process.
Endocytic pathway and PD
Our findings categorize α-synuclein with other familial PD genes such as LRRK2 (Matta et al., 2012) and Parkin (Trempe et al., 2009), which regulate SV endocytosis. Recently, mutations in endocytic proteins such as auxilin (Edvardson et al., 2012), synaptojanin (Krebs et al., 2013), and sequence variants in GAK (Nalls et al., 2011; Lill et al., 2012) have been linked to PD. Collectively, these results strongly implicate the SV endocytic pathway in the etiology of PD. Finally, as all members of the synuclein family are functionally redundant for SV endocytosis, selective lowering of α-synuclein levels may be a suitable therapeutic approach for PD.
Footnotes
This work was supported by a fellowship from the Pew Foundation to K.J.V. and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grants (R01 NS064963, NS083846) to S.S.C., C.H.W. was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant T32GM7223. The study was financed by the Bumpus Foundation (S.S.C.), Anonymous Foundation (S.S.C.), National Institute on Drug Abuse Neuroproteomic Pilot Grant (5 P30 DA018343-07 to S.S.C.), and DA017392 (P.E.C.). We are grateful to Pietro De Camilli for helpful advice during the course of this study and for providing us with key reagents. We thank him, Art Horwich, Thomas Biederer, and members of our laboratory for critically reading this paper. We thank Louise Loucast, Yumiko Taguchi, and Becket Greten-Harrison for excellent technical assistance.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Sreeganga S. Chandra, CNNR Program, Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06536. sreeganga.chandra{at}yale.edu