Abstract
Alcohol directly modulates the BK potassium channel to alter behaviors in species ranging from invertebrates to humans. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, mutations that eliminate the BK channel, SLO-1, convey dramatic resistance to intoxication by ethanol. We hypothesized that certain conserved amino acids are critical for ethanol modulation, but not for basal channel function. To identify such residues, we screened C. elegans strains with different missense mutations in the SLO-1 channel. A strain with the SLO-1 missense mutation T381I in the RCK1 domain was highly resistant to intoxication. This mutation did not interfere with other BK channel-dependent behaviors, suggesting that the mutant channel retained normal in vivo function. Knock-in of wild-type versions of the worm or human BK channel rescued intoxication and other BK channel-dependent behaviors in a slo-1-null mutant background. In contrast, knock-in of the worm T381I or equivalent human T352I mutant BK channel selectively rescued BK channel-dependent behaviors while conveying resistance to intoxication. Single-channel patch-clamp recordings confirmed that the human BK channel engineered with the T352I missense mutation was insensitive to activation by ethanol, but otherwise had normal conductance, potassium selectivity, and only subtle differences in voltage dependence. Together, our behavioral and electrophysiological results demonstrate that the T352I mutation selectively disrupts ethanol modulation of the BK channel. The T352I mutation may alter a binding site for ethanol and/or interfere with ethanol-induced conformational changes that are critical for behavioral responses to ethanol.
Introduction
The large-conductance voltage- and calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel mediates a wide variety of physiological processes, including neurotransmitter release, action potential bursts, and afterhyperpolarization (Lancaster and Nicoll, 1987; Robitaille et al., 1993; Golding et al., 1999). The BK channel also mediates ethanol intoxication and/or tolerance in worms, flies, mice, and humans (Davies et al., 2003; Cowmeadow et al., 2005, 2006; Martin et al., 2008; Kreifeldt et al., 2013). Many studies have demonstrated BK channel activity is altered by pharmacologically relevant concentrations (20–100 mm) of ethanol (Chu and Treistman, 1997; Jakab et al., 1997; Dopico et al., 1998, 2003; Walters et al., 2000; Brodie et al., 2007). Modulation of the BK channel by ethanol is also evident in reconstituted lipid bilayers demonstrating that ethanol directly acts on the protein (Chu et al., 1998).
A few studies have mechanistically explored how ethanol modulates the BK channel in vitro. For example, phosphorylation of two residues near the first two transmembrane domains switches the action of ethanol from activation to inhibition in the bovine BK channel (Liu et al., 2006). Ethanol modulation further depends on the presence of intracellular calcium and specific residues required for calcium activation, as well as the intracellular tail (Liu et al., 2008, 2013).
We previously showed that mutants with predicted null mutations in the worm BK channel SLO-1 are extremely resistant to ethanol intoxication as measured by egg laying and locomotion (Davies et al., 2003). In Caenorhabditis elegans, egg laying is a behavior governed by a defined neural circuit (Waggoner et al., 1998). Ethanol reduces the rate of egg laying by 90% in wild-type worms compared with only 0–30% in slo-1(null) mutant worms (Davies et al., 2003). Ethanol reduces the rate of locomotion by 70% in wild-type worms and only 35% in slo-1(null). In addition, the native SLO-1 channel excised in patches of neuronal membrane from C. elegans was activated by ethanol (20–100 mm; (Davies et al., 2003).
Our previous work demonstrated that the BK channel is critical for intoxication in C. elegans, but did not divulge a molecular mechanism for ethanol action. In this study, we exploited the facile genetics of C. elegans and screened mutant worms with novel missense mutations in the BK channel. Our aim was to identify an amino acid residue that mediates ethanol effects but is not critical for normal basal activity in vivo. We identified a mutation in a conserved residue that was essential for both ethanol modulation of the BK channel in vitro and intoxication in vivo without altering single-channel properties or other BK channel-dependent behaviors.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
C. elegans strains were grown at 20°C and fed OP50 strain bacteria seeded on Nematode Growth Media (NGM) agar plates as described previously (Brenner, 1974). Worms cultured on plates contaminated with fungi or other bacteria were excluded from this study. The N2 Bristol strain of C. elegans was used as the wild-type reference. The slo-1(null) strain used in this study was NM1968 harboring allele js379 (Wang et al., 2001). Additional strains from the Million Mutation Project (Thompson et al., 2013) with predicted missense mutations in the slo-1 gene were also used, including: VC40372, VC40853, VC40064, VC40938, VC30161, VC40899, VC40774, VC40641, VC40384, VC40804, VC40392, VC40468, VC40143, VC40062, VC20545, VC40416, VC20244, VC20444, VC40417, VC20417, VC20590,VC20642, VC40787, VC40642, VC30157, VC40692, VC41014, VC20468, VC40265, VC20240, VC40381, and VC40221. The VC40372 strain was outcrossed with wild-type strain N2 six times, twice in parallel to generate strains JPS428 and JPS429, which are referred to as slo-1(T381I)6x[#1] and slo-1(T381I)6x[#2] in the results, respectively.
Transgenesis.
The background for all transgenic worms generated in this study for behavior analyses included the characterized null allele, js379, of slo-1 (Wang et al., 2001). Transgenic worms used for imaging carried the additional integrated reporter Punc-17::gfp for cholinergic neurons vsIs48 (Chase et al., 2004) and worms used for electrophysiological recordings carried the additional integrated reporter Punc-47::gfp for GABA neurons (Hammarlund et al., 2007). Multisite gateway technology (Invitrogen) was used to construct plasmids; 2501 kb of the native slo-1 promoter (Pslo-1) and the traditional unc-54 UTR were used in combination with either slo-1(cDNA)::mCherry or hslo(cDNA)::mCherry for wild-type transgenes. hslo cDNA was kindly provided by Dr. Richard Aldrich (University of Texas at Austin). Mutant versions were made as described below via site-directed mutagenesis. All plasmids were injected at a concentration of 20 ng/μl. The coinjection reporter PCFJ90 at a concentration of 1.25 ng/μl was used to ensure proper transformation of the following arrays. Two independent isolates were obtained for each of the four strains to help control for variation in extrachromosomal arrays: strains JPS344 and JPS345 carried vxEx344[Pslo-1::slo-1::mcherry::unc-54UTR,Pmyo-2::mcherry], strains JPS327 and JPS 328 carried vxEx327[Pslo-1::slo-1(T381I)::mcherry::unc-54UTR,Pmyo-2::mcherry], strains JPS338 and JPS339 carried vxEx338[Pslo-1::hslo::mcherry::unc-54UTR,Pmyo-2::mcherry], strains JPS325 and JPS326 carried vxEx325[Pslo-1::hslo(T352I)::mcherry::unc-54UTR,Pmyo-2::mcherry]. For the control transgenic strain, the plasmid PCFJ150 (the backbone of which was used to construct the transgenic worms) was injected at a concentration of 20 ng/μl, along with 1.25 ng/μl PCFJ90 plasmid to generate strain JPS383 that carried the extrachromosomal array vxEx383[Pmyo-2::mcherry].
Site-directed mutagenesis.
QuikChange II XL mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used. The primers 5′-ggacaccgaatcgtagatgatatggccacagac-3′ and 5′-gtctgtggccatatcatctacgattcggtgtcc-3′ were used to cause a C→T mutation in the slo-1 gene that resulted in a T381I amino acid substitution. The primers 5′-gtggtctgcggacacatcattctggagagtgttt-3′ and 5′-aaacactctccagaatgatgtgtccgcagaccac-3′ were used to cause a C→T mutation in the hslo gene, which resulted in a T352I amino acid substitution. All plasmids were confirmed by sequencing the full cDNA.
Locomotion posture assay.
The movement of single worms was digitally recorded at 30 frames per second for 5–10 min and analyzed as described previously (Pierce-Shimomura et al., 2008). Briefly, custom-written software automatically recognizes the worm from each frame and assigns 13 points spaced equally from the head to the tail along the midline of the body. The neck angle was defined as the angle formed by the most anterior three points for video frames selected when the head of the worm was maximally swung to the ventral side while crawling on an unseeded NGM-agar plate.
Egg-laying response to ethanol.
Plastic Petri plates (6 cm diameter) filled with NGM-agar (12 ml) were seeded with OP50 Escherichia coli at least 20 h before the assay and stored at 4°C for no more than 2 weeks. Plates were brought to room temperature (20°C) 1 h before testing. Ethanol plates were prepared by adding 200 proof ethanol (Sigma Aldrich) beneath the agar 30 min before the assay to allow ethanol time to soak into the agar. For 600 mm plates, 420 μl was added. For 400 mm plates, 292 μl was added. It is important to note that these concentrations of exogenous alcohol are not equivalent to the concentration internally. Previous studies have demonstrated that internal concentrations are 40–60 mm when exposed to 400–600 mm external concentrations (Davies et al., 2003; Kapfhamer et al., 2008; Alaimo et al., 2012). The 400 mm exogenous concentration of ethanol was required to prevent a floor effect in testing egg laying in the hslo(+) transgenic worms. At the start of the assay, 10 young adult worms were placed on a control plate containing no ethanol. After 1 h, worms were then transferred to an ethanol plate for another hour before being removed. The number of eggs laid by the 10 worms was counted on each plate. Average relative values of egg-laying frequencies per worm were determined for untreated and ethanol-treated conditions.
Locomotion response to ethanol.
Plates were prepared as described in the egg-laying response to ethanol using 600 mm EtOH plates and seeded with 200 μl of OP50. At the start of the assay, five young adult worms were placed in the center of the OP50 on a control plate containing no EtOH and allowed to crawl for 5 min. Their position on the control plate was marked and worms were moved to an EtOH plate. After 20 min on the EtOH plate, worms were moved to another EtOH plate in the center of the OP50 and allowed to crawl for 5 min. Worms were removed and their position marked. For each worm, the distance from the center was recorded as a measure of worm locomotion on control and EtOH plates.
Aldicarb analysis.
Assays were performed as described previously (Mahoney et al. 2006). Briefly, 20 young adult worms were picked to plates containing unseeded, NGM-agar with either 1.5 mm or 2 mm aldicarb (Sigma). All worms were observed at the start of the assay to ensure that they were living and mobile. Every 30 min for the following 2 h, the number of paralyzed worms was noted. A worm was defined as paralyzed when it showed no spontaneous movement or pharyngeal pumping.
Cell transfection.
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells were cultured and transfected using standard procedures. Briefly, HEK293 cells were used over a passage range of 5–25. Cells were passaged every 3–5 d at ∼80% confluency using trypsin-EDTA and maintained in 25 cm2 Greiner flasks with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% GlutaMAX, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in a 37°C incubator with 95% (v/v) air and 5% CO2.
For electrophysiological experiments, HEK293 cells were cultured on 13 mm diameter plastic Thermanox coverslips (Thermo Scientific) in a sterile 12-well tissue culture plate until ∼80% confluency. Cells were transiently transfected with 50 ng of the appropriate DNA and 10 μl of PolyFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). cDNA of hslo was contained in the mammalian expression vector pCDNA6 and kindly provided by Dr. Richard Aldrich (University of Texas at Austin). After transfection, HEK293 cells were used 24–72 h later for electrophysiological assays.
Confocal imaging.
Worms were picked onto an unseeded plate and allowed to crawl for 5 min to remove any bacteria. Worms were then placed into a drop of NGM buffer on a glass slide containing 2% agarose and 3 mm azide. A coverslip was then pressed on top of the worms. All worms were used within 1 h of placement onto slide. Confocal images were collected using a Zeiss LSM 710 microscope at 20× and 63× magnification, and processed using ImageJ software.
Electrophysiology.
For C. elegans recordings, neurons were extruded from restrained worms (L4 and young-adult stage) for patch-clamp recording as described previously (Goodman et al., 1998). Inside-out patches were obtained from ventral cord motor neurons. During recordings, electrodes and the bath contained the following (in mm): 125 potassium gluconate, 18 KCl, 4 NaCl, 0.7 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES; pH 7.2, adjusted with KOH for a symmetrical potassium environment during single-channel recordings.
For HEK293 cells, single-channel recordings were obtained from inside-out membrane patches using standard procedures. The high-K+ extracellular recording solution contained the following (in mm): 140 K+ gluconate, 2.2 CaCl2, 4 EGTA, 4 HEDTA, 1 MgCl2, and 15 HEPES. The 1 μm calcium intracellular recording solution contained the following (in mm): 140 K+ gluconate, 5 Na+ gluconate, 0.43 CaCl2, 2 HEDTA, 1 MgCl2, and 15 HEPES. Solutions were adjusted to pH 7.35 with KOH as needed. These solutions were used previously by Yuan et al. (2008) to study effects of alcohol on the BK channel.
Single-channel currents were low-pass filtered at 2.9 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz using an EPC10 amplifier and Patchmaster software (HEKA Elektronik). Data were stored on a PC and analyzed using QuB (Milescu et al., 2000).
Statistical analysis.
Data that passed Shapiro–Wilk normality test were analyzed using standard t or ANOVA tests and the Holm–Sidak method for post hoc multiple-comparison test (Zar, 1999). Data that did not pass the Shapiro–Wilk normality test were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test or Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks and Dunn's test for post hoc multiple comparisons (Zar, 1999).
Results
T381I missense mutation in the SLO-1 BK channel dramatically reduces ethanol intoxication without altering other BK channel-dependent behaviors
To elucidate residues of the BK channel that are selective for behavioral intoxication by ethanol but not basal function, we screened all mutant strains harboring missense mutations in the slo-1 gene from the C. elegans Million Mutation Project (Thompson et al., 2013). This library contains 32 strains with unique missense mutations in the slo-1 gene (Fig. 1A). Intoxication was measured by the degree that ethanol inhibited egg laying behavior.
Most mutations in these strains were associated with wild-type-like sensitivity to intoxication, including VC20444 (L720F) and VC40804 (D401N; Fig. 1A, blue-coded residues). We defined wild-type sensitivity to ethanol as ≤41% of egg laying for ethanol compared with control conditions, which was the reduction in egg laying on ethanol (19%) plus two SDs (11%) demonstrated by wild-type C. elegans (Fig. 2). Low level of resistance was defined as 42–61%, moderate resistance 62–82%, and high resistance >82%. One strain, VC20240, with missense mutation G1036D, displayed moderate resistance to intoxication (Figs. 1A, 2A,B). A few strains could not be assessed because they displayed basal defects in egg laying (Fig. 1A). Defective egg laying in these strains may be due to gain-of-function mutations in the slo-1 gene as observed previously (Davies et al., 2003), due to background mutations, or due to both.
Of all of the missense mutants, however, only one strain, VC40372 (T381I), which harbors the slo-1 allele gk602291, displayed strong resistance to intoxication (Fig. 1A–C, red bold text). Similar to the slo-1(null) mutant, VC40372 mutant worms showed only a 6.3% reduction in egg laying (Fig. 2A,B). In contrast, ethanol reduced the rate of egg laying by 80.7% in wild-type worms (Fig. 2A,B). The gk602291 allele results in a threonine to isoleucine mutation at position 381 of the worm SLO-1 channel. This is located only 10 and 15 residues away from the predicted calcium-binding aspartate residues in the RCK1 domain on the intracellular tail (Fig. 1A–C). Importantly, the T381 residue is highly conserved across species (Fig. 1B).
The strong ethanol resistance of VC40372 may be due to additional background mutations or solely due to the gk602291 mutation in the slo-1 gene. To test the first possibility, we outcrossed the VC40372 strain six times, twice independently, with wild-type by tracking the gk602291 genotype to generate strains slo-1(T381I)x6[#1] and slo-1(T381I)x6[#2]. Both of the outcrossed strains retained a strong level of resistance to ethanol that was statistically indistinguishable from the slo-1(null) strain (Fig. 2C). In addition, because background mutations have been known to persist after outcrossing, we asked whether one of the ×6 outcrossed strains retained resistance after crossing with the slo-1(null) strain. We found that the F1 progeny from this cross, slo-1(T381I)x6[#2]/slo-1(null), displayed strong resistance to ethanol equivalent to the parent strains, a phenomenon called “failing to complement” (Fig. 2C). This provides strong evidence that the ethanol resistance of the VC40372 strain resulted from the gk602291 mutation in slo-1, since recessive background mutations in the parental strains would be heterozygous in the F1 cross progeny and fail to account for ethanol resistance.
We performed additional complementation testing with wild-type worms to uncover the genetic relation between the null and T381I slo-1 alleles. The F1 cross progeny of slo-1(null) and wild-type displayed intoxication indistinguishable from wild-type (Fig. 2C). This shows that only one wild-type copy of the slo-1 gene is needed to rescue slo-1-dependent intoxication. Intriguingly, we found that the F1 cross progeny of slo-1(T381I)x6[#2] and wild-type displayed an ethanol sensitivity intermediate between wild-type and slo-1(null) strains (Fig. 2C). Given that BK channels are composed of four subunits (Shen et al., 1994), this result hints at the possibility that the mutant SLO-1(T381I) channel α-subunits may form heteromers with wild-type α-subunits, resulting in a channel with intermediate ethanol sensitivity in vivo.
To test whether the T381I mutation conferred resistance to a distinct ethanol-mediated behavior, we tested the two 6× outcrossed slo-1(T381I) strains for resistance to the depressing effects of ethanol on locomotion. Both strains exhibited resistance to intoxication (∼62% of untreated level), crawling further away from a starting point than wild-type, but similar to the slo-1(null) mutant worms (70% of untreated level; Fig. 2D). In contrast, ethanol significantly reduced the rate of locomotion in wild-type worms (29% of untreated level; Fig. 2D) in agreement with our previous findings (Davies et al., 2003). This suggests that the T381I mutation provides resistance to ethanol in distinct neuromuscular circuits in C. elegans. Our results above suggest that the T381I missense allele gk602291 was the sole determinant, explaining the robust resistance to intoxication in slo-1 mutant strains carrying the T381I mutation.
To determine whether the mutation compromises basal function, leading to lack of ethanol sensitivity, we assessed BK channel function in vivo by analyzing three independent behaviors previously found to depend on normal BK-channel function: neck posture, egg laying, and aldicarb paralysis.
Mutations in slo-1 that are predicted to eliminate or strongly reduce BK channel function cause C. elegans to crawl with unusually sharp head bends—a phenotype described as a “crooked neck” posture (Kim et al., 2009). We performed quantitative image analysis on the slo-1(T381I)x6 mutants to compare neck posture with wild-type and the slo-1(null) mutant. Similar to other mutants tested with wild-type sensitivity or moderate resistance to intoxication, the slo-1(T381I) mutant displayed wild-type neck posture consistent with functional BK channels in vivo (Fig. 3A). Unlike previously characterized slo-1 null and loss-of-function alleles, slo-1(T381I) represents the first mutant that is both strongly resistant to ethanol while displaying wild-type neck posture.
We next investigated basal egg-laying behavior, which was previously shown to be slightly lower in slo-1(null) than in wild-type worms (Davies et al., 2003). Here, we also found a slight but significant difference between slo-1(null) and wild-type egg-laying rates (Fig. 3B). However, no difference was observed between slo-1(T381I)x6 outcrossed strains and wild-type, providing further evidence for functional BK channels in the mutants (Fig. 3B).
The BK channel is also an important negative regulator of neurotransmitter release at the neuromuscular junction in C. elegans (Wang et al., 2001). One manifestation of this is that loss of slo-1 function causes hypersensitivity to paralysis by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, aldicarb, due to abnormally rapid buildup of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Thus, chronic exposure to aldicarb causes a gradual paralyzing contraction of muscles that occurs faster in slo-1(null) relative to wild-type (Wang et al., 2001; Davies et al., 2003). In this study, we tested aldicarb sensitivity of the slo-1(T381I)x6[#2] mutant and found that it was more like wild-type than slo-1(null) for both 1.5 and 2 mm aldicarb treatments (Fig. 3C). Overall, our results strongly suggest that the worm BK channel with the T381I missense mutation is both functional in vivo and resistant to ethanol.
Single conserved residue required for ethanol sensitivity of the human BK channel
We performed an additional test to determine whether the T381I missense mutation results in an ethanol-resistant, but functional BK channel in vivo. We transformed the slo-1(null) strain with wild-type or T381I mutant cDNA for the slo-1 isoform slo-1a. To visualize SLO-1 protein expression in the worm, we tagged the C-terminal (intracellular) side of SLO-1 with the fluorophore mCherry. The slo-1a::mCherry transgene was driven by the native slo-1 promoter Pslo-1. Transgenic worms harboring the wild-type or mutant slo-1 transgene were identifiable as worms that also expressed a cotransformed mCherry reporter in the feeding organ (pharynx). The wild-type slo-1(+) transgene rescued both ethanol sensitivity (Fig. 4A1) and neck posture (Fig. 4B1). In contrast, transformation with the slo-1(T381I) transgene rescued neck posture, but failed to rescue ethanol sensitivity (Fig. 4A1,B1). Identical results were found for independently derived transformant strains (#1 and #2), suggesting that these results were not due to transgenesis efficiency. In addition, a control strain that was transformed with only the coinjection marker and empty plasmid failed to rescue ethanol sensitivity or neck posture (Fig. 4A1,B1, None). These results provide strong independent evidence that the T381I mutant SLO-1 channel functions normally in vivo in addition to being insensitive to ethanol.
The T381 residue of SLO-1 is conserved across a wide range of species, including in the human BK channel (Fig. 1B). To determine whether this residue plays a conserved role in behavioral responses to ethanol, we transformed slo-1(null) mutants with wild-type or mutant cDNA for the human BK channel gene hslo. For the mutant, the equivalent T352 residue was mutated to encode isoleucine. As above, we used the Pslo-1 promoter and tagged the human BK channel at the C terminus with mCherry and cotransformed with the same fluorescent reporter. Consistent with our results with the worm slo-1(+) transgene, we found that the wild-type human hslo(+) transgene rescued ethanol sensitivity and neck posture for two transformant strains (Fig. 4A2,B2). Also consistent with our results in slo-1, we found that transformation with hslo(T352I) selectively rescued the neck posture phenotype but not ethanol sensitivity (Fig. 4A2,B2). In addition, a control strain that was transformed with only the coinjection marker and empty plasmid failed to rescue ethanol sensitivity or neck posture (Fig. 4A2,B2). This suggests a strong conservation from worm to human of the threonine 381/352 residue in contributing to behavioral intoxication by ethanol, without being critical for channel function.
The worm T381I and human T352I mutant BK channels might convey resistance to ethanol and yet rescue neck posture if they are expressed at abnormally low levels and/or are expressed in cells important for neck bending but not for intoxication. To address these possibilities, we examined the in vivo distribution of BK channels by visualizing their mCherry tag in the transgenic strains described above. Despite the widespread neuronal and muscle BK expression profile, expression of wild-type slo-1 in cholinergic neurons alone was previously found to be sufficient to rescue intoxication (Davies et al., 2003). Thus, we used a cholinergic GFP reporter to assess colocalization of mCherry-tagged transgenic BK channels in cholinergic neurons. By confocal microscopy, we found colocalization of mCherry signal in cholinergic motor neurons regardless of whether the transgenic BK channel was wild-type or mutant, worm or human (Fig. 5). Coexpression could be seen at high magnification (63×) in somata and neuronal processes throughout the ventral nerve cord across all strains (Fig. 5, column 5). These results are also consistent with the reported expression pattern of the Pslo-1 promoter that was used to drive the transgenes (Chen et al. 2011). Importantly, punctate mCherry fluorescence was colocalized with GFP throughout the cholinergic motor neurons previously shown to be critical for the behavioral response to ethanol (Fig. 5). Thus, gross differences in expression pattern or in expression level do not appear to explain the dramatic ethanol resistance in the worm T381I or human T352I transgenic strains. Instead, our results strongly suggest that these mutations specifically affect the interaction between ethanol and the BK channel in vivo.
The T352I mutation selectively eliminates ethanol sensitivity of the BK channel
The behavioral and expression analyses described above suggest that the T352I mutant BK channel functions normally in C. elegans. For a direct measure of channel function, we performed in vivo single-channel patch-clamp recordings of identified neurons in slo-1(null) mutant worms that had been transformed with wild-type or T352I mutant human BK channels. Our previous work demonstrated that SLO-1 single-channel currents were completely absent in neurons of slo-1(null) mutants (Davies et al., 2003). In contrast, we found a high incidence of large conductance, outward rectifying currents with inside-out recordings from ventral cord motor neurons in worms expressing the wild-type or T352I mutant HSLO channel (Fig. 6). These currents are likely mediated by the HSLO channel because they had a conductance of 292 ± 2 SEM pS (n = 4). This value is consistent with previous reports of the human channel, which are notably higher than the 38 pS conductance of the worm SLO-1 channel (Dworetzky et al., 1994; Davies et al., 2003). In addition, these currents were blocked by the BK channel-selective antagonist paxilline, and were voltage and calcium sensitive. These findings demonstrate functional human BK channels expressed in C. elegans neurons and indicate that the T352I mutation does not overtly affect single-channel expression or in vivo function.
To quantitatively measure effects of the T352I mutation, we next studied HSLO channels transfected into HEK cells. Under basal conditions, no significant differences in conductance were observed between the wild-type and T352I mutant HSLO channel (Fig. 7A), and only minor differences in open probability were seen across different voltages (Fig. 7B). ANOVA showed a small yet significant difference in the interaction between genotype and voltage (p = 0.045), but no significant difference was found in post hoc analyses comparing channel open-probability values at specific voltages (40 mV p = 0.5, 50 mV p = 0.19, 60 mV p = 0.12, n = 10). These results demonstrate that the T352I mutation has only subtle effects on basal function of the human BK channel at the level of single-channel currents.
We next tested effects of the T352I mutation on ethanol responses of HSLO in HEK cells. Previous work has demonstrated that ethanol modulates single-channel currents from BK channels excised from neuronal membranes or minimal planar lipid bilayers, suggesting a direct interaction of the BK channel and ethanol (Chu et al., 1998). Consistent with these reports for the wild-type human BK channel, we found that ethanol application caused a significant increase in open probability of 50–80% above basal levels (40 mV holding potential; Fig. 8A,C). This increase had a rapid onset and was reversible upon removal of ethanol (Fig. 8A1,A2,C). In contrast, ethanol had no effect on the T352I mutant BK channel at this holding potential (Fig. 8A1,A2,D).
The mutant also showed a slight, but insignificant difference in open probability at 40 mV (Po WT = 0.22 vs T352I = 0.15). Such a change might lower the activation state of the mutant channel and prevent potentiation by ethanol. To compensate for subtle differences in activation and observe channel function under similar activation conditions, we compared the ethanol response of the mutant at 50 mV to the wild-type channel at 40 mV (basal Po WT = 0.22 vs T352I = 0.26). After 2 min of ethanol application, when the WT channel reaches maximal potentiation, the T352I mutant demonstrated no change in channel opening (Fig. 8B,E). Our single-channel analysis showed that the T352I mutation eliminates potentiation by ethanol without significantly altering basal function of the human BK channel.
Discussion
We screened C. elegans carrying missense mutations in the BK channel SLO-1 to identify conserved residues that are specifically required for intoxication but not for other BK channel-dependent behaviors. We identified one residue, T381, that when mutated to an isoleucine met these criteria and was conserved in the human BK channel as T352. Although we did not record from the worm SLO-1 channel, our subsequent analyses with in vivo and in vitro single-channel patch-clamp recordings of the human BK channel verified that the T352I mutation rendered the channel insensitive to activation by ethanol but otherwise largely preserved normal basal function. The conserved T352 residue identified in this study might be part of an ethanol-binding pocket, permit ethanol binding at another site, and/or occupy part of the channel that undergoes conformational changes during ethanol binding.
The human BK channel can functionally replace the C. elegans BK channel
The BK channel is highly conserved across species from invertebrates to humans, including the functional domains such as RCK1 and the Ca2+ bowl (Fodor and Aldrich, 2009). The worm and human BK channel both respond to Ca2+ and voltage depolarization, as well as the antagonists paxilline and iberiotoxin (Xia et al., 2002; Davies et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2011). However, the conductance of the worm SLO-1 channel is vastly smaller (38 pS) than the conductance of the human BK channel (180–300 pS; Hille, 2001; Davies et al., 2003). This difference in conductance may explain why lower ethanol concentrations were able to produce intoxication in worms expressing the HSLO channel compared with the SLO-1 channel. Lower doses of ethanol may have been effective in producing a large potassium conductance from the human channel to suppress neuronal activity. Despite the large difference in conductance, the T381 residue appeared to be functionally equivalent to the human T352 residue since the mutation selectively abolished behavioral sensitivity to ethanol. In fact, this entire region is highly conserved–only two of the 20 closest residues to T381/352 are highly dissimilar between worms and humans. This region is also highly conserved in other species, including fly, cow, rat, and mouse. Because the mutant channel functioned normally in vitro and in vivo, we suspect that this residue represents a conserved site across species required for mediating intoxication that operates independent of the calcium and voltage activation.
Behavioral genetic approach to identify critical residues for drugs
Our “in vivo first” approach contrasts with conventional methodologies where an ion channel is first altered via site-directed mutagenesis at specific residues and studied with single-channel patch recordings in vitro in a heterologous system. A related conventional in vitro approach uses chimeras made of ethanol-sensitive and -insensitive components of related ion channels (Mihic et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2003, 2013). While these conventional approaches are powerful and have proved successful, they cannot easily determine whether the mutations identified as important for ethanol effects in vitro are also relevant to ethanol-modulated behaviors in vivo. In addition, sometimes it is clear that the mutations identified from these in vitro approaches would be detrimental or fatal if the mutant channel replaced the wild-type in vivo. For instance, although single-residue mutations that render the glycine receptor S267 insensitive to ethanol have been known for over a decade, the knock-in replacement of the wild-type with the mutant channel resulted in post embryonic lethality shortly after birth. The abnormally low activity of the channel likely leads to fatal seizure activity (Findlay et al., 2005). These problems were finally overcome for the α2 GABAA receptor after a decade of searching for a distinct combination of S270H/L277A mutations that produce a viable mutant knock-in mouse with altered ethanol but not basal behaviors (Blednov et al., 2011; Harris et al., 2011). Thus, in vivo first approaches may accelerate the discovery of ethanol-selective mutations for other targets of ethanol.
Additionally, because in vitro first conventional approaches generally postulate that positions showing divergence within an ion channel family contribute to differential drug sensitivities, conserved mechanisms important for drug action may be missed. Here we show that a relatively conservative substitution at T352 disrupts ethanol sensitivity. This residue is also conserved not just between different isoforms and across species, but also in other large conductance potassium channels like SLICK and SLACK that are not sensitive to ethanol (Lui et al., 2013). In a chimeric-based in vitro approach, the T352 residue would not be targeted, and as a result never identified.
Liu et al. (2013) demonstrated the importance of the intracellular portion of the BK channel, and Liu et al. (2008) found that mutation of calcium-binding residues in the Ca2+ bowl and RCK1 domain abolished the ability of ethanol to activate the BK channel in vitro. However, mutations of the calcium-binding residues also dramatically alter calcium dependence and greatly reduce voltage sensitivity (Schreiber and Salkoff, 1997; Xia et al., 2002). Such radical differences in function would be expected to produce changes in basal behaviors that would obscure any changes in ethanol-mediated behaviors. Our in vivo first approach overcomes these problems by screening a simple genetic model for missense mutations that abolish ethanol-dependent behaviors while leaving ethanol-independent behaviors intact. We identify a residue important for ethanol sensitivity earlier in the signal transduction pathway—before interaction with channel-gating mechanisms. Evidence for maintenance of basal function in worms was substantiated by in vivo rescue of ethanol-independent behaviors that are known to depend on BK channel function such as neck posture, egg laying, and aldicarb paralysis. Future studies will investigate whether the T381I mutation abolishes ethanol sensitivity at the single-channel level in SLO-1 like it does for HSLO. In principle, this approach could be applied to search for additional residues in the BK channel important for the actions of ethanol, or residues in other proteins involved in the actions of ethanol or other drugs. Importantly, this approach may be especially useful for drug targets that cannot be assessed easily at the molecular level.
Implications for the role of BK channels in alcohol abuse behaviors
It is remarkable that mutation of a single residue could have such a dramatic specific effect on ethanol modulation while minimally affecting basal BK channel function. Mutation of individual residues is also critical for ethanol-sensitive ligand-gated ion channels, highlighting the specificity of ethanol action on protein targets and eluding to binding sites for ethanol on channel proteins (Howard et al., 2014).
Identification of the T352I mutation elucidates a molecular basis of ethanol-dependent modulation of the BK channel. The T352 residue is positioned in the conserved RCK1 domain, which is thought to be critical for activation by intracellular calcium (Xia et al., 2002). This residue is not predicted to be a phosphorylation site (Blom et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2005; Dinkel et al., 2014). The T352I mutation results in a larger amino acid at position 352 and changes the residue from polar to nonpolar. Future studies will need to explore how alternative mutations at and near T352 influence ethanol responses of single channels. Such analyses might reveal whether this location provides a specific binding site for ethanol and/or represents a portion of the channel that undergoes conformational change in the presence of ethanol.
The BK channel has been implicated in behavioral responses to alcohol such as tolerance and consumption in mutant mice lacking BK channel auxiliary subunits (Martin et al., 2008; Kreifeldt et al., 2013). However, the basal behavioral impairments of the BK channel knock-out mouse have made it difficult thus far to probe the role of the channel itself. These results suggest that knocking in the T352I mutation in rodent models may alter ethanol-dependent behaviors without causing gross behavioral impairments, which would allow us to further advance our understanding of the role of the BK channel in alcohol-mediated behaviors.
Footnotes
Funds were provided by National Research Service Award (NRSA) award F31AA021641 to S.D.; by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); and the Waggoner Center, ABMRF, NIAAA–National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R03AA020195 and R01AA020992; and the University of Texas, Austin, start-up funds to J.T.P. We thank M. Edgley for pointing out the power of the Million Mutation Project; J. Rand and the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center (funded by the NIH) for reagents; J. Mayfield for critical editing; and N. Atkinson, R. Aldrich, and A. Harris for helpful comments.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan T. Pierce-Shimomura, University of Texas at Austin, Neuroscience Department, 2506 Speedway NMS 5.234, Mailcode C7350, Austin, TX 78712. jonps{at}austin.utexas.edu