Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Sounds Activate Visual Cortex and Improve Visual Discrimination

Wenfeng Feng, Viola S. Störmer, Antigona Martinez, John J. McDonald and Steven A. Hillyard
Journal of Neuroscience 16 July 2014, 34 (29) 9817-9824; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4869-13.2014
Wenfeng Feng
1Department of Psychology, School of Education, SooChow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China,
2Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0608,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viola S. Störmer
3Vision Sciences Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antigona Martinez
2Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0608,
4Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. McDonald
5Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven A. Hillyard
2Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0608,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Schematic illustration of the stimulus sequence. Example shown is for a valid trial in which a target letter L was presented on the same side as the auditory cue. B, ACOP waveforms averaged over six pairs of posterior electrode sites ipsilateral and contralateral to the sound stimulus (see Materials and Methods) on sound-only (cue-only) trials. The ACOP (contralateral minus ipsilateral difference) begins at ∼200–250 ms and extends to ∼450 ms. The shaded area (300–400 ms) shows the interval in which the ACOP was quantified on the letter-present trials, which had a cue–target SOA of 400 ms. The ACOP difference amplitude averaged over the 300–400 ms interval was highly significant on these cue-only trials (contralateral vs ipsilateral, F(1,15) = 15.83, p < 0.002). Topographical map shows ACOP distribution with lateral occipital maximum. C, ACOP difference amplitudes mapped over successive 20 ms intervals within the 300–400 ms measurement window. The successive scalp distributions are highly similar, indicative of stable neural generators over the 300–400 ms interval.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    ERP waveforms elicited by lateralized sounds and topographical distributions of lateralized N1 (92–140 ms) and ACOP (300–400 ms) components under valid conditions. N1 waveforms (left column) were averaged over seven homologous pairs of anterior temporal sites, and ACOP waveforms were averaged over six homologous pairs of occipital electrodes. ERP waveforms were collapsed over left and right sound locations and left and right hemispheres to form averaged waveforms recorded contralaterally and ipsilaterally with respect to sound location. Topographical voltage distributions are shown for the contralateral minus ipsilateral difference amplitude, projected onto the right hemisphere. Enlarged N1 negativities were observed for both correct trials (A) and incorrect trials (B), but the ACOP was only elicited on correct trials. The voltage scale shown for the top left pair of waveforms applies to all.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Same as Figure 2 but for invalid cueing condition. Enlarged N1 negativities and significant ACOPs were observed for both correct trials (A) and incorrect trials (B).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    A, Mean ACOP difference amplitudes (contralateral minus ipsilateral) within the time window of 300–400 ms averaged over a cluster of six occipital electrodes. Note that the ACOP was significantly larger for correct than for incorrect trials under the valid cueing condition (p < 0.005) but not for the invalid condition. B, Estimated dipole sources of the ACOP difference amplitudes (300–400 ms), derived from the grand-averaged voltage topographies, were localized to the ventrolateral extrastriate visual cortex (Brodmann's area 19). Colored areas represent maximal current densities of the grand-averaged ACOP difference as determined by LAURA.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Left, ERPs to visual targets (letters), recorded at occipital sites I5/I6 contralateral to the target location. These waveforms were obtained by collapsing ERPs recorded from left and right hemispheres elicited by stimuli in the right and left visual fields, respectively. Measurement intervals for the P1 (120–140 ms), N1 (160–190 ms), and P3/P300 (400–500 ms) components are shaded. Right, Topographical voltage distributions for the correct minus incorrect difference amplitudes for each component. Maps depict voltages contralateral to the stimulus on the right side and ipsilateral on the left.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (29)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 29
16 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sounds Activate Visual Cortex and Improve Visual Discrimination
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sounds Activate Visual Cortex and Improve Visual Discrimination
Wenfeng Feng, Viola S. Störmer, Antigona Martinez, John J. McDonald, Steven A. Hillyard
Journal of Neuroscience 16 July 2014, 34 (29) 9817-9824; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4869-13.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Sounds Activate Visual Cortex and Improve Visual Discrimination
Wenfeng Feng, Viola S. Störmer, Antigona Martinez, John J. McDonald, Steven A. Hillyard
Journal of Neuroscience 16 July 2014, 34 (29) 9817-9824; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4869-13.2014
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ACOP
  • ERP
  • sound
  • visual cortex
  • visual discrimination

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Regional Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance Relates to Self-Reference Effect on Recollection via the Precuneus/Posterior Cingulate Cortex–Medial Prefrontal Cortex Connectivity
  • Attention Alters Population Spatial Frequency Tuning
  • Complex Impact of Stimulus Envelope on Motor Synchronization to Sound
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.