Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Prion Transmission Prevented by Modifying the β2-α2 Loop Structure of Host PrPC

Timothy D. Kurt, Cyrus Bett, Natalia Fernández-Borges, Shivanjali Joshi-Barr, Simone Hornemann, Thomas Rülicke, Joaquín Castilla, Kurt Wüthrich, Adriano Aguzzi and Christina J. Sigurdson
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 1022-1027; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4636-13.2014
Timothy D. Kurt
1Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cyrus Bett
1Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Fernández-Borges
2CIC bioGUNE, Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, Spain,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shivanjali Joshi-Barr
1Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Hornemann
3Institut für Molekularbiologie und Biophysik, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Rülicke
4Institute of Laboratory Animal Science and Biomodels, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joaquín Castilla
2CIC bioGUNE, Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, Spain,
5IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt Wüthrich
3Institut für Molekularbiologie und Biophysik, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland,
6Department of Integrated Structural and Computational Biology, and Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriano Aguzzi
7UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Institute of Neuropathology, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina J. Sigurdson
1Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093,
7UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Institute of Neuropathology, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland, and
8Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Microbiology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Zoonotic prion transmission was reported after the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) epidemic, when >200 cases of prion disease in humans were diagnosed as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Assessing the risk of cross-species prion transmission remains challenging. We and others have studied how specific amino acid residue differences between species impact prion conversion and have found that the β2-α2 loop region of the mouse prion protein (residues 165–175) markedly influences infection by sheep scrapie, BSE, mouse-adapted scrapie, deer chronic wasting disease, and hamster-adapted scrapie prions. The tyrosine residue at position 169 is strictly conserved among mammals and an aromatic side chain in this position is essential to maintain a 310-helical turn in the β2-α2 loop. Here we examined the impact of the Y169G substitution together with the previously described S170N, N174T “rigid loop” substitutions on cross-species prion transmission in vivo and in vitro. We found that transgenic mice expressing mouse PrP containing the triple-amino acid substitution completely resisted infection with two strains of mouse prions and with deer chronic wasting disease prions. These studies indicate that Y169 is important for prion formation, and they provide a strong indication that variation of the β2-α2 loop structure can modulate interspecies prion transmission.

  • conversion
  • transmission
  • amyloid
  • TSE
  • prions

Introduction

Transmission of prion diseases between individuals can be remarkably efficient and has led to epidemics, as seen with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and chronic wasting disease (CWD) (Anderson et al., 1996; Miller and Williams, 2003). Disease occurs when β-sheet-rich prion protein aggregates, known as PrPSc, template the conversion of the normal cellular prion protein, PrPC, in an autocatalytic process (Prusiner, 1982). Although the mechanism of PrP conversion is not yet clear, single-residue differences between PrPSc and host PrPC have been reported to inhibit prion replication (Priola and Chesebro, 1995; Kaneko et al., 1997; Perrier et al., 2002).

The cellular mouse prion protein consists of a flexibly disordered 100-residue amino-terminal domain and a globular C-terminal domain of similar size, which includes three α-helices and a short β-sheet (Riek et al., 1996, 1997). Although the overall architecture of the globular domain is highly conserved, NMR studies revealed structural variations in the β2-α2 loop region (residues 165–175) among mammalian PrPs. Specifically, at 20°C, the β2-α2 loop is disordered in the NMR structures of PrPC from mouse, cattle, and humans (Riek et al., 1996; López Garcia et al., 2000; Zahn et al., 2000). Elk, bank vole, and horse PrPCs display a structurally well-defined β2-α2 loop at 20°C (Gossert et al., 2005; Christen et al., 2008; Pérez et al., 2010) and have been referred to as “rigid loop PrPCs” (RL-PrPC). Inserting the β2-α2 loop sequences of elk, bank vole, or horse PrP into mouse PrP results in hybrid mouse prion proteins showing RL-PrPC behavior (Gossert et al., 2005; Christen et al., 2008; Pérez et al., 2010).

We have previously found that the β2-α2 loop structure profoundly impacts interspecies prion transmission. Transgenic mice expressing a mouse PrP variant with the elk substitutions S170N and N174T [Tg(MoPrP170,174)] showed a prolonged incubation period when exposed to mouse-adapted prions, indicating a transmission barrier (Sigurdson et al., 2010). Wild-type (WT) mice are relatively resistant to infection with CWD or hamster prions (Race et al., 2002; Raymond et al., 2007) yet are susceptible to infection with sheep scrapie and BSE (Hill et al., 1997; Bruce et al., 2002). Tg(MoPrP170,174) mice showed a complete switch in species barriers, in that the mice were susceptible to prions from deer and hamsters, which contain N170, but resisted infection with prions from sheep and cattle, which contain S170 (Sigurdson et al., 2010). In contrast, the D167S substitution in mouse PrP (Pérez et al., 2010), which also results in RL-PrPC behavior, had no effect on prion species barriers in transgenic mice (Bett et al., 2012), suggesting that in this case a primary sequence variation determines the ease of interspecies prion transmission.

Recent NMR studies revealed the reason for the poor structural definition of the β2-α2 loop in PrPCs of many mammals, showing that there is a conformational equilibrium between two different loop structures (i.e., a 310-helix turn and a type I β-turn) (Damberger et al., 2011; Christen et al., 2012, 2013). In prion proteins showing a structurally poorly defined loop, the exchange between the two forms at 20°C is sufficiently slow to broaden the NMR signals beyond detection, whereas in RL-PrPCs, the exchange is sufficiently rapid to observe the dominant 310-helix form. Replacement of Y169 with glycine results in a PrPC containing only the type I β-turn loop structure (Damberger et al., 2011). These observations on PrPC structures provided the basis for the present investigations of the effect from this rather dramatic local conformational change on the ease of interspecies transmission of TSEs. To this end, we investigated the conversion of variant mouse PrP containing the amino acid substitutions Y169G, S170N, and N174T by a variety of infectious prions from different species.

Materials and Methods

Generation of transgenic mice expressing MoPrP169,170,174.

Single-point mutations that alter the amino acid sequence of the mouse to 169G, 170N, and 174T were generated within a pMECA subclone, based on pHGPrP (Fischer et al., 1996), using the Stratagene point mutagenesis kit (primers: forward, 5′-GGCCA GTG GAT CAG GGC AAC AAC CAG AAC ACC TTC GTG CAC GAC-3′ and rc 5′-GTC GTG CAC GAA GGT GTT CTG GTT GTT GCC CTG ATC CAC TGGCC-3′). The PmeI/NheI pMECA subclone was then cloned into the PmeI/NheI sites of the pHGPrP plasmid, and the entire ORF was sequenced (Rosenberg et al., 1977). The Prnp minigene sequence was excised with NotI/SalI, and constructs were microinjected into the pronucleus of fertilized B6;129S5-Prnp+/o oocytes (Prnp-KO Zurich I) using conventional methods (Rülicke, 2004). Founder lines were identified by PCR for the transgene as previously described (Sigurdson et al., 2011), and founders were bred to Prnpo/o mice. Nine transgene-carrying founder mice were identified that transmitted the transgene to their progeny; Tg(Prp169,170,174)70–91Biat. Lines were maintained by crossing with Prnpo/o mice. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions.

Prion inoculations.

WT (C57BL/6), Tg(MoPrP169,170,174), or Tga20 transgenic mice (groups of n = 4–6 mice) of either sex were intracerebrally inoculated into the left parietal cortex with 30 μl of brain homogenate containing RML or 22L mouse scrapie prions, or CWD prions from a naturally infected mule deer previously shown to contain infectious prions (Sigurdson et al., 2006). Uninfected brain homogenate was inoculated into the same mouse genotypes as a negative control. Mice were monitored three times weekly, and TSE was diagnosed according to clinical criteria, including ataxia, kyphosis, stiff tail, hind leg clasp, and hind leg paresis. Mice were killed at the onset of terminal disease when showing signs including weight loss, tremors, slow movements, and severe kyphosis, or by ∼600 d after inoculation. Incubation period was calculated from the day of inoculation to the day of terminal clinical disease.

Sodium phosphotungstic acid (NaPTA) precipitation and Western blotting.

A total of 10% brain homogenates from all prion-inoculated mice were prepared in PBS using a Beadbeater tissue homogenizer. Samples were subjected to NaPTA precipitation as previously described (Wadsworth et al., 2001).

PrP peptide ELISA.

The peptide ELISA was performed as described by Lau et al. (2007) with minor modifications. PrP was measured by standard sandwich ELISA on a 96-well plate precoated with 2.5 μg/ml POM-2 antibody. A biotinylated POM-1 antibody (50 ng/ml) followed by streptavidin HRP and an Ultra TMB-ELISA substrate (Thermo Scientific) was used for detection. RML-infected and uninfected control brain samples were included in every experiment. Samples were run in triplicate.

Histopathology and immunohistochemical stains.

Two-micron-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or immunostained using antibodies for PrP as previously described (Bett et al., 2012).

Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA).

The in vitro prion replication and PrPSc detection of amplified samples was performed as previously described (Castilla et al., 2008). Briefly, 50 μl of brain homogenate was seeded with 5 μl of each of prion seed and subjected to sonication in a sonicator water bath at 37°C-38°C. The sonicator settings were as follows: 20 s at power setting 70%–80% followed by 30 min of incubation (model S-700MPX, QSonica). Three serial rounds of PMCA were performed, and all sonicated samples were digested with 50–100 μg/ml of PK for 1 h at 42°C. To test for PrPSc in L87 mice, each brain homogenate was subjected to 4 experimental repetitions, each performed with four replicates. Blots were probed with monoclonal antibodies 6D11 or 6H4.

Results

Mouse characterization

We developed transgenic mice that express variant murine PrPC with the Y169G, S170N, and N174T substitutions under the prion promoter. Nine lines of Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) were bred on a PrP knock-out background and found to have onefold to twofold PrPC expression levels in the brain compared with WT mice. Because PrP function can be assessed only indirectly, we tested whether mutant PrP functions similarly to WT PrP in rescuing early death in mice expressing amino-terminally truncated PrP (F35) (Shmerling et al., 1998). MoPrP169,170,174 rescued the early death of the F35 mice, similar to WT MoPrP (F35: 92 ± 6 d; F35/WT: 259 ± 15 d; F35/MoPrP169,170,174: 207 ± 25 d; mean ± SE; n = 5–9/group).

Line 87 (L87) mice, which expressed PrP at slightly less than WT levels (data not shown), were selected for prion inoculation experiments. MoPrP170,174 is aggregation-prone and leads to a spontaneous transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, with prion plaques in the brain and skeletal muscle of aged mice (Sigurdson et al., 2009). Here, we did not observe spontaneous prion disease or plaques in the brain of aged L87 mice.

Species barriers to mouse prions

We assessed the impact of the Y169G, S170N, and N174T residue exchanges on prion conversion in vivo. Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) and WT mice were intracerebrally inoculated with RML mouse prions on the same day. WT mice developed prion disease by 173 d, whereas none of the RML-exposed Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice developed clinical signs of prion disease, after up to 466 d after inoculation (Table 1), or showed any evidence of prion infection in the brain by Western blotting using sodium phosphotungstic acid precipitation or PrP immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1A,B). Mild vacuolation was apparent in brains of some Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice. We considered the possibility that these mice had developed PK-sensitive multimers of PrP. We therefore tested for PrP aggregates using a PrP-peptide ELISA assay (Lau et al., 2007), but no PK-sensitive PrP aggregates were revealed in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice (Fig. 1C). PrPSc is readily detected in the brains of mice expressing 50% of WT PrPc levels at 200 d after inoculation with RML (C.J.S., unpublished data), indicating that the absence of PrPSc in Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice was not due to the slightly lower PrPc expression levels.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Incubation period of Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) and WT mice inoculated with mouse or cervid CWD prions

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice inoculated with mouse or deer prion-infected brain show no PrPSc accumulation in the brain by Western blot, ELISA, or PrP immunohistochemistry. Brain homogenates from Tg(MoPrP169,170,174), WT, or Tga20 mice, which had been inoculated with mouse prions (RML, 22L), deer prions (CWD), or uninfected brain (mock), were subjected to NaPTA precipitation and Western blotting. PrPSc is seen only in WT and Tga20 mice expressing mouse PrP (A, D, F). A, Western blot of RML-inoculated Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice at 384–466 d after inoculation. B, Brain at hippocampus shows no PrPSc deposits in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice inoculated with RML. C, Peptide ELISA reveals no PK-sensitive PrPSc in Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice inoculated with RML, 22L, or CWD, whereas PrPSc was present in WT mice inoculated with RML or 22L prions. WT mice resisted infection with deer CWD. D, Western blot of 22L-inoculated Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice at 378–529 d after inoculation. E, Brain at hippocampus shows no PrPSc deposits in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice inoculated with 22L. Western blot of CWD-inoculated Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice at 493–618 d after inoculation. A, D, F, The negative control shows the PrP signal from the brain of a Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mouse.

Because the PrPSc conformation impacts the conversion efficiency of PrPC (Telling et al., 1996; Atarashi et al., 2006), we tested a second mouse-adapted prion strain known as 22L. Whereas the WT mice were highly susceptible to 22L mouse prions, the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice resisted infection after up to 529 d post inoculation, and they did not reveal any evidence of PrPSc by peptide ELISA, Western blot, or PrP immunostaining of brain sections (Fig. 1C–E; Table 1).

Species barriers to deer prions

Transgenic mice that express mouse PrP with a β2-α2 loop homologous to deer and elk [Tg(MoPrP170,174)] are susceptible to deer CWD prions (Sigurdson et al., 2010). To determine whether the additional Y169G substitution would affect CWD susceptibility, we inoculated Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) and WT mice, as well as Tga20 mice as previously reported, with deer CWD (Sigurdson et al., 2006, 2010). However, unlike Tg(MoPrP170,174) and Tga20 mice, the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice completely resisted infection with the same CWD inoculum, suggesting that the Y169G substitution contributed to a species barrier to CWD (Fig. 1F; Table 1). Thus, MoPrP169,170,174 was not converted by either two strains of mouse prions or by deer prions.

Confirming absence of prion propagation in Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice

To assess whether low levels of PrPSc exist in the brains of the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice inoculated with mouse or deer prions, we performed serial PMCA to detect PrPSc that may have been present at low levels (Saá et al., 2006). PrPC substrate from uninfected Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) or healthy WT mouse brain was seeded with prion-exposed Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mouse brain homogenate, and the samples were subjected to three serial rounds (24 h per round) of PMCA. None of the brain samples from the prion-exposed Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice showed any detectable PK-resistant PrP with either of the substrates used, whereas RML- and 22L-infected WT brain samples showed efficient PrPSc amplification in WT substrate after one round of PMCA (Fig. 2). In one of four experiments, there was a very low level of conversion in one of four replicate samples of Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) substrate directly seeded with RML or 22L after three rounds of serial PMCA.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

No PrPSc is detected in the brains of Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice by serial PMCA. Brain homogenates from inoculated Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice (378–618 dpi) were used in an attempt to seed WT or Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) normal brain homogenate over 3 rounds of serial PMCA. Four technical replicates were performed, and the proportion of positives noted. RML- and 22L-infected WT brain samples were used to seed WT mouse brain homogenate as a positive control (C57BL/6), and to seed Tg(MoPrP169,170,174). Unseeded samples were used as negative controls.

Species barriers to cattle, sheep, or hamster prions

Because neither mouse nor deer prions could detectably convert MoPrP169,170,174 in vivo, suggesting a strong species barrier, we further tested whether MoPrP169,170,174 could be converted by prions from cattle, sheep, or hamsters using the PMCA assay. As a source of PrPC, we used brain homogenate from Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) or WT mice. To determine whether any PrPSc could be amplified in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) substrate, we performed three serial rounds of PMCA amplification. The WT mouse substrate amplified PrPSc from 263K hamster scrapie after 2 rounds, and from sheep scrapie and cattle BSE after 3 amplification rounds. Remarkably, neither prions from sheep, cattle, or hamster, nor from deer, converted MoPrP169,170,174, even after 3 rounds of PMCA (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

PMCA assay reveals either poor or no conversion in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) substrate by prions originating from different species. Mouse-scrapie strains RML and 22L, deer CWD, sheep scrapie, hamster scrapie 263K, and cattle BSE were subjected to three serial rounds of PMCA using WT mouse (C57BL/6) or Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) brain homogenates as the substrate. Although none of the prions from deer, hamster, cattle, or sheep were amplified using Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mouse brains, all of the prions, with the exception of CWD, were amplified using WT mouse brains. CWD has previously been amplified in transgenic mice expressing cervid PrP (Green et al., 2008). Low level conversion was noted in one of four Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) samples seeded with RML or 22L prions.

Discussion

Here we found that transgenic mice expressing a variant mouse PrP containing the three amino acid substitutions S170N, N174T, and Y169G in the β2-α2 loop completely resisted infection with two different strains of mouse prions. The previously generated “rigid loop” mice, which express mouse PrP with the S170N and N174T substitutions, were susceptible to mouse prions, whereby all mice developed prion disease with prolonged and variable incubation periods indicative of a transmission barrier (Sigurdson et al., 2010). The additional replacement of the strictly conserved tyrosine in the β2-α2 loop with glycine now abolished all conversion in the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice. There was no detectable PrPSc in the brain of any of these mice, even after incubation periods of up to 466 d, whereas the WT mice developed disease after 173 d. Together, these results suggest that the added substitution of Y169G had a profound inhibitory effect on TSE transmission.

The Tg(MoPrP170,174) mice were 100% susceptible to CWD; however, the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice showed no detectable CWD prion infection in vivo or in vitro. The Tg(MoPrP170,174) mice express higher PrPC levels than the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) mice, so there was the possibility that differences in CWD susceptibility were due to different PrPC expression levels. However, this is highly unlikely, as three rounds of PMCA also failed to show PrP conversion. We also tested whether the MoPrP169,170,174 could be converted by hamster, cattle, or sheep prions and found no conversion of the MoPrP169,170,174 seeded by any of these prions in three rounds of the PMCA assay. Therefore, none of the prions from four of detectable conversion of MoPrP169,170,174. Mouse prions successfully converted one of four replicates of MoPrP169,170,174, suggesting that the barrier to mouse prions is weaker than the barrier to prions from the other four species. Three rounds of PMCA were performed to robustly compare the Tg(MoPrP169,170,174) with the WT substrate yet avoid false positive signals from spontaneous conversion (three PMCA rounds have previously replicated known species barriers) (Kurt et al., 2009). It remains possible that MoPrP169,170,174 might be converted by prions through further PMCA rounds.

Few single-residue substitutions in PrPC have been reported to completely abolish prion infection. The E219K substitution may delay or prevent prion infection in humans and mice, depending on the prion strain and the genetic background of the mice (Perrier et al., 2002; Hizume et al., 2009). G96S inhibits CWD infection in a transgenic mouse model (Meade-White et al., 2007), yet there are CWD-infected deer expressing PrP with serine in position 96 (Johnson et al., 2006). Transgenic mice expressing mouse PrP with the single Q168R β2-α2 loop substitution show a complete barrier to infection with RML mouse prions (Perrier et al., 2002). The Q172R substitution, which also lies within the β2-α2 loop, potently inhibits in vitro conversion by mouse or hamster prions (Geoghegan et al., 2009).

Because the substitution of Y169 in MoPrP with glycine results in a quite dramatic local change of the molecular conformation, where the β2-α2 loop forms a type I β-turn and there is no evidence for a dynamic admixture of other significantly populated structures (Damberger et al., 2011; Christen et al., 2013), the present data show that, in addition to the primary structure effects indicated by studies of different variant PrPs (see above), the conformation of the β2-α2 loop in PrPC may also impact the ease of TSE transmission between different species. We await with interest the results of in vivo experiments (in progress in one of our laboratories) with transgenic mice expressing MoPrP with different single-amino acid substitutions in position 169. Because these substitutions result either in an apparently “pure” type I β-sheet turn structure or in maintaining the dynamic equilibrium between two loop structures (Damberger et al., 2011; Christen et al., 2012; Christen et al., 2013), as observed in natural PrPCs of mammalian species, these experiments should provide additional information on the apparently intricate interplay between the amino acid sequence of the β2-α2 loop and its conformation in their effects on TSE transmission.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants NS055116, NS069566, and U54AI0359 to C.J.S., Spain National Grants AGL2012-37988-C04-01 and EFA205/11, the Swiss National Science Foundation and the ETH Zürich through the NCCR Structural Biology, and the Morris Animal Foundation Fellowship D13ZO-419 to T.D.K. We thank Jun Liu and Tom Yang for excellent technical support and the animal caretakers at University of California San Diego.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to either of the following: Dr. Adriano Aguzzi, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Institute of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Schmelzbergstrasse 12, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland, adriano.aguzzi{at}usz.ch; or Dr. Christina J. Sigurdson, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, csigurdson{at}ucsd.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Anderson RM,
    2. Donnelly CA,
    3. Ferguson NM,
    4. Woolhouse ME,
    5. Watt CJ,
    6. Udy HJ,
    7. MaWhinney S,
    8. Dunstan SP,
    9. Southwood TR,
    10. Wilesmith JW,
    11. Ryan JB,
    12. Hoinville LJ,
    13. Hillerton JE,
    14. Austin AR,
    15. Wells GA
    (1996) Transmission dynamics and epidemiology of BSE in British cattle. Nature 382:779–788, doi:10.1038/382779a0, pmid:8752271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Atarashi R,
    2. Sim VL,
    3. Nishida N,
    4. Caughey B,
    5. Katamine S
    (2006) Prion strain-dependent differences in conversion of mutant prion proteins in cell culture. J Virol 80:7854–7862, doi:10.1128/JVI.00424-06, pmid:16873242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bett C,
    2. Fernández-Borges N,
    3. Kurt TD,
    4. Lucero M,
    5. Nilsson KP,
    6. Castilla J,
    7. Sigurdson CJ
    (2012) Structure of the beta2-alpha2 loop and interspecies prion transmission. FASEB J 26:2868–2876, doi:10.1096/fj.11-200923, pmid:22490928.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bruce ME,
    2. Boyle A,
    3. Cousens S,
    4. McConnell I,
    5. Foster J,
    6. Goldmann W,
    7. Fraser H
    (2002) Strain characterization of natural sheep scrapie and comparison with BSE. J Gen Virol 83:695–704, pmid:11842264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Castilla J,
    2. Morales R,
    3. Saá P,
    4. Barria M,
    5. Gambetti P,
    6. Soto C
    (2008) Cell-free propagation of prion strains. EMBO J 27:2557–2566, doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.181, pmid:18800058.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Christen B,
    2. Pérez DR,
    3. Hornemann S,
    4. Wüthrich K
    (2008) NMR structure of the bank vole prion protein at 20 degrees C contains a structured loop of residues 165–171. J Mol Biol 383:306–312, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.045, pmid:18773909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Christen B,
    2. Hornemann S,
    3. Damberger FF,
    4. Wüthrich K
    (2012) Prion protein mPrP[F175A](121–231): structure and stability in solution. J Mol Biol 423:496–502, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.011, pmid:22922482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Christen B,
    2. Damberger FF,
    3. Pérez DR,
    4. Hornemann S,
    5. Wüthrich K
    (2013) Structural plasticity of the cellular prion protein and implications in health and disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:8549–8554, doi:10.1073/pnas.1306178110, pmid:23650394.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Damberger FF,
    2. Christen B,
    3. Pérez DR,
    4. Hornemann S,
    5. Wüthrich K
    (2011) Cellular prion protein conformation and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:17308–17313, doi:10.1073/pnas.1106325108, pmid:21987789.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Fischer M,
    2. Rülicke T,
    3. Raeber A,
    4. Sailer A,
    5. Moser M,
    6. Oesch B,
    7. Brandner S,
    8. Aguzzi A,
    9. Weissmann C
    (1996) Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie. EMBO J 15:1255–1264, pmid:8635458.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Geoghegan JC,
    2. Miller MB,
    3. Kwak AH,
    4. Harris BT,
    5. Supattapone S
    (2009) Trans-dominant inhibition of prion propagation in vitro is not mediated by an accessory cofactor. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000535, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000535, pmid:19649330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Gossert AD,
    2. Bonjour S,
    3. Lysek DA,
    4. Fiorito F,
    5. Wüthrich K
    (2005) Prion protein NMR structures of elk and of mouse/elk hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:646–650, doi:10.1073/pnas.0409008102, pmid:15647363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Green KM,
    2. Castilla J,
    3. Seward TS,
    4. Napier DL,
    5. Jewell JE,
    6. Soto C,
    7. Telling GC
    (2008) Accelerated high fidelity prion amplification within and across prion species barriers. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000139, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000139, pmid:18769716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hill AF,
    2. Desbruslais M,
    3. Joiner S,
    4. Sidle KC,
    5. Gowland I,
    6. Collinge J,
    7. Doey LJ,
    8. Lantos P
    (1997) The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE [letter] Nature 389:448–450, doi:10.1038/38925, pmid:9333232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hizume M,
    2. Kobayashi A,
    3. Teruya K,
    4. Ohashi H,
    5. Ironside JW,
    6. Mohri S,
    7. Kitamoto T
    (2009) Human prion protein (PrP) 219K is converted to PrPSc but shows heterozygous inhibition in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease infection. J Biol Chem 284:3603–3609, doi:10.1074/jbc.M809254200, pmid:19074151.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Johnson C,
    2. Johnson J,
    3. Vanderloo JP,
    4. Keane D,
    5. Aiken JM,
    6. McKenzie D
    (2006) Prion protein polymorphisms in white-tailed deer influence susceptibility to chronic wasting disease. J Gen Virol 87:2109–2114, doi:10.1099/vir.0.81615-0, pmid:16760415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Kaneko K,
    2. Zulianello L,
    3. Scott M,
    4. Cooper CM,
    5. Wallace AC,
    6. James TL,
    7. Cohen FE,
    8. Prusiner SB
    (1997) Evidence for protein X binding to a discontinuous epitope on the cellular prion protein during scrapie prion propagation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:10069–10074, doi:10.1073/pnas.94.19.10069, pmid:9294164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Kurt TD,
    2. Telling GC,
    3. Zabel MD,
    4. Hoover EA
    (2009) Trans-species amplification of PrPCWD and correlation with rigid loop 170N. Virology 387:235–243, doi:10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.025, pmid:19269662.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lau AL,
    2. Yam AY,
    3. Michelitsch MM,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Gao C,
    6. Goodson RJ,
    7. Shimizu R,
    8. Timoteo G,
    9. Hall J,
    10. Medina-Selby A,
    11. Coit D,
    12. McCoin C,
    13. Phelps B,
    14. Wu P,
    15. Hu C,
    16. Chien D,
    17. Peretz D
    (2007) Characterization of prion protein (PrP)-derived peptides that discriminate full-length PrPSc from PrPC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11551–11556, doi:10.1073/pnas.0704260104, pmid:17601775.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. López Garcia F,
    2. Zahn R,
    3. Riek R,
    4. Wüthrich K
    (2000) NMR structure of the bovine prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8334–8339, doi:10.1073/pnas.97.15.8334, pmid:10899999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Meade-White K,
    2. Race B,
    3. Trifilo M,
    4. Bossers A,
    5. Favara C,
    6. Lacasse R,
    7. Miller M,
    8. Williams E,
    9. Oldstone M,
    10. Race R,
    11. Chesebro B
    (2007) Resistance to chronic wasting disease in transgenic mice expressing a naturally occurring allelic variant of deer prion protein. J Virol 81:4533–4539, doi:10.1128/JVI.02762-06, pmid:17314157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Miller MW,
    2. Williams ES
    (2003) Prion disease: horizontal prion transmission in mule deer. Nature 425:35–36, doi:10.1038/425035a, pmid:12955129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pérez DR,
    2. Damberger FF,
    3. Wüthrich K
    (2010) Horse prion protein NMR structure and comparisons with related variants of the mouse prion protein. J Mol Biol 400:121–128, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.066, pmid:20460128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Perrier V,
    2. Kaneko K,
    3. Safar J,
    4. Vergara J,
    5. Tremblay P,
    6. DeArmond SJ,
    7. Cohen FE,
    8. Prusiner SB,
    9. Wallace AC
    (2002) Dominant-negative inhibition of prion replication in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:13079–13084, doi:10.1073/pnas.182425299, pmid:12271119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Priola SA,
    2. Chesebro B
    (1995) A single hamster PrP amino acid blocks conversion to protease-resistant PrP in scrapie-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells. J Virol 69:7754–7758, pmid:7494285.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Prusiner SB
    (1982) Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216:136–144, doi:10.1126/science.6801762, pmid:6801762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Race R,
    2. Meade-White K,
    3. Raines A,
    4. Raymond GJ,
    5. Caughey B,
    6. Chesebro B
    (2002) Subclinical scrapie infection in a resistant species: persistence, replication, and adaptation of infectivity during four passages. J Infect Dis 186(Suppl 2):S166–S170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Raymond GJ,
    2. Raymond LD,
    3. Meade-White KD,
    4. Hughson AG,
    5. Favara C,
    6. Gardner D,
    7. Williams ES,
    8. Miller MW,
    9. Race RE,
    10. Caughey B
    (2007) Transmission and adaptation of chronic wasting disease to hamsters and transgenic mice: evidence for strains. J Virol 81:4305–4314, doi:10.1128/JVI.02474-06, pmid:17287284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Riek R,
    2. Hornemann S,
    3. Wider G,
    4. Billeter M,
    5. Glockshuber R,
    6. Wüthrich K
    (1996) NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121–321) Nature 382:180–182, doi:10.1038/382180a0, pmid:8700211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Riek R,
    2. Hornemann S,
    3. Wider G,
    4. Glockshuber R,
    5. Wüthrich K
    (1997) NMR characterization of the full-length recombinant murine prion protein, mPrP(23–231) FEBS Lett 413:282–288, doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00920-4, pmid:9280298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Rosenberg M,
    2. Segal S,
    3. Kuff EL,
    4. Singer MF
    (1977) The nucleotide sequence of repetitive monkey DNA found in defective simian virus 40. Cell 11:845–857, doi:10.1016/0092-8674(77)90296-3, pmid:196763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Rülicke T
    (2004) Pronuclear microinjection of mouse zygotes. Methods Mol Biol 254:165–194, doi:10.1385/1-59259-741-6:165, pmid:15041762.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Saá P,
    2. Castilla J,
    3. Soto C
    (2006) Ultra-efficient replication of infectious prions by automated protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J Biol Chem 281:35245–35252, doi:10.1074/jbc.M603964200, pmid:16982620.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Shmerling D,
    2. Hegyi I,
    3. Fischer M,
    4. Blättler T,
    5. Brandner S,
    6. Götz J,
    7. Rülicke T,
    8. Flechsig E,
    9. Cozzio A,
    10. von Mering C,
    11. Hangartner C,
    12. Aguzzi A,
    13. Weissmann C
    (1998) Expression of amino-terminally truncated PrP in the mouse leading to ataxia and specific cerebellar lesions. Cell 93:203–214, doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81572-X, pmid:9568713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Sigurdson CJ,
    2. Manco G,
    3. Schwarz P,
    4. Liberski P,
    5. Hoover EA,
    6. Hornemann S,
    7. Polymenidou M,
    8. Miller MW,
    9. Glatzel M,
    10. Aguzzi A
    (2006) Strain fidelity of chronic wasting disease upon murine adaptation. J Virol 80:12303–12311, doi:10.1128/JVI.01120-06, pmid:17020952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Sigurdson CJ,
    2. Nilsson KP,
    3. Hornemann S,
    4. Heikenwalder M,
    5. Manco G,
    6. Schwarz P,
    7. Ott D,
    8. Rulicke T,
    9. Liberski PP,
    10. Julius C,
    11. Falsig J,
    12. Stitz L,
    13. Wüthrich K,
    14. Aguzzi A
    (2009) De novo generation of a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by mouse transgenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:304–309, doi:10.1073/pnas.0810680105, pmid:19073920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Sigurdson CJ,
    2. Nilsson KP,
    3. Hornemann S,
    4. Manco G,
    5. Fernández-Borges N,
    6. Schwarz P,
    7. Castilla J,
    8. Wüthrich K,
    9. Aguzzi A
    (2010) A molecular switch controls interspecies prion disease transmission in mice. J Clin Invest 120:2590–2599, doi:10.1172/JCI42051, pmid:20551516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Sigurdson CJ,
    2. Joshi-Barr S,
    3. Bett C,
    4. Winson O,
    5. Manco G,
    6. Schwarz P,
    7. Rülicke T,
    8. Nilsson KP,
    9. Margalith I,
    10. Raeber A,
    11. Peretz D,
    12. Hornemann S,
    13. Wüthrich K,
    14. Aguzzi A
    (2011) Spongiform encephalopathy in transgenic mice expressing a point mutation in the b2–a2 loop of the prion protein. J Neurosci 31:13840–13847, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3504-11.2011, pmid:21957246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Telling GC,
    2. Parchi P,
    3. DeArmond SJ,
    4. Cortelli P,
    5. Montagna P,
    6. Gabizon R,
    7. Mastrianni J,
    8. Lugaresi E,
    9. Gambetti P,
    10. Prusiner SB
    (1996) Evidence for the conformation of the pathologic isoform of the prion protein enciphering and propagating prion diversity. Science 274:2079–2082, doi:10.1126/science.274.5295.2079, pmid:8953038.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Wadsworth JD,
    2. Joiner S,
    3. Hill AF,
    4. Campbell TA,
    5. Desbruslais M,
    6. Luthert PJ,
    7. Collinge J
    (2001) Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant CJD using a highly sensitive immuno-blotting assay. Lancet 358:171–180, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05403-4, pmid:11476832.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Zahn R,
    2. Liu A,
    3. Lührs T,
    4. Riek R,
    5. von Schroetter C,
    6. López Garcia F,
    7. Billeter M,
    8. Calzolai L,
    9. Wider G,
    10. Wüthrich K
    (2000) NMR solution structure of the human prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:145–150, doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.145, pmid:10618385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 3
15 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prion Transmission Prevented by Modifying the β2-α2 Loop Structure of Host PrPC
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Prion Transmission Prevented by Modifying the β2-α2 Loop Structure of Host PrPC
Timothy D. Kurt, Cyrus Bett, Natalia Fernández-Borges, Shivanjali Joshi-Barr, Simone Hornemann, Thomas Rülicke, Joaquín Castilla, Kurt Wüthrich, Adriano Aguzzi, Christina J. Sigurdson
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 1022-1027; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4636-13.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Prion Transmission Prevented by Modifying the β2-α2 Loop Structure of Host PrPC
Timothy D. Kurt, Cyrus Bett, Natalia Fernández-Borges, Shivanjali Joshi-Barr, Simone Hornemann, Thomas Rülicke, Joaquín Castilla, Kurt Wüthrich, Adriano Aguzzi, Christina J. Sigurdson
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 1022-1027; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4636-13.2014
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • conversion
  • transmission
  • amyloid
  • TSE
  • prions

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.