Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

An Investigation into the Origin of Anatomical Differences in Dyslexia

Anthony J. Krafnick, D. Lynn Flowers, Megan M. Luetje, Eileen M. Napoliello and Guinevere F. Eden
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 901-908; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2092-13.2013
Anthony J. Krafnick
1Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Lynn Flowers
1Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, and
2Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan M. Luetje
1Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eileen M. Napoliello
1Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guinevere F. Eden
1Center for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Studies have converged in their findings of relatively less gray matter volume (GMV) in developmental dyslexia in bilateral temporoparietal and left occipitotemporal cortical regions. However, the interpretation of these results has been difficult. The reported neuroanatomical differences in dyslexia may be causal to the reading problems, following from, for example, neural migration errors that occurred during early human development and before learning to read. Alternatively, less GMV may represent the consequence of an impoverished reading experience, akin to the experience-dependent GMV differences attributed to illiterate compared with literate adults. Most likely, a combination of these factors is driving these observations. Here we attempt to disambiguate these influences by using a reading level-matched design, where dyslexic children were contrasted not only with age-matched controls, but also with younger controls who read at the same level as the dyslexics. Consistent with previous reports, dyslexics showed less GMV in multiple left and right hemisphere regions, including left superior temporal sulcus when compared with age-matched controls. However, not all of these differences emerged when dyslexics were compared with controls matched on reading abilities, with only right precentral gyrus GMV surviving this second analysis. When similar analyses were performed for white matter volume, no regions emerged from both comparisons. These results indicate that the GMV differences in dyslexia reported here and in prior studies are in large part the outcome of experience (e.g., disordered reading experience) compared with controls, with only a fraction of the differences being driven by dyslexia per se.

  • anatomy
  • dyslexia
  • MRI
  • reading
  • VBM
View Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 3
15 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Investigation into the Origin of Anatomical Differences in Dyslexia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
An Investigation into the Origin of Anatomical Differences in Dyslexia
Anthony J. Krafnick, D. Lynn Flowers, Megan M. Luetje, Eileen M. Napoliello, Guinevere F. Eden
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 901-908; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2092-13.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
An Investigation into the Origin of Anatomical Differences in Dyslexia
Anthony J. Krafnick, D. Lynn Flowers, Megan M. Luetje, Eileen M. Napoliello, Guinevere F. Eden
Journal of Neuroscience 15 January 2014, 34 (3) 901-908; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2092-13.2013
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anatomy
  • dyslexia
  • MRI
  • reading
  • VBM

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Musical training facilitates exogenous temporal attention via delta phase entrainment within a sensorimotor network
  • Goal Choices Modify Frontotemporal Memory Representations
  • Rule abstraction is facilitated by auditory cueing in REM sleep
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.