Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 30 July 2014, 34 (31) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

STAT1 Regulates Ocular Dominance Plasticity

Ikue Nagakura, Audra Van Wart, Jeremy Petravicz, Daniela Tropea, and Mriganka Sur

(see pages 10256–10263)

Monocular deprivation (MD) experiments have proven invaluable for investigating the cellular and molecular underpinnings of experience-dependent plasticity. MD during the critical period first reduces V1 responsiveness to inputs from the deprived eye (after 3–4 d MD in mice), then increases responses to the non-deprived eye (after 5–7 d). The first phase is thought to depend on a Hebbian process involving NMDA receptors and internalization of AMPA receptors (AMPARs), whereas the second phase is thought to be a homeostatic process involving tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). Nagakura et al. now provide evidence that insertion of AMPARs contributes to the homeostatic phase of ocular dominant plasticity. Additionally, they show that the transcription factor STAT1, which inhibits TNFα-mediated signaling, influences the timing of this phase. Knocking out STAT1 caused V1 responses to the non-deprived eye to increase after only 4 d MD. This was accompanied by a higher surface expression of AMPARs and a greater amplitude and frequency of EPSCs compared to wild-type mice exposed to 4 d MD.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Retinotopic maps recorded optically in mouse V1 in response to stimulation of the contralateral (left) and ipsilateral (right) eyes of wild-type (top) and STAT1-null (bottom) mice. See the article by Nagakura et al. for details.

Embedded Image Systems/Circuits

Training Alters Odor Representations in Piriform Cortex

Amin MD. Shakhawat, Carolyn W. Harley, and Qi Yuan

(see pages 10206–10210)

Ensembles of neurons in association cortex are thought to represent perceived objects. For example, ensembles in the anterior piriform cortex are thought to represent odor “objects.” To examine the representation of different odors and whether these representations change with experience, Shakhawat et al. used the catFISH technique, which allows researchers to determine which neurons were activated by each of two stimuli by examining the distribution of the immediate early gene Arc within the neurons. Sequential presentation of the same odor activated partially overlapping (∼25%) neuronal ensembles, and the overlap increased after rats learned to associate the odor with reward, suggesting learning sharpened the representation. Presentation of two different odors also activated partially overlapping (∼18%) ensembles, and associating a mixture of the odors with reward increased the overlap to ∼24%, suggesting representations of the two odors merged. Finally, training rats to distinguish between two closely related odors reduced the overlap in their representations, suggesting that discrimination training causes odor representations to diverge.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Cognitive

Methylation of Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Affects Memory

Vanja Vukojevic, Iris-T. Kolassa, Matthias Fastenrath, Leo Gschwind, Klara Spalek, et al.

(see pages 10274–10284)

Emotionally arousing events are long remembered partly because glucocorticoids released during the events enhance memory formation. Although enhanced memory is generally considered a good thing, it can be problematic: intrusive memories of traumatic events are a hallmark of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), for example. One factor underlying individual differences in PTSD susceptibility is the sensitivity and expression level of glucocorticoid receptors in the brain. Vukojevic et al. report that methylation of a site in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor gene NR3C1 reduced receptor levels and was associated with a reduced severity of intrusive memories and a lower risk of PTSD in male survivors of the Rwandan genocide. Methylation differences likely preceded the traumatic events because a similar pattern of NR3C1 methylation was found across Europeans who had not experienced trauma. Moreover, NR3C1 methylation levels were inversely correlated with picture recognition memory in the European men. Interestingly, NR3C1 methylation was not correlated with either PTSD risk or memory in women.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

BNST Contributes to CO2-Induced Fear

Rebecca J. Taugher, Yuan Lu, Yimo Wang, Collin J. Kreple, Ali Ghobbeh, et al.

(see pages 10247–10255)

Inhaling CO2 typically causes fear and sometimes panic. Several studies have suggested that amygdala neurons expressing acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are activated by the acidosis that accompanies hypercapnia and that these neurons drive fear responses. But a recent study found that people who rarely experienced fear and did not respond to aversive conditioning as a result of amygdalar lesions did feel fear and panicked when they inhaled CO2. Taugher et al. therefore hypothesized that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST)—which also expresses ASICs and has roles in unconditioned fear responses in mice—helps drive CO2 responses. Indeed, BNST lesions in mice significantly reduced fear responses to CO2 inhalation and reduced CO2-conditioned place aversion. Moreover, CO2 inhalation lowered the pH in the BNST, and acidifying the BNST activated neurons and evoked fear responses. Finally, knocking out ASIC1A selectively in the BNST reduced CO2-evoked fear responses, while restoring ASIC1A selectively in the BNST of ASIC1A-null mice increased these responses.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (31)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 31
30 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 30 July 2014, 34 (31) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 30 July 2014, 34 (31) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Systems/Circuits
    • Behavioral/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.