Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Response to Anticipated Reward in the Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Behavior in an Independent Test of Honesty

Nobuhito Abe and Joshua D. Greene
Journal of Neuroscience 6 August 2014, 34 (32) 10564-10572; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-14.2014
Nobuhito Abe
1Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nobuhito Abe
Joshua D. Greene
2Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshua D. Greene
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, B, Task sequence of MID task (A) and coin-flip task (B). In the MID task (A), the subject observes the trial's monetary value, followed by a variable-duration fixation cross. After the fixation cross, a target square is briefly presented. The subject presses a button while the square is on the screen to get a financial reward or to avoid a financial loss. A feedback message with current and cumulative winnings/losses is presented. This is followed by a fixation interval. In the coin-flip task (B), the subject observes the trial's monetary value and privately predicts the outcome of the upcoming coin-flip. The subject records this prediction by pressing one of two buttons (No-Opportunity condition) or presses one of these buttons randomly (Opportunity condition). The subject then observes the outcome of the coin-flip. The subject then indicates whether the prediction was accurate and observes the amount of money won/lost based on the recorded prediction (No-Opportunity) or the self-reported accuracy (Opportunity). This is followed by a fixation interval.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens predicts the frequency of dishonest behavior in an independent task (n = 28). The x-axis shows for each subject the mean difference in the nucleus accumbens' BOLD response to reward versus neutral trials during the MID task. The y-axis shows each subject's self-reported % Wins in the Opportunity condition of the coin-flip task, an index of dishonesty. Coloration shows anatomically defined ROIs superimposed on a standard brain. NAcc, Nucleus accumbens.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens predicts DLPFC activity when refraining from gaining money dishonestly (n = 26). Bilateral DLPFC regions exhibited positive correlations (p < 0.001, uncorrected) between mean response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens (averaged across right and left regions) during the MID task and the difference in mean signal change for chosen (Opportunity) Loss trials versus forced (No-Opportunity) Loss trials. Graphs show time courses of mean decision-related percentage change in BOLD signal during the coin-flip task for the honest, ambiguous, and dishonest groups. Signal time courses are displayed across 6 time-bins of 2.5 s each.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The mean proportions and the reaction times of subjects' responses

    GroupConditionProportion (%)Reaction time (ms)
    MeanSDMeanSD
    HonestOp Win50.16.6496103
    Op Loss49.96.656998
    No-Op Win49.96.050398
    No-Op Loss50.16.0571134
    LV-Op Win49.67.249898
    LV-Op Loss50.47.2604108
    AmbiguousOp Win67.12.0602144
    Op Loss32.92.0719171
    No-Op Win50.55.0594117
    No-Op Loss49.55.0639143
    LV-Op Win52.46.6624178
    LV-Op Loss47.66.6732152
    DishonestOp Win83.68.8539148
    Op Loss16.48.8775365
    No-Op Win50.85.9477111
    No-Op Loss49.25.9559179
    LV-Op Win55.918.8584248
    LV-Op Loss44.118.8608191
    • Op, Opportunity; LV, low-value.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Regions exhibiting positive correlations between response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens in the MID task and difference in mean signal change for chosen (Opportunity) Loss trials versus forced (No-Opportunity) Loss trials

    Region (Brodmann's area)CoordinatesZ valueCluster size
    xyz
    Right superior parietal lobule (7)20−74523.7549
    Right middle frontal gyrus (9)3414543.5213
    Left middle frontal gyrus (46)−3830423.3317
    Left inferior occipital gyrus (18)−28−94−83.1715
    • p < 0.001 uncorrected; minimum cluster size = 10.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Results of planned fMRI contrasts

    Group/contrast/region (Brodmann's Area)CoordinatesZ valueCluster size
    xyz
    Honest
        Op Win > No-Op Win
            No suprathreshold activation
        Op Loss > No-Op Loss
            Left lingual gyrus (18)−24−66−104.3542
            Left fusiform gyrus (37)−30−32−223.7023
            Left cerebellum−4−52−243.3214
    Ambiguous
        Op Win > No-Op Win
            No suprathreshold activation
        Op Loss > No-Op Loss
            Left intraparietal sulcus (7)−26−50443.8819
            Left precentral gyrus (6)−36−10523.7723
            Right precentral gyrus (6)6212243.6225
            Left inferior parietal lobule (2/40)−52−28383.5111
    Dishonest
        Op Win > No-Op Win
            Right inferior frontal gyrus (45)462243.5713
        Op Loss > No-Op Loss
            Left anterior cingulate cortex (25)−43204.3816
            Left hippocampus−14−16−144.1518
            Right middle frontal gyrus (45/46)4234323.9716
    Ambiguous and dishonest
        Op Win > No-Op Win
            Left anterior cingulate cortex (32)−820383.5617
        Op Loss > No-Op Loss
            Right anterior cingulate cortex (32)1614383.7911
            Left orbitofrontal cortex (47)−3226−123.7273
            Left middle frontal gyrus (46)−4052103.6531
            Left anterior cingulate cortex (24)−634143.6388
            Left insula−38603.5548
            Left medial superior frontal gyrus (32)−630363.5386
            Left inferior frontal gyrus (45)−3836123.3011
    • p < 0.001 uncorrected; minimum cluster size = 10. Op, Opportunity.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 32
6 Aug 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to Anticipated Reward in the Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Behavior in an Independent Test of Honesty
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Response to Anticipated Reward in the Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Behavior in an Independent Test of Honesty
Nobuhito Abe, Joshua D. Greene
Journal of Neuroscience 6 August 2014, 34 (32) 10564-10572; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-14.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Response to Anticipated Reward in the Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Behavior in an Independent Test of Honesty
Nobuhito Abe, Joshua D. Greene
Journal of Neuroscience 6 August 2014, 34 (32) 10564-10572; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-14.2014
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dishonesty
  • fMRI
  • moral
  • morality
  • nucleus accumbens
  • reward

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
  • Beta bursting in the retrosplenial cortex is a neurophysiological correlate of environmental novelty which is disrupted in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
  • Transfer of Tactile Learning from Trained to Untrained Body Parts Supported by Cortical Coactivation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.