Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Example face and scene discrimination pairs (A) and a schematic of a discrimination trial (B) (see also Mundy et al., 2013).
- Figure 2.
Relationship between face/scene discrimination accuracy (gray/black lines, respectively) and fornix f, MD (×10−3mm2 s−1) and FA in Task A (A, B, C, respectively) and Task B (D, E, F, respectively).
- Figure 3.
Clusters identified in the fornix-specific TBSS analysis (red voxels), in which MD was more predictive of discrimination accuracy for scenes than faces, in Tasks A (A) and B (B). The clusters are overlaid on coronal sections of the MNI template and the white matter skeleton (green voxels) of all participants, separately for Tasks A and B.
Tables
- Table 1.
Mean ± SD and performance range on Tasks A and B separated by condition (scenes and faces)
Condition Mean ± SD Range A Scenes 74.5 ± 11.85 53.13–90.63 Faces 72.12 ± 5.55 63.54–80.21 B Scenes 79.69 ± 12.57 45.31–95.31 Faces 70.03 ± 11.04 43.75–87.5 - Table 2.
Mean ± SD FA, MD (×10−3mm2 s−1), and f in both the fornix and the ILF of all 27 participants
Tract FA MD f Fornix 0.373 ± 0.032 1.056 ± 0.055 0.727 ± 0.035 ILF 0.428 ± 0.023 0.757 ± 0.017 0.896 ± 0.013
