Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

GABAergic Neurogliaform Cells Represent Local Sources of Insulin in the Cerebral Cortex

Gábor Molnár, Nóra Faragó, Ágnes K. Kocsis, Márton Rózsa, Sándor Lovas, Eszter Boldog, Rita Báldi, Éva Csajbók, János Gardi, László G. Puskás and Gábor Tamás
Journal of Neuroscience 22 January 2014, 34 (4) 1133-1137; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4082-13.2014
Gábor Molnár
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nóra Faragó
2Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Department of Genetics, Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ágnes K. Kocsis
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Márton Rózsa
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sándor Lovas
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eszter Boldog
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rita Báldi
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Éva Csajbók
3Endocrinology Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
János Gardi
3Endocrinology Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
László G. Puskás
2Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Department of Genetics, Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
4Avidin Ltd, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gábor Tamás
1Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Concentrations of insulin in the brain are severalfold higher than blood plasma levels. Insulin in the brain regulates the metabolism, molecular composition, and cognitive performance of microcircuits and reduces food intake; cerebral insulin levels are altered in diabetes, aging, obesity, and Alzheimer's disease. Released by pancreatic β cells, insulin passes the blood–brain barrier, but sources of locally released insulin still remain unclear. We find that insulin is strongly expressed in GABAergic neurogliaform cells in the cerebral cortex of the rat detected by single-cell digital PCR. Focal application of glucose or glibenclamide to neurogliaform cells mimics the excitation suppressing effect of external insulin on local microcircuits via insulin receptors. Thus, neurogliaform cells might link GABAergic and insulinergic action in cortical microcircuits.

Introduction

Insulin is present in the CNS in concentrations of 10–100 times higher than plasma levels, depending on the area of the brain (Havrankova et al., 1978b). Insulin regulates the metabolism, molecular composition, and cognitive performance of microcircuits (Wan et al., 1997; Beattie et al., 2000) with specific alterations in diabetes, aging, obesity, and Alzheimer's disease (Gasparini et al., 2002; Porte et al., 2005). Since this first report suggesting the presence of both pancreatic and locally synthesized insulin in the brain (Havrankova et al., 1978b), a multitude of studies argued in favor of peripheral and central sources. Insulin can cross the blood–brain barrier as shown by increased insulin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after infusion of insulin in the periphery (Margolis and Altszuler, 1967) and studies finding correlation between steady-state endogenous insulin levels in the plasma and CSF (Woods and Porte, 1977), suggesting that insulin enters CNS through the blood–brain barrier by a saturable transport system (Banks et al., 1997). However, local insulin synthesis in the CNS was suggested by variable brain versus blood insulin ratios in experimental paradigms and in pathological states (Havrankova et al., 1979; Baskin et al., 1985; Gasparini et al., 2002; Pilcher, 2006) and by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical studies detecting insulin mRNA in developing and adult neurons and neuronal progenitor cells (Dorn et al., 1983; Devaskar et al., 1994; Kuwabara et al., 2011; Mehran et al., 2012), but the identity of neurons expressing insulin in terms of functional cell classes is not clear. We determined the number of insulin mRNAs in various cell classes in the cerebral cortex and tested whether insulin can be released in the local microcircuit.

Materials and Methods

Electrophysiology and imaging.

All procedures were performed with the approval of the University of Szeged and in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male Wistar rats (P22-P35) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (30 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg); and after decapitation, coronal slices (350 μm) were prepared from the somatosensory cortex. Slice preparation and recordings were performed as described previously (Oláh et al., 2009). Micropipettes (5–7 mΩ) were filled with (in mm) the following: 126 K-gluconate, 4 KCl, 4 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na2, 10 HEPES, 10 creatine phosphate, and 8 biocytin (pH 7.25; 300 mOsm); in low extracellular glucose concentrations, the intracellular solution did not contain ATP-Mg, GTP-Na2, and creatine phosphate. Signals were filtered at 5 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz, and analyzed with PULSE software (HEKA). Voltage-clamp protocols were applied according to Zawar et al. (1999). Detection of spontaneous EPSCs was performed with NeuroMatic functions for Igor Pro (Wavemetrics). In our low chloride recording conditions, reversal potential of unitary inhibitory postsynaptic potential was −73.3 ± 3 mV; thus, separation of GABAergic currents was based on polarity. After Gaussian filtering, EPSC events were detected with threshold detection algorithm and events were reviewed after automatic detection. Threshold was set to 3 pA, onset time limit was set to 2 ms, which defines the maximum interval from the baseline to the deflection reaches the threshold. Peak time limit was set to 3 ms. For imaging, neurogliaform cells were filled with 10 μm Alexa594 and 120 μm OGB-1 (Invitrogen) added to the ATP-free intracellular solution with the application of the hypoglycemic extracellular solution, and detection of signals was performed with a Revolution XD system and IQ Software (Andor). Data are presented as mean ± SD throughout, n values refer to the number of neurons, and statistical tests are defined for each paradigm.

Histology.

Visualization of biocytin and correlated light microscopy and electron microscopy was performed as described previously (Oláh et al., 2009). Three-dimensional light microscopic reconstructions were performed using Neurolucida (MicroBrightfield) with 100× objective.

Single-cell harvesting.

At the end of electrophysiological recordings, the intracellular content was aspirated into the recording pipette by application of a gentle negative pressure while maintaining the tight seal. The pipette was then delicately removed to allow outside-out patch formation, and the content of the pipette (2 μl) was expelled into a low-adsorption test tube (Axygen). Sample was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored or immediately used for RT.

First-strand cDNA synthesis.

RT was performed in two steps. The first step was done for 5 min at 65°C in a total reaction volume of 5 μl, containing 2 μl intracellular solution with the cytoplasmic content of the neuron, 0.3 μl reverse primer (Bioneer), 0.3 μl 10 mm dNTPs (Invitrogen), 1 μl 5× first-strand buffer, 0.3 μl of 0.1 mol/L DTT, 0.3 μl of RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen), and 100 U of reverse transcriptase (Superscript III; Invitrogen). RT primers were designed using CLC Main Workbench (CLC Bio) software, and the sequences were the following: rps18: 5′-ATTAACAGCAAAGGCCCA-3′; ins2: 5′-TTTATTCATTGCAGAGGGG-3′. The second step of the reaction was performed at 50°C for 1 h, and then the reaction was stopped by heating at 70°C for 15 min. The RT reaction mix was used in PCR amplification.

Single-cell qRT-PCR.

Reactions were performed after preamplification of cDNA in a total volume of 20 μl (5 μl RT product, 1 μl of TaqMan primer; rps18: Rn01428913_gH; ins2: Rn01774648_g1), 10 μl TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix (Invitrogen), and 4.5 μl nuclease-free water in MyGenie 32 Thermal Block (Bioneer) using protocols as described previously (Faragó et al., 2013). We repeated qRT-PCRs (traditional and digital) amplifying both the control gene rps18 and ins2 without reverse transcriptase reaction and found no amplification and no PCR products, meaning that possible genomic DNA amplification background under our conditions was negligible. To further eliminate the possibility of amplifying genomic DNA, we tried to amplify the read-through of ins2-igf2 mRNA transcript and also multiple introns of the ins2 as well as intergenic region at the ifngr1 gene locus on chromosome 1, and neither of these primer sets gave positive results during QRT-PCR.

Sequencing.

We sequenced 4 individual PCR products from 4 individual neurogliaform cells using capillary electrophoresis sequencing on 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Invitrogen). After purification of the products, we used 4 different sequencing primers using the following primer sequences: forward 1, 5′-5′-cccatgtcccgccgcg-3′ (16); forward 2, 5′-gtggaggacccacaagtg-3′ (18); reverse 1, 5′-tgccaaggtctgaaggtcac-3′ (20); reverse 2, 5′-ttctgccgggccacctcc-3′ (18).

Digital PCR.

For digital PCR analysis, in case of rps18 2.5 μl RT mixture or in case of ins2 5 μl RT reaction mixture, 2 μl TaqMan assays, 10 μl OpenArray Digital PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen), and nuclease free water (2–4.5 μl) were mixed in a total volume of 20 μl. The mixture was distributed on an OpenArray plate, cycled on an OpenArray NT cycler, and analyzed using the Biotrove OpenArray Digital PCR Software (version 1.0). as described previously (Faragó et al., 2013). For our dPCR protocol amplification, reactions with CT confidence values <100 as well as reactions having CT values <23 and >33 were considered primer dimers or background signals, respectively, and excluded from the dataset.

Radioimmunoassay.

Insulin extraction of cells was performed in the cold by the acid-ethanol technique. Radioimmunoassay (Sensitive Rat Insulin RIA kit, Millipore) was used to determine insulin contents with a sensitivity of 2 pg/tube. BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) was used for detecting total protein content.

Results

We tested whether different neocortical neuron types, all of them identified by whole-cell recordings and subsequent light microscopic assessment (Fig. 1A), express the mRNA of the ins2 gene encoding preproinsulin in the rat (Twigger et al., 2007). After electrophysiological and anatomical identification of cell types based on characterization of membrane and firing properties (Fig. 1A), we harvested the cytoplasm of the recorded cells and applied conventional single-cell qRT-PCR with preamplification protocol and detected ins2 mRNA in 15 of19 neurogliaform cells (Fig. 1C). To exclude any possibilities in amplifying DNA fragments other than ins2, we sequenced four individual PCR products from n = 4 neurogliaform cells and found 100% match (84 of 84; 47 of 47; 42 of 42; 31 of 31) to the ref|NM_019130.2| Rattus norvegicus insulin 2 (ins2) mRNA sequence. To determine the number of ins2 mRNA molecules present in the harvested perisomatic cytoplasm of these cell types, we adapted the digital PCR method to single neurons without preamplification steps, which would have decreased reliability (Faragó et al., 2013) (Fig. 1C). In high extracellular glucose concentration (10 mm), which is standard for brain slice electrophysiology experiments, individual neurogliaform cells (n = 10) contained higher numbers of ins2 mRNAs (30 ± 13) compared with pyramidal (7 ± 2, n = 6) and fast spiking cells (5 ± 3, n = 5, p < 0.002, Kruskal–Wallis test). As a functional control, we lowered the glucose concentration to levels close to what was found in the brain during normoglycemia (2.4 mm) and hypoglycemia (0.5 mm) (Silver and Erecińska, 1994), and this decreased the number of ins2 mRNA molecules in single neurogliaform cells to 14 ± 3 (n = 5, p < 0.008, Kruskal–Wallis test) and further to 7 ± 4 per cell (n = 5, p < 0.04). In contrast, copy numbers of rps18 mRNAs coding the homeostatic ribosomal protein S18 (Twigger et al., 2007) were similar in neurogliaform (n = 16, 65 ± 18), pyramidal (n = 14, 63 ± 26) and fast spiking cells (n = 15, 61 ± 25) regardless of external glucose concentrations. In further control experiments, we determined the number of rps18 (26 ± 6) and ins2 (1 ± 0.8) mRNAs in glial cells (n = 5 and 4, respectively) showing that our data on mRNA copy numbers exclude DNA contamination which might arise in small cells. The copy number of rps18 (p < 0.01) and ins2 (p < 0.04) mRNAs in glial cells was less than in either of the three neuron types we tested (Fig. 1C). In addition, we repeated conventional and digital PCRs amplifying both rps18 and ins2 without reverse transcriptase reaction and found no amplification and no PCR products meaning that genomic DNA amplification was negligible (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cell type-dependent insulin mRNA expression in the cerebral cortex. Aa, Typical responses of a neurogliaform cell (NGFC), pyramidal cell (PC), fast spiking cell (FS), and a glial cell (Glia) to hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current pulses recorded before harvesting their cytoplasm. Ab, Anatomical reconstructions of the cells shown in Aa, colors of dendrites correspond to firing patterns in Aa, axons are black. B, Single-cell qRT-PCR results of the ins2 gene in neurogliaform cells (top) with negative controls (RT-, bottom). Ca, Representative raw data from a single-cell digital PCR array showing the rps18 housekeeping gene and ins2 under high (10 mm) or low (0.5 mm; asterisks) extracellular glucose concentrations in neurogliaform cells (NGFCs). Results of negative controls for both genes (rps18- and ins2-; RT-) are also shown. Color coding indicates the cycle number at which reactions crossed threshold for detecting ins2 or rps18 in each nanowell. Cb, The number of ins2 mRNAs in neurogliaform cells (green) increased significantly (asterisks) together with the extracellular glucose concentration from hypoglycaemic to euglycemic and further to hypergylcemic extracellular conditions. In contrast, the number of ins2 mRNAs remained stable, thus significantly lower in pyramidal (red) and fast spiking (blue) cells regardless of changes in glucose concentration. Copy numbers of ins2 in glial cells were smaller compared with other cell types tested.

An increase in extracellular glucose level might act as a physiological trigger in releasing insulin from neurogliaform cells containing ins2 mRNAs. To test this hypothesis, we first searched for electrophysiologically measurable effects of external insulin in brain slices and administered insulin in the bath in concentrations (100 nm) taking into account extracellular and intracellular space ratios (0.18) and the ∼140 μm diffusion into the slice pushing local concentrations down to a few nanomolar at our recording sites (Havrankova et al., 1978a; Nicholson and Syková, 1998). Insulin reversibly decreased the frequency (from 13.0 ± 9.4 Hz to 7.3 ± 5.5 Hz, n = 16, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test; Fig. 2A) and amplitude (from 12.1 ± 8.13 pA to 10.1 ± 6.28 pA, n = 15, p < 0.005) of spontaneous EPSCs arriving to neocortical neurons in hypoglycemia (0.5 mm) and application of the specific insulin receptor antagonist S961 (20 nm) (Schäffer et al., 2008) prevented the effect (12.2 ± 8.6 Hz and 12.5 ± 9.47 pA). To test whether neurogliaform cells could mimic the reversible effect of externally added insulin, we performed simultaneous paired recordings in hypoglycemic (0.5 mm) conditions and puffed hyperglycemic extracellular solution (10 mm) locally to the soma of neurogliaform cells while measuring the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs arriving to neighboring neurons (pyramidal cells (n = 5), fast spiking basket (n = 4), and axo-axonic (n = 1) cells, data are pooled as no differences were observed between cell types) (Fig. 2B). Relative to control, the frequency (9.0 ± 8.3 Hz) of spontaneous EPSCs decreased after hyperglycemic puffs to neurogliaform cells to 2.4 ± 1.6 Hz (n = 10, p < 0.004, Wilcoxon test). When applying S961 before local hyperglycemia on neurogliaform cells, the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs remained unchanged (8.7 ± 2.9 Hz vs 8.6 ± 2.2 Hz, n = 7, p > 0.47). The effect of glucose puffs to neurogliaform cells was dependent on Y kinase signaling as shown by experiments in which lavendustin (5 μm) intracellularly applied in neighboring pyramidal cells prevented the glucose-induced decrease in sEPSC frequency and amplitude (6.67 ± 5.84 Hz vs 7.12 ± 5.76 Hz, n = 5, p = 0.78 and 12.50 ± 4.45 pA vs 12.92 ± 3.16 pA, p = 0.44; Fig. 2C). Paired recordings of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells and postsynaptic pyramidal cells (n = 5) and fast spiking basket cells (n = 4) showed that insulin decreased the amplitude of unitary EPSCs from 7.18 ± 5.02 to 4.61 ± 3.72 pA (n = 9, p < 0.004), but the paired pulse ratio remained stationary (0.82 ± 0.34 and 0.84 ± 0.36, respectively, p = 0.97; Fig. 2D), suggesting a postsynaptic site of action. Thus, local hyperglycemia on neurogliaform cells triggered insulin receptor-mediated responses in the microcircuit mimicking the effect of external insulin.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Neurogliaform cells mimic the action of external insulin via insulin receptors. A, The frequency of spontaneous EPSCs arriving to neocortical neurons was decreased in response to physiological concentrations of insulin (100 nm), and the specific insulin receptor antagonist S961 (20 nm) reversed the effect. B, Mimicking the effect of insulin shown in A, local application of hyperglycemic extracellular solution containing 10 mm glucose (gluc) to neurogliaform cells (NGFCs) identified electrophysiologically and anatomically decreased the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs arriving to neighboring neurons recorded in hypoglycemic (0.5 mm) conditions and S961 (20 nm) also reversed the effect. Top, Individual experiment. Bottom, Population data. C, The effect of hyperglycemic puffs to neurogliaform cells on spontaneous EPSCs in neighboring pyramidal cells was blocked by lavendustin (5 μm) intracellularly applied in the pyramidal cells. D, Insulin suppresses the amplitude of unitary EPSCs between layer 2/3 pyramidal cells while leaving the paired pulse ratio unchanged.

In a final series of experiments, we addressed mechanisms leading to insulin-like effects of neurogliaform cells. Following previous studies showing that the ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel blocker glibenclamide promotes both insulin expression and release (Taniguchi et al., 2006), we confirmed the presence of KATP channels in neurogliaform cells using protocols established for cortical interneurons (Zawar et al., 1999). Relative to control conditions having a partially suppressed activity of KATP channels due to hypoglycema (0.5 mm) in the external solution (Taniguchi et al., 2006), glibenclamide (20 μm) in the bath produced a current with current–voltage characteristics of KATP channels in neurogliaform cells (n = 8) with a reversal potential (−96.6 ± 2.9 mV) close to the potassium equilibrium potential (Fig. 3A). In addition, bath-applied glibenclamide (20 μm) increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration detected by changes in OGB-1 fluorescence averaged in 50 s time windows right before and 100–150 s after application (n = 5, 1.6 ± 0.4% ΔF/F0, p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test; Fig. 3B). Glibenclamide (20 μm) puffs to the soma of neurogliaform cells in hypoglycemia (0.5 mm) decreased the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs arriving to simultaneously recorded neighboring pyramidal cells (n = 5) and fast spiking basket cells (n = 5) (Fig. 3C; from 11.3 ± 7.3 Hz to 6.1 ± 5.3 Hz) and S961 (20 nm) reversed the effect to 9.2 ± 6.2 Hz (n = 11, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test; Fig. 3C). When applying S961 before glibenclamide, the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs remained unchanged (8.5 ± 7.8 Hz vs 9.7 ± 10.0 Hz, n = 9, p > 0.47; Fig. 3C). Moreover, intracellular application of BAPTA (4 mm) in the neurogliaform cells targeted by glibenclamide also prevented changes in the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs (7.2 ± 2.6 Hz vs 6.8 ± 2.7 Hz, n = 9, p > 0.30; Fig. 3C), confirming that the effect of glibenclamide was Ca2+ dependent. Neurogliaform cells potentially target GABAB receptors (Oláh et al., 2009; Fuentealba et al., 2010), but GABAB blockade with CGP35348 (40 μm) did not prevent the suppressing effect of glibenclamide on spontaneous EPSC frequencies (10.4 ± 2.8 Hz vs 8.5 ± 3.4 Hz, n = 5, p < 0.01). In line with our single-cell digital PCR data showing moderate ins2 RNA expression, we detected no effect on spontaneous EPSC frequencies recorded in nearby pyramidal cells (n = 14) or fast spiking basket cells (n = 6) when locally puffing glibenclamide to pyramidal cells (n = 11, 9.5 ± 4.5 Hz vs 9.1 ± 3.8 Hz, p = 0.76) or fast spiking interneurons (n = 9, 7.4 ± 2.8 Hz vs 7.1 ± 2.7 Hz, p = 0.65; Fig. 3C) in hypoglycemia (0.5 mm). Finally, we added glibenclamide (20 μm) to hypoglycemic (0.5 mm) external solution of neocortical brain slices for 30 min and detected increased insulin levels with radioimmunoassay (80.8 ± 17.5 pg/mg protein, n = 10) in slices at the end of treatment compared with controls without glibenclamide (60.4 ± 21.7 pg/mg protein, n = 10, p < 0.04, Mann–Whitney test, Fig. 3D). Because glibenclamide could not trigger insulin receptor-mediated effects around pyramidal and fast spiking cells, a fraction of this insulin, locally synthesized in acute brain slices in response to glibenclamide, could be produced by neurogliaform interneurons. Moreover, slices incubated in ACSF containing 2.4 or 10 mm glucose showed increased insulin content relative to hypoglycemia (75.4 ± 14.1 and 104.2 ± 26.9 pg/mg protein, n = 10, p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) confirming local insulin synthesis.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

KATP channels and intracellular Ca2+ contribute to insulin receptor-mediated action of neurogliaform cells. A, Current–voltage (I–V) relationship of the glibenclamide-sensitive component of currents recorded in a late spiking (inset) neurogliaform cell in response to ramping membrane potential from −145 to −65 mV with and without glibenclamide (20 μm). B, A neurogliaform cell identified by its firing pattern (top) responds to bath-applied glibenclamide (20 μm) with an increase of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration detected by changes in OGB-1 fluorescence (right) in one of the dendrites (bottom, red border indicates imaged area). C, Whole-cell recordings performed in hypoglycemia (0.5 mm) show that glibenclamide (20 μm) delivered to neurogliaform cells (NGFC) significantly decreased the frequency of EPSCs in simultaneously monitored neighboring neurons, and this effect was blocked by the insulin receptor blocker S961 applied extracellularly and also by intracellular application of BAPTA (B) in the neurogliaform cell. In contrast, glibenclamide applied to pyramidal cells (PC) and fast spiking cells (FSC) caused no significant changes in the frequency of EPSCs in neighboring neurons. D, Time course of sEPSC amplitude (top) and frequency (bottom) changes in a representative experiment as shown in C (top left). E, Radioimmunoassay measurements in homogenates of neocortical slices showed significantly increased insulin levels relative to hypoglycemia during glibenclamide (glib) application and normoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

Discussion

According to a textbook method for identifying a neurotransmitter, neurogliaform cells mimicked the reversible effect of externally added insulin by releasing a substance we identified as insulin based on the same specific receptor antagonist. It remains to be established how and when peptides in general are being released from interneurons. Neuropeptide release was shown to depend on dendritic Ca2+ entry but does not necessarily require somatic action potentials (Ludwig et al., 2002). Failing to drive insulin release with somatic action potentials suggests that local dendritic electrogenesis, possibly in response to focal excitatory inputs to neurogliaform dendrites, might be required. Action potentials in neurogliaform cells did not decrease sEPSCs during GABA receptor and NPY receptor blockade on the neighboring and synaptically coupled cells (data not shown). However, local variations in glucose levels in physiologically relevant concentrations or targeted glibenclamide application were capable of triggering insulin receptor-mediated action of neurogliaform cells without spikes as glibenclamide (4.2 ± 1.4 mV, n = 5, p < 0.02) or glucose (4.4 ± 0.6 mV, n = 8, p < 0.04) depolarized the soma of neurogliaform cells, and these functions required Ca2+ entry. This suggests that GABAergic cells can contribute to local insulin release in conditions when pancreatic insulin supply temporarily or permanently does not match demand (e.g., the actual extracellular glucose availability).

Insulin regulates the metabolism, molecular composition, and cognitive performance of microcircuits (Wan et al., 1997; Biessels et al., 1998), and application of external insulin into the CSF was found to decrease food intake (Woods et al., 1979; Porte et al., 2005). Cerebral insulin levels are altered in diabetes, aging, obesity, and Alzheimer's disease (Havrankova et al., 1979; Baskin et al., 1985; Gasparini et al., 2002; Porte et al., 2005; Pilcher, 2006, Mehran et al., 2012). A decline in cognitive functions was proven in type II diabetic patients (Elias et al., 1997) and intranasal application of insulin, which does not alter plasma levels but reaches the CSF (Born et al., 2002), was found to be promising in preventing the progression of cognitive impairment (Craft et al., 2012). Thus, potential local sources of insulin might have a modulatory effect on neighboring neural microcircuits in health and disease. Damage to cortical insulin-producing neurons could partially explain lower cerebral levels of the hormone in obesity, aging, and Alzheimer's disease (Havrankova et al., 1979; Gasparini et al., 2002) and potentially contribute to the onset of these conditions. Insulin receptors are abundant in the cerebral cortex (Havrankova et al., 1978a; Porte et al., 2005), but the short half-life might prevent neocortical insulin in reaching relatively distant brain areas known to mediate insulin receptor-dependent processes in energy homeostasis and feeding (Porte et al., 2005). Locally, however, neuronal insulin might fine-tune the passage of glucose through the endothelium of local blood vessels expressing insulin-sensitive glucose transporters (Magistretti et al., 1999; Porte et al., 2005). Neurogliaform cells use an action potential dependent form of GABAergic volume transmission (Oláh et al., 2009), which can interact with insulin in regulating the efficacy of synapses (Wan et al., 1997; Beattie et al., 2000). Insulin recruits additional GABAA receptors to synaptic (Wan et al., 1997) and possibly extrasynaptic membrane compartments of pyramidal neurons shunting excitatory inputs and leading to decreased firing and a reduced frequency of sEPSCs. Neurogliaform cells hyperpolarize the membrane potential of cells expressing GABAergic receptors in their neighborhood, and the insulin receptor-dependent effects of nonspiking neurogliaform cells suggested here might complement the spike-triggered GABAergic actions.

Footnotes

  • We thank B. Lambolez, B. Cauli, and J. Rossier for training G.T. in harvesting cytoplasms of neurons; L. Schäffer for donating S961; and E. Tóth for reconstructions.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Gábor Tamás, Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary. gtamas{at}bio.u-szeged.hu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Banks WA,
    2. Jaspan JB,
    3. Huang W,
    4. Kastin AJ
    (1997) Transport of insulin across the blood–brain barrier: saturability at euglycemic doses of insulin. Peptides 18:1423–1429, doi:10.1016/S0196-9781(97)00231-3, pmid:9392846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Baskin DG,
    2. Stein LJ,
    3. Ikeda H,
    4. Woods SC,
    5. Figlewicz DP,
    6. Porte D Jr.,
    7. Greenwood MR,
    8. Dorsa DM
    (1985) Genetically obese Zucker rats have abnormally low brain insulin content. Life Sci 36:627–633, doi:10.1016/0024-3205(85)90166-3, pmid:3881641.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Beattie EC,
    2. Carroll RC,
    3. Yu X,
    4. Morishita W,
    5. Yasuda H,
    6. von Zastrow M,
    7. Malenka RC
    (2000) Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD. Nat Neurosci 3:1291–1300, doi:10.1038/81823, pmid:11100150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Biessels GJ,
    2. Kamal A,
    3. Urban IJ,
    4. Spruijt BM,
    5. Erkelens DW,
    6. Gispen WH
    (1998) Water maze learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-diabetic rats: effects of insulin treatment. Brain Res 800:125–135, doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00510-1, pmid:9685609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Born J,
    2. Lange T,
    3. Kern W,
    4. McGregor GP,
    5. Bickel U,
    6. Fehm HL
    (2002) Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nat Neurosci 5:514–516, doi:10.1038/nn0602-849, pmid:11992114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Craft S,
    2. Baker LD,
    3. Montine TJ,
    4. Minoshima S,
    5. Watson GS,
    6. Claxton A,
    7. Arbuckle M,
    8. Callaghan M,
    9. Tsai E,
    10. Plymate SR,
    11. Green PS,
    12. Leverenz J,
    13. Cross D,
    14. Gerton B
    (2012) Intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot clinical trial. Arch Neurol 69:29–38, doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.233, pmid:21911655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Devaskar SU,
    2. Giddings SJ,
    3. Rajakumar PA,
    4. Carnaghi LR,
    5. Menon RK,
    6. Zahm DS
    (1994) Insulin gene expression and insulin synthesis in mammalian neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 269:8445–8454, pmid:8132571.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Dorn A,
    2. Bernstein HG,
    3. Rinne A,
    4. Ziegler M,
    5. Hahn HJ,
    6. Ansorge S
    (1983) Insulin- and glucagonlike peptides in the brain. Anat Rec 207:69–77, doi:10.1002/ar.1092070108, pmid:6356989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Elias PK,
    2. Elias MF,
    3. D'Agostino RB,
    4. Cupples LA,
    5. Wilson PW,
    6. Silbershatz H,
    7. Wolf PA
    (1997) NIDDM and blood pressure as risk factors for poor cognitive performance: the Framingham Study. Diabetes Care 20:1388–1395, doi:10.2337/diacare.20.9.1388, pmid:9283785.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Faragó N,
    2. Kocsis ÁK,
    3. Lovas S,
    4. Molnár G,
    5. Boldog E,
    6. Rózsa M,
    7. Szemenyei V,
    8. Vámos E,
    9. Nagy LI,
    10. Tamás G,
    11. Puskás LG
    (2013) Digital PCR to determine the number of transcripts from single neurons after patch-clamp recording. BioTechniques 54:327–336, doi:10.2144/000114029, pmid:23750542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Fuentealba P,
    2. Klausberger T,
    3. Karayannis T,
    4. Suen WY,
    5. Huck J,
    6. Tomioka R,
    7. Rockland K,
    8. Capogna M,
    9. Studer M,
    10. Morales M,
    11. Somogyi P
    (2010) Expression of COUP-TFII nuclear receptor in restricted GABAergic neuronal populations in the adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 30:1595–1609, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4199-09.2010, pmid:20130170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Gasparini L,
    2. Netzer WJ,
    3. Greengard P,
    4. Xu H
    (2002) Does insulin dysfunction play a role in Alzheimer's disease? Trends Pharmacol Sci 23:288–293, doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(02)02037-0, pmid:12084635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Havrankova J,
    2. Roth J,
    3. Brownstein M
    (1978a) Insulin receptors are widely distributed in the central nervous system of the rat. Nature 272:827–829, doi:10.1038/272827a0, pmid:205798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Havrankova J,
    2. Schmechel D,
    3. Roth J,
    4. Brownstein M
    (1978b) Identification of insulin in rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75:5737–5741, doi:10.1073/pnas.75.11.5737, pmid:364489.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Havrankova J,
    2. Roth J,
    3. Brownstein MJ
    (1979) Concentrations of insulin and insulin receptors in the brain are independent of peripheral insulin levels: studies of obese and streptozotocin-treated rodents. J Clin Invest 64:636–642, doi:10.1172/JCI109504, pmid:156737.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kuwabara T,
    2. Kagalwala MN,
    3. Onuma Y,
    4. Ito Y,
    5. Warashina M,
    6. Terashima K,
    7. Sanosaka T,
    8. Nakashima K,
    9. Gage FH,
    10. Asashima M
    (2011) Insulin biosynthesis in neuronal progenitors derived from adult hippocampus and the olfactory bulb. EMBO Mol Med 3:742–754, doi:10.1002/emmm.201100177, pmid:21984534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Ludwig M,
    2. Sabatier N,
    3. Bull PM,
    4. Landgraf R,
    5. Dayanithi G,
    6. Leng G
    (2002) Intracellular calcium stores regulate activity-dependent neuropeptide release from dendrites. Nature 418:85–89, doi:10.1038/nature00822, pmid:12097911.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Magistretti PJ,
    2. Pellerin L,
    3. Rothman DL,
    4. Shulman RG
    (1999) Energy on demand. Science 283:496–497, doi:10.1126/science.283.5401.496, pmid:9988650.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Margolis RU,
    2. Altszuler N
    (1967) Insulin in the cerebrospinal fluid. Nature 215:1375–1376, doi:10.1038/2151375a0, pmid:6055448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Mehran AE,
    2. Templeman NM,
    3. Brigidi GS,
    4. Lim GE,
    5. Chu KY,
    6. Hu X,
    7. Botezelli JD,
    8. Asadi A,
    9. Hoffman BG,
    10. Kieffer TJ,
    11. Bamji SX,
    12. Clee SM,
    13. Johnson JD
    (2012) Hyperinsulinemia drives diet-induced obesity independently of brain insulin production. Cell Metab 16:723–737, doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.019, pmid:23217255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Nicholson C,
    2. Syková E
    (1998) Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis. Trends Neurosci 21:207–215, doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01261-2, pmid:9610885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Oláh S,
    2. Füle M,
    3. Komlósi G,
    4. Varga C,
    5. Báldi R,
    6. Barzó P,
    7. Tamás G
    (2009) Regulation of cortical microcircuits by unitary GABA-mediated volume transmission. Nature 461:1278–1281, doi:10.1038/nature08503, pmid:19865171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pilcher H
    (2006) Alzheimer's disease could be “type 3 diabetes.” Lancet Neurol 5:388–389, doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70434-3, pmid:16639835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Porte D Jr.,
    2. Baskin DG,
    3. Schwartz MW
    (2005) Insulin signaling in the central nervous system: a critical role in metabolic homeostasis and disease from C. elegans to humans. Diabetes 54:1264–1276, doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.5.1264, pmid:15855309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Schäffer L,
    2. Brand CL,
    3. Hansen BF,
    4. Ribel U,
    5. Shaw AC,
    6. Slaaby R,
    7. Sturis J
    (2008) A novel high-affinity peptide antagonist to the insulin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376:380–383, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.151, pmid:18782558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Silver IA,
    2. Erecińska M
    (1994) Extracellular glucose concentration in mammalian brain: continuous monitoring of changes during increased neuronal activity and upon limitation in oxygen supply in normo-, hypo-, and hyperglycemic animals. J Neurosci 14:5068–5076, pmid:8046468.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    1. Taniguchi CM,
    2. Emanuelli B,
    3. Kahn CR
    (2006) Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:85–96, doi:10.1038/nrm1837, pmid:16493415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Twigger SN,
    2. Shimoyama M,
    3. Bromberg S,
    4. Kwitek AE,
    5. Jacob HJ
    (2007) The Rat Genome Database, update 2007: easing the path from disease to data and back again. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D658–D662, doi:10.1093/nar/gkl988, pmid:17151068.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Wan Q,
    2. Xiong ZG,
    3. Man HY,
    4. Ackerley CA,
    5. Braunton J,
    6. Lu WY,
    7. Becker LE,
    8. MacDonald JF,
    9. Wang YT
    (1997) Recruitment of functional GABA(A) receptors to postsynaptic domains by insulin. Nature 388:686–690, doi:10.1038/41792, pmid:9262404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Woods SC,
    2. Porte D Jr.
    (1977) Relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid insulin levels of dogs. Am J Physiol 233:E331–E334, pmid:910946.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Woods SC,
    2. Lotter EC,
    3. McKay LD,
    4. Porte D Jr.
    (1979) Chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of insulin reduces food intake and body weight of baboons. Nature 282:503–505, doi:10.1038/282503a0, pmid:116135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Zawar C,
    2. Plant TD,
    3. Schirra C,
    4. Konnerth A,
    5. Neumcke B
    (1999) Cell-type specific expression of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 514:327–341, doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.315ae.x, pmid:9852317.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (4)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 4
22 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GABAergic Neurogliaform Cells Represent Local Sources of Insulin in the Cerebral Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GABAergic Neurogliaform Cells Represent Local Sources of Insulin in the Cerebral Cortex
Gábor Molnár, Nóra Faragó, Ágnes K. Kocsis, Márton Rózsa, Sándor Lovas, Eszter Boldog, Rita Báldi, Éva Csajbók, János Gardi, László G. Puskás, Gábor Tamás
Journal of Neuroscience 22 January 2014, 34 (4) 1133-1137; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4082-13.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GABAergic Neurogliaform Cells Represent Local Sources of Insulin in the Cerebral Cortex
Gábor Molnár, Nóra Faragó, Ágnes K. Kocsis, Márton Rózsa, Sándor Lovas, Eszter Boldog, Rita Báldi, Éva Csajbók, János Gardi, László G. Puskás, Gábor Tamás
Journal of Neuroscience 22 January 2014, 34 (4) 1133-1137; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4082-13.2014
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.