Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Promotes Dendritic Spine Recovery and Improves Neurological Outcome Following Ischemic Stroke

Fang Wu, Marcela Catano, Ramiro Echeverry, Enrique Torre, Woldeab B. Haile, Jie An, Changhua Chen, Lihong Cheng, Andrew Nicholson, Frank C. Tong, Jaekeun Park and Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 22 October 2014, 34 (43) 14219-14232; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-13.2014
Fang Wu
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcela Catano
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramiro Echeverry
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Torre
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Woldeab B. Haile
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie An
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
2Department of Pharmacology, Shandong University School of Medicine, 250100 Jinan, China,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changhua Chen
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lihong Cheng
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Nicholson
3Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank C. Tong
4Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaekeun Park
5Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Yepes
1Department of Neurology and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,
6Department of Neurology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30349
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manuel Yepes
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effect of cerebral ischemia and OGD on neuronal uPA. A, Mean concentration of uPA in the ischemic tissue of Wt mice following 30 and 60 min of tMCAO, or 1–24 h after the end of 60 min of tMCAO (recovery phase); n = 8 per time point. *p = 0.001 and **p = 0.001 compared with uPA concentration in nonischemic brains (control; C), or in the ischemic brain after 30 min or 60 min of tMCAO (acute phase), or 1 h after 60 min of MCAO. ***p = 0.03 compared with uPA concentration in nonischemic brains, or in the ischemic brain after 30 min or 60 min of tMCAO, or after 1 and 24 h of recovery. ̂p < 0.001 compared with controls (C), or in the ischemic brain after 30 and 60 min of tMCAO, or after 1, 3, 6, and 12 h of recovery. Nonsignificant compared with controls and brains after 30 min or 60 min of tMCAO. Lines denote SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. B, Volume of the ischemic lesion in Wt and uPA−/− mice 24 h after MCAO; n = 12 per experimental group. Lines denote SD. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-sample t test. C, Mean concentration of uPA in the culture medium of Wt cerebral cortical neurons following 1, 30, and 55 min of exposure to OGD conditions, or 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after the end of 55 min of OGD conditions (recovery phase); n = 12 per experimental condition from neurons cultures from three different animals. *p < 0.0001, **p < 0.0001, and ***p < 0.0001 compared with uPA concentration in the culture medium of neurons after 1, 30, and 55 min of OGD. ***p < 0.0001 compared with uPA concentration in the culture medium of neurons 3 and 6 h after the end of 55 min of OGD conditions. Lines denote SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. D, Mean cell survival in Wt (white bars) and uPA−/− (black bars) neurons 24 h after 55 min of exposure to OGD conditions; n = 20 per experimental group from neurons cultured from three different animals. *p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.0001 compared with Wt and uPA−/− neurons kept under normal concentrations of oxygen and glucose (two-sample t test). Lines denote SD. Values are given as a percentage compared with survival in cells maintained under physiological concentrations.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    uPA promotes neurological recovery after ischemic stroke. A, B, Mean LI (A) and forelimb strength (B) in Wt (black bars in A and black squares in B), uPA−/− (dark gray bars in A and white diamonds in B), and uPAR−/− (light gray bars in A and black triangles in B) mice, between 6 h and 7 d after tMCAO. White bars in A and white circles in B correspond to sham-operated controls. †p < 0.0001 compared with sham-operated animals. *p = 0.01, **p < 0.0001, §p < 0.0001, and ̂p < 0.0001 in A compared with Wt mice 6 h after tMCAO, and with uPA−/− and uPAR−/− mice at each time point. *p = 0.02, **p < 0.0001, ̂p < 0.0001, and ***p < 0.0001 in B compared with sham-operated, and uPA−/− and uPAR−/− mice at each time point; n = 20 per strain. Lines denote SD. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. C–H, Mean LI (C, E, G) and forelimb strength (D, F, H), in Wt (C, D), uPA−/− (E, F), and uPAR−/− (G, H) mice, between 24 h and 7 d after tMCAO. Mice were treated immediately after tMCAO with either intravenous saline solution (black bars in C, E, G; black circles in D, F, H) or with 0.1/mg/kg per IA of ruPA (gray bars in C, E, G; gray squares in D, F, H); n = 15 observations per time point. Lines denote SD. Compared with mice treated with saline solution at each time point: C, *p = 0.01, **p = 0.04, §p = 0.01, and ̂p = 0.03. D, *p = 0.001, **p = 0.02, ̂p = 0.04, and §p = 0.02. E, *p = 0.01,**p = 0.03, §p = 0.02, and ̂p = 0.001. F, *p = 0.001, **p < 0.0001, ̂p = 0.02, and §p = 0.04. Ns in G and H: nonsignificant compared with saline solution-treated mice (G) and controls (H) at each time point. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of uPA deficiency on the anatomical structure of the peri-infarct cortex. A, Diagram (top) and representative TTC staining (bottom) of a coronal cut through bregma + 0.50 24 h after MCAO. The asterisk denotes the area of the brain where quantifications and observations presented in E and F were performed. M1 and M2 denote primary and secondary motor cortices, respectively. B, Representative photographs of combined DTIs and Fa maps in Wt and uPA −/− mice 24 h after MCAO. Colors represent fiber orientation: red, mediolateral; green, dorsoventral; blue, rostrocaudal. C, D, MD of water (C) and Fa (D) in the area denoted by the asterisk in A and B in the nonischemic (NI; white bars) and ischemic (I; black bars) cortex of Wt and uPA−/− mice 24 h after MCAO. C,*p = 0.001 compared with the nonischemic hemisphere in uPA−/− mice. D, *p = 0.02 compared with the nonischemic hemisphere in Wt mice. **p < 0.0001 compared with the nonischemic hemisphere in uPA−/− mice; n = 6 mice per experimental group. Lines denote SD. Statistical analysis was performed with two-sample t test. E, Mean length of distal neurites located within 0.6 mm of the border of the necrotic core in Wt (white bar) and uPA−/− (black bar) mice 24 h after MCAO; n = 6 mice per experimental group. Bars represent mean values obtained from the analysis of 2000 extensions per mouse; *p < 0.0001. Lines indicate SD. F, Representative micrographs of a tridimensional reconstruction of DiI-stained distal dendrites from neurons originated in cortical layer V from Wt and uPA−/− mice either under nonischemic conditions (controls) or 24 h after tMCAO. Red is the dendritic shaft and blue corresponds to dendritic protrusions.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    uPA mediates dendritic spine recovery in the peri-infarct cortex. A, Representative micrograph of a Golgi-stained coronal section at bregma: +0.5 mm from a Wt brain 24 h after tMCAO. M1 and M2 denote primary and secondary motor cortices, respectively. The square denotes the interface between the necrotic core (Nc) and peri-infarct cortex where observations presented in C–F were performed. Magnification: 4×. B, Representative micrographs taken from the interphase between the Nc and peri-infarct cortex (a). b, Shows the area located within 0.6 mm from the border of the Nc where dendritic spines (arrowheads) are intermixed with dendritic varicosities (arrows). Magnification: 40× in a, and 100× in b. C, Representative micrographs of Golgi-stained dendrites located within 0.6 mm from the border of the Nc from Wt and uPA−/− mice 6, 24, and 168 h (7 d) after tMCAO. NI, nonischemic brains (controls). Arrows in c and d denote dendritic varicosities. Arrows and arrowheads in e denote filopodia and varicosities, respectively. Arrows and arrowheads in f denote dendritic varicosities and small protrusions, respectively. Arrowhead and arrows in g denote dendritic spines and long thin protrusions, respectively. D, E, Mean number of dendritic protrusions per 10 μm (D) and percentage of neurons with dendritic blebbing (E) 0.6 mm from the border of the Nc of Wt (white bars), uPA−/− (black bars), uPAR−/− (gray bars), and PlauGFDhu/GFDhu (silver bars) mice 0–168 h after tMCAO. C, controls, nonischemic brains. Lines denote SD; n = 12 mice per strain at each time point. D, *p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.0001 compared with Wt at 6 h and uPA−/−, uPAR−/−, and PlauGFDhu/GFDhu brains 6, 24, and 168 h after tMCAO. E, *p < 0.0001 compared with Wt at 6 h and with uPA−/−, uPAR−/−, and PlauGFDhu/GFDhu brains and 6, 24, and 168 h after tMCAO. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way ANOVA test. F, Cumulative frequency plot of spine length in the distal 10 μm of 600 dendrites examined from Wt mice either under nonischemic conditions (white squares) or 24 and 168 h after 60 min of tMCAO (black circles and gray triangles, respectively).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    uPAR expression in cerebral cortical neurons. A, Representative micrograph of uPAR expression in cerebral cortical neurons. Green, uPAR; blue, DAPI. Magnification: 20×. B, C, Representative micrographs of wild-type cerebral cortical neurons stained with antibodies against uPAR (white and green in B and C) and MAP-2 (red in B) or synaptophysin (red in C). Arrows in C denote examples where presynaptic synaptophysin-containing vesicles face uPAR-expressing postsynaptic dendrites. Magnification: 60×. D, E, Representative micrograph of uPAR immunostaining (green in D and white and green in E) and phalloidin (red in D and E) in a distal dendrite of a Wt cerebral cortical neuron. The dashed and continuous squares correspond to the areas magnified in E a–c and d–f, respectively. Arrows in c indicate colocalization of uPAR and phalloidin. Arrows in f denote an example where uPAR is localized in the tip of dendritic protrusions. Magnification: 20× in D and 60× in E.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    uPA promotes dendritic protrusion recovery following an excitotoxic injury. A, Diagram of the experimental paradigm used to study the effect of uPA on dendritic spine recovery following an excitotoxic injury. a–c, Correspond to examples of DiI-stained distal dendrites either at baseline (a), or 10 min after exposure to NMDA (b; acute injury), or 180 min after withdrawing NMDA (c; recovery). Arrowheads denote dendritic spines in a and varicosities in b. Arrows in c show dendritic spines and filopodia re-emerging from varicosities. B, Representative micrograph of MAP-2 (red) and uPAR (white in b and yellow in c) staining in the distal dendrite of a Wt neuron 3 h after 10 min of incubation with NMDA. Arrows in c denote uPAR clustered within dendritic varicosities. Magnification: 40×. C, Mean percentage of uPAR-negative (white bar) and uPAR-positive (black bar) varicosities in the distal 10 μm of Wt dendrites following 10 min of treatment with NMDA (n = 200 neurons from three different cultures; p < 0.001; two-sample t test). Lines denote SD. D, Magnification of the area denoted by the square in B. Arrows denote uPAR in filopodia re-emerging from a uPAR-enriched varicosity. Red is MAP-2, white (b) and green (c) are uPAR. Magnification: 100×. E, Mean number of dendritic protrusions per10 μm in the distal dendrites of Wt (white bars), uPA−/− (black bars), and uPAR−/− (gray bars) cerebral cortical neurons either at baseline (time 0), or immediately after 10 min of incubation with NMDA, or 3 h after recovery from 10 min of incubation with NMDA. A subset of Wt, uPA−/−, and uPAR−/− neurons were treated with 10 nm uPA immediately after the end of the excitotoxic injury (ruPA). *p < 0.0001 compared with Wt neurons immediately after NMDA exposure; **p = 0.001 compared with untreated Wt neurons 3 h after NMDA exposure; §p < 0.0001 compared with uPA−/− neurons either immediately after exposure to NMDA or 3 h after NMDA exposure but no treatment with ruPA; n = 60 per time point. Each observation was repeated in cultures from three different animals. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    uPA induces cytoskeletal reorganization in dendritic protrusions. A, Representative micrograph of MAP-2 (green) and phalloidin (white and red) staining in a dendrite of a Wt cerebral cortical neuron incubated 60 min with either 10 nm of uPA (+ uPA) or vehicle (control). Arrows in e denote phalloidin-positive dendritic filopodia. Magnification: 60×. B, Representative micrograph of MAP-2 (green) and profilin (white and red) staining in a Wt cerebral cortical neuron incubated 60 min with either 10 nm of uPA (+ uPA) or vehicle (control). Note that uPA treatment induces the expression of profilin not only in the dendrite but also in the axon. Magnification: 60×. C–G, Representative Western bot analysis and quantification of the mean density of the band of profilin (C) and cofilin (D, E) phosphorylated at serine 3 (p-cofilin) in Wt cerebral cortical neurons incubated 0–60 min with 10 nm uPA (C, D), or 10 nm of uPA's N-terminal fragment (ATF; E), or a combination of uPA and either 5 μm of the Rac inhibitor EHT-1864 (Rac-I; F), or 10 μm of the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (ROCK-I; G). C, D, *p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.0001 compared with cells treated 0–5 min with uPA. E, *p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.0001 compared with cells either left untreated or incubated 30 min with uPA or ATF. F, *p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.0001 compared with cells treated with uPA in the presence of the Rac inhibitor EHT-1864. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (43)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 43
22 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Promotes Dendritic Spine Recovery and Improves Neurological Outcome Following Ischemic Stroke
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Promotes Dendritic Spine Recovery and Improves Neurological Outcome Following Ischemic Stroke
Fang Wu, Marcela Catano, Ramiro Echeverry, Enrique Torre, Woldeab B. Haile, Jie An, Changhua Chen, Lihong Cheng, Andrew Nicholson, Frank C. Tong, Jaekeun Park, Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 22 October 2014, 34 (43) 14219-14232; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-13.2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Promotes Dendritic Spine Recovery and Improves Neurological Outcome Following Ischemic Stroke
Fang Wu, Marcela Catano, Ramiro Echeverry, Enrique Torre, Woldeab B. Haile, Jie An, Changhua Chen, Lihong Cheng, Andrew Nicholson, Frank C. Tong, Jaekeun Park, Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 22 October 2014, 34 (43) 14219-14232; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-13.2014
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cerebral ischemia
  • recovery
  • stroke
  • urokinase-type plasminogen activator

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • The stria vascularis in mice and humans is an early site of age-related cochlear degeneration, macrophage dysfunction, and inflammation
  • Restoration of sleep and circadian behavior by autophagy modulation in Huntington’s disease
  • A New Mouse Model of Giant Axonal Neuropathy with Overt Phenotypes and Neurodegeneration Driven by Neurofilament Disorganization
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.