Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2014, 34 (9) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

VTA Neurons Coregulate Dopamine and Glutamate Release

Martín F. Adrover, Jung Hoon Shin, and Veronica A. Alvarez

(see pages 3183–3192)

Dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) are central in reward processing; most abused drugs facilitate dopamine transmission at these synapses. Some dopaminergic afferents also release glutamate in NAc, thus evoking EPSCs in medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Whether dopamine and glutamate are packaged in the same vesicles and released at the same synapses has been unclear, but experiments by Adrover et al. suggest that they are. Optical stimulation of dopaminergic terminals in NAc both caused dopamine release and evoked glutamatergic EPSCs in MSNs. Like dopamine transients—but unlike EPSCs evoked by stimulating other glutamatergic inputs—optically evoked EPSCs exhibited paired-pulse depression and were inhibited by an agonist of dopamine D2 receptors, which are present on dopaminergic terminals. Thus, glutamate and dopamine release from VTA terminals appears to be coupled. Interestingly, these signaling pathways are uncoupled by cocaine, which inhibits dopamine reuptake: extracellular dopamine continues to modulate MSNs while inhibiting transmitter release from VTA terminals, thus reducing glutamatergic signaling.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Translational Activators and Repressors Contribute to LTP

Chenghai Dong, Svitlana V. Bach, Kathryn A. Haynes, and Ashok N. Hegde

(see pages 3171–3182)

Cellular levels of a protein are determined by its synthesis and degradation rates, which can be modulated by specific translational activators and repressors and by the activity of the proteasome system. The levels of translational activators and repressors are similarly modulated, adding an extra level of complexity to the regulation of cellular processes such as long-term potentiation (LTP). Inhibiting proteasomal degradation in neurons enhances the early phase (induction) of LTP, but inhibits the late phase (maintenance). Dong et al. propose that these effects stem from proteasomal regulation of translational activators and repressors, respectively. LTP-inducing stimulation initially increased expression of two translational activators, with levels peaking after 45 min. Inhibiting proteasomal degradation before this point increased levels of these activators, whose activity was required for the enhancement of LTP induction. In addition, LTP-inducing stimulation increased expression of two translational repressors, whose levels peaked after 90 min. Inhibiting degradation before this point increased levels of these repressors, which appeared necessary for the reduction of LTP maintenance.

Embedded Image Systems/Circuits

Dendritic Arbor Shape Does Not Vary across Orientation Map

Manuel Levy, Zhongyang Lu, Grace Dion, and Prakash Kara

(see pages 3231–3236)

Across primary visual cortex (V1), neurons that respond preferentially to stimuli of a given orientation are clustered in so-called orientation domains. Domains representing different orientations meet at points called pinwheel centers. Because a neuron's orientation selectivity is shaped by local inputs, one might expect neurons at pinwheel centers—surrounded by neurons with various orientation preferences—to be more broadly tuned than neurons in the center of orientation domains. But several studies have suggested that this is not the case. Neurons at pinwheel centers could theoretically sharpen their tuning by distributing their dendrites in a way that biases their sampling of surrounding domains, but Levy et al. found no evidence for this hypothesis. The size and shape of dendritic arbors of cat layer 2/3 pyramidal cells was independent of soma position relative to the orientation map. Moreover, neurons with somata near pinwheel centers extended dendrites into all surrounding orientation domains. Thus, V1 neurons seem to integrate information from surrounding neurons regardless of their orientation selectivity.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Reconstructed somato-dendritic arbor of a V1 neuron located at a pinwheel center. The neuron's dendrites extend into all surrounding orientation domains (indicated by different colors). See the article by Levy et al. for details.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

ApoE Peptide Increases Brain Uptake of Therapeutic Enzyme

Annika Böckenhoff, Sandra Cramer, Philipp Wölte, Simeon Knieling, Claudia Wohlenberg, et al.

(see pages 3122–3129)

A major challenge in developing treatments for neurological disorders is ensuring that the therapeutic agent crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Endogenous mechanisms exist for transporting essential molecules across the BBB, however, and these might be exploited to transport therapeutic molecules. This approach might be especially useful for enzyme replacement therapy. Proteins such as insulin bind to specific receptors on the endothelial cells that form the BBB; after binding, the proteins are endocystosed, transported across the cell, and exocytosed into the brain. Böckenhoff et al. fused the receptor-binding domains of several proteins transported in this way to arylsulfatase A (ASA)—a lysosomal enzyme mutated in metachromatic leukodystrophy—and compared their ability to promote brain entry. Of five tested peptides, only one—derived from apolipoprotein E (ApoE)—increased brain delivery of ASA. The ApoE peptide not only increased brain delivery of peripherally injected ASA, but also enabled a greater reduction in lysosomal storage in brains of ASA-null mice than that achieved with wild-type ASA.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 34 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 34, Issue 9
26 Feb 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2014, 34 (9) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2014, 34 (9) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Systems/Circuits
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.