Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Time Flies When We Intend to Act: Temporal Distortion in a Go/No-Go Task

Yoshiko Yabe and Melvyn A. Goodale
Journal of Neuroscience 25 March 2015, 35 (12) 5023-5029; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4386-14.2015
Yoshiko Yabe
1Brain and Mind Institute and the Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7, and
2Research Institute, Kochi University of Technology, Kami, Kochi, 782 8502, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melvyn A. Goodale
1Brain and Mind Institute and the Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematics of experimental methods. A, The clock. The fixation dot, the second hand, and the rim circle of our stimulus were presented continuously throughout the trial to avoid the flash-lag effect (Kanai et al., 2009). B, Schematic of Experiment 1. C, Schematic of Experiment 2. D, Schematic of Experiment 3.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The perceived timing of the change in the color relative to real timing. Each line represents a different participant. A, Experiment 1 (n = 7), B, Experiment 2 (n = 10). C, Experiment 3A (n = 12). D, Experiment 3B (n = 10).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Results of Experiment 1

    Participantd′Perceived delay from the change in color (ms)Saccade latency (ms)Correlation
    ControlSaccadeDifference from control
    ControlSaccadeMSEMSESaccadeMSErp
    014.334.2562.10107.9052.36163.39−9.75292.55119.860.000.96
    024.054.30−122.34343.9530.66214.20153.00234.3960.370.010.92
    033.152.87126.63147.40193.41191.2966.79284.0368.010.000.97
    043.364.0187.13146.04150.42217.7463.29286.9451.96−0.020.83
    054.254.20202.21191.34242.11286.0839.90265.3471.800.001.00
    063.784.30414.45213.31499.27286.7384.82325.2694.87−0.080.37
    074.404.33112.23166.40124.30197.4412.07197.7149.68−0.060.50
    M3.904.04126.06184.6558.59269.46−0.02
    SE0.490.5356.5155.0318.5614.680.01
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Results of Experiment 2

    Participantd′Perceived delay from the change in color (ms)Saccade latency (ms)Correlation
    ControlGo/no-goGoNo-goDifference from control
    ControlGo/no-goMSEMSEMSEMSEGo/no-goGoNo-goMSErp
    084.273.63116.0288.80203.18118.65205.02108.66195.43157.3387.1689.0079.42287.8061.57−0.170.09
    094.013.92134.6197.11168.41111.81168.86109.33167.13120.2533.7934.2532.52296.5269.41−0.030.78
    103.673.8857.54121.1587.44190.8363.23188.75173.08175.9429.905.69115.54268.3472.030.080.40
    111.812.30146.18244.9885.50351.3555.57356.56158.34332.84−60.68−90.6112.16324.1197.540.150.13
    122.642.99186.46137.01251.22201.48248.13206.65277.18157.4464.7661.6790.72270.4373.61−0.130.17
    063.642.87−49.85116.8251.32271.5038.38290.8197.48185.02101.1788.22147.33331.6082.25−0.040.67
    133.783.67−109.22144.0650.22174.5991.17176.79−71.2993.64159.43200.3937.93313.8972.36−0.260.01
    143.593.83419.21234.33518.30206.55527.89204.34487.78214.4799.09108.6868.57353.8588.63−0.060.57
    153.613.48−39.77168.7216.66128.2335.19130.87−40.79101.6256.4374.97−1.02324.6672.380.060.55
    162.302.82−64.06153.13−29.75332.95−64.38334.83137.66274.2634.31−0.32201.72324.87103.110.060.57
    M3.333.3479.71140.25136.91158.2060.5457.1978.49309.61−0.03
    SE0.800.5547.2647.5449.5646.9917.5223.1918.988.380.04
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Results of Experiment 3A

    ParticipantPerceived delay from the change in color (ms)Response latency (ms)Correlation
    ControlGo/no-goGoNo-goDifference from control
    MSEMSEMSEMSEGo/no-goGoNo-goMSErp
    17112.20136.34108.27101.57120.3896.1377.00109.98−3.948.18−35.20361.5175.220.190.05
    1816.25281.5330.46300.71−10.51203.80163.63485.2414.22−26.76147.38542.51141.89−0.170.09
    19113.58154.30176.10146.77139.28122.99187.78153.0562.5225.7074.19476.82174.03−0.020.87
    2026.22121.0244.82120.2248.2485.0735.22189.6418.6022.029.00360.08100.19−0.030.77
    2149.22100.1379.45134.9673.59135.9998.21132.5630.2324.3748.99482.78119.89−0.020.81
    22−4.96214.2378.51227.9258.78141.68105.83311.9583.4763.74110.79331.8462.510.080.42
    2366.35144.8263.97221.0573.56139.5046.33324.86−2.377.22−20.01434.24109.14−0.060.53
    2480.14115.23151.16164.10131.18109.18231.08286.6671.0251.04150.94341.1074.880.090.36
    252.15121.6379.88134.0137.13113.93149.63137.7377.7334.98147.48407.96101.880.030.78
    26105.80178.71126.23133.01124.53139.57131.35113.1720.4318.7225.55377.51102.630.060.56
    27199.95221.67214.13204.69242.08136.02102.32359.8814.1842.13−97.63404.67131.830.050.62
    28107.35129.38155.74202.25130.59198.82240.62194.2248.3923.24133.27317.9270.09−0.070.46
    M72.85109.0697.40130.7536.2124.5557.90403.240.01
    SE16.4015.5417.9718.348.616.4022.9519.120.03
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Results of Experiment 3B

    ParticipantPerceived delay from the change in color (ms)Response latency (ms)Correlation
    ControlGo/no-goGoNo-goDifference from control
    MSEMSEMSEMSEGo/no-goGoNo-goMSErp
    2950.5111.24171.3718.26190.1120.3482.7636.33120.86139.6032.25496.3411.200.100.22
    30146.1516.87220.3517.09239.2016.04145.6954.6474.2093.04−0.46439.6011.930.340.00
    31105.5210.43185.6410.86188.9911.00174.8229.4480.1183.4769.29426.879.180.060.46
    32184.7524.34227.7028.13189.8830.02337.9264.0842.955.13153.18565.0217.02−0.220.01
    3381.569.62149.309.90153.3612.10139.2717.0367.7571.8057.71467.727.380.090.25
    3455.137.83111.168.38110.889.19112.0719.6856.0455.7556.94378.366.35−0.010.93
    35−17.1410.3676.3612.2978.8115.5368.7715.1193.4995.9585.91435.8411.420.050.52
    3677.709.6071.3112.3074.9613.6361.6026.98−6.38−2.74−16.09469.587.61−0.020.78
    37100.3610.53245.3621.43263.9216.72147.96100.54145.01163.5647.60361.648.810.170.03
    3870.618.48236.5718.15263.0818.61157.0344.16165.96192.4786.42547.2714.050.120.14
    M85.51169.51175.32142.7984.0089.8057.27458.820.07
    SE16.4719.6521.0423.6615.1318.9114.3019.630.04
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 12
25 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time Flies When We Intend to Act: Temporal Distortion in a Go/No-Go Task
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Time Flies When We Intend to Act: Temporal Distortion in a Go/No-Go Task
Yoshiko Yabe, Melvyn A. Goodale
Journal of Neuroscience 25 March 2015, 35 (12) 5023-5029; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4386-14.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Time Flies When We Intend to Act: Temporal Distortion in a Go/No-Go Task
Yoshiko Yabe, Melvyn A. Goodale
Journal of Neuroscience 25 March 2015, 35 (12) 5023-5029; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4386-14.2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • eye movement
  • go/no-go
  • intentional binding
  • sense of agency
  • time perception

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Disentangling Object Category Representations Driven by Dynamic and Static Visual Input
  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
  • Multisession Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Context Discrimination in Mice
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.