Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Gene-Silencing Screen for Mammalian Axon Regeneration Identifies Inpp5f (Sac2) as an Endogenous Suppressor of Repair after Spinal Cord Injury

Yixiao Zou, Massimiliano Stagi, Xingxing Wang, Kazim Yigitkanli, Chad S. Siegel, Fubito Nakatsu, William B. J. Cafferty and Stephen M. Strittmatter
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10429-10439; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1718-15.2015
Yixiao Zou
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yixiao Zou
Massimiliano Stagi
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Massimiliano Stagi
Xingxing Wang
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazim Yigitkanli
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chad S. Siegel
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chad S. Siegel
Fubito Nakatsu
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William B. J. Cafferty
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for William B. J. Cafferty
Stephen M. Strittmatter
Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen M. Strittmatter
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Axonal growth and neuronal rewiring facilitate functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Known interventions that promote neural repair remain limited in their functional efficacy. To understand genetic determinants of mammalian CNS axon regeneration, we completed an unbiased RNAi gene-silencing screen across most phosphatases in the genome. We identified one known and 17 previously unknown phosphatase suppressors of injury-induced CNS axon growth. Silencing Inpp5f (Sac2) leads to robust enhancement of axon regeneration and growth cone reformation. Results from cultured Inpp5f−/− neurons confirm lentiviral shRNA results from the screen. Consistent with the nonoverlapping substrate specificity between Inpp5f and PTEN, rapamycin does not block enhanced regeneration in Inpp5f−/− neurons, implicating mechanisms independent of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Inpp5f−/− mice develop normally, but show enhanced anatomical and functional recovery after mid-thoracic dorsal hemisection injury. More serotonergic axons sprout and/or regenerate caudal to the lesion level, and greater numbers of corticospinal tract axons sprout rostral to the lesion. Functionally, Inpp5f-null mice exhibit enhanced recovery of motor functions in both open-field and rotarod tests. This study demonstrates the potential of an unbiased high-throughput functional screen to identify endogenous suppressors of CNS axon growth after injury, and reveals Inpp5f (Sac2) as a novel suppressor of CNS axon repair after spinal cord injury.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The extent of axon regeneration is a critical determinant of neurological recovery from injury, and is extremely limited in the adult mammalian CNS. We describe an unbiased gene-silencing screen that uncovered novel molecules suppressing axonal regeneration. Inpp5f (Sac2) gene deletion promoted recovery from spinal cord injury with no side effects. The mechanism of action is distinct from another lipid phosphatase implicated in regeneration, PTEN. This opens new pathways for investigation in spinal cord injury research. Furthermore the screening methodology can be applied on a genome wide scale to discovery the entire set of mammalian genes contributing to axonal regeneration.

  • axon regeneration
  • inositol phosphate
  • sac2
  • siRNA
  • spinal cord injury

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition without effective medical treatment. Enhancing axon growth after injury is an attractive strategy for therapeutic intervention. Targeting inhibitory ligands such as CSPG (Bradbury et al., 2002), Nogo (Chen et al., 2000; GrandPré et al., 2000), MAG (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1994), and OMgp (Wang et al., 2002), or their neuronal receptors and signal transduction factors such as NgR1 (Fournier et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2004), PirB (Atwal et al., 2008), PTPRS (Lang et al., 2015), RhoA (Dergham et al., 2002), and ROCK (Fournier et al., 2003), or targeting inhibitory factors intrinsic to injured neurons, such as PTEN (Park et al., 2008), PDE4 (Nikulina et al., 2004), KLF4 (Moore et al., 2009), and SOCS3 (Smith et al., 2009), have led to enhanced axon growth and recovery in various preclinical models. Despite remarkable progress, we still lack a complete understanding of the repertoire of genetic factors that restrict recovery after CNS trauma. From a therapeutic perspective, identification of novel suppressors of axon growth is important for developing single-agent as well as combinatorial therapeutics (Cafferty et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2011; Lewandowski and Steward, 2014).

Functional genetic screens have the potential to uncover new pathways that regulate axon regeneration. PTEN, as a suppressor of regeneration, was identified from a survey of six genes in optic nerve regeneration (Park et al., 2008). KLF4's role is derived from overexpressing 111 developmentally regulated genes in hippocampal neurite outgrowth (Moore et al., 2009). Overexpression screens of cortical neurite outgrowth have revealed novel axon growth regulators (Blackmore et al., 2010; Buchser et al., 2010). The role of DLK-1 (MAP3K12) as a kinase required for initiation of regeneration was revealed by an unbiased RNAi loss-of-function screen in GABAergic axons of Caenorhabditis elegans (Hammarlund et al., 2009). Furthermore, identification of EFA-6 from a screen using C. elegans mutant alleles (Chen et al., 2011) substantially added to our understanding of how microtubule stability contributes to axon regeneration (Ertürk et al., 2007; Hellal et al., 2011). To date, a loss-of-function screen tailored to identify endogenous suppressors of axon regeneration in mammalian primary CNS neurons has not been reported.

We focused on phosphatases because of their limited number in the mammalian genome (<300), the relative feasibility of developing small molecule inhibitors to block phosphatases, and known examples of phosphatases acting as suppressors of CNS regeneration. For instance, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor S (PTPRS) serves as a receptor to extrinsic inhibitor CSPG (Shen et al., 2009). The related phosphatase, LAR, may cooperate with PTPRS as a CSPG receptor (Fry et al., 2010; Fisher et al., 2011). PTEN is a lipid phosphatase that metabolizes PI(3,4,5)P3 and suppresses axon regeneration by negatively regulating the PI3K/mTOR pathway (Park et al., 2008).

Here, we report an RNAi-mediated functional screen to identify phosphatases that inhibit axon regeneration in mouse cortical neurons. We identified 18 phosphatase suppressors from the screen, including one known inhibitor of axon growth (PTEN) and 17 novel genes. We report enhanced axon growth and functional recovery after SCI in mice with targeted deletion of one phosphatase hit, Inpp5f (Sac2). These findings validate this functional genomics approach and establish Inpp5f inactivation as a potential therapeutic approach to improve recovery after SCI.

Materials and Methods

Cortical axon regeneration screen.

Cortices from E17.5 C57BL/6 mice embryos were dissected in ice-cold Hibernate E Minus Calcium medium (catalog #HE-Ca; BrainBits) and incubated in 5 ml of digestion medium for 30 min at 37°C. The digestion medium contains papain (25 U/ml; catalog #LS003127; Worthington Biochemical), DNAse I (2000 U/ml; catalog #10104159001; Roche), 2.5 mm EDTA, and 1.5 mm CaCl2 diluted in plating medium. Plating medium is composed of 500 ml Neurobasal A (catalog #10888-022; Life Technologies) supplemented with 5 ml of 100 mm sodium pyruvate (catalog #11360-070; Life Technologies), 5 ml of 100× GlutaMAX (catalog #35050-061; Life Technologies), 5 ml of 100× penicillin-streptomycin (catalog #15140-122; Life Technologies), and 10 ml of 50× B-27 supplement (catalog #17504-001; Life Technologies). Digested tissues were washed once in 10 ml Neurobasal A medium, triturated 10–15 times in 1.5 ml of plating medium, and then passed through a 40 μm cell strainer (catalog #352340; Corning) to remove large chunks of debris. Cells were plated on 96-well poly-lysine-coated plates (catalog #354413; Corning) at a density of 50,000 cells per well in 200 μl of plating medium. Lentiviral particles targeting 219 phosphatases using 1086 unique shRNA clones (SM0431; Sigma) were added on DIV 5 to achieve a minimum multiplicity of infection of 10. On DIV 8, 96-well cultures were scraped using a custom-fabricated 96-pin array as described previously (Huebner et al., 2011) and allowed to regenerate for another 72 h before fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde. Regenerating axons in the scrape zone were visualized using an antibody against β3-tubulin (1:2000, mouse monoclonal; catalog #G712A; Promega). Growth cones were visualized by staining for F-actin using Alexa 568-conjugated phalloidin (10 nm; catalog #A12380; Life Technologies). Cell density was visualized using nuclear marker DAPI (0.2 μg/ml; catalog #D9542; Sigma). Images were taken on a 10× objective in an automated high-throughput imager (ImageXpress Micro XLS; Molecular Devices) under identical conditions. Regeneration zone identification, image thresholding, and quantitation were performed blind to treatment conditions either in ImageJ or using an automated MATLAB script.

Characterization of INPP5F/Inpp5f mRNA expression.

INPP5F expression in different adult human tissues was measured using RNA-seq by the Illumina Human Body Map 2.0 project. Data were accessed via NCBI AceView (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/av.cgi?db=human&c=Gene&l=INPP5F). For comparison, human brain expression of PTEN was accessed from the same database (http://www.ncbi.n l m . n i h . g o v / I E B / R e s e a r c h / A c e m b l y / a v . c g i ? d b=h u m a n & c= G e n e & l=P T E N). To quantify the extent of Inpp5f gene knockdown after treating with lentiviral shRNA particles, total RNA was harvested from cortical culture in 96-well plates 3 d after adding viruses by applying 30 μl of TRIzol reagent (catalog #15596-026; Life Technologies) to each well. To quantify levels of Inpp5f mRNA expression in different brain regions before or 7 d after SCI, mice were deeply anesthetized by CO2 and decapitated. Different brain regions were rapidly dissected on ice and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. One milliliter of TRIzol reagent was later added per 50–100 mg of tissue. Total RNA was prepared according to the TRIzol reagent protocol. cDNA was then produced by assembling the following reverse transcription PCR: 1 μg of total RNA, 0.5 μl M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase and 2.5 μl 10× buffer (enzyme at 200,000 U/ml stock concentration; catalog #M0253S; New England BioLabs), 1.5 μl Random Primer 9 (50 μm stock; catalog #S1254S; New England BioLabs), 1 μl dNTP (10 mm stock' catalog #U151A; Promega), and brought to 25 μl total reaction volume with DEPC water. PCR program is 30°C for 10 min, 42°C for 40 min, and 99°C for 5 min. cDNA of each sample was then used for real-time qPCR in the following reaction: 1 μl cDNA, 5 μl iQ master mix (catalog #170-8860; Bio-Rad), 3.5 μl ddH2O, and 0.5 μl gene expression assay targeting mouse Inpp5f (20× stock, Mm00724391 m1p Life Technologies). qPCR was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System using standard cycles. GAPDH was used as loading control. Three biological samples were used per condition. Each sample was loaded in triplicates.

Localization of Inpp5f protein in neurons.

Primary mouse cortical neurons were dissociated from E17.5 mice embryos as described above and seeded on 18 mm poly-d-lysine-coated glass coverslips at a density of 40,000 cells/cm2. Five coverslips were housed in each 60 mm Petri dish containing 3 ml of medium. During initial plating, plating medium as described above was supplemented with 1% FBS (catalog #16000-044; Life Technologies). Four hours after plating, medium was replaced to FBS-free plating medium. One milliliter of medium was removed and 2 ml of fresh medium was added every 7 d. On DIV 16, neurons were double transfected with C-terminal GFP-tagged, full-length mouse Inpp5f and cytosolic tdTomato constructs using the calcium phosphate method. On DIV 21, neurons were imaged live on a spinning disk confocal microscope (UltraVIEW; PerkinElmer).

Sensitivity to rapamycin inhibition.

Single-embryo primary cortical cultures were prepared from E17.5 pregnant Inpp5f+/− females mated with Inpp5f+/− males. Tail clips were saved from each embryo for later genotyping. Dissection, trituration, and plating were all performed separately for each embryo. Care was taken to avoid cross-contamination. As described above, neurons were plated at 50,000 cells per well in 200 μl of plating medium on 96-well plates. Fifty percent medium change was performed every 7 d. Scrape injury occurred on DIV 12 and immediately afterward, cultures either received rapamycin (300 nm; LC Laboratories; R-5000) or DMSO vehicle control diluted in plating medium. Final DMSO concentration is 0.0005% for both treatment groups. Seventy-two hours after scrape, culture was fixed and stained for DAPI and β3-tubulin. To test whether enhanced axon regeneration after PTEN inactivation is sensitive to rapamycin inhibition in the scrape assay, primary cortical neurons were prepared from E17.5 WT embryos as described above and cotransfected with either myristoylated GFP plus nontargeting shRNA (SHC002; Sigma) constructs or myristoylated GFP plus mouse PTEN shRNA (SHCLND-NM 008960 TRCN0000028992; Sigma) constructs using the Amaxa Mouse Neuron Nucleofector Kit (VPG-1001; Lonza). Neurons (8 × 106) were mixed with 5 μg of total DNA (1:1 ratio between GFP and shRNA) for each nucleofection reaction under conditions listed in manufacturer's protocol. Nucleofected neurons were plated at 60,000 cells per well in 200 μl of plating medium on 96-well plates. On every seventh day, 50% of the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium. Scrape injury occurred on DIV 8 and immediately afterward cultures either received rapamycin (300 nm) or DMSO vehicle control diluted in plating medium. Final DMSO concentration is 0.0005% for both treatment groups. Seventy-two hours after scrape, cultures were imaged live and GFP+ processes that regenerated into the scraped region were quantified in ImageJ. Immunostaining for phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (catalog #2211; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:100) and Western blot for phospho-mTOR (catalog #5536; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1000), mTOR (catalog #2983; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1000), and actin (catalog #3700; Cell Signaling Technology) were performed by following standard protocols using primary antibodies as indicated.

Mice and surgeries.

Inpp5f−/− mice is a gift from Dr. Jonathan Epstein, University of Pennsylvania (Zhu et al., 2009). All experimental procedures were performed in compliance with animal protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Yale University. For genotyping, genomic DNA was extracted from ear clip samples using REDExtract-N-Amp Tissue PCR Kit (catalog #XNAT; Sigma) and genotyped with the following primers: Wt fwd ′5-TTA CCT GCT GTT CAT GTC TGT GGC-3′; Wt rev ′5-CAC CAA TAG CTG ACC ATC CAG AGC-3′; Mut fwd ′5-ATA TTG AAA CCC ACG GCA TGG TGC-3′; Mut rev ′5-TTT GAT GGA CCA TTT CGG CAC AGC-3′. The wild-type amplicon is 214 bp and the mutant amplicon is 323 bp. Wild-type and mutant reactions were run separately using a touchdown PCR protocol. Adult (3–5 months old) female Inpp5f−/− mice and their littermate controls (including both Inpp5f+/− and WT animals) were used for SCI experiments. All animals received a subcutaneous injection of Buprenex 30 min before surgery at 0.1 mg/kg. Mice were first anesthetized with 4% isoflurane and maintained with 3% isoflurane throughout the procedure. Dorsal hemisection was performed as described previously (Duffy et al., 2012). First, dorsal spinal cord was exposed at T6 and T7 levels by laminectomy. Dura mater was then pierced and a pair of microscissors was used to lesion the spinal cord to a depth of 1.0 mm to completely sever the dorsal and dorsolateral corticospinal tract (CST). Lateral aspect of the spinal cord was scraped with a 30 gauge needle to ensure completeness of the lesion. Muscle and skin overlying the lesion were sutured with 4.0 vicryl. All animals received subcutaneous injection of 100 mg/kg ampicillin and 0.1 mg/kg Buprenex twice a day for the first 2 d after surgery and additional injections later as necessary.

Tracing.

To trace the CST, biotin dextran amine (BDA; 0.1 g/ml in sterile ddH2O, MW = 10,000, catalog #D-1956; Life Technologies) was injected into the sensorimotor cortex to anterogradely label the CST. In each animal, 300 nl of BDA was injected at each of the five sites (coordinates from bregma in mediolateral/anterior–posterior format in mm: 1.0/0.0, 1.5/1.5, 1.5/0.5, 1.5/−0.5, 1.5/−1.5) for a total of 1.5 μl volume. Mice were kept for an additional 14 d before being killed.

Histology and immunohistochemistry.

Mice were given a lethal dose of anesthesia and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains and spinal cords were isolated, embedded in 10% gelatin, and postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. Serial sections (40 μm) were collected on a vibratome (VT1000S; Leica). Transverse sections were collected at C7 cervical enlargements and L2 lumbar enlargements. Furthermore, a 10 mm block of spinal cord including the thoracic lesion site (from −5 mm rostral to +5 mm caudal) was excised from each animal and sectioned sagittally, collecting every single section. In addition, a block of tissue was excised immediately anterior to the sagittally sectioned block and sectioned transversely. Severity of lesion was quantified via phase-contrast microscopy by measuring the length of intact cord at the lesion center and the length of total cord sufficiently removed from the lesion center on every sagittal section using phase-contrast microscopy. To detect 5-HT (or serotonin), sections were blocked and permeabilized in a solution consisting of 10% normal donkey serum (NDS) and 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS (0.2% PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies (1:10,000; rabbit polyclonal; catalog #20080; ImmunoStar) were diluted in 5% NDS and 0.2% PBST and incubated with sections at 4°C overnight. Sections were washed 3× for 10 min each in PBS. Alexa 555-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:500; donkey-anti-rabbit; catalog #A31572; Life Technologies) was applied for 2 h in room temperature. To detect BDA-labeled fibers, BDA staining was performed using a tagged avidin reaction (Vectastain ABC; catalog #PK-4000; Vector Laboratories) and following protocols of the TSA cyanine 3 amplification system (catalog #NEL744001KT; PerkinElmer).

Axonal counting and quantifications.

All quantification was performed blind to genotypes. To quantify total CST axons labeled, BDA+ CST fibers were counted in the dorsal column CST bundle at the level of cervical enlargement. Images were collected on a confocal microscope (LSM710; Zeiss) with 63× objective. Axons were counted in three representative rectangular areas (6000 μm2) per section on two sections. The number of labeled axons was calculated by adjusting counted area to total area of the main CST bundle. To quantify the number of CST sprouting axons in transverse sections, a vertical line was drawn at 200 μm ipsilateral to the sagittal midline and all BDA+ fibers that cross the line were counted. For each mouse, at least six sections were imaged using 20× objective on LSM710 and analyzed. Density of sprouting CST fibers near the lesion were quantified by drawing vertical lines at −5, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, and 3 mm from the lesion on the computer screen and the number of BDA+ fibers outside the main CST bundle crossing each line was counted under a 20× objective lens on a Zeiss Z1 Imager. Every section of the whole spinal cord was analyzed. To quantify the density of 5-HT+ axons innervating the ventral horns in transverse sections, a line 500 μm long that bisects the ventral horn was drawn at each ventral horn. The number of 5-HT+ axons crossing the line was counted in both ventral horns on each section. At least three sections from each mouse were imaged using 20× objective on LSM710 and analyzed.

Behavioral testing.

All behavioral tests were performed by two researchers unaware of the genotype of the mice. We used the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) as a measure of open-field locomotion (Basso et al., 2006). BMS has a quantitative scale from 0 to 9. Observations were made once pre-injury and weekly following hemisection. Rotarod (Columbus Instruments) test was used as a measure of motor coordination, where mice were challenged to stay on a rotating rod for as long as possible before falling off. Mice were tested on two sessions: pre-injury and on day 35 after injury. The longest time of the three runs in one session were taken as the mouse's performance. Mice were allowed to acclimate on the stationary drum for 2 min before start. Mice were allowed to rest for 2–3 min between individual runs within one session. The rotating drum has an initial speed of four rotations per minute (rpm) and an acceleration of 0.3 rpm/s.

Statistics.

For comparison between two groups, two-tailed t test assuming unequal variance was used. For comparison among three or more groups, one-way ANOVA was used first and, if significant differences detected, post hoc pairwise tests were used to compare each group mean with the control mean with Dunnett's correction, or multiple comparisons were corrected by Tukey's method. Measurements taken at different time points or at various anatomical distances in two groups of animals were compared using one-way repeated-measure ANOVA, with post hoc tests at specific times if the series were significantly different. Analyses were conducted using Excel and SPSS.

Results

Gene-silencing screen identifies phosphatase suppressors of axon regeneration

To comprehensively assess the roles of phosphatases in mammalian CNS axon regeneration, we targeted 219 phosphatases for knockdown using 1086 shRNA clones (TRC1 shRNA library; Sigma Aldrich). Screening was performed on dissociated mouse cortical neurons in a 96-well format (Huebner et al., 2011). Briefly, lentiviral particles encoding single shRNA clones were added to neurons on DIV 5. Three days later, a custom-made 96-pin array was used to mechanically abrade all cellular structures from the scraped zone (Huebner et al., 2011). Seventy-two hours after scrape, neurons were fixed and immunostained to visualize axons (βIII-tubulin) and nuclei (DAPI). Under these conditions, MAP2-positive dendrites extend only short distances from the scrape border (data not shown) and contribute minimally to the regeneration signal, which is primarily axonal. Plates were imaged using a high-content imaging system and parameters relevant to regeneration were quantified using automated analysis algorithms (MATLAB and ImageJ). In particular, we quantified the level of βIII-tubulin-immunoreactive axon regrowth into the scraped area and density of nuclei in unscraped region adjacent to the scrape zone (Fig. 1a). To eliminate biases due to variations in regeneration from plate to plate, we normalized βIII-tubulin+ regeneration in each well by the averaged level of regeneration across 96 wells on the same plate. The entire screen was performed twice on duplicated sets of plates. We pooled all wells across two replicates that received shRNA clones targeting the same phosphatase and computed the mean and variance of regeneration for each phosphatase targeted. To rank the phosphatases and identify the strongest suppressors of injury-induced axon regeneration, we defined a Z-score for each targeted phosphatase as the number of SDs that the gene-specific mean differs from the grand mean. Because regeneration levels are normalized on each plate, the grand mean is one. With this measure, we identified 18 phosphatases with a Z-score > 1 for further consideration (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

RNAi-mediated functional screen identifies phosphatase suppressors of CNS axon growth after injury. a, Images from the RNAi-mediated functional screen. Each of the six large parts is from a different shRNA species, as indicated. The largest of the three subparts from each case shows βIII-tubulin staining of axonal growth. The uninjured zone is at the extreme left border and the right 80% of the micrograph shows the extent of regenerative growth. Note that knockdown of each of these five genes increased axonal regeneration. Upper right, DAPI staining of cell nuclei in the uninjured zone. There is no consistent difference in cell density or cell survival with these shRNAs. The density of cell nuclei in the scraped zone is very low, <2% of that in the uninjured zone (data not shown). Bottom right, βIII-tubulin of axons (green) together with phalloidin staining of F-actin (red) to illustrate regenerating axonal growth cones. b, Z-scores of all phosphatases screened. Gene names of all phosphatases with a Z-score > 1 (i.e., above the gray-shaded zone) are labeled. c, Fold change in regeneration after knocking down phosphatases that metabolize water-insoluble and water-soluble inositol phosphates. The data for each gene are pooled from n = 8–10 values, derived from four to five shRNAs each assayed in duplicates, mean ± SEM. d, Fold change in regeneration of several other top hits from the phosphatase screen.

A group of phosphatases that regulates inositol phosphate metabolism was prominent among the hit genes (Fig. 1c). Aside from PTEN, which removes the 3-phosphate from PI(3,4,5)P3, the proteins encoded by two other hit genes regulate phosphoinositide metabolism. Inpp5f is a 4-phosphatase whose substrate is PI4P (Hsu et al., 2015; Nakatsu et al., 2015), although previous studies have suggested it acts a 5-phosphatase, which removes the 5-phosphate group from PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 (Minagawa et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2009). Mtmr9 is a catalytically inactive member of the myotubularin-related phosphatases. Mtmr9 forms heterodimers with Mtmr6, 7, and 8 to facilitate removal of 3-phosphate from PI(3)P, PI(3,5)P2, and water-soluble inositol 1,3 bisphosphate, Ins(1,3)P2 (Zou et al., 2012). The product of two other hit genes regulate water-soluble inositol phosphates (Majerus, 1992). Inpp1 removes 1-phosphate from Ins(1,3,4)P3 and Ins(1,4)P2. Impa1 removes the single phosphate from Ins(1)P, Ins(3)P, and Ins(4)P.

Silencing Inpp5f (Sac2) leads to robust axon regeneration with increased growth cones

To validate putative suppressors identified from the primary screen, we obtained high-titer lentiviral shRNA particles targeting each one as well as nontargeting controls and repeated the axon regeneration assay. In addition to assessing βIII-tubulin+ regrowth 72 h after scrape, we quantified density of growth cones (Phalloidin+ puncta at the tip of βIII-tubulin+ axons) in the injury zone (Figs. 1a, 2d). Suppressing Inpp5f expression leads to robust increases both in βIII-tubulin+ axon regrowth and density of growth cones (Fig. 2b). Of the 18 genes scored as hits on our axonal regeneration screen, Inpp5f scored consistently as the RNAi that most strongly increased the density of growth cones formed in the scrape region. Consistent with the strong effect of shRNA lentiviral particles targeting Inpp5f, the Inpp5f mRNA transcript was suppressed by >90% in primary cortical cultures (Fig. 2c). Moreover, neurons cultured from mice lacking functional Inpp5f regenerated axons more effectively than wild-type neurons (Fig. 4; data not shown).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Inpp5f (Sac2) silencing increases CNS axon growth and growth cone formation after injury. a, Protein domain organization of human INPP5F. b, Silencing Inpp5f using an independent preparation of high-titer shRNA lentiviral particles increases axon regrowth after scrape injury. Data are mean ± SEM from n = 24 wells on 96-well plate per condition. *p < 0.05, Student's t test. c, Inpp5f shRNA lentiviral infection effectively silences Inpp5f transcription by >90%. Data are mean ± SEM from n = 12 wells on 96-well plate per condition. ***p < 0.001, Student's t test. d, Inpp5f inactivation strongly enhances the density of regenerating growth cones in the scraped region. High-titer lentiviral particles were used for all genes targeted. Note that among hits from the primary screen, inactivating Lppr4, Ptpdc1, and Impa1 also lead to a significantly increased number of growth cones in the scraped region. ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. Data are mean ± SEM from n = 24 wells on 96-well plates per condition. Ctrl, control.

Inpp5f (Sac2) expression is consistent with suppression of recovery after SCI

If Inpp5f functions to substantially limit neural repair after adult CNS injury, then it must be expressed in adult CNS neurons with limited regenerative phenotype. RNA-seq data expressed in fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) from lllumina Human Body Map 2.0 indicate that INPP5F is expressed at a higher level in adult brain than PTEN at the mRNA level. PTEN itself ranks within the top 12.5% of highest expressed genes in the adult human brain (INPP5F vs PTEN, 161 vs 65.5 FPKM, NCBI AceView). Among 16 different tissue types examined, INPP5F expression in humans is highly selective to brain (Fig. 3a). Expression level in the brain is more than eight times higher than that in the second and third highest tissue types (testes and ovary). The brain-specific pattern of Inpp5f expression reduces potential side effects that might manifest from inactivating Inpp5f in the periphery, therefore, adding to its favorable profile as a therapeutic target for clinical translation.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Tissue level and subcellular expression patterns of INPP5F/Inpp5f. a, Human INPP5F expression is highly enriched in the adult brain. Data are from the Illumina Human Body Map 2.0. b, Inpp5f is widely expressed in the adult mouse brain at the mRNA level. Expression persists in primary motor cortex and brainstem after dorsal hemisection injury of the spinal cord. Tissues were harvested 7 d after injury. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 3 mice. N.S., p > 0.05, Student's t test. Each sample was tested in triplicate per condition. c, Inpp5f::GFP fusion protein expressed in DIV 21 primary mouse cortical neurons is localized in the cytoplasm of soma, dendrites, and axons, matching the pattern of coexpressed cytosolic marker, tdTomato. Scale bar, 50 μm.

To investigate functions of Inpp5f in the CNS, we examined expression of mouse Inpp5f with and without SCI. Mouse Inpp5f is widely expressed in the adult brain at the mRNA level, including the primary cortices, brainstem, striatum, cerebellum, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglia (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, cortical expression includes all layers and brainstem expression includes the raphe nuclei in the Allen Brain Atlas (Lein et al., 2007). Furthermore, Inpp5f expression persists at high levels in mouse primary motor cortex and brainstem 7 d after mid-thoracic hemisection injury (Fig. 3b). Expression levels are comparable before and after injury. Within DIV 21 cortical neurons, the protein is observed throughout processes, in tapered dendrites and in axons (Fig. 3c). Expression data in human and mice brain support Inpp5f's role as a putative suppressor of regeneration of descending tracts and recovery of motor functions after SCI.

Inpp5f and PTEN suppress CNS axon regeneration via distinct mechanisms

Because Inpp5f had been reported to metabolize PI(3,4,5)P3 by removing the 5-phosphate group (Minagawa et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2009), we considered whether its mechanism of action might overlap with that of PTEN. PTEN suppresses CNS axon regeneration by removing the 3-phosphate group from PI(3,4,5)P3, therefore, reducing activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. It is known that the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin abolishes the growth-enhancing effects of PTEN inactivation in optic nerve regeneration (Park et al., 2008) and compensatory sprouting from the adult corticospinal tract (Lee et al., 2014). Therefore, we tested whether increased regeneration caused by loss of Inpp5f or PTEN is sensitive to rapamycin inhibition using the scrape assay.

Inpp5f removal was achieved by using Inpp5f−/− neurons and compared against Inpp5f+/− or WT littermate controls. Cultures were scraped on DIV 12. PTEN removal was achieved by nucleofection of dissociated WT E17.5 cortical neurons with a validated shRNA targeting mouse PTEN and compared against the same WT neurons nucleofected with a nontargeting control shRNA. To mark transfected cells, a myristoylated GFP driven by CAG promoter construct was conucleofected with the shRNA plasmids. Eighty percent of GFP+ PTEN+ cell bodies become GFP+ PTEN− on DIV 5. Cultures were scraped on DIV 8 and only GFP+ processes were analyzed for regeneration. Rapamycin (300 nm) or DMSO vehicle of the same concentration was added to the medium immediately after scrape and maintained during regeneration (Fig. 4). Cultures were fixed at 72 h post injury and quantified for regeneration. Cell lysate harvested at 72 h post injury from parallel cultures indicates that rapamycin effectively reduces mTOR autophosphorylation (Fig. 4d). Downstream phosphorylation of S6 kinase protein is eliminated by rapamycin treatment (Fig. 4c). While neurons lacking Inpp5f regenerate more robustly than WT neurons, rapamycin does not alter regeneration for either genotype (Fig. 4a,b). In contrast, rapamycin completely abolishes enhanced regeneration after shRNA-mediated PTEN inactivation (Fig. 4e). Thus, distinct from PTEN, endogenous Inpp5f suppresses regeneration independently of mTORC1 regulation. This is consistent with more recent data that the primary substrate of Inpp5f is PI(4)P and the protein participate in regulation of endocytosis (Hsu et al., 2015; Nakatsu et al., 2015).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Sensitivity of Inpp5f inactivation induced axon growth to rapamycin. a, Regrowth of βIII-tubulin+ axons after scrape, with or without genomic deletion of Inpp5f and with or without presence of rapamycin (300 nm). The uninjured zone is at the left border of images. Notice enhanced regrowth of Inpp5f−/− axons, with or without rapamycin. Scale bar, 50 μm. b, Inpp5f−/− neurons show enhanced regeneration after scrape injury. Enhanced axon growth is not sensitive to rapamycin (300 nm) inhibition, demonstrating mTORC1-independent mechanisms of action. ***p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc pairwise comparison with Tukey's correction. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 36 wells from three Inpp5f−/− embryos and n = 84 wells from seven Inpp5f+/− or WT embryos per condition. All embryos are cultured independently without mixing of cells. Ctrl, control. c, Phospho-S6 (pS6) ribosomal protein immunoreactivity in primary cortical neurons 3 d after scrape injury. Note comparable levels of pS6 kinase signal in control versus Inpp5f−/− neurons after vehicle treatment, but absence of pS6 kinase signal from neurons of either genotype after 3 d of 300 nm rapamycin treatment. Scale bar, 100 μm. d, Three days of 300 nm rapamycin treatment also effectively reduced levels of activated (p-Ser2448) mTOR protein detected by immunoblot of cell lysates. e, Enhanced regeneration caused by PTEN inactivation is sensitive to rapamycin (300 nm) inhibition. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's Post hoc pairwise tests. Data are mean ± SEM from n = 20–24 wells per condition.

Inpp5f-null mice have normal descending spinal tract projections

To assess the role of Inpp5f in suppressing CNS axon regeneration and functional recovery in vivo, we studied gene-targeted mice lacking Inpp5f. As previously characterized (Zhu et al., 2009), Inpp5f−/− mice are grossly normal and fertile. Before we assessed the anatomical and behavioral recovery of Inpp5f−/− mice from SCI, we sought to understand the baseline anatomy of two descending spinal tracts without injury, the CST and raphespinal tract. We anterogradely traced the CST with BDA and characterized the pattern of BDA+ fibers in the spinal cord. WT, Inpp5f+/−, and Inpp5f−/− littermates have indistinguishable CST anatomy, with most fibers forming a tight bundle in the dorsal column (Fig. 6a,b). In addition, densities of BDA+ fibers that sprout out from the main CST bundle and terminate in the gray matter are nearly identical in control and Inpp5f−/− littermates (Fig. 6f). Thus, CST development and maintenance without injury does not require Inpp5f.

We visualized the raphespinal tract by immunostaining serotonin (5-HT), the neurotransmitter uniquely expressed in raphespinal tract axons in the spinal cord. The patterns of 5-HT+ projections are comparable among WT, Inpp5f+/−, and Inpp5f−/− mice. The main tract descends in a diffuse bundle in the intermediolateral white matter and main ramifications are present in the intermediolateral column and in the gray matter. Because 5-HT+ terminals in lumbar ventral horns have a critical role in facilitating lower limb locomotion, we quantified density of 5-HT+ terminals in the lumbar ventral horn. The densities are comparable between intact control and Inpp5f−/− animals (Fig. 5g). Both CST and raphespinal tracts develop normally without Inpp5f.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Increased raphespinal tract growth in Inpp5f−/− mice after T7 dorsal hemisection. a–d, Representative images of the spinal ventral horn in coronal sections from Inpp5f+/− and Inpp5f−/− mice. a, b, C7 spinal cord. c, d, L2 spinal cord. Scale bar, 100 μm. Dorsal hemisections were performed in 3- to 5-month-old mice. Animals were killed 7 weeks after injury. Sections were stained for serotonin (5-HT). e, Quantification of 5-HT+ fiber density in a and b. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 14 control mice and n = 14 Inpp5f−/− mice. No significant difference. Student's t test. f, Quantification of 5-HT+ fiber density in c and d. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 14 control mice and n = 14 Inpp5f−/− mice. *p < 0.05, Student's t test. g, Quantification of 5-HT+ fiber density in uninjured L2 spinal ventral horns. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 5 control mice and n = 5 Inpp5f−/− mice. No significant difference. Student's t test. For all quantifications, at least three sections were randomly selected from each mouse for measurement. Control mice include both WT and Inpp5f+/− mice. Ctrl, control.

Inpp5f-null mice have enhanced lumbar raphespinal growth after T7 dorsal hemisection

To understand whether Inpp5f titrates neural repair after CNS injury, we created T7 dorsal hemisection SCIs in adult Inpp5f−/− and littermate control mice. As a first measure, we visualized 5-HT+ terminals in the spinal cord via immunostaining. On day 49 after dorsal hemisection injury, while the density of 5-HT+ terminals in the ventral horn region of cervical enlargement is not different between control and Inpp5f−/− groups (Fig. 5a,b; quantified in e), the density of ventral horn 5-HT+ terminals in lumbar enlargement is twice as high in Inpp5f−/− group compared with controls (Fig. 5c,d; quantified in f). Because thoracic dorsal hemisection cuts most but not all raphespinal tract axons, we considered whether increased 5-HT+ fiber density below the lesion could be from differences in spared tissue at the lesion center, possibly due to enhanced neuroprotection in Inpp5f−/− mice. However, the spared tissue at lesion center is not different between these two groups (25 ± 4 vs 34 ± 4%, mean ± SEM, n = 14 for each group analyzed for 5-HT staining; not significant by two-sample t test, p = 0.10; analysis of all mice in Fig. 8a,b). Therefore, our observation of increased 5-HT+ density below the lesion is most consistent with enhanced serotonergic fiber sprouting after injury in Inpp5f−/− animals.

Although initial evaluation of development in Inpp5f−/− mice above revealed no alteration in cervical raphespinal fibers (Fig. 5e), we considered whether the pre-injury baseline 5-HT+ density might be greater in the Inpp5f−/− lumbar cord. No developmental effect of Inpp5f deletion was detectable in the lumbar region of uninjured mice even though this region showed greater postinjury density (Fig. 5g). Thus, there is a selective postinjury increase in raphespinal innervation for mice lacking Inpp5f, demonstrating a role for the protein in limiting endogenous neural repair.

Inpp5f-null mice show enhanced CST plasticity after T7 dorsal hemisection

Because the CST plays a pivotal role in voluntary movement for humans, we investigated the anatomical response of the CST to SCI in Inpp5f-null mice. The T7 dorsal hemisection adult mice received injection of BDA into the sensorimotor cortex to trace the CST unilaterally on day 35 post injury. After 2 week survival, the total number of BDA+ CST fibers counted in the cervical dorsal columns was comparable between control (n = 15) and Inpp5f−/− (n = 11) littermates, at 971 ± 142 and 1307 ± 185 axons per animal, respectively, mean ± SEM. Incidentally, in two of 11 Inpp5f−/− animals but none of 15 Inpp5f+/− animals, BDA+ CST axons were observed below the lesion. Consistently, the density of BDA+ CST fibers that branch off the main tract rostral to the SCI and terminate in the gray matter is significantly higher in the Inpp5f−/− compared with controls (Fig. 6c–e; quantified in g; p < 0.01, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA). This difference is the most pronounced in thoracic spinal cord between 1 and 3 mm rostral to the lesion, where CST terminals are as much as three times more numerous in the Inpp5f−/− group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The magnitude of the difference is progressively less pronounced more rostral from the lesion site, while a nonsignificant trend in favor of Inpp5f−/− animals persists in upper thoracic spinal cord (Fig. 6h) and the cervical enlargement (Fig. 6i). Thus, while Inpp5f is not required for CST development and maintenance without injury, removing Inpp5f increases the density of sprouting CST fibers rostral to the lesion.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Increased CST plasticity in Inpp5f−/− mice after T7 dorsal hemisection. a, b, Representative mid-thoracic sagittal section from one Inpp5f+/− and one Inpp5f−/− uninjured, adult mouse. The CST was labeled by cortical BDA injection; dorsal is up and rostral is left. Note the dense CST bundle near the top and the similar sprouting pattern and density between genotypes. Sprouting from the bundled CST is measured in f. Scale bar, 100 μm. c–e, Representative images of sagittal sections from one Inpp5f+/− and two Inpp5f−/− mice. Dorsal hemisections were performed in 3- to 5-month-old mice. BDA was injected into the right sensorimotor cortex at 5 weeks post injury and mice were killed 2 weeks later. Sections were stained for BDA. Red triangle indicates lesion site. Scale bar, 500 μm. Notice significantly denser CST sprouts (yellow box insets) in Inpp5f −/− animals compared with the control. f, CSI sprouting is comparable between the genotypes in mid-thoracic spinal cord in the absence of injury. Measured from section such as in a and b. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 5 control mice and for n = 5 Inpp5f−/− mice. No significant difference between genotypes, Student's t test. g, Quantification of the density of labeled CST axons sprouting from the main CST bundle 7 weeks after injury. All labeled fibers outside the main CST bundle on all sagittal sections per animal were counted. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 15 for control mice and for n = 11 Inpp5f−/− mice. **p < 0.01, significant difference between genotypes, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA; *p < 0.05, at specific distances. h, i, A trend of enhanced CST sprouting in favor of Inpp5f knock-out animals after SCI, as detected in cervical (h) and upper thoracic spinal cord (i). Data are mean ± SEM for n = 15 for control (Ctrl) mice and for n = 11 Inpp5f−/− mice. No significant difference between genotypes, Student's t test. Control mice include both WT and Inpp5f+/− mice.

Inpp5f-null mice show enhanced functional recovery after T7 dorsal hemisection

To understand if the anatomical plasticity and regeneration observed in Inpp5f deletion mice has functional significance, we tracked locomotor performance of injured mice in two behavioral tests: BMS and rotarod. In the BMS test, while control and Inpp5f−/− both start at the perfect score of 9 before injury and decrease to scores <1 (i.e., close to complete paralysis) one day after injury, Inpp5f−/− group recovers significantly more quickly and more completely (Fig. 7a). By day 7 after injury, the Inpp5f−/− group has an average score of close to 3. Most animals exhibit extensive ankle movement and some were able to achieve proper paw placement, weight support, and beyond using their hindlimbs. On the other hand, the control group only achieved an average score between 1 and 2 by day 7. Most of animals in the control group exhibit slight to extensive ankle movement with few exhibiting more advanced hindlimb functions. The Inpp5f−/− group (n = 26) maintained their advantage in functional recovery over the control group (n = 29) over the following 4 weeks, with a final BMS score of 4.08 ± 0.29 versus 3.09 ± 0.21 (p < 0.001, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Enhanced behavioral recovery in Inpp5f−/− mice after T7 dorsal hemisection. a, Open-field locomotion performance measured by BMS of Inpp5f+/− and Inpp5f−/−mice. Animals were scored on days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 by two experienced observers blinded of genotype. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 29 control (Ctrl) mice and for n = 26 Inpp5f−/− mice. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, significant difference between genotypes, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA across time series followed by post hoc test between genotypes at indicated times. b, c, Rotarod performance of control and Inpp5f−/− animals before and after injury. *p < 0.05, significant difference between genotypes after injury. No significant difference in performance between genotypes before injury. Student's t test. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 29 for control mice and for n = 26 for Inpp5f−/− mice. Control mice include both WT and Inpp5f+/− mice.

Given the greater BMS recovery of the Inpp5f-null group within 7 d, we considered whether there might be an unexpected neuroprotective effect in addition to an early sprouting effect. We quantified tissue sparing at the epicenter of dorsal hemisection injury (Fig. 8a). Although there was no statistically significant difference between groups (Fig. 8b), there is a nonsignificant trend to tissue preservation in the Inpp5f−/− group. We performed a post hoc secondary analysis to stratify animals by lesion severity, confining the analysis to intermediate tissue loss (Fig. 8d). Even with this stratification, there is a robust enhancement in BMS recovery in Inpp5f−/− group compared with controls (Fig. 8c; p < 0.01). We conclude that the greater BMS recovery after SCI is more likely because of axon growth rather than neuroprotection.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Tissue sparing cannot account for improved recovery in Inpp5f−/− mice. a, Quantification of the extent of tissue sparing. Phase-contrast images of sagittal spinal cord sections were collected from every section in every animal. On each section, the yellow line indicates distance of spared tissue. The green line indicates extent of healthy spinal cord. Spared tissue fraction of each animal was calculated by the ratio of the sum of all yellow lines in each animal and the sum of all green lines in each animal. All measurements were performed blind to genotypes. b, Statistically insignificant difference in spared tissue fraction between Inpp5f knock-out and control groups. No significant difference, p > 0.05 by Student's t test. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 29 control mice and for n = 26 Inpp5f−/− mice. c, Improved open-field locomotion recovery in Inpp5f knock-out mice after strictly controlling for differences in spared tissue fraction. This subanalysis only included animals with spared tissue fraction between 0.15 and 0.4. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 13 control (Ctrl) mice and for n = 10 Inpp5f−/− mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA across time series followed by post hoc test between genotypes at indicated times. d, No difference in spared tissue fraction between Inpp5f knock-out and control groups in animals used for subanalysis in c. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 13 control mice and for n = 10 Inpp5f−/− mice. Control mice include both WT and Inpp5f+/− mice.

As a secondary outcome measure, the same mouse cohort was assessed for rotarod performance after SCI. While the two genotype groups behave similarly before injury (Fig. 7b), the Inpp5f−/− group is able to stay on the rotating drum almost twice as long as the control group on day 35 after injury (Fig. 7c). Together, the BMS and rotarod data demonstrate that greater functional recovery from SCI accompanies greater axonal growth after CNS trauma in mice lacking Inpp5f.

Discussion

Through an unbiased functional screen, we identified 18 phosphatases that negatively regulate CNS axon growth after injury, including 17 phosphatases not previously known to function in this capacity in neurons. Unexpectedly, our screen highlighted metabolism of water-soluble and water-insoluble inositol phosphates as a key pathway that regulates CNS axon growth after injury. Using gene-targeted mice, we specifically investigated how one of the hit genes, Inpp5f (Sac2), suppresses recovery both on the anatomical and functional levels after SCI in vivo. Inactivation of Inpp5f led to enhanced regeneration and sprouting of serotonergic fibers below the injury level, enhanced sprouting of injured corticospinal fibers above the injury level, and enhanced locomotor performance in open-field and rotarod tests. Thus, our study demonstrated the promise of an unbiased functional genomic discovery method and uncovered a previously unknown suppressor of CNS regeneration.

While there is substantially greater locomotor recovery and axonal sprouting after traumatic SCI when the Inpp5f gene is deleted, the most critical anatomical pathways are not defined here. In mice, the CST is dispensable for unskilled locomotor functions as those tested by open-field BMS score and rotarod (Siegel et al., 2015). The raphe nuclei, on the other hand, may provide the basis for enhanced recovery in Inpp5f-null mice. While some intraspinal serotonergic axons are found in mice, the vast majority of serotonergic fibers that we observed in the lumbar spinal cord likely originate from the raphe nuclei in the brainstem. Given the high expression of Inpp5f in brainstem and the activating effect of raphespinal innervation in the spinal cord, enhanced regeneration and sprouting of the raphespinal tract can be a major driver of enhanced functional recovery observed in Inpp5f-null mice. Directly testing this hypothesis by inactivating the raphe nuclei using pharmacogenetic tools will be of significant interest (Siegel et al., 2015). In addition to the CST and raphespinal tract, two other descending projections may contribute to enhanced functional recovery in Inpp5f knock-out mice. Rubrospinal tract and reticulospinal tract are both important for recovery of locomotor functions after SCI (Schucht et al., 2002). Inpp5f is expressed in the red nuclei and the reticular formations in adult mice and humans [Allen Brain Atlas (Lein et al., 2007)]. Injecting retrograde tracers into spinal cord below the lesion coupled to a complete lesion may be able to shed light on changes in regeneration properties of these two tracts in Inpp5f-null mice.

This study focused on the screen of phosphatases and the validation of Inpp5f as an axon growth regeneration inhibitor. Initial biochemical studies pointed to the 5-position of PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 as the preferred substrates of Inpp5f (Minagawa et al., 2001), and raised the possibility that it may mimic the regeneration action of PTEN. However, rapamycin does not reduce the increased regeneration observed in Inpp5f-null neurons (Fig. 4) or after Inpp5f silencing (our unpublished observations), suggesting alternative mechanisms and substrates. Recent work from our group and others identified the 4-position of PI(4)P as the substrate in non-neuronal cells (Hsu et al., 2015; Nakatsu et al., 2015). At a cellular level, the primary role of Inpp5f (Sac2) is in the regulation of endocytic events (Hsu et al., 2015; Nakatsu et al., 2015). There is pre-existing evidence that membrane traffic plays a key role in axonal extension. A recent high-profile study described a link between ER and endosome contact in mediating axonal extension (Raiborg et al., 2015). Over many years, membrane addition and subtraction from distal tip of the axon has been appreciated as crucial for regulating growth rates. We showed that semaphorins, as extracellular cues inhibiting extension and collapsing growth cones, stimulate local and massive macropinocytosis at the growth cone (Fournier et al., 2000). In C. elegans, loss of function in any of three endocytosis genes (unc-26/synaptojanin, unc-57/endophilin, and unc-41/stonin) results in decreased regeneration (Chen et al., 2011). Multiple studies have demonstrated that new membrane is added to the distal axon tip during growth, and the growth cone is known to be highly enriched in endomembranous stacks (Cheng and Reese, 1987; Lockerbie et al., 1991; Diefenbach et al., 1999; Hazuka et al., 1999; Tojima et al., 2007; Kolpak et al., 2009). Dendritic branching in Drosophila is intimately connected with Golgi outposts (Ye et al., 2007). Thus, Inpp5f regulation of distal membrane traffic may be crucial for effective regeneration via regulation of membrane addition.

We focused our attention on Inpp5f because of its robust phenotype in the primary screen and follow-up assays as well as Inpp5f's favorable safety profile in contrast to that of PTEN as a potential therapeutic target. In mice, Inpp5f-null animals develop and reproduce normally and exhibit no adverse phenotypes under basal conditions. Despite two recent correlative studies (Kim et al., 2014; Nalls et al., 2014), human INPP5F loss of function is not known to cause adverse medical conditions. In contrast, loss-of-function PTEN mutations in humans are frequent drivers in glioblastoma, endometrial cancer, and prostate cancer cases (Hollander et al., 2011). In mice, whole-body removal of PTEN in adult mice via conditional Cre-mediated genomic excision leads to 100% lethality within 28 d (data not shown). Overall, INPP5F's favorable safety profile adds to its promise as a potential therapeutic target to improve recovery after SCI.

Footnotes

  • We acknowledge National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Predoctoral Fellowship support to Y.Z., and research support from the NIH and the Falk Medical Research Trust to S.M.S. We thank Stefano Sodi and Yiguang Fu for technical assistance.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Stephen M. Strittmatter, Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair Program, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06536. stephen.strittmatter{at}yale.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Atwal JK,
    2. Pinkston-Gosse J,
    3. Syken J,
    4. Stawicki S,
    5. Wu Y,
    6. Shatz C,
    7. Tessier-Lavigne M
    (2008) PirB is a functional receptor for myelin inhibitors of axonal regeneration. Science 322:967–970, doi:10.1126/science.1161151, pmid:18988857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Basso DM,
    2. Fisher LC,
    3. Anderson AJ,
    4. Jakeman LB,
    5. McTigue DM,
    6. Popovich PG
    (2006) Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma 23:635–659, doi:10.1089/neu.2006.23.635, pmid:16689667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Blackmore MG,
    2. Moore DL,
    3. Smith RP,
    4. Goldberg JL,
    5. Bixby JL,
    6. Lemmon VP
    (2010) High content screening of cortical neurons identifies novel regulators of axon growth. Mol Cell Neurosci 44:43–54, doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2010.02.002, pmid:20159039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bradbury EJ,
    2. Moon LD,
    3. Popat RJ,
    4. King VR,
    5. Bennett GS,
    6. Patel PN,
    7. Fawcett JW,
    8. McMahon SB
    (2002) Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 416:636–640, doi:10.1038/416636a, pmid:11948352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Buchser WJ,
    2. Slepak TI,
    3. Gutierrez-Arenas O,
    4. Bixby JL,
    5. Lemmon VP
    (2010) Kinase/phosphatase overexpression reveals pathways regulating hippocampal neuron morphology. Mol Syst Biol 6:391, doi:10.1038/msb.2010.52, pmid:20664637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cafferty WB,
    2. Duffy P,
    3. Huebner E,
    4. Strittmatter SM
    (2010) MAG and OMgp synergize with Nogo-A to restrict axonal growth and neurological recovery after spinal cord trauma. J Neurosci 30:6825–6837, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6239-09.2010, pmid:20484625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Ghosh-Roy A,
    4. Hubert T,
    5. Yan D,
    6. O'Rourke S,
    7. Bowerman B,
    8. Wu Z,
    9. Jin Y,
    10. Chisholm AD
    (2011) Axon regeneration pathways identified by systematic genetic screening in C. elegans. Neuron 71:1043–1057, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.009, pmid:21943602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chen MS,
    2. Huber AB,
    3. van der Haar ME,
    4. Frank M,
    5. Schnell L,
    6. Spillmann AA,
    7. Christ F,
    8. Schwab ME
    (2000) Nogo-A is a myelin-associated neurite outgrowth inhibitor and an antigen for monoclonal antibody IN-1. Nature 403:434–439, doi:10.1038/35000219, pmid:10667796.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cheng TP,
    2. Reese TS
    (1987) Recycling of plasmalemma in chick tectal growth cones. J Neurosci 7:1752–1759, pmid:3598645.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    1. Dergham P,
    2. Ellezam B,
    3. Essagian C,
    4. Avedissian H,
    5. Lubell WD,
    6. McKerracher L
    (2002) Rho signaling pathway targeted to promote spinal cord repair. J Neurosci 22:6570–6577, pmid:12151536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Diefenbach TJ,
    2. Guthrie PB,
    3. Stier H,
    4. Billups B,
    5. Kater SB
    (1999) Membrane recycling in the neuronal growth cone revealed by FM1-43 labeling. J Neurosci 19:9436–9444, pmid:10531447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Duffy P,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Siegel CS,
    4. Tu N,
    5. Henkemeyer M,
    6. Cafferty WB,
    7. Strittmatter SM
    (2012) Myelin-derived ephrinB3 restricts axonal regeneration and recovery after adult CNS injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5063–5068, doi:10.1073/pnas.1113953109, pmid:22411787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Ertürk A,
    2. Hellal F,
    3. Enes J,
    4. Bradke F
    (2007) Disorganized microtubules underlie the formation of retraction bulbs and the failure of axonal regeneration. J Neurosci 27:9169–9180, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0612-07.2007, pmid:17715353.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Fisher D,
    2. Xing B,
    3. Dill J,
    4. Li H,
    5. Hoang HH,
    6. Zhao Z,
    7. Yang XL,
    8. Bachoo R,
    9. Cannon S,
    10. Longo FM,
    11. Sheng M,
    12. Silver J,
    13. Li S
    (2011) Leukocyte common antigen-related phosphatase is a functional receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan axon growth inhibitors. J Neurosci 31:14051–14066, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1737-11.2011, pmid:21976490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Fournier AE,
    2. Nakamura F,
    3. Kawamoto S,
    4. Goshima Y,
    5. Kalb RG,
    6. Strittmatter SM
    (2000) Semaphorin3A enhances endocytosis at sites of receptor-F-actin colocalization during growth cone collapse. J Cell Biol 149:411–422, doi:10.1083/jcb.149.2.411, pmid:10769032.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Fournier AE,
    2. GrandPre T,
    3. Strittmatter SM
    (2001) Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature 409:341–346, doi:10.1038/35053072, pmid:11201742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Fournier AE,
    2. Takizawa BT,
    3. Strittmatter SM
    (2003) Rho kinase inhibition enhances axonal regeneration in the injured CNS. J Neurosci 23:1416–1423, pmid:12598630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Fry EJ,
    2. Chagnon MJ,
    3. López-Vales R,
    4. Tremblay ML,
    5. David S
    (2010) Corticospinal tract regeneration after spinal cord injury in receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma deficient mice. Glia 58:423–433, pmid:19780196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. GrandPré T,
    2. Nakamura F,
    3. Vartanian T,
    4. Strittmatter SM
    (2000) Identification of the Nogo inhibitor of axon regeneration as a Reticulon protein. Nature 403:439–444, doi:10.1038/35000226, pmid:10667797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hammarlund M,
    2. Nix P,
    3. Hauth L,
    4. Jorgensen EM,
    5. Bastiani M
    (2009) Axon regeneration requires a conserved MAP kinase pathway. Science 323:802–806, doi:10.1126/science.1165527, pmid:19164707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hazuka CD,
    2. Foletti DL,
    3. Hsu SC,
    4. Kee Y,
    5. Hopf FW,
    6. Scheller RH
    (1999) The sec6/8 complex is located at neurite outgrowth and axonal synapse-assembly domains. J Neurosci 19:1324–1334, pmid:9952410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Hellal F,
    2. Hurtado A,
    3. Ruschel J,
    4. Flynn KC,
    5. Laskowski CJ,
    6. Umlauf M,
    7. Kapitein LC,
    8. Strikis D,
    9. Lemmon V,
    10. Bixby J,
    11. Hoogenraad CC,
    12. Bradke F
    (2011) Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science 331:928–931, doi:10.1126/science.1201148, pmid:21273450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Hollander MC,
    2. Blumenthal GM,
    3. Dennis PA
    (2011) PTEN loss in the continuum of common cancers, rare syndromes and mouse models. Nat Rev Cancer 11:289–301, doi:10.1038/nrc3037, pmid:21430697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hsu F,
    2. Hu F,
    3. Mao Y
    (2015) Spatiotemporal control of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate by Sac2 regulates endocytic recycling. J Cell Biol 209:97–110, doi:10.1083/jcb.201408027, pmid:25869669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Huebner EA,
    2. Kim BG,
    3. Duffy PJ,
    4. Brown RH,
    5. Strittmatter SM
    (2011) A multi-domain fragment of Nogo-A protein is a potent inhibitor of cortical axon regeneration via Nogo receptor 1. J Biol Chem 286:18026–18036, doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.208108, pmid:21454605.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Kim HS,
    2. Li A,
    3. Ahn S,
    4. Song H,
    5. Zhang W
    (2014) Inositol Polyphosphate-5-Phosphatase F (INPP5F) inhibits STAT3 activity and suppresses gliomas tumorigenicity. Sci Rep 4:7330, doi:10.1038/srep07330, pmid:25476455.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kim JE,
    2. Liu BP,
    3. Park JH,
    4. Strittmatter SM
    (2004) Nogo-66 receptor prevents raphespinal and rubrospinal axon regeneration and limits functional recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuron 44:439–451, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.015, pmid:15504325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kolpak AL,
    2. Jiang J,
    3. Guo D,
    4. Standley C,
    5. Bellve K,
    6. Fogarty K,
    7. Bao ZZ
    (2009) Negative guidance factor-induced macropinocytosis in the growth cone plays a critical role in repulsive axon turning. J Neurosci 29:10488–10498, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2355-09.2009, pmid:19710302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Lang BT,
    2. Cregg JM,
    3. DePaul MA,
    4. Tran AP,
    5. Xu K,
    6. Dyck SM,
    7. Madalena KM,
    8. Brown BP,
    9. Weng YL,
    10. Li S,
    11. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S,
    12. Busch SA,
    13. Shen Y,
    14. Silver J
    (2015) Modulation of the proteoglycan receptor PTPsigma promotes recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 518:404–408, doi:10.1038/nature13974, pmid:25470046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lee DH,
    2. Luo X,
    3. Yungher BJ,
    4. Bray E,
    5. Lee JK,
    6. Park KK
    (2014) Mammalian target of rapamycin's distinct roles and effectiveness in promoting compensatory axonal sprouting in the injured CNS. J Neurosci 34:15347–15355, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1935-14.2014, pmid:25392502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Lein ES,
    2. Hawrylycz MJ,
    3. Ao N,
    4. Ayres M,
    5. Bensinger A,
    6. Bernard A,
    7. Boe AF,
    8. Boguski MS,
    9. Brockway KS,
    10. Byrnes EJ,
    11. Chen L,
    12. Chen TM,
    13. Chin MC,
    14. Chong J,
    15. Crook BE,
    16. Czaplinska A,
    17. Dang CN,
    18. Datta S,
    19. Dee NR,
    20. Desaki AL,
    21. et al.
    (2007) Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445:168–176, doi:10.1038/nature05453, pmid:17151600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Lewandowski G,
    2. Steward O
    (2014) AAVshRNA-mediated suppression of PTEN in adult rats in combination with salmon fibrin administration enables regenerative growth of corticospinal axons and enhances recovery of voluntary motor function after cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 34:9951–9962, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-14.2014, pmid:25057197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Lockerbie RO,
    2. Miller VE,
    3. Pfenninger KH
    (1991) Regulated plasmalemmal expansion in nerve growth cones. J Cell Biol 112:1215–1227, doi:10.1083/jcb.112.6.1215, pmid:1999470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Majerus PW
    (1992) Inositol phosphate biochemistry. Annu Rev Biochem 61:225–250, doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.001301, pmid:1323235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Minagawa T,
    2. Ijuin T,
    3. Mochizuki Y,
    4. Takenawa T
    (2001) Identification and characterization of a sac domain-containing phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase. J Biol Chem 276:22011–22015, doi:10.1074/jbc.M101579200, pmid:11274189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Moore DL,
    2. Blackmore MG,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Kaestner KH,
    5. Bixby JL,
    6. Lemmon VP,
    7. Goldberg JL
    (2009) KLF family members regulate intrinsic axon regeneration ability. Science 326:298–301, doi:10.1126/science.1175737, pmid:19815778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay G,
    2. Doherty P,
    3. Walsh FS,
    4. Crocker PR,
    5. Filbin MT
    (1994) A novel role for myelin-associated glycoprotein as an inhibitor of axonal regeneration. Neuron 13:757–767, doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90042-6, pmid:7522484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Nakatsu F,
    2. Messa M,
    3. Nández R,
    4. Czapla H,
    5. Zou Y,
    6. Strittmatter SM,
    7. De Camilli P
    (2015) Sac2/INPP5F is an inositol 4-phosphatase that functions in the endocytic pathway. J Cell Biol 209:85–95, doi:10.1083/jcb.201409064, pmid:25869668.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Nalls MA,
    2. Pankratz N,
    3. Lill CM,
    4. Do CB,
    5. Hernandez DG,
    6. Saad M,
    7. DeStefano AL,
    8. Kara E,
    9. Bras J,
    10. Sharma M,
    11. Schulte C,
    12. Keller MF,
    13. Arepalli S,
    14. Letson C,
    15. Edsall C,
    16. Stefansson H,
    17. Liu X,
    18. Pliner H,
    19. Lee JH,
    20. Cheng R,
    21. et al.
    (2014) Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet 46:989–993, doi:10.1038/ng.3043, pmid:25064009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Nikulina E,
    2. Tidwell JL,
    3. Dai HN,
    4. Bregman BS,
    5. Filbin MT
    (2004) The phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram delivered after a spinal cord lesion promotes axonal regeneration and functional recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8786–8790, doi:10.1073/pnas.0402595101, pmid:15173585.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Park KK,
    2. Liu K,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Smith PD,
    5. Wang C,
    6. Cai B,
    7. Xu B,
    8. Connolly L,
    9. Kramvis I,
    10. Sahin M,
    11. He Z
    (2008) Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science 322:963–966, doi:10.1126/science.1161566, pmid:18988856.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Raiborg C,
    2. Wenzel EM,
    3. Pedersen NM,
    4. Olsvik H,
    5. Schink KO,
    6. Schultz SW,
    7. Vietri M,
    8. Nisi V,
    9. Bucci C,
    10. Brech A,
    11. Johansen T,
    12. Stenmark H
    (2015) Repeated ER-endosome contacts promote endosome translocation and neurite outgrowth. Nature 520:234–238, doi:10.1038/nature14359, pmid:25855459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schucht P,
    2. Raineteau O,
    3. Schwab ME,
    4. Fouad K
    (2002) Anatomical correlates of locomotor recovery following dorsal and ventral lesions of the rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol 176:143–153, doi:10.1006/exnr.2002.7909, pmid:12093091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Shen Y,
    2. Tenney AP,
    3. Busch SA,
    4. Horn KP,
    5. Cuascut FX,
    6. Liu K,
    7. He Z,
    8. Silver J,
    9. Flanagan JG
    (2009) PTPsigma is a receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, an inhibitor of neural regeneration. Science 326:592–596, doi:10.1126/science.1178310, pmid:19833921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Siegel CS,
    2. Fink KL,
    3. Strittmatter SM,
    4. Cafferty WB
    (2015) Plasticity of intact rubral projections mediates spontaneous recovery of function after corticospinal tract injury. J Neurosci 35:1443–1457, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3713-14.2015, pmid:25632122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Smith PD,
    2. Sun F,
    3. Park KK,
    4. Cai B,
    5. Wang C,
    6. Kuwako K,
    7. Martinez-Carrasco I,
    8. Connolly L,
    9. He Z
    (2009) SOCS3 deletion promotes optic nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 64:617–623, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021, pmid:20005819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Sun F,
    2. Park KK,
    3. Belin S,
    4. Wang D,
    5. Lu T,
    6. Chen G,
    7. Zhang K,
    8. Yeung C,
    9. Feng G,
    10. Yankner BA,
    11. He Z
    (2011) Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nature 480:372–375, doi:10.1038/nature10594, pmid:22056987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Tojima T,
    2. Akiyama H,
    3. Itofusa R,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Katayama H,
    6. Miyawaki A,
    7. Kamiguchi H
    (2007) Attractive axon guidance involves asymmetric membrane transport and exocytosis in the growth cone. Nat Neurosci 10:58–66, doi:10.1038/nn1814, pmid:17159991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Wang KC,
    2. Koprivica V,
    3. Kim JA,
    4. Sivasankaran R,
    5. Guo Y,
    6. Neve RL,
    7. He Z
    (2002) Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a Nogo receptor ligand that inhibits neurite outgrowth. Nature 417:941–944, doi:10.1038/nature00867, pmid:12068310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Ye B,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Song W,
    4. Younger SH,
    5. Jan LY,
    6. Jan YN
    (2007) Growing dendrites and axons differ in their reliance on the secretory pathway. Cell 130:717–729, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.032, pmid:17719548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Zhu W,
    2. Trivedi CM,
    3. Zhou D,
    4. Yuan L,
    5. Lu MM,
    6. Epstein JA
    (2009) Inpp5f is a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase that regulates cardiac hypertrophic responsiveness. Circ Res 105:1240–1247, doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.208785, pmid:19875726.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Zou J,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Marjanovic J,
    4. Kisseleva MV,
    5. Majerus PW,
    6. Wilson MP
    (2012) Myotubularin-related protein (MTMR) 9 determines the enzymatic activity, substrate specificity, and role in autophagy of MTMR8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:9539–9544, doi:10.1073/pnas.1207021109, pmid:22647598.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (29)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 29
22 Jul 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gene-Silencing Screen for Mammalian Axon Regeneration Identifies Inpp5f (Sac2) as an Endogenous Suppressor of Repair after Spinal Cord Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Gene-Silencing Screen for Mammalian Axon Regeneration Identifies Inpp5f (Sac2) as an Endogenous Suppressor of Repair after Spinal Cord Injury
Yixiao Zou, Massimiliano Stagi, Xingxing Wang, Kazim Yigitkanli, Chad S. Siegel, Fubito Nakatsu, William B. J. Cafferty, Stephen M. Strittmatter
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10429-10439; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1718-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Gene-Silencing Screen for Mammalian Axon Regeneration Identifies Inpp5f (Sac2) as an Endogenous Suppressor of Repair after Spinal Cord Injury
Yixiao Zou, Massimiliano Stagi, Xingxing Wang, Kazim Yigitkanli, Chad S. Siegel, Fubito Nakatsu, William B. J. Cafferty, Stephen M. Strittmatter
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10429-10439; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1718-15.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • axon regeneration
  • inositol phosphate
  • sac2
  • siRNA
  • spinal cord injury

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Reduced Post-Activation Depression in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury is not related to Stretch Reflex Hyperexcitability
  • Dysfunction of Unc119, a Transducin-Binding Protein, Leads to Cone–Rod Dystrophy through Activating JAK-Stat and NF-κB Inflammatory Pathways in the Mouse Retina
  • Distinct Ultrastructural Properties and Plasticity of Synapses Formed by Adult-Born and Early-Born Interneurons in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.