Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

The Neurodynamics of Affect in the Laboratory Predicts Persistence of Real-World Emotional Responses

Aaron S. Heller, Andrew S. Fox, Erik K. Wing, Kaitlyn M. McQuisition, Nathan J. Vack and Richard J. Davidson
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10503-10509; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0569-15.2015
Aaron S. Heller
1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706,
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew S. Fox
1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706,
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew S. Fox
Erik K. Wing
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaitlyn M. McQuisition
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan J. Vack
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Davidson
1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706,
2Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, and
3HealthEmotions Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53719
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic of EMA and fMRI task. A, EMA occurred over 10 d. Emotional effects of real-world reward were measured over minutes to hours. fMRI analyses parsed BOLD reward responses into amplitude and width. These parameters were used to predict individual differences in naturalistic emotional reactivity and duration. B, EMA and fMRI task. In the EMA task, subjects received text messages in which they rated their positive and negative emotion several times a day. Each day, subjects also played a game in which they could win $15. After game outcome, emotion was sampled frequently over the ensuing 90 min and allowed estimation of positive emotion duration. In the fMRI task, subjects played the identical game in which they could win or not win $1. Subjects saw the number 5, guessed whether the next number would be higher or lower than 5, and received the outcome. A green arrow pointing upward indicated that the participant had guessed correctly.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The EMA game impacts positive emotion as evidenced by deviation from baseline positive emotion. Histogram displays the distribution of duration of positive emotion following winning. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Amplitude of DLPFC engagement after winning predicts individual differences in real-world positive emotion reactivity. Thresholded at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Width of ventral striatal engagement over seconds after winning predicts duration of real-world positive emotion. Green denotes the small volume mask used, and hot colors correspond to the suprathreshold activity within this a priori ROI; p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons across the small volume ROI.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (29)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 29
22 Jul 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Neurodynamics of Affect in the Laboratory Predicts Persistence of Real-World Emotional Responses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Neurodynamics of Affect in the Laboratory Predicts Persistence of Real-World Emotional Responses
Aaron S. Heller, Andrew S. Fox, Erik K. Wing, Kaitlyn M. McQuisition, Nathan J. Vack, Richard J. Davidson
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10503-10509; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0569-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The Neurodynamics of Affect in the Laboratory Predicts Persistence of Real-World Emotional Responses
Aaron S. Heller, Andrew S. Fox, Erik K. Wing, Kaitlyn M. McQuisition, Nathan J. Vack, Richard J. Davidson
Journal of Neuroscience 22 July 2015, 35 (29) 10503-10509; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0569-15.2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ecological momentary assessment
  • emotion
  • PFC
  • positive emotion
  • temporal dynamics
  • ventral striatum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
  • Beta bursting in the retrosplenial cortex is a neurophysiological correlate of environmental novelty which is disrupted in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
  • Transfer of Tactile Learning from Trained to Untrained Body Parts Supported by Cortical Coactivation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.