Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

The Potent BACE1 Inhibitor LY2886721 Elicits Robust Central Aβ Pharmacodynamic Responses in Mice, Dogs, and Humans

Patrick C. May, Brian A. Willis, Stephen L. Lowe, Robert A. Dean, Scott A. Monk, Patrick J. Cocke, James E. Audia, Leonard N. Boggs, Anthony R. Borders, Richard A. Brier, David O. Calligaro, Theresa A. Day, Larry Ereshefsky, Jon A. Erickson, Hykop Gevorkyan, Celedon R. Gonzales, Douglas E. James, Stanford S. Jhee, Steven F. Komjathy, Linglin Li, Terry D. Lindstrom, Brian M. Mathes, Ferenc Martényi, Scott M. Sheehan, Stephanie L. Stout, David E. Timm, Grant M. Vaught, Brian M. Watson, Leonard L. Winneroski, Zhixiang Yang and Dustin J. Mergott
Journal of Neuroscience 21 January 2015, 35 (3) 1199-1210; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4129-14.2015
Patrick C. May
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian A. Willis
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen L. Lowe
2National University of Singapore Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Singapore 117597, Singapore,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A. Dean
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Monk
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick J. Cocke
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. Audia
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James E. Audia
Leonard N. Boggs
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony R. Borders
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Brier
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David O. Calligaro
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa A. Day
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry Ereshefsky
3PAREXEL International, Glendale, California 91206, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon A. Erickson
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hykop Gevorkyan
4California Clinical Trials Medical Group, Inc., Glendale, California 91206
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hykop Gevorkyan
Celedon R. Gonzales
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas E. James
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanford S. Jhee
3PAREXEL International, Glendale, California 91206, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven F. Komjathy
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linglin Li
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry D. Lindstrom
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Mathes
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferenc Martényi
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott M. Sheehan
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie L. Stout
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Timm
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant M. Vaught
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Watson
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard L. Winneroski
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhixiang Yang
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dustin J. Mergott
1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dustin J. Mergott
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    LY2886721: Compound structure (A) and crystal structure of LY2886721 in the BACE1 active site (B). Molecular surface is shown in gray, with Thr72 and Gln73 omitted for clarity. Carbon atoms are colored white or yellow. Oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and fluorine atoms are colored red, blue, yellow, and green, respectively. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bond contact distances between LY2886721 and the catalytic Asp residues (in Å). Structure factors and protein coordinates will be deposited into the Protein Data Bank. The figure was generated using PyMOL (Schroedinger, LLC).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Pharmacologic effects in vivo of oral administration of LY2886721. Young PDAPP mice (n = 6–8 per group) were treated with increasing doses of LY2886721 or vehicle, and hippocampal Aβ1-x (A), cortical Aβ1-x (B), cortical C99 (C), or cortical sAPPβ (D) levels were determined from brain extracts obtained 3 h after dosing. LY2886721 produced dose-dependent decreases in all APP-related PD markers of BACE1 inhibition in PDAPP mice, p < 0.01 versus vehicle control, ANOVA/Dunnett's post hoc analysis.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Peripheral and central PD effects of LY2886721 in beagle dogs after a single 1.5 mg/kg dose. Baseline plasma and CSF samples were collected from cannulated beagle dogs (n = 6) before dosing with 1.5 mg/kg LY2886721. After dosing, plasma and CSF samples were collected at various times and stored for analysis; Aβ1-x levels are measured in plasma and CSF and averaged across all 6 animals. Baseline plasma Aβ1-x was 234 ± 17 pg/ml (mean ± SEM; n = 6) and baseline CSF Aβ1-x was 4.85 ± 0.64 ng/ml (mean ± SEM; n = 6). LY2886721 produced robust and time-dependent decreases in Aβ1-x in both plasma and CSF of dog relative to baseline. **p < 0.01 compared with baseline. p-values derived from ANOVA: Dunnett's post hoc analysis.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Plasma Aβ species by time course in humans after administration of a single dose of 5, 7, 10, 15, 25, 35, and 70 mg of LY2886721 in healthy subjects. Subjects received a single dose of 5, 7, 10, 15, 25, 35, or 70 mg of LY2886721 (n = at least 6/dose) or placebo. Samples were drawn for PD biomarkers at baseline and at times up to 168 h after dosing. The time at which the mean nadir occurred across LY2886721 doses was 6–12 h and appeared to be independent of dose. The reduction from baseline in levels of Aβ species, as measured by either the nadir or the average reduction over the first 24 h, tended to increase with increasing doses of LY2886721. At the highest dose, 70 mg, the reduction from baseline was 83.3% for plasma concentrations of Aβ1–40 (A) and 74.0% for Aβ1–42 (B). Plasma levels of Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 slowly approached baseline levels by 168 h.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    CSF levels of amyloid β species after a single dose of 35 mg of LY2886721 in healthy subjects (n = 4). CSF concentrations of Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 closely paralleled one another after a single 35 mg dose of LY2886721. The mean nadir for both species occurred at 18 h, ∼6–12 h after the plasma nadir occurred. At nadir, the mean reduction from baseline was 40.0% for Aβ1–40 and 36.3% for Aβ1–42, approximately half the reduction seen in plasma at the same dose. After concentrations reached nadir, they slowly returned to their predose baseline values over 32–36 h.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Steady-state plasma Aβ species time course in humans after once daily administration of 5, 15, 35, or 70 mg of LY2886721 for 14 d in healthy human subjects. Healthy subjects (n = 6–10 per dose group) received daily doses of 5, 15, 35, or 70 mg of LY2886721 for 14 d. After the last dose, plasma samples were collected for up to 216 h and analyzed for Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42. Values are expressed as the percentage change from baseline levels. Both Aβ species were reduced compared with placebo, reached a nadir, and slowly approached baseline by the end of the sampling period (216 h). A, Aβ1–40 concentrations were reduced and reached a nadir at 8 h for the 3 lower doses and 9 h for the highest dose of 70 mg. Whether measured as change from baseline or time-averaged change from day 1 baseline from 0–24 h, the percentage reduction from baseline increased with dose (reduction from baseline at nadir: 66.3%, 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for 5, 15, 35, and 70 mg, respectively). B, Concentrations of Aβ1–42 were reduced in a similar manner. Steady-state Aβ1–42 concentrations reached a mean nadir at between 8 and 10 h and reductions from baseline concentrations after 14 d of a steady dose ranged from 47.1% to 80.1%.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Comparison of CSF Aβ1–40, Aβ1–42,sAPPα, and sAPPβ at steady state by dose after daily administration of LY2886721 in healthy subjects. Subjects received daily doses of LY2886721 for 14 d. On day 15, 24 ± 4 h after the last dose of LY2886721 on day 14, CSF samples were collected for measurement of Aβ1–40, Aβ1–42, sAPPα, and sAPPβ. Values are expressed as the percentage change from baseline levels. As the dose increased, increasing reductions in CSFAβ1–40, Aβ1–42, and sAPPβ were observed. At the 35 mg dose, the mean level of decrease in CSFAβ1–40, Aβ1–42, and sAPPβ was between 53.2% and 59.0% of baseline levels. At the 70 mg dose, the decrease was between 71% and 78% (all p < 0.001, as determined by ANCOVA analysis). In contrast, sAPPα demonstrated a clear dose-dependent increase with a maximum increase of 60% and 80% of baseline for the 35 and 70 mg dose levels, respectively.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Crystallographic data

    Space groupP212121
    Cell constants86.43 × 89.77 × 130.66 Å3, α = β = γ = 90°
    Resolution73.99–1.77 Å
    Unique reflections99,735 (14,421)
    Completeness100% (100%)
    Multiplicity7.3 (7.3)
    Rmerge0.097 (0.469)
    Mn (I/SD)13.2 (3.9)
    Rcryst0.173 (0.230)
    Rfree0.207 (0.284)
    RMSD bonds0.010 Å
    RMSD angles1.39 deg
    Mean B value19.35 Å2
    • Mn (I/SD), Mean intensity divided by the mean SD; RMSD, root mean square deviation.

    • Crystallographic statistics are from REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 1997) and SCALA (Winn et al., 2011). Values for the highest-resolution shell (1.86–1.77) are in parentheses.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Potency of LY2886721 in BACE1 and other aspartyl proteases and potency of LY2886721 in cellular assays

    Aspartyl protease assays, absolute IC50, nm (SD)
        hBACE1 mca FRET assay (n = 10): 20.3 (10.1)hBACE2 mca FRET assay (n = 12/14): 10.2 (4.8)Cathepsin D FRET assay (n = 1/6): >300,000Pepsin FRET assay (n = 5): >100,000Renin FRET assay (n = 6): >100,000
    Cellular assays, relative IC50, nm (SD)
        HEK293Swe Aβ1–40 (n = 9): 18.5 (12.7)HEK293Swe Aβ1–42 (n = 10): 19.7 (10.3)HEK293Swe cytotox (n = 1/9): >100,000PDAPP 1o neuron Aβ1–40 (n = 6): 10.7 (3.5)PDAPP 1o neuron Aβ1–42 (n = 6): 9.2 (3.9)PDAPP 1o neuron cytotox (n = 1/6): >50,000
    • hBACE1, human recombinant beta-APP cleaving enzyme1; hBACE2, human recombinant beta-APP cleaving enzyme 2; IC50, concentration at which enzyme activity is inhibited by 50%; mca, methylcoumarin.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Subject characteristics by study

    Study 1: SAD (n = 39)Study 2: MAD (n = 42)Study 3: SAD and MAD (n = 15)*
    Age, y
        Mean (SD)37.0 (18.8)31.0 (7.5)32.9 (10.0)
    Weight, kg
        Mean (SD)74.6 (13.7)76.7 (14.0)78.1 (9.5)
    Female sex, n (%)6 (15.4)3 (7.1)0 (0.0)
    Race, n (%)
        White11 (28.2)20 (47.6)8 (53.3)
        Asian12 (30.8)14 (33.3)4 (26.7)
        Black13 (33.3)8 (19.0)2 (13.3)
    • ↵*n represents those subjects of a total of 30 enrolled in Study 3 who received doses of 70 mg of LY2886721 or placebo; 10 subjects received at least a single dose of LY2886721 and 5 subjects had placebo.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Adverse event profile after administration of multiple doses of LY2886721

    Adverse eventNumber of adverse events (subjects)
    Placebo (n = 20)LY2886721 (n = 35)
    5 mg (n = 10)15 mg (n = 10)35 mg (n = 9)70 mg (n = 6)All doses (n = 35)
    TotRelTotRelTotRelTotRelTotRelTotRel
    Headache2 (1)1 (1)0 (0)00 (0)01 (1)1 (1)0 (0)01 (1)1 (1)
    Procedural headache2 (2)*00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)01 (1)02 (2)0
    Cough0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)01 (1)0
    Dry mouth1 (1)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)0
    Gingivitis1 (1)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)0
    Insomnia0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)01 (1)0
    Visual field tests abnormal1 (1)01 (1)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)0
    Orthostatic hypotension0 (0)01 (1)1 (1)0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)1 (1)
    Muscle spasms0 (0)00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)0
    Libido decreased0 (0)00 (0)01 (1)1 (1)0 (0)00 (0)01 (1)1 (1)
    Rash0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)01 (1)0
    Scotoma1 (1)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)0
    Sinus congestion0 (0)00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)0
    Chest pain0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)01 (1)0
    Oral herpes0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)01 (1)0
    URI1 (1)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)00 (0)0
    Viral infection0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)01 (1)00 (0)01 (1)0
    • Adverse event, all-cause and related to study drug, by treatment, in order of frequency.

    • Rel, Related to study drug; Tot, total; URI, upper respiratory tract infection.

    • ↵*Only this adverse event was moderate in severity and all others were mild in severity. None was considered severe.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 3
21 Jan 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Potent BACE1 Inhibitor LY2886721 Elicits Robust Central Aβ Pharmacodynamic Responses in Mice, Dogs, and Humans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Potent BACE1 Inhibitor LY2886721 Elicits Robust Central Aβ Pharmacodynamic Responses in Mice, Dogs, and Humans
Patrick C. May, Brian A. Willis, Stephen L. Lowe, Robert A. Dean, Scott A. Monk, Patrick J. Cocke, James E. Audia, Leonard N. Boggs, Anthony R. Borders, Richard A. Brier, David O. Calligaro, Theresa A. Day, Larry Ereshefsky, Jon A. Erickson, Hykop Gevorkyan, Celedon R. Gonzales, Douglas E. James, Stanford S. Jhee, Steven F. Komjathy, Linglin Li, Terry D. Lindstrom, Brian M. Mathes, Ferenc Martényi, Scott M. Sheehan, Stephanie L. Stout, David E. Timm, Grant M. Vaught, Brian M. Watson, Leonard L. Winneroski, Zhixiang Yang, Dustin J. Mergott
Journal of Neuroscience 21 January 2015, 35 (3) 1199-1210; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4129-14.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The Potent BACE1 Inhibitor LY2886721 Elicits Robust Central Aβ Pharmacodynamic Responses in Mice, Dogs, and Humans
Patrick C. May, Brian A. Willis, Stephen L. Lowe, Robert A. Dean, Scott A. Monk, Patrick J. Cocke, James E. Audia, Leonard N. Boggs, Anthony R. Borders, Richard A. Brier, David O. Calligaro, Theresa A. Day, Larry Ereshefsky, Jon A. Erickson, Hykop Gevorkyan, Celedon R. Gonzales, Douglas E. James, Stanford S. Jhee, Steven F. Komjathy, Linglin Li, Terry D. Lindstrom, Brian M. Mathes, Ferenc Martényi, Scott M. Sheehan, Stephanie L. Stout, David E. Timm, Grant M. Vaught, Brian M. Watson, Leonard L. Winneroski, Zhixiang Yang, Dustin J. Mergott
Journal of Neuroscience 21 January 2015, 35 (3) 1199-1210; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4129-14.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • amyloid beta
  • BACE1
  • clinical trial
  • nonclinical animal model

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Multi-omics analysis reveals miR-7220-5p alleviates N2O addictive behaviors via NR2B/ERK/CREB signaling
  • Disrupted Neurogenesis from Basal Intermediate Precursor Cells Alters the Postnatal Neocortex in the TcMAC21 Mouse model of Down Syndrome
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Neuroimaging of the Pink1-/- Rat Parkinson Disease Model with the Norepinephrine Transporter (NET) Ligand [18F]NS12137
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.