Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Systems/Circuits

Predator Stress-Induced CRF Release Causes Enduring Sensitization of Basolateral Amygdala Norepinephrine Systems that Promote PTSD-Like Startle Abnormalities

Abha K. Rajbhandari, Brian A. Baldo and Vaishali P. Bakshi
Journal of Neuroscience 21 October 2015, 35 (42) 14270-14285; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-14.2015
Abha K. Rajbhandari
2Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53719
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abha K. Rajbhandari
Brian A. Baldo
1Department of Psychiatry and
2Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53719
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vaishali P. Bakshi
1Department of Psychiatry and
2Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53719
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    General timeline used for all behavioral experiments. After recovery from surgery, rats underwent a mock infusion (injectors lowered without infusate), followed by the repeated treatment regimen (in purple; drug infusion, ferret exposure, or both), another mock infusion, a challenge drug infusion (dark blue), and then an additional mock infusion. Data from these latter two mock infusions were averaged and termed mock 2; mock 2 was used for all statistical comparisons. Amount of time between consecutive test days is indicated in hours along the timeline. Each test day (vertical line) included prepulse inhibition/startle testing immediately after the treatment (mock, repeated regimen, or challenge).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effects on %PPI of repeated (three presentations) ferret exposure or of various intra-BLA treatments and subsequent subthreshold challenge injections. A, Repeated ferret exposure (termed 1st Ferret, 2nd Ferret, and 3rd Ferret) and subsequent intra-BLA challenges with NE (0.3 μg; which took place 4, 11, and 18 d after the termination of ferret exposure) or systemic yohimbine (1 mg/kg) with accompanying control mock injections (mock2 to mock4). Note that the final challenge (yohimbine) took place 28 d after ferret exposures had ended. B, Repeated intra-BLA CRF infusions (termed first CRF, second CRF, and third CRF; all were 200 ng) with subsequent intra-BLA NE challenge injection (0.3 μg) 4 d after repeated CRF infusions ended. C, Repeated intra-BLA NE infusions (termed first NE, second NE, and third NE; all were 20 μg) with subsequent intra-BLA CRF challenge injection (200 ng) 4 d after repeated NE infusions ended. D, Repeated intra-BLA vehicle (termed first vehicle, second vehicle, and third vehicle) with subsequent intra-BLA NE challenge injection (0.3 μg) 4 d after repeated vehicle infusions ended. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with corresponding mock infusion; +p < 0.06, $p < 0.05, compared with the first NE infusion.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects on %PPI of CRF1-R antagonist (NBI27914, 1 μg) and repeated ferret exposure (three exposures total in each group: 1st Ferret, 2nd Ferret, and 3rd Ferret). A–C, CRF1-R antagonist was injected into the BLA immediately before (A) or 30 min after (B) each ferret exposure, or immediately before the intra-BLA NE challenge (C; 0.3 μg of NE). Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. NE challenges took place 4 d after the termination of the repeated ferret exposures. NBI, NBI27914. *p < 0.05, compared with mock2.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effects on %PPI of intra-BLA infusion of the α1 noradrenergic receptor agonist PHEN or the β-receptor agonist ISO. PHEN (30 μg) or ISO (30 μg) were tested 4 d after the termination of the repeated ferret exposures (three exposures total in each group: 1st Ferret, 2nd Ferret, and 3rd Ferret). Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, compared with mock2.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    A–D, Representative injector tip locations within the CeA (A) and BLA (C) of the amygdala, which are indicated by arrows; chartings depicting the location of infusions of CRF (squares), NE (triangles), or vehicle (circles) into CeA (B) and BLA (D). VM, Ventromedial thalamus; opt, optic tract; Pe, periventricular hypothalamus.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A high degree of colocalization of CRF1 and α1 receptors is seen in BLA neurons. A–A3, Immunofluorescence labeling of CRF1 receptors (A), α1 receptors (A1), DAPI-labeled cells (A2), and their merge (A3) showing the coexpression of red, green, and blue in the same individual cells. A4 shows a high-magnification image of the cell identified with an arrow. B–B2, Double-immunofluorescence labeling in BLA showing α1 receptor (B), NeuN (B1), and their merge (B2). Arrows indicate individual neurons.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    BLA neurons that express α1 NE receptors are not GABAergic presumptive interneurons. A, A1, Double-immunofluorescence labeling of GAD67 (A) and α1 NE receptors (A1) from the same section/slice in BLA. B, B1, Immunoperoxidase labeling of GAD67 (brown) and α1 NE receptors (blue) in BLA. Arrows indicate individual cells.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Retrogradely transported microsphere beads injected into nucleus accumbens (NAcc) are deposited in basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons that express CRF1 receptors, indicating that repeated ferret exposure changes the functional sensitivity of BLA output projections neurons that innervate the NAcc. A–E, Line drawing of NAcc area for microsphere infusion (A); overlaid fluorescent image (B) and close-up (C) showing restricted deposition of retrograde tracer in NAcc; immunofluorescence labeling of CRF1 receptors in the BLA (D), BLA cells with fluorescence-labeled microspheres (E), and the merged image (F) showing CRF1 receptors colabeled with cells that are filled with the microspheres. Arrows indicated representative cells.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Schematic of the working model for predator stress-induced effects in the basolateral amygdala. A, Before our studies, it was known only that α1 (Embedded Image) and CRF1 (Embedded Image) receptors were both present in BLA, but their localization relative to each other and on different types of BLA cells (glia, orange; GABAergic inhibitory interneurons, blue; excitatory output neurons, green) was not known. B, We completed immunohistochemical and tract-tracing studies (Experiment 6; Figs. 6, 7, 8) to address these gaps in knowledge. First, we found that α1 and CRF1 receptors are colocalized on the same neurons and not on glial cells. Second, we failed to find these receptors on GABAergic cells. Third, we found that these receptors are present on BLA glutamatergic projection neurons that innervate the NAcc. Finally, we found that these output projection neurons that express CRF1 and α1 receptors are innervated by GABAergic neurons (presumptive inhibitory interneurons). C, Working model for behavioral sensitization induced by repeated predator exposure. Repeated exposure to predator stress sensitizes α1 receptors on BLA output neurons via initial activation of CRF1 receptors. Sensitized α1 receptors are hence abnormally responsive to low levels of NE, leading to increased glutamate release in downstream targets such as the NAcc, and thereby disrupting PPI. This putative mechanism of stress-induced BLA NE α1 receptor sensitization could thus contribute to startle abnormalities (exaggerated startle and disrupted PPI) that are seen in post-traumatic stress disorder.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Preabsorption with α1 peptide and CRF1 peptide eliminates receptor-like labeling in the BLA, shown with parallel fluorescence and immunoperoxidase methods. A–A2, α1 Preabsorption and secondary alone controls with fluorescence labeling. A3–A5, Bright-field images of the preabsorption and secondary-alone controls for α1 receptor using an immunoperoxidase staining method. B–B2, CRF1 preabsorption and secondary-alone controls with fluorescence labeling. B3–B5, bright-field images of the preabsorption and secondary alone controls for CRF1 receptor, using an immunoperoxidase method. With the CRF1 receptor antibody preabsorption, we noticed some residual labeling resembling blood vessels (see B1), which is consistent with the presence of CRF2-R (CRF2-R is also recognized to some degree by the sc-1757 antibody; Lukkes et al., 2011). However, receptor-like, “ring-shaped” structures were eliminated by primary antibody preabsorption with CRFR1 antigen. Asterisks denote presumptive receptors; arrows denote presumptive blood vessels.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    CRF1 receptor labeling is present in the BLA but is absent in the CeA, a region known to be devoid of CRF1 receptors (Lovenberg et al., 1995), further suggesting that the antibody revealed true labeling of CRF1 receptors. Top, Fluorescence labeling with ring-shaped, receptor-like structures in the BLA is shown with asterisks. In both BLA and CeA, blood vessel-like structures were also noted, as shown with arrows. It is possible that these could be CRF2 labeling as these receptors are present in brain arterioles (Lovenberg et al., 1995). Bottom, Bright-field images of the BLA and CeA CRF1 receptor-like labeling conducted in parallel with an immunoperoxidase method. Again, note the absence of receptor-like labeling in the CeA.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Experimental design for behavioral studies (experiments 1–5)

    Repeated treatmentChallenge injection
    Experiment 1 (BLA)Ferret exposure (N = 8)0.3 μg NE, 4 d after ferret exposure
    0.3 μg NE, 11 d after ferret exposure
    0.3 μg NE, 18 d after ferret exposure
    1 mg/kg yohimbine, 28 d after ferret exposure
    Experiment 2 (BLA)200 ng CRF (N = 7)0.3 μg NE
    20 μg NE (N = 12)200 ng CRF
    Vehicle (N = 8)0.3 μg NE
    Experiment 3 (CeA)200 ng CRF (N = 9)0.3 μg NE
    20 μg NE (N = 12)200 ng CRF
    Vehicle (N = 8)0.3 μg NE
    Experiment 4 (BLA)NBI 1000 ng before ferret exposure (N = 8)0.3 μg NE
    NBI 1000 ng after ferret exposure (N = 8)0.3 μg NE
    Ferret exposure (N = 11)NBI 1000 ng before 0.3 μg NE
    Experiment 5 (BLA)Ferret exposure (N = 8)30 μg PHEN
    Ferret exposure (N = 9)30 μg ISO
    • Five experiments were performed; each experiment except for Experiment 1 contained separate groups of rats that received different treatment regimens. The brain region into which injections were made for different groups of rats is indicated next to each experiment number. Repeated treatment = the manipulation (either ferret exposure and/or intracranial drug infusion) each group of rats underwent repeatedly (three exposures total, with consecutive exposures separated by 3d) as well as the number of rats per group; Challenge injection = the drug that was tested in each group of rats after the completion of the repeated treatment regimen (for all experiments except Experiment 1, the challenge injection took place 4 d after the termination of the repeated treatment for that particular group of rats). In Experiment 1, the initial challenge injection took place 4 d after repeated treatment, but there were additional challenge injections subsequently. Unless indicated otherwise, all doses are 0.5 μl/side. NBI, NBI27914. For Experiment 4, the first group of rats received intra-BLA infusion of NBI immediately before each ferret exposure; the second group received it 30 min after each ferret exposure; the third group did not receive it with ferret exposures, but instead received NBI into BLA immediately before the NE challenge injection.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Omnibus ANOVA results for PPI in behavioral studies (experiments 1–5)

    StudyOmnibus ANOVA for PPI
    Experiment 1Repeated ferret exposureF(10,70) = 4.1, p < 0.005*
    Experiment 2Repeated CRF infusions in BLAF(5,30) = 2.5, p < 0.049*
    Repeated NE infusions in BLAF(5,55) = 6.1, p < 0.005*
    Repeated vehicle infusions in BLAF(5,35) = 0.9, p < 0.514
    Experiment 3Repeated CRF infusions in CeAF(5,40) = 1.8, p < 0.117
    Repeated NE infusions in CeAF(5,55) = 1.3, p < 0.251
    Repeated vehicle infusions in CeAF(4,28) = 0.4, p < 0.794
    Experiment 4NBI before each repeated ferret exposureF(5,35) = 0.5, p < 0.705
    NBI after each repeated ferret exposureF(5,35) = 4.3, p < 0.003*
    Repeated ferret exposure and then NBI with NE challengeF(5,50) = 7.5, p < 0.005*
    Experiment 5Repeated ferret exposure and then PHEN injectionF(5,35) = 3.3, p < 0.013*
    Repeated ferret exposure and then ISO injectionF(5,40) = 4.4, p < 0.003*
    • A single-factor within-subjects ANOVA of %PPI was performed for each group of rats in order to determine whether any manipulation (either the repeated treatment regimen or the subsequent challenge injection) affected %PPI in any study. Based on significant omnibus ANOVAs within each separate group of rats, subsequent analyses of simple main effects and comparisons of individual means were performed, as reported in the Results section of the text. Study, The specific group of rats within a particular experiment; Omnibus ANOVA for PPI, F ratio and p value for the ANOVA for that particular group of rats; NBI, NBI27914.

    • ↵*Indicates a significant (p < 0.05) result from the omnibus ANOVA.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Omnibus ANOVA results for startle magnitude in behavioral studies (experiments 1–5)

    StudyOmnibus ANOVA for startle
    Experiment 1Repeated ferret exposureF(10,70) = 6.7, p < 0.005*
    Experiment 2Repeated CRF infusions in BLAF(5,30) = 1.2, p < 0.314
    Repeated NE infusions in BLAF(5,55) = 0.6, p < 0.710
    Repeated vehicle infusions in BLAF(5,35) = 1.0, p < 0.412
    Experiment 3Repeated CRF infusions in CeAF(5,40) = 1.3, p < 0.278
    Repeated NE infusions in CeAF(5,55) = 0.6, p < 0.724
    Repeated vehicle in CeAF(4,28) = 0.6, p < 0.692
    Experiment 4NBI before each repeated ferret exposureF(5,35) = 1.3, p < 0.262
    NBI after each repeated ferret exposureF(5,35) = 0.5, p < 0.729
    Repeated ferret exposure and then NBI with NE challengeF(5,50) = 2.8, p < 0.026*
    Experiment 5Repeated ferret exposure and then PHEN injectionF(5,35) = 0.3, p < 0.916
    Repeated ferret exposure and then ISO injectionF(5,40) = 2.7, p < 0.033*
    • A single-factor within-subjects omnibus ANOVA of startle magnitude was performed for each group of rats in order to determine whether any manipulation (either the repeated treatment regimen or the subsequent challenge injection) affected startle in any study. Based on significant omnibus ANOVAs within each separate group of rats, subsequent analyses of simple main effects and comparisons of individual means were performed, as reported in the Results section of the text. Study, The specific group of rats within a particular experiment; Omnibus ANOVA for startle, the F ratio and p value for the ANOVA for that particular group of rats; NBI, NBI27914.

    • ↵*Indicates a significant (p < 0.05) result from the ANOVA.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Effects of various treatments on baseline startle magnitude after repeated treatment

    mock11st ferret2nd ferret3rd ferretmock21st NE challengemock32nd NE challengemock43rd NE challengeYohimbine
    Experiment 1 (ferret exposure)481 ± 70402 ± 40359 ± 51352 ± 51419 ± 41421 ± 50351 ± 50561 ± 70*489 ± 59621 ± 68*560 ± 91*
    mock1infusion1infusion2infusion3mock2Challenge
    Experiment 2
        CRF (200 ng)452 ± 64422 ± 69432 ± 71428 ± 46442 ± 66525 ± 86 (NE 0.3 μg)
        NE (20 μg)392 ± 97358 ± 51364 ± 47329 ± 32324 ± 35349 ± 31 (CRF 200 ng)
        Vehicle367 ± 49386 ± 45377 ± 42424 ± 47366 ± 42430 ± 52 (NE 0.3 μg)
    mock11st ferret2nd ferret3rd ferretmock2NE challenge
    Experiment 4
        NBI before ferret exposure292 ± 45276 ± 51241 ± 26326 ± 59295 ± 31309 ± 35
        NBI after ferret exposure371 ± 54318 ± 53312 ± 27304 ± 34303 ± 34315 ± 34
        Ferret exposurea360 ± 55319 ± 33319 ± 37311 ± 33343 ± 38419 ± 40*
    mock11st ferret2nd ferret3rd ferretmock2Challenge
    Experiment 5
        Ferret exposure452 ± 74411 ± 58409 ± 57456 ± 56431 ± 58427 ± 57 (PHEN 30 μg)
        Ferret exposure266 ± 26331 ± 42334 ± 39304 ± 31336 ± 30259 ± 28* (ISO 30 μg)
    • All experiments listed in this table were with intra-BLA infusions. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. Except for yohimbine, which was 1 mg/kg given systemically, all drug doses are for an intra-BLA infusion in a volume of 0.5 μl/side. NBI, NBI27914, 1000 ng.

    • ↵aIntra-BLA vehicle infusions occurred in this group with each ferret exposure, and NBI was injected into BLA immediately prior to intra-BLA NE challenge infusion.

    • ↵*p < 0.05, compared to corresponding mock infusion.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (42)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 42
21 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predator Stress-Induced CRF Release Causes Enduring Sensitization of Basolateral Amygdala Norepinephrine Systems that Promote PTSD-Like Startle Abnormalities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Predator Stress-Induced CRF Release Causes Enduring Sensitization of Basolateral Amygdala Norepinephrine Systems that Promote PTSD-Like Startle Abnormalities
Abha K. Rajbhandari, Brian A. Baldo, Vaishali P. Bakshi
Journal of Neuroscience 21 October 2015, 35 (42) 14270-14285; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-14.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Predator Stress-Induced CRF Release Causes Enduring Sensitization of Basolateral Amygdala Norepinephrine Systems that Promote PTSD-Like Startle Abnormalities
Abha K. Rajbhandari, Brian A. Baldo, Vaishali P. Bakshi
Journal of Neuroscience 21 October 2015, 35 (42) 14270-14285; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-14.2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • corticotropin-releasing factor
  • corticotropin-releasing hormone
  • noradrenergic
  • prepulse inhibition
  • schizophrenia
  • sensorimotor gating

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • 2-AG-Mediated Control of GABAergic Signaling Is Impaired in a Model of Epilepsy
  • Expression of a Form of Cerebellar Motor Memory Requires Learned Alterations to the Activity of Inhibitory Molecular Layer Interneurons
  • Quantitative Fluorescence Analysis Reveals Dendrite-Specific Thalamocortical Plasticity in L5 Pyramidal Neurons during Learning
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.