Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Reliable Genetic Labeling of Adult-Born Dentate Granule Cells Using Ascl1CreERT2 and GlastCreERT2 Murine Lines

Sung M. Yang, Diego D. Alvarez and Alejandro F. Schinder
Journal of Neuroscience 18 November 2015, 35 (46) 15379-15390; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2345-15.2015
Sung M. Yang
Laboratorio de Plasticidad Neuronal, Fundación Instituto Leloir-Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, C1405BWE, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego D. Alvarez
Laboratorio de Plasticidad Neuronal, Fundación Instituto Leloir-Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, C1405BWE, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandro F. Schinder
Laboratorio de Plasticidad Neuronal, Fundación Instituto Leloir-Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, C1405BWE, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alejandro F. Schinder
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Intrinsic membrane properties of developing GCs generated in adult Ascl1CreERT2 mice. A, Confocal image of a 60-μm-thick hippocampal section depicting adult-born GCs (red) at 49 d after TAM injection (dpi). NeuN immunofluorescence (blue) allows visualizing the GCL and CA1, CA2, and CA3 pyramidal layers. Dendrites extend through the molecular layer (ML), and mossy fibers project across the hilus (H) to CA3, via the stratum lucidum. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Tom indelible expression was induced by TAM administration, and mice were killed at different times post injection to perform electrophysiological recordings in acute slices. C–E, Resting potential (C), input resistance (D), and membrane capacitance (E) were measured in Tom+ adult-born neurons and unlabeled mature GCs. Sample sizes (presented as neurons/mice) were 35/6 (22 dpi), 44/5 (25 dpi), 44/6 (28 dpi), 35/5 (35 dpi), 33/5 (49 dpi), and 40/23 (mature). ***p < 0.001 compared with mature GCs. **p < 0.01 compared with mature GCs. *p < 0.05 compared with mature GCs. ns, Not significant. Red lines indicate mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were done using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Spiking properties of adult-born GCs in Ascl1CreERT2 mice. A, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings in GCs at different ages. Spiking was elicited by depolarizing current steps of increasing amplitude (500 ms, 0–130 pA, 10 pA steps). Panels represent example traces at the indicated current steps. Calibration: left, 100 mV; right, 20 mV; 100 ms. B, Repetitive firing quantified as the number of spikes elicited by increasing current steps. C, Current threshold to elicit the first spike for the experiments shown in B. D, E, AP amplitude, AHP amplitude, and AP half-width were measured for the first spike (D) and all identified spikes (E). ***p < 0.001 compared with mature GCs. **p < 0.01 compared with mature GCs. *p < 0.05 compared with mature GCs. ns, Not significant. Sample sizes (presented as neurons/mice) were 34/6 (22 dpi), 39/5 (25 dpi), 42/6 (28 dpi), 35/5 (35 dpi), 31/5 (49 dpi), and 40/23 (mature). Red lines indicate mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were done using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Excitatory input connectivity of adult-born GCs in Ascl1CreERT2 mice. A, Representative traces of sEPSC recorded at −70 mV in GCs at different ages. Top, Time-compressed traces allow the visualization of sEPSC frequency. Bottom, Expanded presentations show individual events. Calibration: top, 10 pA, 10 s; bottom, 2 pA, 100 ms. B, Frequency of sEPSC events, measured during 120 s. ***p < 0.001 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). **p < 0.01 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). *p < 0.05 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). C, sEPSC amplitude presented as mean value for each cell (Ci), and cumulative frequency for each cell age (Cii). Inset in Cii depicts amplitude histogram. Errors bars in Cii were omitted for clarity. Cumulative frequencies presented no differences with mature GCs by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (minimum p > 0.24). D, Kinetic analysis of sEPSCs: rise time (20%–90%), decay time (90%–30%), and half-width. No significant differences were found for any of the parameters by Kruskal–Wallis test (amplitude, p = 0.06; rise time, p = 0.32; decay time, p = 0.10; width, p = 0.04). Sample sizes (presented as neurons/mice) were 29/6 (22 dpi), 34/5 (25 dpi), 34/6 (28 dpi), 17/3 (35 dpi), 31/5 (49 dpi), and 38/22 (mature). Red lines indicate mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Morphology and neuronal markers for developing GCs generated in adult Ascl1CreERT2 mice. A, Confocal images of Tom+ cells in the dentate gyrus of Ascl1CreERT2;CAGfloxStopTom mice at different times after TAM induction. NeuN immunolabeling was performed to allow the identification of the GCL. Note the rise in the number of labeled cells from 3 to 14 dpi, characteristic of cell proliferation. White dashed lines were added to facilitate visualization of dendrites among densely packed tagged neurons. Imaging conditions were selected to render similar fluorescence intensity in all age groups. B, Examples of 22 and 35 dpi GCs obtained with identical imaging settings reveal a time-dependent increase in fluorescence intensity. Note the mixed population of high and low Tom intensities at 35 dpi. C, Representative images of single optical sections, and quantification of Sox2 (left) and NeuN (right) levels. Sample sizes: >50 Tom+ cells, with 2 mice for each time point (1 mouse for 28 dpi). D, Left, Representative images display single optical sections of DCX (top) and Cb (bottom) expression in Tom+ GCs at different times after induction. Inset, Higher magnification of Tom+ cells, to assess colocalization with DCX or Cb. Right, Quantification of DCX (top) and Cb (bottom) levels. Sample sizes: > 90 Tom+ GCs, with 2 or 3 mice for each time point. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM. All scale bars represent 20 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Computational simulation of adult neurogenesis in Ascl1CreERT2 mice. Neurogenesis results from the combination of a generation rate of newborn GCs (A, left; G(t)) and their survival probability (A, right; S(n)). Generation was represented by an exponential function starting at 1 dpi (Tinflexion) with a decay time of 5 d (τneurogenesis). Tinflexion and τneurogenesis were the only free parameters in the model. Survival probability was calculated based on experimental data (Brandt et al., 2003). The generation rate depends on the time after TAM induction, whereas the survival probability is a function of cell age. The number of newborn cells N(t, n) whose age is n at the time t was calculated as N(t, n) = G(t − n) × S(n). The population of GCs at different times after TAM induction has a substantial contribution of neurons whose age is close to the time after induction (B). To compute the expression of neuronal markers, we assumed that each labeled cell independently expresses DCX or Cb with a probability represented by respective sigmoid functions (C), according to previous experimental data (Espósito et al., 2005; Piatti et al., 2011). The model predicts expression levels of DCX (D, left, violet line) and Cb (D, right, red line) tightly close to experimental data (green bars, extracted from Fig. 4). For details on the model, see also Materials and Methods.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Intrinsic properties of adult-born GCs in GlastCreERT2 mice. A, Confocal image of a 60-μm-thick hippocampal section depicting adult-born GCs (red) at 49 dpi. NeuN immunofluorescence (blue) allows visualizing the GCL, CA1, CA2, and CA3 pyramidal layers. Dendrites extend through the molecular layer (ML), and mossy fibers project across the hilus (H) to CA3, via the stratum lucidum. There are scattered Tom+ astrocytes throughout the section. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Tom indelible expression was induced by TAM administration, and animals were killed at different ages to perform electrophysiological recordings in acute slices. C–E, Resting potential (C), input resistance (D), and capacitance (E) were measured in fluorescent adult-born neurons and unlabeled mature GCs. Sample sizes (presented as neurons/mice) were 38/5 (22 dpi), 37/6 (25 dpi), 37/4 (28 dpi), 33/4 (49 dpi), and 28/19 (mature). ***p < 0.001 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). **p < 0.01 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). *p < 0.05 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). ns, Not significant. Red lines indicate mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Spiking properties of adult-born GCs in GlastCreERT2 mice. A, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings in GCs at different ages, as indicated. Spiking was elicited by depolarizing current steps of increasing amplitude (500 ms, 0–130 pA, 10 pA steps). Panels represent example traces at the indicated current steps. Calibration: left, 100 mV; right, 20 mV; 100 ms. B, Repetitive firing quantified as the number of spikes elicited by increasing current steps. C, Current threshold to elicit the first spike for the experiments shown in B. D, E, AP amplitude, AHP amplitude, and AP half-width were measured for the first spike (D) and all identified spikes (E). ***p < 0.001 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). **p < 0.01 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). *p < 0.05 compared with mature GCs (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test). ns, Not significant. Sample sizes (presented as neurons/mice) were 36/5 (22 dpi), 37/6 (25 dpi), 35/4 (28 dpi), 32/4 (49 dpi), and 27/16 (mature). Red lines indicate mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Neuronal markers in developing GCs generated in adult GlastCreERT2 mice. Left, Representative images display single optical sections of DCX (top) and Cb (bottom) expression in Tom+ GCs at different times after induction. Inset, Higher magnification of Tom+ cells allows visualizing colocalization with early or late neuronal markers. Scale bar, 20 μm. Right, Quantification of DCX (left) and Cb (right) levels. Sample sizes: >120 Tom+ GCs, with 3 or 4 mice for each time point. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Membrane resistance in adult-born GCs labeled using different approachesa

    Age (dpi)Input resistance
    Ascl1CreERT2 miceGlastCreERT2 miceRetroviral labeling
    (Mongiat et al., 2009)(Gu et al., 2012)
    Mean ± SD (mΩ)Dispersion (%)Mean ± SD (mΩ)Dispersion (%)Mean (mΩ)Mean (mΩ)
    22990 ± 470481040 ± 64062950890
    25840 ± 40047790 ± 45057——
    28560 ± 20036660 ± 25038450530
    49380 ± 10026380 ± 12032240270
    Mature324 ± 9529310 ± 11035220—
    • ↵aInput resistance (mean ± SD) measured in Ascl1CreERT2 mice and GlastCreERT2 mice for different groups. Reported data use retroviral labeling. Dispersion was calculated as SD/mean value (%).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (46)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 46
18 Nov 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reliable Genetic Labeling of Adult-Born Dentate Granule Cells Using Ascl1CreERT2 and GlastCreERT2 Murine Lines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Reliable Genetic Labeling of Adult-Born Dentate Granule Cells Using Ascl1CreERT2 and GlastCreERT2 Murine Lines
Sung M. Yang, Diego D. Alvarez, Alejandro F. Schinder
Journal of Neuroscience 18 November 2015, 35 (46) 15379-15390; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2345-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Reliable Genetic Labeling of Adult-Born Dentate Granule Cells Using Ascl1CreERT2 and GlastCreERT2 Murine Lines
Sung M. Yang, Diego D. Alvarez, Alejandro F. Schinder
Journal of Neuroscience 18 November 2015, 35 (46) 15379-15390; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2345-15.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • adult neurogenesis
  • electrophysiology
  • hippocampus
  • neural circuits
  • synaptogenesis
  • transgenic mice

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Developmental Changes in Brain Cellular Membrane and Energy Metabolism: A Multi-Occasion 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study
  • The Epigenetic Reader PHF23 Is Required for Embryonic Neurogenesis
  • Microglia Support Both the Singular Form of LTP Expressed by the Lateral Perforant Path and Episodic Memory
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.