Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 4 February 2015, 35 (5) i
Teresa Esch
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Microglia Interact with Axon Initial Segments

Kelli Baalman, Miguel A. Marin, Tammy Szu-Yu Ho, Marlesa Godoy, Leela Cherian, et al.

(see pages 2283–2292)

Microglia are known as the resident immune cells of the CNS. Under normal conditions, they repeatedly extend and retract processes, sampling the environment for signs of injury. When injury is detected, microglia migrate toward the injury and release pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines, depending on the type of insult. They also phagocytose invading bacteria and cellular debris.

Microglial function is not limited to immune responses, however: microglia also influence neuronal activity, connectivity, and plasticity in the healthy brain. Microglia express several types of neurotransmitter receptors that allow them to respond to neuronal activity. In zebrafish, microglial processes detect highly active neurons, and after microglial contact, the neurons' activity declines. During development, microglia help shape neural circuits by pruning inactive and hyperactive synapses. Microglia also influence synaptic plasticity in adults, by releasing glycine and TNF-α, which modulate NMDA receptor activity and AMPA receptor expression, and by releasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (reviewed in Salter and Beggs, 2014, Cell 158:15).

New work by Baalman et al. suggests that microglia can also influence neuronal activity through specific interactions with the axon initial segment (AIS), where action potentials are generated. In mice, ∼8% of cortical microglia extended a process along an AIS, and ∼4% of cortical pyramidal neurons had AIS-associated microglia. AIS-associated microglia were less frequent among GABAergic cortical neurons and in subcortical brain regions. But given the high motility of microglial processes, all these measurements may be underestimates.

Because the AIS is dismantled after traumatic brain injury and microglia phagocytose cellular debris, Baalman et al. predicted that such injury would increase the number of AIS-associated microglia. Contrary to expectations, however, fewer microglia were associated with AISs in the injured hemisphere than in the control. Dismantling the AIS by knocking out Ankyrin G, which helps organize the complex protein structure of the AIS, also reduced the number of AIS-associated microglia, suggesting that microglia are only attracted to an intact AIS.

Together, the data suggest that microglia routinely monitor intact AISs, particularly those of excitatory cortical neurons, in the healthy brain. The function of AIS-associated microglia and whether they constitute a unique glial subpopulation remain unknown, however.

“Odd” Neurons Increase Odor Sensitivity in Drosophila

Gemma Slater, Peter Levy, K. L. Andrew Chan, and Camilla Larsen

(see pages 1831–1848)

Most animals use olfaction to locate food, recognize conspecifics, and detect poisons and predators. As with other sensory systems, gain control is required to maintain odor sensitivity over a wide range of intensities. This is especially true when olfaction is the primary means by which an animal finds its way to a food source or mate. In Drosophila, food odors are detected by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) that project to the antennal lobe, where they synapse with projection neurons (PNs), which project to the mushroom body and lateral horn. ORNs and PNs also synapse with local neurons (LNs) in the antennal lobe. As odor concentration increases, more ORNs are activated, resulting in increased activation of inhibitory LNs. These LNs inhibit ORN terminals, thus reducing odor sensitivity and preventing response saturation.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Reconstruction of all eight larval Odd neurons in a standard larval brain. Three of these neurons extend dendrites into the calyx of the mushroom body (MB, red) and extend axons into the centroposterior medial compartment (CPM, yellow) and two of these three project across the midline (white vertical line). Odd neurons appear to regulate odor sensitivity. See the article by Slater et al. for details.

Slater et al. have discovered another group of neurons that influence odor sensitivity in Drosophila larvae. The neurons, called Odd neurons because they express the transcription factor Odd-skipped, extend dendrites into the mushroom body calyx, where they form synapses with PNs. Ultrasensitive calcium sensors indicated that Odd neurons respond to attractive odors but not to aversive odors.

Several experiments suggested that manipulating Odd-neuron activity affected odor sensitivity. Silencing Odd neurons reduced, whereas increasing Odd-neuron excitability increased, the number of larvae that reached an attractive odor source. This difference likely stemmed not from differences in locomotor speed, which was similar across genotypes, but from differences in odor-sampling behavior. Compared to controls, Odd-silenced larvae exhibited more lateral head swings (used to determine the orientation of an odor gradient) and took more convoluted paths to the odor source. Conversely, Odd-excited larvae made fewer lateral head swings and took more direct paths to the odor.

These results suggest that Odd neurons increase odor sensitivity. Indeed, whereas normal larvae could discriminate between low-to-moderate odor concentrations that differed sixfold, Odd-silenced larvae required a tenfold difference while Odd-excited larvae could detect a fourfold difference. But Odd-excited larvae strayed farther from strong odor sources than Odd-silenced larvae, suggesting Odd-neuron activity reduced discrimination at higher concentrations. Odd neurons thus appear to boost olfactory sensitivity primarily when odor concentrations are low.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 5
4 Feb 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Watch this issue's cover video
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 February 2015, 35 (5) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 February 2015, 35 (5) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Microglia Interact with Axon Initial Segments
    • “Odd” Neurons Increase Odor Sensitivity in Drosophila
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.