Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Stimuli and trial structure. A, Four identities, shown from 180 viewpoints, were used for the experiments. B, The symmetry judgment task required participants to report which of two pairs of faces were shown from mirror-symmetric viewpoints. The angle judgment task required reporting the pair with the larger difference in viewpoint. Shown here are examples from Experiment 1 (contralateral stimulation). In Experiment 2 (ipsilateral stimulation), the stimuli were presented to the right of fixation.
- Figure 2.
OFA targeting. The right OFA was defined functionally using individual fMRI localizer data, contrasting BOLD responses to faces versus houses/objects and corresponding scrambled stimuli (example participant shown).
- Figure 3.
Results of Experiments 1 and 2. Performance in the angle and symmetry tasks after sham and rTMS in the contralateral experiment (A) and ipsilateral experiment (B). C and D show the effect of TMS on both tasks when performed in the contralateral and ipsilateral visual fields, respectively. Error bars indicate ±SEM.
- Figure 4.
Eye-tracking control experiment. Shown are the average fixation positions, recorded during the presentation of the experimental stimuli, for both visual fields and tasks. Gray dots show single trial data; red dots and orange dots indicate average positions for individual TMS and control participants, respectively. Black dots indicate group averages of fixation positions.
In this issue
