Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 4 March 2015, 35 (9) i
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Acetylcholine Receptors Distinguish STN Neurons

Cheng Xiao, Julie M. Miwa, Brandon J. Henderson, Ying Wang, Purnima Deshpande, et al.

(see pages 3734–3746)

Abnormal synchronous oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are closely linked to motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Disruption of these oscillations is associated with motor improvement during l-DOPA treatment and deep brain stimulation (DBS). As a component of the basal ganglia's “indirect pathway,” the STN excites GABAergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) and globus pallidus interna. Additionally, the STN has reciprocal connections with cholinergic neurons in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) and with dopaminergic neurons in the SN pars compacta (SNc). These modulatory inputs influence synchronous oscillations in the STN: loss of dopamine induces the oscillations, whereas activation of cholinergic pathways via chronic nicotine use or PPT stimulation enhances the ability of l-DOPA and DBS to disrupt the oscillations.

Xiao et al. discovered that exogenous acetylcholine (ACh) increases spike rates in two distinct populations of mouse STN neurons in slices. One population expressed nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) containing α4β2 subunits, while the other population expressed α7-containing nAChRs. Compared to α7-expressing neurons, those expressing α4β2 were more sensitive to ACh, and their activity remained elevated for a longer period after ACh application. Furthermore, α4β2-expressing neurons received twice as many excitatory inputs and one-third as many inhibitory inputs as α7-expressing neurons, so α4β2-expressing neurons tended to be excited by local electrical stimulation, while α7-expressing neurons were more often inhibited. Chronic nicotine exposure only affected α4β2-expressing neurons: by increasing expression of α4β2 receptors, it increased nicotine-induced currents and spontaneous firing rate in these neurons. Finally, although both populations activated neurons in SNr and SNc, α4β2-expressing neurons had a greater effect on SNr GABAergic neurons, while α7-expressing neurons had a greater effect on SNc dopaminergic neurons.

Together, these and previous results suggest that DBS disrupts synchronous oscillations in the STN partly by increasing the activity of α4β2-expressing neurons relative to that of α7-expressing neurons. This effect is probably enhanced by nicotine and by activation of cholinergic inputs. By primarily exciting GABAergic neurons in SNr, increased activation of α4β2-expressing neurons likely increases inhibition of downstream dopaminergic neurons in SNc. Genetically targeting α4β2-expressing neurons will help to elucidate their contribution to normal and abnormal circuit activity.

β1-Integrin Influences BMP Signaling in Astrocytes

Hilary A. North, Liuliu Pan, Tammy L. McGuire, Sarah Brooker, and John A. Kessler

(see pages 3725–3733)

After spinal cord injury (SCI), some ependymal zone stem cells (EZCs) that surround the central canal of the spinal cord differentiate into astrocytes. Initially, these and previously generated astrocytes limit infiltration of inflammatory cells, assist in wound healing, and help restore homeostasis; but they later form a dense glial scar that hinders axon regeneration. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), which helps specify astrocytic fate in stem cells, contributes to both the positive and negative effects of “reactive” astrocytes, but interestingly, it does so through activation of distinct receptors (BMPRs). Specifically, BMPR1a is essential for limiting inflammation and promoting healing, whereas BMPR1b is thought to promote glial scar formation.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

β1-integrin expression (red) is low in EZCs (green) of uninjured mice (left). Expression increases within 2 d of SCI (right). DAPI (blue) labels nuclei. See North et al. for details.

North et al. present evidence that β1-integrins regulate reactive astrocytes by limiting astrocyte generation and BMP signaling. After SCI, as EZCs proliferated and migrated to the injury site, β1-integrin expression increased. Selectively knocking out β1-integrin in ependymal cells caused more EZCs to migrate away from the central canal, differentiate, and express markers of reactive astrocytes after SCI. β1-integrin knockout also greatly reduced functional recovery from SCI.

Interestingly, although knocking out β1-integrin reduced expression of BMPR1a and BMPR1b, it increased activation of SMAD1/5/8 and p38, two downstream mediators of BMPR signaling. This effect may have resulted from a redistribution of BMPR1b into lipid rafts, which are thought to facilitate receptor-mediated activation of downstream signaling complexes. Indeed, the amount of BMPR1b present in lipid raft fractions increased after β1-integrin was knocked out, and disrupting lipid rafts reduced activation of SMAD1/5/8 and p38. Additional experiments indicated that β1-integrin interacts directly with BMPRs and that activation of BMPR increases expression of β1-integrin.

Together, these data suggest a model in which BMP signaling, activated in EZCs after SCI, is limited by BMPR-induced upregulation of β1-integrin. Through direct interaction with BMPR1b, β1-integrin prevents BMPR1b accumulation in lipid rafts, thus limiting its ability to activate downstream signaling. In this way, as well as by reducing the generation of new astrocytes, β1-integrin may limit glial scar formation, thus facilitating axon regeneration and functional recovery after SCI.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 35 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 35, Issue 9
4 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 March 2015, 35 (9) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 March 2015, 35 (9) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acetylcholine Receptors Distinguish STN Neurons
    • β1-Integrin Influences BMP Signaling in Astrocytes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.