Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

GluD2 Endows Parallel Fiber–Purkinje Cell Synapses with a High Regenerative Capacity

Ryoichi Ichikawa, Kenji Sakimura and Masahiko Watanabe
Journal of Neuroscience 27 April 2016, 36 (17) 4846-4858; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0161-16.2016
Ryoichi Ichikawa
1Department of Anatomy, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryoichi Ichikawa
Kenji Sakimura
2Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiko Watanabe
3Department of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Masahiko Watanabe
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Surgical transection of PFs. A, Illustration of the dorsal cerebellar view and slanted double incisions. B, C, Immunofluorescence for calbindin (green) and VGluT1 (red) in a coronal cerebellar section 7 d after PF transection. Both fluorescent signals are disrupted at the double incisions (arrows). Cerebellar islands between double incisions were used for analysis. C, An enlarged image of the boxed region in B. D, E, Injection of BDA into cerebellar islands or the corresponding cerebellar portions (yellow dots) in sham-operated control (D) and PF-transected (E) mice. Note that tracts of BDA-labeled PFs do not extend beyond the incision in PF-transected mice (E). Scale bars: B, D, E, 500 μm; C, 100 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Changes in PFs and PF synapses after surgical transection. A–H, Electron micrographs of the superficial molecular layer in sham-operated control (A, E) and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 1 (B, F), 7 (C, G), and 30 (D, H) in wild-type (A–D) and GluD2-KO (E–H) genotypes. PF axons and terminals are pseudocolored in red and orange, respectively, whereas PC spines in contact with PF terminals or lacking synaptic contact (ie, free spines) are in blue or green, respectively. Pairs of arrowheads indicate the PSD. I–L, Bar graphs showing the density of PF axons per square micrometer of the molecular layer (I), the percentage of PC spines in contact with PF terminals (J), the size (short diameter) of PF terminals (K), and the contact ratio of PC spines per PF terminal (L; mean ± SD, n = 3 mice for each). Left and right bars represent scores in wild-type and GluD2-KO mice, respectively. Differences between sham-operated control and PF-transected mice in each genotype were assessed using ANOVA with Dunnett's test. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (actual p value is indicated in the parenthesis). Scale bars, 500 nm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Sprouting and elongation of PC collaterals. A–F, Phase-contrast light microscopic images of BDA-labeled PF trajectory in sham-operated control (A, D) and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 7 (B, E) and 30 (C, F) in wild-type (A–C) and GluD2-KO (D–F) genotypes. Arrowheads indicate varicosities or boutons along BDA-labeled PFs, while arrows indicate the branching point of PF collaterals. C, Inset, A different focal plane of the boxed region in the center, showing numerous varicosities along a long collateral of a BDA-labeled PF. G, Bar graphs showing the density of PF varicosities per mm of BDA-labeled PF (mean ± SD, n = 3 mice for each). No significant difference in density after PF lesioning was found in either wild-type (left) or GluD2-KO (right) mice. The density of PF varicosities, at ∼160/mm, is consistent with a previous study in the cat (Brand et al., 1976). Scale bars, 10 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Changes in molecular layer thickness and CF reach after PF transection. A–H, Double-immunofluorescence for calbindin (green) and VGluT2 (red) in sham-operated control (A, E), and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 1 (B, F), 7 (C, G), and 30 (D, H) in wild-type (A–D) and GluD2-KO (E–H) genotypes. Arrowheads indicate the distal tips of VGluT2-labeled CF terminals. I–K, Bar graphs showing the vertical height to the tips of calbindin-positive PC dendrites (ie, molecular layer thickness; I) or to the tips of VGluT2-labeled CF terminals (ie, CF reach; J), and the CF reach relative to molecular layer thickness (K; mean ± SD, n = 3 mice for each). Differences between sham-operated control and PF-transected mice in each genotype were assessed using ANOVA with Dunnett's test, while those between wild-type and GluD2-KO mice at each time point were assessed using Student's t test. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (actual p values are indicated in the parenthesis). Scale bars, 25 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Ultrastructural reconstruction of dendritic innervation. A–D, Electron micrographs showing CF synapse labeled for VGluT2 by immunoperoxidase (A), PF synapse innervated by transverse axons on the transverse plane (B), free spines (fSP) and degenerating PF synapse 1 d after PF transection (C), and inhibitory synapse on PC spine labeled for VIAAT by silver-enhanced immunogold 1 d after PF transection (D). Compared with the well developed PSD in CF and PF synapses (pairs of arrowheads in A, B), the PSD in free spines is small and thin (pairs of arrowheads in C). E–L, Schematic illustrations showing the location of three kinds of spine-type synapses (PF synapse, red; CF synapse, yellow; inhibitory synapse, green) and free spines (pink) along reconstructed single dendritic tracts in sham-operated control (E, F) and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 1 (G, H), 7 (I, J), and 30 (K, L) in wild-type (E, G, I, K) and GluD2-KO (F, H, J, L) genotypes. We also illustrate the three distinct dendritic domains in different colors: PCD-I, blue; PCD-II, cyan; PCD-III, green. Scale bars, 500 nm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Electron micrographs and 3D reconstructed images of PF synapses on distal dendrites in sham-operated control (A, B, I, J) and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 1 (C, D, K, L), 7 (E, F, M, N) and 30 (G, H, O, P) in wild-type (A–H) and GluD2-KO (I–P) genotypes. In electron micrographs, PC dendrites/spines and PF axons/terminals are pseudocolored in green and orange, respectively. Insets, Enlarged and nonpseudocolored images of PF–PC synapses in boxed regions of pseudocolored images. Pairs of arrowheads and asterisks indicate the PSD and free spines, respectively. Note the emergence of free spines at distal dendrites on postlesion day 1 in wild-type mice (C, D) and their very frequent occurrence on all postlesion days in GluD2-KO mice (K–P). Also, note the hypertrophic changes in PF–PC synapses on postlesion day 7 in wild-type mice (E, F). Scale bars, 500 nm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Electron micrographs and 3D reconstructed images of CF synapses on proximal dendrites in sham-operated control (A, B, I, J) and PF-transected mice on postlesion days 1 (C, D, K, L), 7 (E, F, M, N), and 30 (G, H, O, P) in wild-type (A–H) and GluD2-KO (I–P) genotypes. In electron micrographs, PC dendrites/spines are pseudocolored in green, whereas CFs are labeled by dark precipitates for VGluT2. Insets, Enlarged images of PF–PC synapses in boxed regions. Pairs of arrowheads and asterisks indicate the PSD and free spines, respectively. Note the emergence of free spines at proximal dendrites on postlesion day 1 in wild-type mice (C, D) and their frequent occurrence on all postlesion days in GluD2-KO mice (K–P). Scale bars, 500 nm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Changes after PF transection in the path length of innervation territories and in the number of PF synapses, CF synapses, free spines, and spine-type GABAergic synapses. A, The path length (μm) of whole single dendritic tracts and of PCD-I (blue), PCD-II (cyan), and PCD-III (green). B, The path length of the PF territory (ie, PCD-II + PCD-III). C, PF synapse number in the PF territory. D, The path length of the CF territory (ie, PCD-I + PCD-II). E, CF synapse number in the CF territory. F, The path length of dendrites studded with free spines. G, Free spine number. H, Spine-type GABAergic synapse number. Left and right bars represent scores in wild-type and GluD2-KO mice, respectively. All scores were measured from three mice at each time point for each analysis, and expressed as the mean ± SD. Differences between sham-operated control and PF-transected mice in each genotype were assessed using ANOVA with Dunnett's test. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (actual p values are indicated in the parenthesis).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Summary schematic illustrating the three distinct phases of regenerative PF wiring in wild-type mice (top) and the arrested regeneration in GluD2-KO mice (bottom). Three dendritic domains are colored in blue for PCD-I, cyan for PCD-II, and green for PCD-III. In wild-type mice, PF axons and synapses massively degenerate after PF transection. In this degenerative phase, numerous free spines emerge and the PF territory expands aberrantly. Then, PF synapses enlarge, and there is an increase in the contact ratio with PC spines (to 1:2) in the hypertrophic phase. In this phase, the number and density of PF synapses nearly recover to normal levels, and free spines nearly completely disappear, but PF density remains low. In the remodeling phase, PF density increases, at least partly through sprouting and elongation of PF collaterals, and PF synapses reacquire a compact structure and a 1:1 contact ratio with PC spines. This suggests that competitive synaptic wiring by PFs and CFs onto PCs is regained in wild-type mice. In contrast, in the GluD2-KO mice, the degenerative phase persists, without a shift to the hypertrophic or remodeling phases of PF–PC regenerative rewiring.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (17)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 17
27 Apr 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GluD2 Endows Parallel Fiber–Purkinje Cell Synapses with a High Regenerative Capacity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GluD2 Endows Parallel Fiber–Purkinje Cell Synapses with a High Regenerative Capacity
Ryoichi Ichikawa, Kenji Sakimura, Masahiko Watanabe
Journal of Neuroscience 27 April 2016, 36 (17) 4846-4858; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0161-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GluD2 Endows Parallel Fiber–Purkinje Cell Synapses with a High Regenerative Capacity
Ryoichi Ichikawa, Kenji Sakimura, Masahiko Watanabe
Journal of Neuroscience 27 April 2016, 36 (17) 4846-4858; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0161-16.2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cerebellum
  • climbing fiber
  • GluD2
  • parallel fiber
  • Purkinje cell
  • synapse regeneration

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • The immediate early gene Arc is not required for hippocampal long-term potentiation
  • Interneuron Origins in the Embryonic Porcine Medial Ganglionic Eminence
  • Macrostructural changes of the acoustic radiation in humans with hearing loss and tinnitus revealed with fixel-based analysis
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.