Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

fMRI Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language

Kirsten Weber, Morten H. Christiansen, Karl Magnus Petersson, Peter Indefrey and Peter Hagoort
Journal of Neuroscience 29 June 2016, 36 (26) 6872-6880; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3180-15.2016
Kirsten Weber
1Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6526 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kirsten Weber
Morten H. Christiansen
3Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl Magnus Petersson
1Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6526 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Indefrey
4Department of Linguistics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Hagoort
1Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6526 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Hagoort
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Trial structure and experimental conditions. A, Trial structure of a prime-target pair (both OSV word order in this example) followed by a filler trial (SV word order). On Day 2 the target trial sentence would be followed by a matching picture, on Days 3 and 9 participants would have to choose between two pictures showing the same action with the roles reversed. B, Illustration of the different factors and conditions. One of the two possible word order to target structure-type mapping is shown (the other is frequent: OSV; infrequent: VOS; known: SVO; counterbalanced across participants). The frequency manipulation was introduced on Day 2 (see number of trials Day 2). On Days 3 and 9 all target types occurred equally often. C, Two examples of possible prime-target pairs.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Behavioral results of the picture choice task displaying percentage correct picture choices per type of structure. Error bars indicate SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Results of the main region-of-interest analysis using Marsbar. A, The two regions-of-interest in left inferior frontal and left posterior middle/superior temporal gyrus (defined using the activation maps to the query syntactic on the meta-analysis toolbox neurosynth.org thresholded at Z > 9). B, Mean contrast estimates for the syntactic repetition effects per type of structure in the two regions-of-interest averaged over Days 3 and 9. Error bars indicate SEM. C, Scatter plots showing the relationship between the neural syntactic repetition effects and behavioral performance. The left graph shows the relationship between the syntactic repetition effect to novel structures and the performance on the picture choice task on these structures on the last day of learning. The right graph illustrates the relationship between the syntactic repetition effect to the known syntactic structure and the performance on the picture choice task for this structure on the last day.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Repetition effects in the whole-brain analysis. All effects displayed are at a voxel-level threshold p < 0.001, cluster-level pFWE < 0.05. A, Verb repetition enhancement effects averaged over Days 3 and 9 (red). B, Interaction between verb repetition and day, driven by increased repetition enhancement effects over days. For illustration purposes, bar graphs of the verb repetition effects and SEM on the three different days are shown for representative peaks. C, Interaction between verb repetition and syntax repetition averaged over Days 3 and 9. The effect is driven by a larger syntactic repetition enhancement effect if the verb is repeated as well, as illustrated by the bar graph of the effects in a representative peak in left angular gyrus.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Example of one of the lists of lexical items

    Transitive verbsTransitive verbsIntransitive verbs
    AlieneseEnglish (Dutch)AlieneseEnglish (Dutch)AlieneseEnglish (Dutch)
    BasiTo dress (aankleden)AgeroTo shoot (neerschieten)AtokuTo dry (afdrogen)
    DaseTo chase (achtervolgen)EpakiTo topple s.o. (omtrekken)MikuroTo yawn (gapen)
    HakiTo dry s.o. (afdrogen)HakaroTo pick s.o. up (optillen)ParubeTo bend over (buigen)
    KisuTo scare (bangmaken)HakenuTo help getting up (overeindhelpen)SimeraTo dance (dansen)
    MomuTo serve (bedienen)HakobaTo annoy (pesten)TokasiTo think (denken)
    MoseTo hassle (bedreigen)HipareTo kick (schoppen)MimuTo jump (hinkelen)
    NagoTo greet (begroeten)ImeraTo hit (slaan)OteTo cry (huilen)
    NosokuTo pay (betalen)MisabeTo tow (slepen)SukiTo clap (klappen)
    NugaTo jostle (duwen)MukareTo stop (stoppen)UchaTo beckon (zwaaien)
    OkuTo photograph (fotograferen)NagabiTo draw (tekenen)UgoTo drink (drinken)
    OmoTo help (helpen)NurasiTo console (troosten)Nouns
    OnaTo interview (interviewen)OdakuTo wave goodbye (uitzwaaien)JosaWoman (vrouw)
    SaweTo hug (knuffelen)OdokaTo tie someone (vastbinden)KomiMan (man)
    SitaguTo massage (masseren)OdosiTo attend to s.o. (verzorgen)SakoBoy (jongen)
    SosaTo tow (meetrekken)OsutaTo find (vinden)MiruGirl (meisje)
    TesoTo measure (meten)SikimoTo feed (voeren)
    TomiTo call after (naroepen)UtapeTo send away (wegsturen)
    ToseTo make wet (natmaken)UtusoTo choke (wurgen)
    • There were eight such lists with different Alienese-to-English meaning mapping.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Whole-brain repetition effects

    Anatomical labelBAGlobal and local maximaCluster size, kCluster level, pFWEZ
    xyz
    Verb repetition enhancement effect (verb repeated > verb not repeated)
        Right superior temporal gyrus2260−46182474<0.0015.68
        Right middle temporal gyrus2160−34−44.44
        Right supramarginal gyrus4054−44464.08
        Right angular gyrus39/4038−56503.67
        Right precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex232−64266056<0.0015.51
        Left precuneus−6−52404.99
        Left cuneus19−14−80204.84
        Right lingual gyrus176−7244.52
        Left lingual gyrus19−16−56−83.98
        Right inferior frontal gyrus455420145680.0054.96
        Left middle temporal gyrus21−56−44−43450.0314.31
        Left inferior parietal cortex40−54−40445410.0063.74
        Left middle temporal gyrus21/22−62−56223.67
        Left middle occipital/left angular gyrus37/39−42−68183.15
    Verb repetition suppression effects
        n.s.
    Verb repetition effect by day (Day 9 greater repetition enhancement than Day 2)
        Right calcarine gyrus1710−7283711<0.0014.64
        Left calcarine gyrus17−14−6864.48
        Right precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex234−64264.39
        Left cuneus18−10−84183.71
        Right superior temporal gyrus/supramarginal gyrus40/4256−42241104<0.0014.21
        Right middle temporal gyrus2154−32−23.80
        Right middle temporal gyrus21/2258−12−103.73
    Syntax by verb repetition (greater syntax repetition enhancement if verb repeated)
        Left middle occipital gyrus19/39−42−76322910.0183.89
        Left angular gyrus39−40−54283.50
        Left angular gyrus39−50−58363.49
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (26)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 26
29 Jun 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
fMRI Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
fMRI Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language
Kirsten Weber, Morten H. Christiansen, Karl Magnus Petersson, Peter Indefrey, Peter Hagoort
Journal of Neuroscience 29 June 2016, 36 (26) 6872-6880; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3180-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
fMRI Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language
Kirsten Weber, Morten H. Christiansen, Karl Magnus Petersson, Peter Indefrey, Peter Hagoort
Journal of Neuroscience 29 June 2016, 36 (26) 6872-6880; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3180-15.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • fMRI
  • language learning
  • miniature language
  • priming
  • repetition effects
  • syntax

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Prefrontal default-mode network interactions with posterior hippocampus during exploration
  • Using fMRI representations of single objects to predict multiple objects in working memory in human occipitotemporal and posterior parietal cortices
  • Is the whole the sum of its parts? Neural computation of consumer bundle valuation in humans
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.