Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Reassembly of Excitable Domains after CNS Axon Regeneration

Miguel A. Marin, Silmara de Lima, Hui-Ya Gilbert, Roman J. Giger, Larry Benowitz and Matthew N. Rasband
Journal of Neuroscience 31 August 2016, 36 (35) 9148-9160; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-16.2016
Miguel A. Marin
1Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silmara de Lima
2Boston Children's Hospital and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui-Ya Gilbert
2Boston Children's Hospital and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hui-Ya Gilbert
Roman J. Giger
4Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roman J. Giger
Larry Benowitz
2Boston Children's Hospital and
3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Larry Benowitz
Matthew N. Rasband
1Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew N. Rasband
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Optic nerve crush results in both proximal and distal axon degeneration. A–D, Optic nerves immunostained for NF-M to label axons 12 h, 24 h, 7 d, and 30 d after optic nerve crush. *Crush site. E, Naive mouse optic nerve immunostained for βIV spectrin to label nodes of Ranvier (green, arrow) and Caspr to label flanking paranodes (red). F, Flat-mount of mouse retina immunostained for βIV spectrin to label AIS (green, arrow) and NF-M to label axons (red). Scale bars: A–D, 200 μm; E, 5 μm; F, 30 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Nodes of Ranvier degenerate after optic nerve crush. A–P, Representative images of optic nerves immunostained for βIV spectrin (green) and caspr (red) at the indicated time points after nerve crush and distances from the crush site. Q–T, The ratio of nodes of Ranvier per FOV in crushed optic nerve to uninjured control optic nerve in areas proximal (−325 μm), within (0 μm), and distal (+325 and +975 μm) to the crush site. Scale bars, 10 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    AISs of RGCs degenerate after optic nerve crush. A–F, Representative images of flat-mounts of retina immunostained for βIV spectrin reveal RGC AIS (arrow) and AII amacrine cell lobular dendritic processes (arrowhead) in control (A) and after optic nerve crush (B–F). G, H, Quantification of AIS degeneration (G) and changes in AIS length (H) after optic nerve crush. Scale bars: A–F, 20 μm. **p < 0.01 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test). ***p < 0.001 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Axons regenerate after genetic deletion of PTEN coupled with intravitreal injection of zymosan and CTP-cAMP (Cre+Zymo+cAMP). A–C, Optic nerves immunostained for NF-M in control saline-injected and Cre+zymosan+cAMP-treated mice at 2 weeks (A), 6 weeks (B), and 12 weeks (C) after crush. *Crush site. Scale bar, 200 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Nodes of Ranvier are reassembled in regenerating CNS axons. A–F, Representative images of optic nerves immunostained for βIV spectrin (green, arrows) and Caspr (red) proximal to the crush (A, C, E) and at the crush site (B, D, F). Optic nerves were examined at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after crush. G, H, The ratio of nodes of Ranvier per FOV in crushed optic nerve to uninjured control optic nerve at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after crush. Measurements were made proximal to the crush site (−325 μm) and within the crush site (0 μm). Treatment = Cre+zymosan+cAMP. Scale bars: A–F, 10 μm. *p < 0.05 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Nodes of Ranvier are reassembled in regenerating CNS axons distal to the crush site. A–F, Representative images of optic nerves immunostained for βIV spectrin (green, arrows) and Caspr (red) distal to the crush (A, C, E: 325 μm; B, D, F: 925 μm). Optic nerves were examined at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after crush. G, H, The ratio of nodes of Ranvier per FOV in crushed optic nerve to uninjured control optic nerve at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after crush. Measurements were made distal to the crush site (+325 and +975 μm). Treatment = Cre+zymosan+cAMP. Scale bars: A–F, 10 μm. *p < 0.05 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Regenerating CNS axons can be remyelinated and reassemble paranodal junctions. A, B, Proximal (A) and distal (D) regions of optic nerve immunostained for NF-M showing examples of “U-turn” axons (arrows) 12 weeks after optic nerve crush in Cre+zymosan+cAMP mice. C, D, Proximal optic nerve immunostained for Nav1.6 (C) or AnkG (D) to label nodes of Ranvier (red, arrow) and Caspr to label flanking paranodes (green) 12 weeks after optic nerve crush in Cre+zymosan+cAMP mice. E–H, Optic nerve immunostained for Caspr (green) and NF-M (red) to label paranodes and axons, respectively, in Cre+zymosan+cAMP mice 12 weeks after optic nerve crush. I, Quantification of Caspr-labeled paranodes along regenerating optic nerve in saline-treated and Cre+zymosan+cAMP-treated mice 12 weeks after optic nerve crush. J, K, Electron microscopy of control (J) and regenerating axons (K) showing the electron dense reaction product from HRP-CTB histochemistry (asterisks) in the axoplasm of myelinated axons. L, The number of regenerating CTB-HRP-labeled myelinated axons per nerve. N = 3 mice per group. ***p < 0.001 (unpaired t test). Scale bars: A, B, 5 μm; C, D, 10 μm; E, 300 μm; F–H, 5 μm; J, K, 0.5 μm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    AISs are reassembled in regenerating CNS axons. A–C, Flat-mounts of uninjured control (A), 12 week saline-treated (B), and 12 week Cre+zymosan+cAMP-treated retinas (C) immunostained for NF-M to label axons. D–K, Immunostaining of retinas using antibodies against βIV spectrin (green) and NF-M (red) to label axons in saline-treated (D, G) and Cre+zymosan+cAMP-treated (E, H–K), retinas at 6 weeks (D, E) and 12 weeks (G–K) after optic nerve crush. F, Uninjured controls. L, The number of AISs per FOV after optic nerve crush. M, AIS length after optic nerve crush. Treatment = Cre+zymosan+cAMP. Labels on x-axis of M apply to the x-axis of L. Scale bars: A–C, 300 μm; D–K, 20 μm. *p < 0.05 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test). ***p < 0.001 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    AnkG is not required for axon regeneration. A, GAP-43 immunostatining of optic nerve after intravitreal injection of β-1,3-glucan (Curdlan) or saline, 2 weeks after optic nerve crush. B, Quantification of GAP-43-labeled axons in mice administered either Curdlan or saline 2 weeks after optic nerve crush. C, Immunostaining of Ank3f/f mouse optic nerves after intravitreal injection of either AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre-GFP using antibodies against ankG (red), Caspr (blue), and GFP (green). Arrows indicate nodes of Ranvier. Red arrowheads indicate paranodal ankG in the AAV-Cre-GFP injected mice. D, F, Optic nerves from Ank3f/f mice treated with Curdlan and either AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre-GFP and immunostained with GAP-43 (D) or GFP (F) 2 weeks after optic nerve crush. E, G, Quantification of GAP-43 (E) or GFP (G) positive axons in regenerating axons in Ank3f/f mice administered curdlan and either AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre-GFP 2 weeks after optic nerve crush. Scale bars: A, D, 300 μm; F, 200 μm. ****p < 0.0001 (unpaired t test with Mann–Whitney post test).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (35)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 35
31 Aug 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reassembly of Excitable Domains after CNS Axon Regeneration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Reassembly of Excitable Domains after CNS Axon Regeneration
Miguel A. Marin, Silmara de Lima, Hui-Ya Gilbert, Roman J. Giger, Larry Benowitz, Matthew N. Rasband
Journal of Neuroscience 31 August 2016, 36 (35) 9148-9160; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Reassembly of Excitable Domains after CNS Axon Regeneration
Miguel A. Marin, Silmara de Lima, Hui-Ya Gilbert, Roman J. Giger, Larry Benowitz, Matthew N. Rasband
Journal of Neuroscience 31 August 2016, 36 (35) 9148-9160; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-16.2016
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • axon
  • ion channel
  • myelin
  • regeneration

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Motor Activity-Induced White Matter Repair in White Matter Stroke
  • miR-218 Promotes Dopaminergic Differentiation and Controls Neuron Excitability and Neurotransmitter Release through the Regulation of a Synaptic-Related Genes Network
  • Does ipsilateral remapping following hand loss impact motor control of the intact hand?
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.