Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Inactivation of the Dorsal Premotor Area Disrupts Internally Generated, But Not Visually Guided, Sequential Movements

Machiko Ohbayashi, Nathalie Picard and Peter L. Strick
Journal of Neuroscience 10 February 2016, 36 (6) 1971-1976; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2356-15.2016
Machiko Ohbayashi
1Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, and
2Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Machiko Ohbayashi
Nathalie Picard
1Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, and
2Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter L. Strick
1Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, and
2Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Task and cortical maps for monkey S. a, Repeating task, targets, and movements for sequence 5-3-1. b, Repeating task, targets, and movements for sequence 1-2-4. c, Lateral view of cebus brain. Dashed lines indicate the M1–PMd border and the pre-PMd–PMd border. PS, Principal sulcus; ArS, arcuate sulcus; CS, central sulcus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; LS, lateral sulcus; R, rostral; L, lateral. d, MR image after the chamber implantation for monkey S. The white dotted circle indicates the chamber outline. e, Intracortical stimulation map from monkey S. Letters indicate the movements evoked at each site: S, shoulder; E, elbow; W, wrist; D, digit; F, face; T, trunk. f, Intracortical stimulation thresholds are indicated by the filled circle size. g, Penetration sites for single-unit recordings. h, Muscimol injection sites in the PMd (sites 1–10) and M1 (sites 11 and 12). * indicates that site 2 was injected twice. Black numbers, Injection sites with a significant effect; gray number, injection site in which no significant effect was observed.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Neural activity in the PMd during the two tasks. a, Activity of a Repeating enhanced neuron. The activity was enhanced for movements from target 1 to target 5. The increase was present after contact with target 1 (right; MI = 0.9) and before the contact with target 5 (left). This neuron displayed only modest or no changes in activity when the same movements were made during the Random task (t test, p < 0.001 for all moves). b, Activity of a Random enhanced neuron. The activity was enhanced for movements from target 3 to target 1 (right; MI = −0.6). This neuron displayed only modest or no changes in activity during the Repeating task (bottom; t test, p < 0.001 for move 1-5, p = 0.01 for move 5-3, p < 0.001 for move 3-1). The movement performed is indicated by the symbols and numbers at the top of each column. Each tick mark represents a spike. The rasters and histograms are aligned on target contact. The rasters show 10 trials. Histograms include all correct trials. Histogram bin width, 20 ms.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Reaching end points before and after muscimol injection. Left, Preinjection; right, postinjection. EA, Accuracy errors; ED, Direction errors; gray dots, correct response; black dots, error response. The muscimol injection was placed at site 2 in monkey S (Fig. 1 h). a, End points for move 5 to 3. b, End points for move 3 to 1. Percentage of trials ending in each target are given below the targets. Touches between targets were counted as touches to the closest target. *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effects of PMd inactivation. a–c, The performance data for an injection at site 2 in monkey S (Fig. 1h). a, Error rate in the Random task. PMd inactivation did not have any effect on number of errors (χ2 test, p = 0.992 for move 1-5, p = 1.000 for move 5-3, p = 1.000 for move 3-1, df = 1; others, t test, p = 0.415). b, Error rate in the Repeating task. After the muscimol injection, the number of errors increased dramatically with all movements in the Repeating task (χ2 test, p < 0.001 for all moves, df = 1). c, Predictive responses. The percentage of predictive responses decreased significantly after the muscimol injection (χ2 test, p = 0.006 for move 1-5, p < 0.001 for move 5-3, p = 0.014 for move 3-1, df = 1). d–f, Population data for 14 effective injections at 13 cortical sites. d, Average error rate in the Random task. PMd inactivation did not have an effect on the number of error responses in the Random task (paired t test with 14 injection experiments, p = 0.260 for move 1-5, p = 1.000 for move 5-3, p = 0.273 for move 3-1, p = 0.753 for others, df = 13). e, Average error rate in the Repeating task. The error rate in the Repeating task increased significantly after the PMd inactivation (paired t test, p = 0.015 for move 1-5, p = 0.03 for move 5-3, p = 0.014 for move 3-1, df = 13). f, Average predictive responses. The percentage of predictive responses decreased after localized inactivation of the PMd (paired t test, p = 0.004 for move 1-5, p = 0.004 for move 5-3, p < 0.001 for move 3-1, df = 13). Other, Movements that were not a part of the Repeating sequence (5-3, 3-1, or 1-5). *p < 0.05.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (6)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 6
10 Feb 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inactivation of the Dorsal Premotor Area Disrupts Internally Generated, But Not Visually Guided, Sequential Movements
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Inactivation of the Dorsal Premotor Area Disrupts Internally Generated, But Not Visually Guided, Sequential Movements
Machiko Ohbayashi, Nathalie Picard, Peter L. Strick
Journal of Neuroscience 10 February 2016, 36 (6) 1971-1976; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2356-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Inactivation of the Dorsal Premotor Area Disrupts Internally Generated, But Not Visually Guided, Sequential Movements
Machiko Ohbayashi, Nathalie Picard, Peter L. Strick
Journal of Neuroscience 10 February 2016, 36 (6) 1971-1976; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2356-15.2016
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.