Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

A Bright and Fast Red Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicator That Reports Neuronal Activity in Organotypic Brain Slices

Ahmed S. Abdelfattah, Samouil L. Farhi, Yongxin Zhao, Daan Brinks, Peng Zou, Araya Ruangkittisakul, Jelena Platisa, Vincent A. Pieribone, Klaus Ballanyi, Adam E. Cohen and Robert E. Campbell
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2016, 36 (8) 2458-2472; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-15.2016
Ahmed S. Abdelfattah
1Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samouil L. Farhi
2Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samouil L. Farhi
Yongxin Zhao
1Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daan Brinks
2Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peng Zou
2Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peng Zou
Araya Ruangkittisakul
3Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jelena Platisa
4The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut 06519,
5Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent A. Pieribone
4The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut 06519,
5Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520,
6Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent A. Pieribone
Klaus Ballanyi
3Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam E. Cohen
2Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
7Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, and
8Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Campbell
1Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic representation of FlicR indicator and directed evolution process. A, B, Representation of FlicR indicator. B, Model of FlicR1 represented by the crystal structures of CiVSD (PDB ID 4G80; Li et al., 2014) and cpmApple (PDB ID 4I2Y; Akerboom et al., 2013). C, Schematic representation of directed evolution strategy used to develop FlicR1. First, libraries of DNA-encoding indicator genes were transformed into E. coli and cultured on agar plates. Second, E. coli colonies expressing FlicR1 were illuminated with yellow light. Colonies with bright red fluorescence were picked and screened for voltage sensitivity in mammalian cells. Voltage sensitivity of FlicR1 variants was then tested via field stimulation in HeLa cells coexpressing ArcLight. D, E, Image of HeLa cells coexpressing ArcLight Q239 (D) and FlicR1 (E), Scale bar,10 μm. F, ArcLight fluorescence response of two regions shown in D to electrical field stimulation pulses (10 ms, 25 V). G, FlicR1 fluorescence response of the same two regions shown in D to electrical field stimulation pulses (10 ms, 25 V). H, Improvement in voltage sensitivity of FlicR variants during directed evolution represented as a ratio of response amplitude in HeLa cells compared with ArcLight Q239. Error bars indicate SD (n = 10–15 cells). Fluorescence imaging for field stimulation measurements was performed at 100 Hz. Illumination intensities were 0.2 W/cm2 for FlicR1 and 0.1 W/cm2 for ArcLight Q239.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Sequence alignment of FlicR1. Alignment of FlicR1 gene with the CiVSD domain (top) and cpmApple (residues 60–304, R-GECO1 numbering) from R-GECO1 (bottom). The red highlighted residues are the amino acid mutations of FlicR1 compared with the starting template. Residues MYG in the box correspond to the mApple chromophore. Calmodulin (CaM) and the M13 peptide are not shown in the R-GECO1 sequence.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Characterization of FlicR1. A, Image of HEK293 cells expressing FlicR1 under the CMV promoter. Scale bar, 10 μm. B, Fluorescence response (top) to a triangle wave in membrane potential (bottom) from −100 mV to +50 mV. Fluorescence trace (acquired at 10 Hz) is filtered using a 15 point moving-average low-pass filter. ΔF/F0 is calculated as (F – F0)/F0, where F is the fluorescence at a particular time point and F0 is initial fluorescence. C, FlicR1 fluorescence response (top) from a representative cell to a square wave in membrane potential (bottom) from −70 mV to +30 mV. D, E, FlicR1 (D) and ArcLight Q239 (E) fluorescence as a function of membrane voltage in a representative HEK293 cell. Fluorescence (F/Fmin, where F is the fluorescence intensity at a particular membrane voltage and Fmin is the minimum fluorescence intensity over the range of −100 mV to +50 mV) is the mean of three ramp cycles from −100 mV to +50 mV and back. Fluorescence is the mean of three ramp cycles from −100 mV to +50 mV and back. Fluorescence is plotted starting at −25 mV, depolarizing to +50 mV, hyperpolarizing to −100 mV, and then returning back up to −25 mV as marked by the arrows. Fluorescence showed little hysteresis between increasing and decreasing voltage ramps. F, FlicR1 fluorescence response to a 100 mV step potential in HEK293 cells. Solid line shows fluorescence response at 34°C. Dotted line shows fluorescence response at 22°C. G, ArcLight Q239 fluorescence response to a 100 mV step potential in HEK293 cells 22°C. Note the different time axis compared with F. H, Magnification of the “on” and “off” portions of 22°C fluorescence traces from FlicR (red) and ArcLight (black). I, Normalized bleaching curves for FlicR1, ArcLight, and ASAP1 in HEK239 cells. J, Time constants for photobleaching of FlicR1, ASAP1, and ArcLight Q239 in HEK293 cells using continuous 10 W/cm2 561 nm light illumination for FlicR1 and continuous 10 W/cm2 488 nm light illumination for ASAP1 and ArcLight Q239. Fluorescence was captured every 500 ms. Time constants are based on single exponential fits. Error bars indicate SEM for FlicR1 (n = 5 cells), ASAP1 (n = 5 cells), and ArcLight Q239 (n = 4 cells). K, Spectral characterization of FlicR1 in vitro. Shown are absorbance (solid black line), excitation (dotted red line), and emission (solid red line) of FlicR1. Fluorescence imaging for voltage-sensitivity measurements was performed at 10 Hz. Step responses were recorded at 2 kHz for FlicR1 and 1 kHz for ArcLight Q239. Illumination intensities were 10 W/cm2.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Two-photon imaging of FlicR1 in HEK cells. A, Uncorrected fluorescence response of FlicR1 during −100 to +100 mV voltage steps (0.25 Hz square wave, 2 s +100 mV, 2 s −100 mV) when excited at 1120 nm in image-scanning mode (6.5 frames/s). B, Fluorescence intensity as a function of time for a 1000 Hz point scan of FlicR1 fluorescence during a 100 Hz voltage square wave (5 ms +100 mV, 5 ms −100 mV; n = 50 cycles averaged). C, Fluorescence intensity as a function of time for a point scan of ASAP1 excited at 950 nm and FlicR1 excited at 1120 nm. Fluorescence is sampled at 100 Hz, with excitation power (∼1 mW at both wavelengths) tuned to achieve ∼400 counts per bin initially.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    FlicR1 characterization in neurons. A, Image of cultured hippocampal neuron expressing FlicR1. Scale bar, 30 μm. B, Detection of spontaneous activity waveforms in rat hippocampal neuron culture with FlicR1 indicator. Sample single-trial recordings of spontaneous action potential bursts from three neurons. Red trace is from cell in A. C, Magnification of regions marked in B. D, FlicR1 fluorescence response to 5 Hz stimulated action potential train. E, Mean fluorescence response of FlicR1 (left) and ArcLight Q239 (right). F, FlicR1 (top) and ArcLight (bottom) response to 10, 50, and 100 Hz stimulated action potential trains in neurons. Colored traces are filtered with Savitzky–Golay smoothing (5 points) and are overlaid over the grayscale unfiltered traces. All traces have single exponential correction of bleach. For A–C, fluorescence was recorded at 100 Hz frame rate and illumination intensity was 0.2 W/cm2. For D–F, fluorescence was acquired at a 1 kHz frame rate and 10 W/cm2 illumination intensity. Colored traces in D–F are filtered with Savitzky–Golay smoothing (5 points) for both FlicR1 and ArcLight Q239.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Detection of spontaneous activity and theophylline-induced activity in rat hippocampal brain slice with FlicR1 indicator. A, Fluorescence image of hippocampal brain slice transfected with FlicR1 and imaged 21 d after transfection. Neuron processes are clearly labeled with FlicR1. Both cell bodies and processes show some fluorescence puncta. B, Single-trial fluorescence traces of activity in neuron cell bodies and neuron processes imaged with FlicR1. The traces correspond to the regions in the image marked with the same color. These traces are from wide-field fluorescence data acquired using a 100 W mercury lamp at 100 Hz imaging frequency. C, Magnification of traces in B marked with black borderline. D, Fluorescence image of hippocampal brain slice transfected with FlicR1 and imaged 18 d after transfection. Neuron processes are clearly labeled with FlicR1. Both cell bodies and processes show some fluorescent puncta. E, Fluorescence traces acquired at 50 Hz of theophylline-induced membrane depolarization in neuron cell bodies and neuron processes imaged with FlicR1. The traces correspond to the regions in the image marked with the same color. All fluorescence traces are bleach corrected and traces in B and C are filtered with Savitzky–Golay smoothing (5 pts). Fluorescence traces were recorded at 100 Hz (A–C) and 50 Hz (D, E) frame rate. Illumination intensity was 0.4 W/cm2.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    All optical electrophysiology with FlicR1 indicator in mammalian cells and comparison with R-GECO1 photoactivation. A, B, Image of HeLa cells coexpressing FlicR1 (A) and ChIEF-Citrine (B). C, Image of HeLa cells expressing FlicR1 only. D, Fluorescence trace of FlicR1 in HeLa cells activated by 5 Hz stimulation of ChIEF using 405 nm laser pulses. Shown is a trace from the cell in A. E, Fluorescence trace of FlicR1 in HeLa cells activated by 10 Hz stimulation of ChIEF using 405 nm laser pulses. Shown is a trace from the cell in A. F, Control fluorescence trace for FlicR1 in HeLa cells using 405 nm laser pulses without coexpression of ChIEF. Shown is a trace from the cell in C. G, Image of HeLa cells expressing R-GECO1 only. H, I, Image of HeLa cells coexpressing R-GECO1 (H) and ChIEF-Citrine (I). J, Control fluorescence trace for R-GECO1 in HeLa cells using 405 nm laser pulses. Shown is a trace from the cell in G. K, Fluorescence trace of R-GECO1 in HeLa cells activated by stimulation of ChIEF using 405 nm laser pulses. Shown is a trace from the cell in H. Fluorescence traces were recorded at 100 Hz. The intensity of yellow light used to image FlicR1 and R-GECO1 was 60 mW/cm2. 405 nm laser intensity to activate ChIEF was 20 mW/cm2 in all experiments.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    All-optical electrophysiology using FlicR1 in cultured hippocampal neurons. A, Diagram showing experimental setup using a digital micromirror device (DMD) to target the blue light to the neuronal processes. B, Red, FlicR1 fluorescence readout from single-trial optical recording of single action potentials initiated by pulses of blue light illumination using the experimental setup shown in A. Yellow illumination to image FlicR1 was 10 W/cm2. Black, Patch-clamp recording. Blue, 488 nm illumination (10 ms, 0.5–2 W/cm2). C, Magnification of traces in B marked with black borderline. D, Patch-clamp recording of neuron expressing PsChR when exposed to 561 nm laser (10 W/cm2). This illumination depolarized the cell by 14 mV, but did not induce action potentials on its own. All fluorescence traces are bleach corrected. Fluorescence trace was collected at a frame rate of 500 Hz using an EMCCD camera. Fluorescence trace in C is filtered with Savitzky–Golay smoothing (5 points).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    FlicR1 and ArcLightQ239 kinetics in HEK293 cells

    22°C34°C
    ActivationDeactivationActivationDeactivation
    −70 mV to 30 mV30 mV to −70 mV−70 mV to 30 mV30 mV to −70 mV
    FlicR1
        τ1 fast (ms)3.0 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.30.74 ± 0.060.93 ± 0.07
        τ2 slow (ms)41 ± 718 ± 327 ± 614 ± 6
        % fast component90 ± 270 ± 490 ± 279 ± 4
        n56
    ArcLightQ239
        τ1 (ms)28 ± 8100 ± 209 ± 117 ± 1
        τ2 (ms)271 ± 6280 ± 4048 ± 460 ± 7
        % fast component39 ± 861 ± 1550 ± 379 ± 3
        n66
    • Values for ArcLight Q239 at 34°C are from Jin et al. (2012).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 8
24 Feb 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Bright and Fast Red Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicator That Reports Neuronal Activity in Organotypic Brain Slices
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Bright and Fast Red Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicator That Reports Neuronal Activity in Organotypic Brain Slices
Ahmed S. Abdelfattah, Samouil L. Farhi, Yongxin Zhao, Daan Brinks, Peng Zou, Araya Ruangkittisakul, Jelena Platisa, Vincent A. Pieribone, Klaus Ballanyi, Adam E. Cohen, Robert E. Campbell
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2016, 36 (8) 2458-2472; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
A Bright and Fast Red Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicator That Reports Neuronal Activity in Organotypic Brain Slices
Ahmed S. Abdelfattah, Samouil L. Farhi, Yongxin Zhao, Daan Brinks, Peng Zou, Araya Ruangkittisakul, Jelena Platisa, Vincent A. Pieribone, Klaus Ballanyi, Adam E. Cohen, Robert E. Campbell
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2016, 36 (8) 2458-2472; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-15.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • biosensors
  • fluorescence imaging
  • fluorescent proteins
  • genetically encoded indicators
  • protein engineering
  • voltage imaging

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.