Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Neuroinflammatory Dynamics Underlie Memory Impairments after Repeated Social Defeat

Daniel B. McKim, Anzela Niraula, Andrew J. Tarr, Eric S. Wohleb, John F. Sheridan and Jonathan P. Godbout
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2016, 36 (9) 2590-2604; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2394-15.2016
Daniel B. McKim
1Division of Biosciences,
2Department of Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel B. McKim
Anzela Niraula
1Division of Biosciences,
2Department of Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Tarr
1Division of Biosciences,
2Department of Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric S. Wohleb
1Division of Biosciences,
2Department of Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John F. Sheridan
1Division of Biosciences,
3Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, and
4Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John F. Sheridan
Jonathan P. Godbout
2Department of Neuroscience,
3Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, and
4Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Increased inflammation and presence of CD45+ myeloid cells in the hippocampus after RSD. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. A, The mRNA levels of several inflammatory mediators (IL-1β, TNF, IL-6, and arginase) and growth factors (BDNF, VEGF, NGF, and IGF-1) were determined in the hippocampus collected immediately after RSD (n = 6). In a related experiment, mice were subjected to six cycles of social defeat, and mice were perfused and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde 14 h later. Brain samples were postfixed, frozen, and sectioned, and Iba-1 or CD45 expression was determined (n = 6). B, Representative images of Iba-1 labeling are shown in the DG. The arrows show the Iba-1+ cell depicted in the inset. C, Quantification of Iba-1 labeling for the entire volume of the hippocampus with rostral–caudal distinction. D, Representative images of CD45 labeling are shown in the DG. The arrows show the CD45+ cell depicted in the inset. E, Quantification of CD45+ cells per hippocampal section. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CON.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Impaired working memory after RSD. A, Representative time line of working memory assessment in the MWM. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. Working memory was examined for 5 d (D7–D11) after completion of RSD (n = 10). B, In this paradigm, the escape platform was moved to a different quadrant each testing day. C, Representative paths for CON and RSD mice in the MWM on day 3. Velocity (D), latency to the platform (E), distance traveled (F), and percentage time in the outer annulus (G) were determined for all 5 testing days. Graphs represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CONs; #p = 0.06–0.10, means tended to be different from CONs.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Impaired spatial memory recall in the MWM after RSD. A, Representative time line of learning and memory recall assessments in the MWM. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. Learning was examined after the completion of RSD for 5 d (D7–D11), and then memory recall was tested (D12; n = 8). B, In this paradigm, the escape platform remained in the same location each testing day of the acquisition phase but was removed during the probe trial. During the acquisition phase, latency to the platform (C) and distance traveled (D) were determined each of the 5 d of testing. E, Representative search paths of CON and RSD mice during the probe trial (D12). Spatial memory recall was assessed during the probe trial, and distance traveled (F) and percentage of time in the target quadrant (G) were determined. Graphs and bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CONs.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Impaired spatial memory recall in the Barnes maze after RSD. A, Representative time line of cognitive assessment in the Barnes maze after RSD. Mice were trained on the Barnes maze to acquire learning before social defeat (Pre-Con and Pre-RSD). Next, mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs, and memory recall was determined on D7 and D8. Escape latency (B) and total errors (C) are shown before and after RSD exposure. In a related experiment, mice were used as above, and memory recall was determined at 34 and 35 d. Escape latency (D) and total errors (E) are shown before and after RSD exposure. Lines represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CONs; #p = 0.06–0.10, means tended to be different from CONs.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Number of proliferating progenitor cells and young neurons in the hippocampus remain unchanged 0.5 d after RSD. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. BrdU was injected during the last three cycles of social defeat. BrdU+ and DCX+ cells were determined in the DG 0.5 d later (n = 6). A, Representative images of BrdU labeling in the DG for CON and RSD mice. B, Quantification of BrdU labeling in the DG for the entire volume of the hippocampus. C, Representative images of DCX+ neurons in the DG for CON and RSD mice. D, Quantification of DCX labeling in the DG for the entire volume of the hippocampus. E, Representative images of mature and immature DCX+ neurons. F, Quantification of immature DCX labeling and mature DCX labeling. Bars represent the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Reduced proliferating neurons in the hippocampus 10 d after RSD. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. BrdU was injected during the last three cycles of social defeat. BrdU+ and DCX+ cells were determined in the DG 10 d later (n = 6). A, Representative images of BrdU/DCX double labeling in the DG are shown. The insets represent a BrdU+/DCX+ cell (yellow) and BrdU+/DCX− cell (green). B, Percentage of BrdU+ cells that were also DCX+ in the DG. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. means are significantly different from CON.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Impaired development of hippocampal NPCs into mature neurons 28 d after RSD. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. BrdU was injected during the last three cycles of social defeat. BrdU+, NeuN+, and GFAP+ cells were determined 28 d later (n = 6). A, Representative images of BrdU labeling are shown in the DG. B, Quantification of BrdU+ cells per section of the hippocampus. C, Representative images of NeuN/BrdU labeling are shown in the DG. The arrows show the cell depicted in the inset. D, Quantification of NeuN+/BrdU+ cells per section of the hippocampus with rostral–caudal distinction. E, Representative images of GFAP/BrdU labeling are shown in the DG. The arrows show the cell depicted in the inset. F, Quantification of GFAP+/BrdU+ cells per section of the hippocampus. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CON.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Social avoidance behavior was present 28 d after RSD. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs, and social interaction was determined 28 d later (n = 14). A, Representative time line of the experiment is shown. B, Interaction paths are shown for the Empty (Trial 1, top) and Social (Trial 2, bottom) trials. C, Time spent in the interaction zone during the Empty and Social Trials. D, Time spent in the corner zone during the Empty and Social Trials. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from all other groups.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Minocycline intervention attenuated RSD-induced microglia activation and monocyte recruitment. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. Minocycline (90 mg/kg) was administered in drinking water throughout the 6 d of RSD. A, Representative images of Iba-1 labeling in the DG are shown. B, Proportional area quantification of Iba-1. C, Representative images of CD45 labeling in the DG are shown. B, Quantification of CD45+ cells. E, A coronal brain section was collected 14 h after the last cycle of stress, and the mRNA level of IL-1β was determined. Bars represent mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CON.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Minocycline prevented spatial memory impairments after RSD. Mice were trained on the Barnes maze to acquire learning before social defeat (Pre-Veh CON, Pre-Veh RSD, and Pre-Mino RSD). The Pre-Mino RSD group received minocycline (90 mg/kg) in drinking water 1 d before RSD and continued throughout the RSD period. Mice were subjected to six cycles of social defeat (Veh RSD and Mino RSD) or left undisturbed as CONs (Veh CON), and memory recall was determined on D7 and D8. A, Representative time line of cognitive assessment in the Barnes maze after RSD (n = 6–9). Escape latency (B) and errors (C) are shown before and after RSD exposure. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CON mice; #p = 0.06, mean tended to be different from CONs.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Minocycline did not prevent persistent social avoidance or long-term deficits in NPC differentiation. Mice were subjected to six cycles of RSD or left undisturbed as CONs. Minocycline (90 mg/kg) was administered in drinking water throughout the 6 d of RSD. All mice received BrdU injections (50 mg/kg) during the last three cycles of RSD. Then, 28 d later, social behavior was determined (D34). A, Representative time line of experimental manipulations (n = 6–9). B, Time spent in the interaction zone during the Empty and Social Trials was examined. C, Representative images of NeuN and BrdU labeling in the DG. The arrows show the cell depicted in the inset. D, Quantification of NeuN+/BrdU+ cells in the DG. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, means are significantly different from CON mice.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 36 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 36, Issue 9
2 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neuroinflammatory Dynamics Underlie Memory Impairments after Repeated Social Defeat
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neuroinflammatory Dynamics Underlie Memory Impairments after Repeated Social Defeat
Daniel B. McKim, Anzela Niraula, Andrew J. Tarr, Eric S. Wohleb, John F. Sheridan, Jonathan P. Godbout
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2016, 36 (9) 2590-2604; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2394-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Neuroinflammatory Dynamics Underlie Memory Impairments after Repeated Social Defeat
Daniel B. McKim, Anzela Niraula, Andrew J. Tarr, Eric S. Wohleb, John F. Sheridan, Jonathan P. Godbout
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2016, 36 (9) 2590-2604; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2394-15.2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • macrophages
  • microglia
  • neurogenesis
  • neuroinflammation
  • social avoidance
  • stress

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Prostaglandin E2 induces long-lasting inhibition of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus and moderates the behavioral response to stressors
  • Detection of spatially-localized sounds is robust to saccades and concurrent eye movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs)
  • Rewarding capacity of optogenetically activating a giant GABAergic central-brain interneuron in larval Drosophila
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.