Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 4 January 2017, 37 (1) i
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

PPTg Contributes to Reinforcement

Ji Hoon Yoo, Vivien Zell, Johnathan Wu, Cindy Punta, Nivedita Ramajayam, et al.

(see pages 38–46)

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) is a brainstem structure that has been proposed to have two primary roles: promoting arousal as part of the ascending reticular activating system and controlling movement as part of the mesencephalic locomotor region. The latter function has recently been called into question, however, as accumulating evidence suggests that the PPTg is a basal-ganglia-like structure involved in reinforcement-based learning, decision making, and action selection, rather than a pure locomotor center (Gut and Winn 2016 Mov Disord 31:615). In support of this reinterpretation, the PPTg and basal ganglia are extensively interconnected, and stimulation of the PPTg induces burst firing in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, which project to the striatum and shape reward learning.

The PPTg is distinctive for its large population of cholinergic projection neurons, which are thought to have an essential role in arousal. The nucleus also contains numerous glutamatergic projection neurons, however, and considerably less is known about the functions of these neurons. Yoo et al. now provide evidence that glutamatergic PPTg neurons contribute to reinforcement learning via projections to the dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA).

The authors first demonstrated that glutamatergic PPTg neurons project to the VTA, and that optically stimulating these projections produced EPSCs and increased firing rates in dopaminergic and other VTA neurons in brain slices. Optogenetic stimulation of glutamatergic PPTg neurons or their terminals in vivo also activated dopaminergic and nondopaminergic VTA neurons. Moreover, in vivo optical stimulation was reinforcing: when one of two nosepoke holes was paired with PPTg stimulation, mice showed a preference for the stimulation-paired hole. And remarkably, water-deprived mice preferentially licked a water sipper paired with stimulation of glutamatergic PPTg neurons even when the alternative sipper contained a highly desirable sucrose solution.

These results clearly establish a role for glutamatergic PPTg neurons in reinforcement and demonstrate that this function is mediated at least partly by activation of VTA neurons, including dopaminergic neurons. The work thus expands our understanding of the neural circuitry driving motivated behaviors, providing additional potential targets for treating drug addiction and other conditions involving maladaptive activation of reward pathways.

Leaks Occur Near Pericytes after Capillary Occlusion

Robert G. Underly, Manuel Levy, David A. Hartmann, Roger I. Grant, Ashley N. Watson, et al.

(see pages 129–140)

The blood–brain barrier limits the movement of blood-borne molecules and cells into the CNS, thus helping to maintain the ionic balance within the brain and preventing infiltration of toxins and pathogens. The barrier is formed by specialized endothelial cells that are linked together by tight junctions and adherens junctions. Its construction is orchestrated by pericytes, which extend processes along blood vessels and promote expression of tight junction proteins. Pericytes, along with astrocytic endfeet, remain essential for maintaining the integrity of the blood–brain barrier throughout life.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Pericytes (red, arrow) extend processes along capillaries (green). After blood flow in capillaries is blocked (right), fluid leaks out preferentially near pericyte somata. See Underly et al. for details.

Blockage of CNS blood vessels during ischemic stroke leads to opening of the blood–brain barrier, allowing extravasation of serum proteins and immune cells, which in turn exacerbate neuronal damage. The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying stroke-induced blood–brain barrier breakdown remain unclear. Upregulation of the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9, which break down basal lamina and tight junction proteins, are important contributors to barrier opening, but the cellular source of these proteins is unknown (Jin et al. 2010 Neurobiol Dis 38:376). Loss of pericytes might also contribute to blood–brain barrier degradation, but the temporal relationship between pericyte loss and barrier breakdown is unclear.

To address this question, Underly et al. used two-photon microscopy to track leakage after cerebral capillary occlusion in mice that expressed a fluorescent marker selectively in pericytes. MMP-9 and MMP-2 activity increased around the somata of pericytes and non-pericyte glia cells, respectively, within 30 min of capillary occlusion. Capillary contents (indicated by a fluorescent dye) began leaking into surrounding tissue where MMP activity was elevated. Notably, ∼80% of leakage sites were near pericyte somata, even though these somata covered only ∼7% of the total capillary length. And inhibiting MMPs decreased capillary leakage selectively near pericyte somata.

These results indicate that upregulation and activation of MMP-9 near pericyte somata contributes to blood–brain barrier disruption after stroke. Whether MMP-9 is secreted by pericytes themselves or secreted by other cells (e.g., leukocytes or endothelial cells) surrounding pericytes is not yet clear. Nonetheless, these data provide additional evidence that inhibiting MMP-9 might improve stroke outcomes by preventing disruption of the blood–brain barrier.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (1)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 1
4 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 January 2017, 37 (1) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 January 2017, 37 (1) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • PPTg Contributes to Reinforcement
    • Leaks Occur Near Pericytes after Capillary Occlusion
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.