Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 15 March 2017, 37 (11) i
Teresa Esch
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Paraventricular Thalamus Influences Approach and Avoidance

Eun A Choi and Gavan P. McNally

(see pages 3018–3029)

Two opposing motivational forces drive animal behavior: approach and avoidance. These opposing drives are often activated simultaneously in the natural world. For example, a place where an animal's food is abundant often attracts its predators. Numerous studies have investigated the neural circuits involved in approach toward rewards and avoidance of threats, but little is known about how these circuits interact in the presence of conflicting cues. Choi and McNally addressed this question and provide evidence that such interactions take place in the paraventricular thalamus.

When rats were trained to press a lever to obtain food and then underwent fear conditioning in the same arena, they froze less in response to shock-paired cues than rats that had not undergone lever training. Silencing neurons in the paraventricular thalamus further reduced freezing in lever-trained rats, suggesting it added weight to the food-seeking drive. When a separate group of rats was first trained to associate cues with shock in an arena without food available and then underwent a second round of fear conditioning in an arena where they had previously learned to seek food, they exhibited less freezing in the food-associated arena. In these rats, silencing paraventricular thalamus neurons increased freezing during the test phase, apparently reducing the influence of the food-seeking drive. Importantly, silencing neurons had no effect on either lever pressing or freezing behavior in rats that underwent only one type of training.

These results suggest that the paraventricular thalamus contributes to behavioral choices only when conflicting motivations are present. Why silencing this nucleus increased fear responses in one circumstance and reduced such responses in the other is unclear. One possibility is that the effect depended on the rats' most recent experience in the chamber: when the most recent experience included both food and shock, paraventricular thalamus activity increased fear responses, whereas when the most recent experience involved only food, paraventricular thalamus activity reduced fear responses. Future work will be required to more clearly define the role of paraventricular thalamus in shaping behaviors in the presence of conflicting motivational cues.

Spreading Depression Impairs Glymphatic Flow

Aaron J. Schain, Agustin Melo, Andrew M. Strassman, and Rami Burstein

(see pages 2904–2915)

Brain cells are bathed in interstitial fluid, which fills spaces between neurons and glia. Cellular waste is dumped into this fluid and diffuses toward blood vessels. Although some secreted molecules are transported into local capillaries and are cleared from the brain via blood, others are thought to be carried longer distances in the fluid-filled channels that run along vessels. These paravascular channels comprise the glymphatic system, and they have been proposed to be a major pathway for removing toxic molecules such as β-amyloid peptides from the brain.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Dye injected into mouse cortex fills the paraventricular space (red) surrounding a blood vessel (BV), but it does not fill the subarachnoid space (unlabeled area under blue skull). Green labels parenchyma. See Schain et al. for details.

Schain et al. report that glymphatic transport is impaired during cortical spreading depression (CSD), an electrophysiological phenomenon that contributes to neuronal death after ischemia and brain injury and likely underlies the sensory auras that precede migraine headaches in many patients. CSD results from sudden, simultaneous depolarization of all cells in a small cortical area, leading to near complete breakdown of transmembrane ion gradients and thus to neuronal silence lasting >30 s. Because depolarization causes glutamate release, it initiates a wave of depolarization/depression that propagates across gray matter. When the depolarization wave enters a new cortical area, it causes immediate, severe constriction of local arteries, followed by brief arterial dilation, and then a prolonged period of milder arterial constriction lasting >25 min. Schain et al. found that arrival of the CSD wave was quickly followed by nearly complete closure of paravascular spaces surrounding both surface and penetrating arteries and veins. Paravascular spaces remained partially constricted for >30 min. Moreover, the CSD-induced collapse of the paravascular space forced a fluorescent marker into arterial walls and slowed movement of the marker through the brain.

These results indicate that cortical spreading depression causes constriction of the paravascular space and thus impairs glymphatic clearance of solutes. By slowing the removal of inflammatory agents and other toxic molecules, this could exacerbate the damaging effects of CSD after ischemia and might contribute to the development of headache after migraine aura. How CSD waves cause collapse of the paravascular space is unclear, but swelling of astrocytic endfeet that form the wall of the paravascular space is a likely contributor, given that such swelling has been documented in previous studies.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (11)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 11
15 Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 15 March 2017, 37 (11) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 15 March 2017, 37 (11) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Paraventricular Thalamus Influences Approach and Avoidance
    • Spreading Depression Impairs Glymphatic Flow
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.