Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Systems/Circuits

Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1

Maria C. Dadarlat and Michael P. Stryker
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) 3764-3775; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2728-16.2017
Maria C. Dadarlat
1Department of Physiology, University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, and
2Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maria C. Dadarlat
Michael P. Stryker
1Department of Physiology, University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, and
2Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael P. Stryker
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Cortical state change during locomotion. a, The activity of 35–73 single neurons was recorded from the primary visual cortex of freely-moving mice. Moving gratings (6 orientations, each moving in one of two possible directions) were displayed for 1.5 s in the visual field contralateral to the recording site. Mouse movement was tracked over the course of the experiment. b, Evoked mean spike count, averaged over all visual stimuli, across behavioral conditions (N = 409 cells in 8 mice, p = 1e-47, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Gray line indicates unity. c, CSD plot for one mouse overlaid with inferred laminar boundaries (thick gray lines). Distances at left refer to electrode location relative to the center of the array. d, Mean spike counts of cells by layer, averaged across all stimulus presentations. Layer II, N = 112; layer IV, N = 90; layer V, N = 84; layer VI, N = 123. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. *p < 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). **p < 0.01 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). ***p < 1.3e-5 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). p values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Bonferroni method. e, Change in mean spike count during running as a fraction of mean spike count at rest, using data from d. Numbers of samples as in d. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. *p < 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). p values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Bonferroni method.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Cortical state affects single-neuron activity. a, Single-cell mutual information, I(S, R), during running and rest (N = 409, p = 8e-31, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Gray line indicates unity. b, I(S, R) per spike (N = 409, p = 6e-12, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Gray line indicates unity. c, Average behaviorally dependent I(S, R), within each cortical layer. Layer II, N = 112; layer IV, N = 90; layer V, N = 84; layer VI, N = 123. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. *p = 0.012 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). **p = 0.002 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). ***p = 0.0007 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). p values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Bonferroni method. d, Fractional change in mutual information, ΔI(S,R), within each cortical layer during running. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. **p = 0.002 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). ***p < 0.0005 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). p values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Bonferroni method. e, Relationship between average spike count and stimulus-specific information, SSI(s). Each point indicates the SSI of a single cell to a particular grating movement direction (N = 4908). Blue line indicates fit of linear regression (R2 = 0.85, p < 1e-30). f, Schematic of multiplicative (top) and additive (bottom) tuning curve shifts from rest (black) to locomotion (red). g, Sample single-cell tuning curves for evoked responses at rest (black) and during locomotion (red), with values of additive and multiplicative modulation printed above each. Bold represents significant modulation. h, Relationship between additive and multiplicative components of modulation for rapidly spiking cells (N = 409, ρ = −0.315, p = 1.2e-7). Gray points indicate cells with no significant modulation. Colors represent significant modulation for multiplicative (blue), additive (black), or both (magenta) components. Gray lines represent null hypotheses that no modulation occurs. Open circles represent data points outside of plot range. i, Average modulation across cortical layers during locomotion for cells that are significantly modulated. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. j, ΔI(S,R) as a function of multiplicative (left; ρ = 0.58, p = 2.4e-38) and additive (right; ρ = −0.16, p = 0.001) components of modulation (N = 409). Lines as described in h. Blue line indicates fit of linear regression.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Classification of single-trial neural responses recorded during locomotion is more accurate than of those recorded at rest. a, Error in LOOCV-LDA classification of visual stimulus movement direction and orientation, as a population (All) and within particular layers. Numbers above layer labels indicate the fraction of the total population included in the decoding. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. b, Fractional change in decoding error with behavior (Errorrun − Errorstill/Errorstill). More negative values indicate greater improvement during locomotion. All, All cells; SMG, significant multiplicative gain > 1; SAG, significant additive gain > 0; MG, multiplicative gain > 1; AG, additive gain > 0; ∼, entire population excluding the category specified. Numbers above layer labels indicate the fraction of the total population included. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. Horizontal gray line indicates no change.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Noise correlations influence population representation of visual stimuli. a, The distribution of population spike counts and the sum of spikes from all neurons on a single trial overlap in the running and rest conditions. b, Classification error for grating movement direction (left) and orientation (right) as a function of population spike count. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. Dashed gray line indicates chance levels of performance. c, Stimulus-independent (noise) pairwise correlations shift with behavior. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. All, All pairs of cells; E-E, pairs of putative excitatory cells; I-I, pairs of putative inhibitory cells; E-I, pairs of one putative excitatory and inhibitory cells. Values below layer labels are number of pairs included in analysis. **Significant change during running (p < 1e-5, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). d, Noise correlations between excitatory cells by cell modulation. Error bars indicate bootstrapped SEM. All, All pairs of excitatory cells; SMG, significant multiplicative gain > 1; SAG, significant additive gain > 0; MG, multiplicative gain > 1; AG, additive gain > 0. *Significant change during running (p < 1e-3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). **Significant change during running (p < 1e-6, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Values below labels are number of pairs included in analysis. e, Noise correlations between excitatory cells within a single layer and across layers. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. Values below layer labels are number of pairs included in the analysis. For significant changes during running: *p < 0.02 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test); **p < 0.005 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Stimulus discriminability depends on firing rates and noise correlations. a, Schematic calculation of d′ measure. Ovals represent distribution of responses of two neurons to two visual stimuli. Black arrow between response distributions indicates difference vector upon which responses are projected, yielding distributions drawn in bottom right. Values for d′ are calculated from these overlapping distributions using Equation 6. b, Discriminability of grating movement direction, calculated on pairs of neighboring stimuli across behavioral state (p = 3e-17, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Black points indicate d′ for a pair of stimuli (n = 248; 8 mice, 31 per mouse). Gray line indicates unity. c, Decorrelation reduces change in d′ with behavior, and increases overall d′ values. Mean improvement in d′ with correlated data (47%, p = 3e-17, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Mean improvement in d′ with decorrelated data (31%, p = 1e-12, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Error bars indicate bootstrapped CIs of the mean. **p < 5e-8, difference between correlated and decorrelated d′ values.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Stimulus information as a function of time. a, Mutual information between cell spiking and stimulus per 10 ms time bin, averaged across all recorded cells. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE. b, Classification error over sequential 100 ms time periods after stimulus onset. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of 95% CIs. c, Classification error over various time ranges after stimulus onset. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of 95% CIs. Shaded bars represent 95% CIs of the mean during the first 100 ms after neural response onset.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Relationship between running speed and spike counts, population responses, and classification error. a, Residual spike counts as a function of run speed for 15 sample cells after mean visually evoked responses were subtracted. Cells were chosen randomly from the population in a single mouse; responses shown are from run trials. Blue bar represents speed of visual stimulus, 30 cm/s. b, Population spike counts as a function of the natural logarithm of mouse running speed on single running trials (black dots). Red lines indicate fit of linear regression. Panels are individual mice. c, Average LOOCV error with increasing mouse running speed for stimulus orientation (blue) and movement direction (red). Numbers of samples at each mean speed are listed at top of each panel. Error bars indicate bootstrapped estimates of SE.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 14
5 Apr 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1
Maria C. Dadarlat, Michael P. Stryker
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) 3764-3775; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2728-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1
Maria C. Dadarlat, Michael P. Stryker
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) 3764-3775; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2728-16.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cortical state
  • decorrelation
  • gain
  • locomotion
  • visual cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • CaMKIIβ-mediated phosphorylation enhances protein stability of spastin to promote neurite outgrowth
  • Vocal error monitoring in the primate auditory cortex
  • EEG Correlates of Active Removal from Working Memory
Show more Research Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • CaMKIIβ-mediated phosphorylation enhances protein stability of spastin to promote neurite outgrowth
  • Vocal error monitoring in the primate auditory cortex
  • EEG Correlates of Active Removal from Working Memory
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.