Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Stephani Sutherland [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) i
Stephani Sutherland
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephani Sutherland
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Coaxing Delta Opioid Receptors into Action for Pain Relief

Daniel J. Shiwarski, Alycia Tipton, Melissa D. Giraldo, Brigitte F. Schmidt, Michael S. Gold, et al.

(see pages 3741–3752)

Opioid drugs and our brain's endogenous opioids work primarily at mu-type opioid receptors (μR) to dampen pain signals. But because the μR is expressed throughout the brain and body, μR agonists can cause side effects ranging from constipation to addiction. The related delta-type opioid receptor (δR), in contrast, has more limited expression, but it is found in nociceptive sensory neurons, making it an attractive target to produce pain relief with lower abuse potential. Researchers have been stymied in this effort, however, because effective pain relief requires extremely high doses of δR agonists for reasons that remain mysterious. Past studies have hinted that the receptor may be located inside sensory neurons with little availability at the surface.

Shiwarski et al. delved into how receptor trafficking to the cell surface might be controlled in sensory neurons by focusing on the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) pathways, which figure prominently in neuronal differentiation and trafficking. They hypothesized that the balance of activity between the two pathways might control δR surface availability, with PI3K promoting membrane delivery and PTEN favoring intracellular retention. In heterologous PC12 cells expressing functional fluorescent δR, receptors are found on the cell surface, but treatment with nerve growth factor led to intracellular accumulation of δR. PTEN blockers prevented this accumulation and increased surface δR. Similarly, PTEN inhibition in neurons cultured from mouse trigeminal ganglia caused redistribution of δR to the cell surface. The Gi-coupled receptors were functional according to an assay that measured their inhibition of cAMP.

To test whether PTEN increased availability of functional endogenous δRs, the team measured calcium current inhibition in response to a δR agonist. While the magnitude of current inhibition remained steady, more trigeminal cells responded to the agonist following pretreatment with PTEN. In vivo, PTEN inhibition also increased trafficking of endogenous δR to the cell surface in trigeminal neurons. Finally, in a mouse model of chronic inflammatory pain, PTEN inhibition reversed mechanical pain hypersensitivity that was prevented by a δR-selective antagonist. The authors conclude that increasing δR availability at the sensory neuron surface may be a viable strategy to target δRs for pain relief.

Febrile Seizure Defects Rely on Neuronal Silencing Factor

Katelin P. Patterson, Jeremy M. Barry, Megan M. Curran, Akanksha Singh-Taylor, Gary Brennan, et al.

(see pages 3799–3812)

Febrile seizures, the most common childhood seizure, can cause lifelong memory and learning impairments, but how remains unknown. Patterson, Barry et al. used experimental febrile status epilepticus (eFSE) in rats to probe the neural underpinnings of seizure-related structural and functional changes. Neuron restrictive silencing factor (NRSF), a transcription factor, suppresses expression of certain genes during neuronal development and in mature neurons. Previous work has shown that NRSF underlies functional changes in hippocampal networks following eFSE.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Traces showing movement by rats during a spatial learning task after experimental febrile status epilepticus. Control rats (left) spent more time in the shock quadrant than rats that in which NRSF activity was blocked (right). See Patterson, Barry et al. for details.

NRSF binds the hcn1 gene that encodes the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 1 (HCN1), which is expressed in the hippocampal formation and is reduced after eFSE. The researchers designed decoy oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) containing the NRSF-hcn1 binding site sequence to sequester NRSF and render it inactive. ODNs with a scrambled sequence served as a control. NRSF binding to hcn1 chromatin three hours after eFSE was increased significantly in rats that received the scrambled ODN compared to those that got the NRSF-sequestering ODN, and the decoy ODN prevented eFSE-induced suppression of hcn1.

To measure cognitive deficits, rats underwent a spatial memory task that placed them in a rotating arena, one quadrant of which delivered a shock. One and two days after eFSE, rats that received the scrambled ODN spent more time in the shock quadrant, received more shocks, and spent less time in the quadrant opposite the shock compartment compared to rats that did not receive eFSE; the learning deficit persisted a month later. The result indicates that rats failed to learn which quadrant delivered a shock. The rats that received the NRSF-blocking ODN, however, were indistinguishable from rats that did not undergo eFSE, suggesting that NRSF activity underlies the memory defect.

To measure neuronal activity, the researchers recorded oscillations from the hippocampal CA1 region that are associated with spatial learning using implanted electrode arrays. Theta rhythms and slow and fast gamma oscillation kinetics were disrupted in rats that underwent eFSE, but not those receiving the decoy ODN.

Examination of post-mortem tissue revealed that eFSE caused aberrant synaptogenesis of excitatory synapses at granule cells. The results depict disturbances in brain development caused by eFSE that depend on NRSF gene suppression and suggest that interfering with NRSF activity following seizure could provide protection against lasting cognitive deficits.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Stephani Sutherland, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 14
5 Apr 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2017, 37 (14) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Coaxing Delta Opioid Receptors into Action for Pain Relief
    • Febrile Seizure Defects Rely on Neuronal Silencing Factor
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.