Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

GABAergic Networks in the Prefrontal Cortex and Working Memory

Cristina Bañuelos and Marta Urszula Wołoszynowska-Fraser
Journal of Neuroscience 12 April 2017, 37 (15) 3989-3991; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0135-17.2017
Cristina Bañuelos
Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Biomedical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Urszula Wołoszynowska-Fraser
Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Biomedical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Introduction

Working memory, the ability to briefly store and act on mental representations of information, even when that information is no longer associated with sensory input, is crucial to completing goal-directed behaviors (Goldman-Rakic, 1996; Miller and Cohen, 2001). This type of memory critically depends on the prefrontal cortex, as first described based on neurophysiological and lesion studies in monkeys (Fuster, 1990; Goldman-Rakic, 1990). The ability to maintain information in prefrontal cortex after the sensory stimulus is removed is linked to persistent firing of excitatory glutamatergic pyramidal cells (Goldman-Rakic, 1996), but disruption of GABAergic circuits in the prefrontal cortex can produce profound impairments in working memory (Enomoto et al., 2011). Conversely, pharmacologically targeting this local inhibitory circuitry can reverse age-related working memory deficits (Bañuelos et al., 2014). These results from animal studies suggest a critical role for inhibitory GABAergic circuits in prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory (Murray et al., 2015). Consistent with this, postmortem studies of people with schizophrenia, a psychiatric disorder that is associated with significant working memory deficits, have found reduced levels of GABAergic markers in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Lewis et al., 2005). However, few in vivo human studies have directly linked GABA levels to working memory performance. Therefore, Yoon et al. (2016) explored whether GABA levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are correlated with individual differences in working memory task performance and working memory load capacity.

Yoon et al. (2016) estimated GABA content within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of young-adult volunteers using single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Participants were then tested on a delayed response working memory task with five trial conditions. All trials followed the cue, delay, probe format, but they differed in the number of cues presented (1 vs 2), length of delay (2 s vs 9 s), and the inclusion of distractors during the delay (no distractor vs 1 s distractor). This procedure allowed for the assessment of three frequently studied working memory components: memory load, maintenance, and resistance to distraction. Participants performed 28 trials for each condition and accuracy as a function of trial condition was used to calculate a metric for changes in memory load, maintenance, and distraction; a higher value indicated a greater degradation in that component of working memory. The relationship between working memory component values and GABA levels in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was then assessed for each participant.

Accuracy decreased as the task became more difficult, decreasing from 99.6% in trials with a single cue and a short delay to 76.0% for the most difficult condition with two cues, a long delay, and an interpolated distractor. There was a significant relationship between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex GABA levels and working memory load such that individuals with higher GABA levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex performed significantly better on the trials requiring greater memory capacity. There was no significant relationship between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex GABA levels and the other two components of working memory: maintenance and resistance to distraction. The significant relationship between GABA levels and working memory load was specific to GABA in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as no such relationship was observed in the visual cortex or between levels of glutamine plus glutamate and working memory load.

Working memory decline in aging

Accumulating evidence indicates that, during normal aging, executive functions supported by the prefrontal cortex, including working memory, are among the earliest and most severely impaired cognitive abilities (Salthouse et al., 2003). Working memory in humans declines longitudinally with age, and aged individuals perform significantly worse than young (Nagel et al., 2009). In humans and primates, the total number of prefrontal cortex cells is preserved in aging (Peters et al., 1996). There is, however, evidence of significant age-related changes in neuronal morphology, including apical dendritic regression, loss of synapses, and a decrease in spine number (Peters et al., 1996; Bloss et al., 2013). Moreover, inhibitory circuits in the prefrontal cortex are vulnerable to age-related changes that may underlie cognitive decline at advanced age. These changes include increased expression of GAD, the critical enzyme for GABA synthesis, altered expression of GABAB receptors, and reduced expression of GAT-1, the GABA transporter responsible for the reuptake of GABA at the synapse, in aged prefrontal cortex compared with young (Bañuelos et al., 2014). In contrast to Yoon et al. (2016), increased inhibition in the prefrontal cortex negatively affects working memory performance in aged rats, implying that the relationship between GABAergic drive and cognitive performance differs in an age-dependent manner. The loss of tonic presynaptic GABAB autoreceptor activation in layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in the prefrontal cortex of aged rats supports this premise (Carpenter et al., 2016). Together, these data suggest that there is an optimal inhibitory state in the young and aged prefrontal cortex, and any deviation from this state could adversely affect the cognitive processes mediated by this area.

The balance between excitation and inhibition is crucial for optimal cognitive functioning and maintaining network oscillations that support these capacities. An emerging literature demonstrates that, in aging, significant changes in both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission may be related to cognitive impairment (Bories et al., 2013). Theta (4–8 Hz) and gamma (20–100 Hz) oscillations, neural oscillations that have been linked to information processing and cognition, are attenuated in certain behavioral conditions in aging (Jacobson et al., 2013). The coupling of theta and gamma oscillations, which supports cognitive processes, is also decreased in aged rats (Jacobson et al., 2013). In humans, gamma oscillatory power is positively correlated with working memory load (Howard et al., 2003). Moreover, gamma band dynamics are decreased in older adults in association with poor working memory (Missonnier et al., 2010). Gamma oscillations are directly linked to the firing of fast-spiking parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic interneurons (Sohal et al., 2009). Therefore, more GABA, as reported by Yoon et al. (2016), would be predicted to facilitate the modulation of neuronal rhythms during cognitive engagement.

In a recently published study, Porges et al. (2017) used a technique similar to Yoon et al. (2016) to measure in vivo GABA levels in young and older individuals that were assessed on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. They found that GABA concentrations in both frontal and posterior regions declined with age. Interestingly, in line with Yoon et al. (2016), after controlling for age, years of education, and brain atrophy, greater frontal GABA concentrations were associated with superior cognitive performance. This study assessed general cognitive function and did not look at specific frontal regions. Extending the approach of Yoon et al. (2016) to include a direct assessment specifically of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex GABA levels in relation to working memory performance in older individuals would shed new light on how GABA levels change with age, in relation to age-related working memory deficits.

It is noteworthy that the study by Yoon et al. (2016) included both males and females but sex differences in working memory performance or GABA levels were not reported. Nonetheless, significant sex effects have been reported previously (Epperson et al., 2002; Harness et al., 2008). In longitudinal studies of cognitive aging, older women displayed greater resilience to age-related cognitive decline compared with male counterparts (McCarrey et al., 2016). It would therefore be valuable to examine the relationship between sex, cortical GABA levels, and working memory performance in aging.

The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging, as outlined by Yoon et al. (2016), to assess neural substrates, such as GABA in vivo in humans, may be a useful tool to study the integrity of excitatory/inhibitory influences in specific brain regions in relation to cognitive ability across the lifetime. Data from such studies may point to novel therapeutic targets for treating cognitive deficits in aging that aim to restore homeostasis at advanced age. Most currently available treatments for age-related cognitive decline target excitatory circuitry; and although patients with mild cognitive impairment show improved performance on explicit memory tasks, this therapeutic approach appears to be effective for a relatively short time after initiation of treatment (Jacqueline and Leon, 2006; Schneider et al., 2011). Therefore, there is a great need to develop novel therapeutic approaches. Targeting inhibitory GABAergic systems pharmacologically, with transcranial magnetic stimulation or by other directed techniques, may be such an approach.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • We thank Dr. Peter R. Rapp (National Institute on Aging) for invaluable comments during the preparation of the manuscript.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Cristina Bañuelos, 251 Bayview Blvd, Suite 100, Room 09C705, Baltimore, MD 21224. cristina.banuelos{at}nih.gov

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bañuelos C,
    2. Beas BS,
    3. McQuail JA,
    4. Gilbert RJ,
    5. Frazier CJ,
    6. Setlow B,
    7. Bizon JL
    (2014) Prefrontal cortical GABAergic dysfunction contributes to age-related working memory impairment. J Neurosci 34:3457–3466. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5192-13.2014 pmid:24599447
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bloss EB,
    2. Puri R,
    3. Yuk F,
    4. Punsoni M,
    5. Hara Y,
    6. Janssen WG,
    7. McEwen BS,
    8. Morrison JH
    (2013) Morphological and molecular changes in aging rat prelimbic prefrontal cortical synapses. Neurobiol Aging 34:200–210. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.014 pmid:22727942
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bories C,
    2. Husson Z,
    3. Guitton MJ,
    4. De Koninck Y
    (2013) Differential balance of prefrontal synaptic activity in successful versus unsuccessful cognitive aging. J Neurosci 33:1344–1356. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3258-12.2013 pmid:23345211
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Carpenter HE,
    2. Kelly KB,
    3. Bizon JL,
    4. Frazier CJ
    (2016) Age-related changes in tonic activation of presynaptic versus extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors in rat medial prefrontal cortex. Neurobiol Aging 45:88–97. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.05.015 pmid:27459929
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Constantinidis C,
    2. Goldman-Rakic PS
    (2002) Correlated discharges among putative pyramidal neurons and interneurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 88:3487–3497. doi:10.1152/jn.00188.2002 pmid:12466463
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Enomoto T,
    2. Tse MT,
    3. Floresco SB
    (2011) Reducing prefrontal gamma-aminobutyric acid activity induces cognitive, behavioral, and dopaminergic abnormalities that resemble schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 69:432–441. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.038 pmid:21146155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Epperson CN,
    2. Haga K,
    3. Mason GF,
    4. Sellers E,
    5. Gueorguieva R,
    6. Zhang W,
    7. Weiss E,
    8. Rothman DL,
    9. Krystal JH
    (2002) Cortical gamma-aminobutyric acid levels across the menstrual cycle in healthy women and those with premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:851–858. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.851 pmid:12215085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fuster JM
    (1990) Behavioral electrophysiology of the prefrontal cortex of the primate. Prog Brain Res 85:313–323; discussion 323–324. pmid:2094902
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Goldman-Rakic PS
    (1990) Cellular and circuit basis of working memory in prefrontal cortex of nonhuman primates. Prog Brain Res 85:325–335. pmid:2094903
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Goldman-Rakic PS
    (1996) Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:13473–13480. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13473 pmid:8942959
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Harness A,
    2. Jacot L,
    3. Scherf S,
    4. White A,
    5. Warnick JE
    (2008) Sex differences in working memory. Psychol Rep 103:214–218. doi:10.2466/pr0.103.1.214-218 pmid:18982954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Howard MW,
    2. Rizzuto DS,
    3. Caplan JB,
    4. Madsen JR,
    5. Lisman J,
    6. Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R,
    7. Schulze-Bonhage A,
    8. Kahana MJ
    (2003) Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. Cereb Cortex 13:1369–1374. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg084 pmid:14615302
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Jacobson TK,
    2. Howe MD,
    3. Schmidt B,
    4. Hinman JR,
    5. Escabí MA,
    6. Markus EJ
    (2013) Hippocampal theta, gamma, and theta-gamma coupling: effects of aging, environmental change, and cholinergic activation. J Neurophysiol 109:1852–1865. doi:10.1152/jn.00409.2012 pmid:23303862
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Jacqueline B,
    2. Leon F
    (2006) Donepezil for mild cognitive impairment. In: Cochrane database of systematic reviews. New York: Wiley.
  14. ↵
    1. Lewis DA,
    2. Hashimoto T,
    3. Volk DW
    (2005) Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev 6:312–324. doi:10.1038/nrn1648 pmid:15803162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. McCarrey AC,
    2. An Y,
    3. Kitner-Triolo MH,
    4. Ferrucci L,
    5. Resnick SM
    (2016) Sex differences in cognitive trajectories in clinically normal older adults. Psychol Aging 31:166–175. doi:10.1037/pag0000070 pmid:26796792
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Miller EK,
    2. Cohen JD
    (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 pmid:11283309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Missonnier P,
    2. Herrmann FR,
    3. Michon A,
    4. Fazio-Costa L,
    5. Gold G,
    6. Giannakopoulos P
    (2010) Early disturbances in gamma band dynamics in mild cognitive impairment. J Neural Transm 117:489–498. doi:10.1007/s00702-010-0384-9 pmid:20217436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Murray AJ,
    2. Woloszynowska-Fraser MU,
    3. Ansel-Bollepalli L,
    4. Cole KL,
    5. Foggetti A,
    6. Crouch B,
    7. Riedel G,
    8. Wulff P
    (2015) Parvalbumin-positive interneurons of the prefrontal cortex support working memory and cognitive flexibility. Sci Rep 26:16778. doi:10.1038/srep16778 pmid:26608841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Nagel IE,
    2. Preuschhof C,
    3. Li SC,
    4. Nyberg L,
    5. Bäckman L,
    6. Lindenberger U,
    7. Heekeren HR
    (2009) Performance level modulates adult age differences in brain activation during spatial working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:22552–22557. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908238106 pmid:20018709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Peters A,
    2. Rosene DL,
    3. Moss MB,
    4. Kemper TL,
    5. Abraham CR,
    6. Tigges J,
    7. Albert MS
    (1996) Neurobiological bases of age-related cognitive decline in the rhesus monkey. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 55:861–874. doi:10.1097/00005072-199608000-00001 pmid:8759775
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Porges EC,
    2. Woods AJ,
    3. Edden RA,
    4. Puts NA,
    5. Harris AD,
    6. Chen H,
    7. Garcia AM,
    8. Seider TR,
    9. Lamb DG,
    10. Williamson JB,
    11. Cohen RA
    (2017) Frontal gamma-aminobutyric acid concentrations are associated with cognitive performance in older adults. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.06.004 pmid:28217759
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Salthouse TA,
    2. Atkinson TM,
    3. Berish DE
    (2003) Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. J Exp Psychol Gen 132:566–594. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566 pmid:14640849
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Schneider LS,
    2. Dagerman KS,
    3. Higgins JP,
    4. McShane R
    (2011) Lack of evidence for the efficacy of memantine in mild Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 66:991–998. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.69 pmid:21482915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Sohal VS,
    2. Zhang F,
    3. Yizhar O,
    4. Deisseroth K
    (2009) Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature 459:698–702. doi:10.1038/nature07991 pmid:19396159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Yoon JH,
    2. Grandelis A,
    3. Maddock RJ
    (2016) Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex GABA concentration in humans predicts working memory load processing capacity. J Neurosci 36:11788–11794. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1970-16.2016 pmid:27852785
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (15)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 15
12 Apr 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GABAergic Networks in the Prefrontal Cortex and Working Memory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GABAergic Networks in the Prefrontal Cortex and Working Memory
Cristina Bañuelos, Marta Urszula Wołoszynowska-Fraser
Journal of Neuroscience 12 April 2017, 37 (15) 3989-3991; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0135-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GABAergic Networks in the Prefrontal Cortex and Working Memory
Cristina Bañuelos, Marta Urszula Wołoszynowska-Fraser
Journal of Neuroscience 12 April 2017, 37 (15) 3989-3991; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0135-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Neural Development of Social Interaction Perception in the Superior Temporal Sulcus
  • Universal Coding for Uncertainty?
  • Beyond Motor Control: Diffusion MRI Reveals Associations between the Cerebello-VTA Pathway and Socio-affective Behaviors in Humans
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.