Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 17 May 2017, 37 (20) i
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Gray Matter Density Increases during Adolescence

Efstathios D. Gennatas, Brian B. Avants, Daniel H. Wolf, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Kosha Ruparel, et al.

(see pages 5065–5073)

Numerous studies have found that increases in cognitive abilities in human adults are associated with increases in cortical gray matter volume and/or thickness. During adolescent development, however, gray matter volume and cortical thickness decrease while cognitive abilities increase. Pruning of exuberant projections and synapses, which has been documented in other developing mammals, has been proposed to explain this apparent contradiction. But gray matter volume also tends to be higher in males than in females, despite similar intellectual abilities. This suggests that gray matter volume is not a reliable indicator of cognitive ability. Indeed, Gennatas et al. report that decreases in gray matter volume are accompanied by increases in gray matter density during adolescence and between males and females.

The authors analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 1189 adolescents and compared cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and gray matter density across subjects. Consistent with previous work, total gray matter volume was greater in males than in females. Nonetheless, gray matter density was greater in females. Similarly, while total gray matter volume and cortical thickness were greater in the youngest than in the oldest subjects, gray matter density increased with age. Moreover, age-associated differences in gray matter density were found throughout the brain, whereas significant age-associated differences in gray matter volume were found in only 52–65% of gray-matter parcels. Finally, age explained more of the variance in mean gray matter density across subjects than it explained variance in gray matter volume.

Importantly, gray matter mass, defined as density × volume, decreased modestly during adolescence, suggesting gray matter loss does occur during this period. Nonetheless, the analyses suggest that gray matter loss during adolescence is much less than previously assumed. The authors suggest that increases in myelination during adolescent development may lead to compaction of gray matter. Alternatively, myelin development might affect the classification of gray and white matter in MRI scans, confounding interpretation of volume and density changes. Direct comparison of histological and imaging data in individual subjects will be required to determine how gray matter changes during development and to allow accurate interpretation of MRI data.

Primate pOFC Projects Densely to Amygdala Intercalated Masses

Basilis Zikopoulos, Malin Hoistad, Yohan John, and Helen Barbas

(see pages 5051–5064)

To ensure survival, animals must respond appropriately to cues that predict rewards and threats. Because cues that are highly informative in some contexts may be uninformative in others, animals must learn to distinguish contexts and initiate or inhibit learned responses accordingly. This ability depends on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). For example, the prelimbic region of rodent mPFC promotes expression of defensive responses, while the infralimbic region inhibits these responses after extinction training. These effects are mediated by projections from the mPFC to the amygdala. In particular, prelimbic cortex is thought to excite neurons in the basolateral nucleus, which elicit fear responses via projections to the central nucleus. In contrast, the infralimbic cortex is thought to inhibit communication between the basolateral and central nuclei, partly via projections to GABAergic neurons in the intercalated masses of the amygdala.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A pOFC axon terminal (green) closely apposes a dendrite of a DARPP-32-expressing neuron (red) in the intercalated masses of the amygdala. See Zikopoulos et al. for details.

To gain further insight into how mPFC regulates amygdala circuitry, Zikopoulos et al. examined projections from primate posterior orbitofrontal cortex (pOFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to amygdala nuclei. Both prefrontal areas innervated multiple nuclei in the amygdala, but the distribution of projections differed. For example, whereas ∼70% of ACC projections targeted the basolateral nucleus, only ∼28% of pOFC projections did. Moreover, a greater proportion of pOFC projections (30%) than ACC projections (8%) targeted the intercalated masses. Finally, only the pOFC innervated the lateral nucleus, a key site of fear learning.

The densest innervation by pOFC—and the largest, presumably strongest, synaptic terminals—occurred in the intercalated masses. Here, pOFC afferents formed synapses with the three main neuronal classes: spiny neurons that express the dopamine-responsive phosphoprotein DARPP-32, aspiny neurons that express calbindin, and aspiny neurons that express nitric oxide synthase. The largest of these classes comprises neurons expressing DARPP-32, and accordingly, most pOFC terminations apposed these neurons.

The authors suggest that primate pOFC is equivalent to rodent infralimbic cortex and that it inhibits fear responses by exciting neurons in the intercalated masses, which in turn inhibit neurons in the central nucleus that initiate defensive behaviors. Most pOFC targets in the intercalated masses are sensitive to dopamine, which inhibits these neurons in mice. Therefore, dopamine likely opposes the effects of pOFC. This might explain why stress, which elevates dopamine levels, interferes with extinction and allows inappropriate generation of fear responses in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (20)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 20
17 May 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 17 May 2017, 37 (20) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 17 May 2017, 37 (20) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Gray Matter Density Increases during Adolescence
    • Primate pOFC Projects Densely to Amygdala Intercalated Masses
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.