Abstract
The endogenous opioid system supports a multitude of functions related to appetitive behavior in humans and animals, and it has been proposed to govern hedonic aspects of feeding thus contributing to the development of obesity. Here we used positron emission tomography to investigate whether feeding results in hedonia-dependent endogenous opioid release in humans. Ten healthy males were recruited for the study. They were scanned with the μ-opioid-specific ligand [11C]carfentanil three times, as follows: after a palatable meal, a nonpalatable meal, and after an overnight fast. Subjective mood, satiety, and circulating hormone levels were measured. Feeding induced significant endogenous opioid release throughout the brain. This response was more pronounced following a nonpalatable meal versus a palatable meal, and independent of the subjective hedonic responses to feeding. We conclude that feeding consistently triggers cerebral opioid release even in the absence of subjective pleasure associated with feeding, suggesting that metabolic and homeostatic rather than exclusively hedonic responses play a role in the feeding-triggered cerebral opioid release.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The endogenous opioid system supports both hedonic and homeostatic functions. It has been proposed that overeating and concomitant opioid release could downregulate opioid receptors and promote the development of obesity. However, it remains unresolved whether feeding leads to endogenous opioid release in humans. We used in vivo positron emission tomography to test whether feeding triggers cerebral opioid release and whether this response is associated with pleasurable sensations. We scanned volunteers using the μ-opioid receptor-specific radioligand [11C]carfentanil three times, as follows: after an overnight fast, after consuming a palatable meal, and after consuming a nonpalatable meal. Feeding led to significant endogenous opioid release, and this occurred also in the absence of feeding-triggered hedonia. Feeding-triggered opioid release thus also reflects metabolic and homeostatic responses rather than hedonic responses exclusively.
Introduction
Brain μ-opioid receptor (MORs) system supports a multitude of functions related to appetitive behavior and food intake (Henriksen and Willoch, 2008; Pecina and Smith, 2010; Nummenmaa and Tuominen, 2017). In animals, activation of the MOR in the shell of nucleus accumbens increases pleasure responses for foods and may also trigger eating (Peciña and Berridge, 2005). In line with this, μ-opioid receptor antagonists decrease and agonists increase food intake in both rodents and humans (Glass et al., 1999; Yeomans and Gray, 2002; Giuliano et al., 2012; Ziauddeen et al., 2013). Opioid receptor antagonists also decrease the pleasantness of the taste and smell of palatable foods in healthy volunteers (Yeomans and Wright, 1991), whereas inverse MOR agonists reduce the hedonic properties of food and eating (Nathan et al., 2012). Clinical evidence also shows that chronic opioid exposure is associated with increased sugar intake (Mysels and Sullivan, 2010). Accordingly, opiate addicts perceive sweetness as more pleasant than drug-naive control subjects, and this effect is reversible by opioid antagonists (Langleben et al., 2012; Green et al., 2013). Finally, MORs are also downregulated in individuals with morbid obesity and binge-eating disorder (Burghardt et al., 2015; Karlsson et al., 2015; Majuri et al., 2017), suggesting an opioidergic contribution in the development and maintenance of obesity.
Animal studies have established that palatable food consumption leads to endogenous opioid release in the hypothalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and nucleus accumbens (Dum et al., 1983; Colantuoni et al., 2001). Because weight loss normalizes initially downregulated MOR levels in obese humans, the downregulation in the obese state has been proposed to reflect prolonged overeating leading to perpetual overstimulation and concomitant downregulation of MORs (Burghardt et al., 2015; Karlsson et al., 2016). Yet in humans, the evidence for endogenous opioid release and its relation to hedonic aspects of feeding remains elusive. Positive mood has been reported to trigger endogenous opioid release in the amygdala (Koepp et al., 2009), and another early study reported that amphetamine-induced euphoric feelings correlated with increased endogenous opioid release (Colasanti et al., 2012), suggesting an association between opioidergic activity and hedonia. Subsequent studies have, however, failed to replicate this finding (Guterstam et al., 2013; Mick et al., 2014). More recently MOR availability has been shown to decrease immediately following a liquid meal (Burghardt et al., 2015), reflecting an increase in endogenous opioid levels. However, this study did not assess whether the opioid release reflected hedonic aspects of eating, or whether it is simply triggered by feeding per se.
If opioid release following feeding is related to the hedonic responses, pleasure caused by eating should increase opioid release in a dose-dependent manner. Consequently, endogenous opioid release following food consumption would be a candidate neurobiological mechanism that reinforces overeating in obese individuals. This hypothesis has far-reaching implications as novel treatments for overeating targeting the opioid system are developed, yet direct evidence for hedonia-related opioid release following food consumption is lacking in humans. Here we directly tested whether endogenous opioid release is related to the hedonic value of the consumed food. We used positron emission tomography (PET) with the MOR-specific ligand [11C]carfentanil to quantify the MOR availability following a (1) 12 h fast, (2) a palatable meal (high hedonic value), and (3) a nonpalatable meal (low hedonic value). We hypothesized that food consumption would lead to endogenous opioid release and that this response would be stronger following a palatable rather than a nonpalatable meal.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Hospital District of South-Western Finland. Subjects gave written informed consent before participating in the measurements and were financially compensated for their participation in this study.
Subjects.
Ten healthy males participated in the study (Table 1). They were recruited from the local student population in the Turku area via e-mail advertisements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) male sex, (2) age 20–35 years, (3) native Finnish speaker with western Caucasian origin, and (4) body mass index (BMI) 18.5–25.0 kg/m2. Only males were included in the sample because MOR availability differs between sexes (Zubieta et al., 1999). Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) regular use of any medication; (2) recent weight changes of >2 kg in 1 year; (3) prior or current psychiatric disorder including eating disorders; (4) expected poor compliance; (5) nicotine use; (6) excessive use of alcohol (>20 portions/month); (7) history of any drug abuse; (8) diabetes or disturbed glucose metabolism (fasting glucose level, >6.0 mmol/L; or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, >6.0%); (9) past dose of radiation (from diagnostic imaging or prior research-related PET scans); and (10) presence of ferromagnetic objects contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eligibility based on these criteria was determined during a screening visit consisting of somatic examination and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) interview. Conductance-derived fat percentages were measured with the Omron BF 400-E scale (Omron Healthcare Europe). Because the palatable meal consisted of pizza, the subject candidates were also briefly questioned regarding their meal preferences, and those expressing a dislike for pizza were not enrolled in the study.
Subject characteristics, injected doses of radioactivity, and self-reported tastiness of the foods
Experimental design.
The study was run using a within-subjects design with the following three PET scan conditions: fasting, palatable food (pizza) consumption, and nonpalatable liquid meal (nutrient drink) consumption. Scans were performed on separate days within a 3–4 week period and always at the same time of the day for a single participant, either in the morning (8:00 to 9:00 A.M.) or in the afternoon (12:00 to 13:00 P.M.). The order of the conditions was counterbalanced across participants. Before each visit, participants refrained from eating for 12–14 h (overnight fast) and were asked to avoid physical and mental stress and sexual interaction for 2 d. Alcohol consumption was not allowed during the study period. All testing sessions begun with the placing of an intravenous catheter in the antecubital vein for radioligand injection and blood sampling for ∼60 min before the scans.
In the fasting condition, subjects were scanned after a 40 min resting period, while in the palatable and nonpalatable meal conditions participants started pizza and diet coke consumption 20 min before the scheduled start of the PET scan. The 20 min time frame was based on a pilot study confirming that 20 min was sufficient for completing the meals. To ensure that hedonic properties of the pizza matched with individual preferences, the subjects chose their preferred pizza from three predetermined topping combinations from a pizza chain (Kotipizza), which makes each pizza with standardized recipe and ingredients. The pizza was served warm. Caloric content, carbohydrates, fat, other nutrients, and the number of calories (1040–1100 kcal per serving; ∼50 g of protein, 84 g of carbohydrates, 63 g of fat, and 6 g of salt) were matched as closely as possible between the pizzas and the nutritional drink (see below). The subjects also consumed a 0.5 L soft drink (Coca-Cola Light; 2 kcal, <0.1 g protein, 0 g carbohydrates, and 0 g fat). The nutritional drink was made from pure carbohydrate, whey protein flour, canola oil, and salt (1108 kcal of energy, 69.8 g of protein, 84 g of carbohydrates, 63 g of fat, and 6 g of salt). The raw ingredients were measured with per-gram precision with a standard kitchen scale. The total volume of the nutritional drink was 0.9 L, matching the volume of pizza and the soda after chewing.
Participants reported their feelings of happiness, anxiety, pleasantness, hunger, irritability, nausea, thirst, and satiation on a visual analog scale (0–5) upon arrival, as well as before and after each scan. Participants also rated the deliciousness, satiety levels, and food craving while consuming the meals.
Laboratory measurements.
Plasma samples were obtained before the meals and after the PET scan via an antecubital catheter that was used for radioligand injections. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured upon arrival as a control to ensure that the subjects had fasted as instructed. On the day of the fasting scan, the blood samples were taken only once. On meal consumption scans, the plasma samples were taken immediately before eating and after the scans (20 and 51 min after the first sample). Glucose and insulin samples were analyzed on site by laboratory technicians using routine procedures. Ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), and leptin samples were processed after mixing the sample with an enzyme inhibitor cocktail to be able to measure active portions of the gastrointestinal hormones. The samples were frozen and stored before the analysis (below −70°C). The sample processing and analysis was performed using the provided instructions of the laboratory kit (MILLIPLEXmap Kit: Human Metabolic Hormone Magnetic Bead Panel, HMHEMAG-34K, Merck Millipore). We were able to obtain the ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY, and leptin measurements from only 6 of 10 participants due to the unexpected delivery problems of the enzyme inhibitor cocktails at the beginning of the study.
PET data acquisition and preprocessing.
Data were acquired as described previously (Karlsson et al., 2015). Briefly, MOR availability was measured with the high-affinity agonist radioligand [11C]carfentanil (Frost et al., 1985), which has high test–retest reliability (Hirvonen et al., 2009). The radioligand was produced as described earlier (Karlsson et al., 2015), except that the mobile phase was altered to CH3OH/0.1 m NH4HCO2 (70:30). After intravenous radioligand injection, radioactivity in the brain was recorded with the GE Healthcare Discovery 690 PET/computed tomography scanner for 51 min with an in-plane resolution of 3.75 mm [effective resolution, 4.7 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)], using 13 frames of increasing duration (3 × 1 min, 4 × 3 min, 6 × 6 min). The injected radioligand doses were similar across the scans (Table 1). During scanning, participants were lying in a supine position with their heads gently strapped to the scanner table to limit head movement. Participants were monitored throughout the scan. Researchers ensured wakefulness by regular visits to the scanner room. T1-weighted anatomical MR reference images (1 mm3 voxel size) were acquired with a Philips Ingenuity TF PET/MR 3 T (TR, 8.1 ms; TE, 3.7 ms; flip angle, 7°; scan time, 263 s).
Data were preprocessed with SPM12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/) running on Matlab 2014b for Mac (MathWorks). To account for head movements, the images of the first scan session were coregistered to the eighth frame of that session and summed. Subsequently, all PET images were realigned to the produced the summed image. Each subject's T1-weighted MR image was coregistered to the mean PET images. Occipital cortex was drawn manually on the MRI images using PMOD version 3.4 software (PMOD Technologies). Receptor availability was expressed in terms of BPND, which is the ratio of specific to nondisplaceable binding in the brain. Occipital cortex was used as the reference region, as it is practically devoid of MOR (Hiller and Fan, 1996). BPND was calculated for each voxel with PMOD version 3.4 using the simplified reference tissue model with reference–tissue time activity curves as input data (Gunn et al., 1997). This outcome measure is not confounded by blood flow or radioligand transport (Sander et al., 2014). Subject-wise parametric BPND images were normalized to the MNI space using the transformation matrices obtained from the normalization of the T1-weighted MR images. Finally, 8 mm FWHM Gaussian smoothing was applied.
Statistical analysis.
The study was run using a fully within-subjects design. Voxelwise differences in MOR availability were analyzed using SPM12 using directed t contrasts, as follows: fast > nonpalatable meal, fast > palatable meal, and palatable meal > nonpalatable meal, as well as the opposite contrasts. Statistical threshold was set at p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) corrected at cluster level (p < 0.05). In a complementary methodological approach, anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) were automatically generated in the ventral striatum, caudate nucleus, putamen, insula, amygdala, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, middle cingulate cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex using the Anatomy and AAL toolboxes (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002; Eickhoff et al., 2005). Subsequently, condition-wise BPND values were extracted for each subject and ROI using the Marsbar toolbox (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/download.html). Behavioral, biological, and ROI data were analyzed with SPSS Statistics version 22 for Mac OS X (IBM). The normality assumption was tested with a Shapiro–Wilk test. We used an appropriate repeated-measures ANOVA to investigate the changes of the binding potentials and other measures within and between scan sessions. Within the ANOVA models, nonsphericity was estimated with Mauchley's test, and when the criteria were not met, the Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied.
Results
Self-reports and laboratory measures
Self-reports and laboratory measures are summarized in Figure 1 and Table 2. During feeding, the palatable meal (pizza) was consistently rated more tasty than the nonpalatable meal (8.4 vs 3.8; t(9) = 8.70, p < 0.001). Accordingly, pleasure ratings were comparable before eating the palatable versus the nonpalatable meals (t = −0.75, p = 0.47) but differed at the beginning of the PET scans following food consumption (F(2,20) = 5.116, p = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.36). Pleasure ratings were higher for palatable versus nonpalatable foods and for fast versus nonpalatable foods (p values <0.05). Again, no differences were found after the scan (F(2,20) = 0.46, p = 0.64). Satiety was comparable before eating the palatable versus nonpalatable meals (t = 0.45, p = 0.67) but differed at the beginning of the PET scans following food consumption (F(2,20) = 57.58, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.88). Both immediately after the meal as well as after the PET scan, satiety was higher following the palatable and nonpalatable meal versus fasting (p values <0.001), but, importantly, there were no differences between the palatable and nonpalatable meal conditions (t = 1.81, p = 0.10). Plasma insulin (F(1,7) = 26.32, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.79), GLP-1 (F(1,5) = 23.04, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.82), ghrelin (F(1,5) = 6.14, p = 0.05, ηp2 = 0.58), and PYY (F(1,5) = 15.39, p = 0.01, ηp2 = 0.76) concentrations increased postprandially. However, there were no significant food type × measurement time interactions (F values <2.55, p values >0.16). Plasma glucose and leptin levels were comparable across conditions and were not influenced by food consumption (F values <2.92, p values >0.15).
Behavioral ratings and laboratory measurements. A, B, Mean subjective ratings for satiety (A) and pleasure (B) before meal, before scan, and after scan. C, D, Mean plasma insulin (C) and glucose (D) levels before the meal and after the scans. Error bars show the SEM.
Laboratory measurements before and after the meals
μ-Opioid binding potentials
Full-volume analysis revealed that the consumption of both palatable (pizza) and nonpalatable meals triggered widespread endogenous opioid release (reflected in decreased [11C]carfentanil BPND) in comparison with the baseline fasting scan (Fig. 2). Nonpalatable food consumption caused a global BPND decrease compared with fasting scans (Fig. 2, left). Palatable food consumption versus fasting state also decreased MOR binding, but in a more limited number of regions including caudate nucleus, thalamus, and cingulate cortex (Fig. 2, middle). Direct comparisons between nonpalatable versus palatable meal conditions revealed that decreases in BPND values were significantly larger following the nonpalatable meal condition (Fig. 2, right).
Full-volume analysis. Brain regions where [11C]carfentanil BPND values were different between fasting and the nonpalatable meal (left), fasting and the palatable meal (middle), and the palatable meal and the nonpalatable meal (right). The data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level. The color bar shows the t statistic range.
These effects were corroborated by a complementary ROI analysis. In a 3 (condition: fast, palatable meal, nonpalatable meal) × 10 (ROI) repeated-measures ANOVA, we found a main effect of condition (F(2,22) = 9.81, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.47), reflecting BPND changes across the nonpalatable food versus fasting condition (p < 0.001) and marginally for the palatable food versus fasting condition (p = 0.056), as well as a main effect of ROI (F(9,198) = 78.64, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.87), resulting from regional differences in MOR availability. These effects were qualified by a condition × ROI interaction (F(18,198) = 5.71, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.34). ROI-wise contrast tests revealed that binding potentials exhibited a clear pattern of fast > palatable meal > nonpalatable meal (Fig. 3). MOR binding decreased in all ROIs following nonpalatable meal versus fasting state conditions. For palatable meal versus fast, a significant effect was observed in dorsal caudate nucleus. BPND values decreased more following nonpalatable versus palatable meal in all ROIs (p values <0.05) except amygdala.
Region-of-interest analysis. Means and SEs of mean for regional binding potentials (i.e., BPND values) in the nonpalatable meal, the palatable meal, and fasting conditions. Letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in the one-way contrasts between fast > nonpalatable meal (a), fast > palatable meal (b), and palatable meal > nonpalatable meal (c).
Finally, we tested whether food consumption-triggered regional BPND changes would be associated with pleasantness ratings with foods. However, these effects were not statistically significant in either condition (palatable or nonpalatable meal) in any region.
Discussion
Our main finding was that consuming both palatable and nonpalatable meals led to widespread endogenous opioid release in the brain. These effects were observed in large clusters, with peaks in the ventral striatum, thalamus, and anterior cingulate cortex. Opioid release was significantly stronger following the nonpalatable versus palatable meal, and it was independent of the subjective hedonic value of food. Consequently, even the consumption of nonpalatable foods may lead to significant postprandial endogenous opioid release in the absence of concomitant hedonic response, even though hedonia associated with feeding may also contribute to the response (Dum et al., 1983; Colantuoni et al., 2001).
Feeding triggers opioid release independently of hedonia
A prominent hypothesis proposes that the brain opioid system encodes the “liking” component (i.e., the hedonic reaction) of the reward processing (Berridge, 2009; Berridge et al., 2010), and previous PET studies in humans have linked the human endogenous opioid system with variety of mood and hedonic functions (Zubieta et al., 2001; Koepp et al., 2009; Nummenmaa et al., 2016). Consequently, it has been proposed that altered opioidergic functions in conditions involving overeating would reflect alterations in hedonic processing (Burghardt et al., 2015; Karlsson et al., 2015). Our findings on postprandial opioid release accord with the general role of opioids in feeding (Pecina and Smith, 2010) and suggest that repeated feeding-triggered opioid release is a possible mechanism leading to MOR downregulation in obesity. The effects were also consistent across the studied individuals (n = 10). In ventral striatum, feeding-induced opioid release was observed in 10 of 10 subjects in the nonpalatable meal condition and in 7 of 10 subjects in the palatable meal condition; furthermore, the difference between nonpalatable and palatable meals was significant in 7 of 10 subjects. The corresponding effect sizes (Cohen's d) were >1.39, exceeding the conventional limit (0.8) for a large effect (Cohen, 1992).
Against our expectations, the present study did not reveal an association between MOR activation and hedonic aspects of feeding. Both palatable and nonpalatable meals induced significant changes in MOR activity, while only palatable meal consumption induced subjective pleasurable sensations. However, we found that the opioid release was stronger following the nonpalatable meal than the palatable meal, despite careful matching of the energy content and nutrients in the meals and no differences in subjective (self-report) and hormonal (plasma insulin, GLP-1, ghrelin, and PYY levels) measures of satiety, as well as using a subjectively preferred palatable meal whose feeding has been found to be modulated by the opioid system in preclinical studies (for a review, see Gosnell and Levine, 2009). No association between endogenous opioid release and self-reported pleasure could be established (although this may also reflect the limited sample size), which accords with some prior studies showing decoupling between endogenous opioid levels and acute mood changes (Guterstam et al., 2013; Mick et al., 2014; Burghardt et al., 2015). Thus, the present evidence suggests that a mere change in the energy homeostasis following feeding is enough to trigger endogenous opioid release in humans. Rewarding aspects of feeding may contribute to the opioid release independently of the homeostatic response, but the present study cannot directly disentangle the relative magnitudes of the two effects.
A possible reason for these discrepancies is that whereas prior preclinical and clinical studies have upregulated or downregulated the MOR system pharmacologically, we instead measured feeding-triggered endogenous opioid release directly in vivo. The observed MOR activation may indeed be influenced by numerous factors other than the hedonic response of feeding (for a review, see Nummenmaa and Tuominen, 2017). One possible explanation for the larger opioid release following the nonpalatable meal is that the nonpalatable liquid meal was digested faster in both the stomach and intestine, thus resulting in faster humoral and neural gastrointestinal responses. Consequently, the faster coupling between plasma nutrients and circulating hormones may cause opioid release in the brain via hypothalamus-mediated mechanisms. Regardless of what mechanism ultimately underlies the eating-dependent endogenous opioid release, these results suggest that repeated stimulation of the MOR system due to overeating can potentially lead to its downregulation, as speculated in prior studies (Karlsson et al., 2015, 2016). However, even though eating itself would not always lead to hedonia-dependent changes in opioid release (e.g., in the case of nonpalatable food consumption), it is possible that the MOR downregulation following repeated overeating can lead to alterations in mood. Accordingly, one prior study (Karlsson et al., 2015) has found that MOR availability was associated with trait anxiety in the morbidly obese subjects, suggesting that the interaction between feeding and mood may be mediated by MOR.
All in all, our results suggest that the relationship among opioids, feeding, and pleasure may be more complex than previously thought. Even though opioid agonists and antagonists increase and decrease food intake, respectively (Glass et al., 1999; Yeomans and Gray, 2002; Mysels and Sullivan, 2010; Giuliano et al., 2012; Ziauddeen et al., 2013), the effects of μ-opioid agonists in subjective hedonic feelings in drug-naive subjects are much more variable (Lasagna et al., 1955; Tedeschi et al., 1984; Zacny and Gutierrez, 2003, 2009; Riley et al., 2010; Ipser et al., 2013). Together with mixed evidence on endogenous opioid release during positive moods in imaging studies (Boecker et al., 2008; Koepp et al., 2009; Burghardt et al., 2015; Manninen et al., 2017; Nummenmaa and Tuominen, 2017), these data call for a more detailed investigation of the specific contribution of opioids in affective and homeostatic processes in humans.
It must be noted that rewarding and motivating effects of foods likely also act via other neurotransmitter systems, in particular the dopaminergic system, which interacts intimately with the opioidergic system (Tuominen et al., 2015). In line with this, orally consumed foods trigger significant dopamine release in the striatum (Small et al., 2003), yet similar effects are not observed with intravenously administered glucose (Haltia et al., 2007, 2008). Consequently, the actual process of consuming the food (rather than the concomitant changes in blood glucose levels) might also be critical for the activity changes in the reward system. It is thus possible that the dopamine system is critical for the rewarding aspects of feeding, whereas the opioid release observed in the present study would be triggered by more general-level homeostatic signaling (Nogueiras et al., 2012).
Face-to-face individual treatment of obesity is very labor intensive and costly, and, unfortunately, the conventional dieting-based approach for weight loss has a low success rate (Anderson et al., 2001). Alterations in the opioid system that controls food intake (Karlsson et al., 2015) may be partly responsible for maintaining unhealthy eating habits. The present data provide further evidence that opioid blockage might be an effective way for preventing overeating and promoting weight loss in humans by blocking the effects of feeding-induced opioid release. Indeed, opioid antagonists also prevent food seeking and binge-like eating (Giuliano et al., 2012; Cambridge et al., 2013). Similarly, it has been established that weight loss by dieting or by surgical means normalizes MORs in morbidly obese subjects (Burghardt et al., 2015; Karlsson et al., 2015), suggesting that both acute and chronic alterations in the opioidergic system contribute to feeding preferences.
Methodological considerations
We studied only healthy young males, so it remains unknown whether these results generalize to females and other age groups. The PET technique does not allow disentangling whether the BPND changes reflect receptor internalization, altered conformation, or occupancy by endogenous neurotransmitter. Therefore, we cannot specify which interpretation is most appropriate. Nonetheless, all of these changes are thought to reflect endogenous opioid release. Additionally, using the current protocol we cannot disentangle the exact time course of the MOR activation changes. As the subjects were scanned ∼15 min after the meal, it is possible that the peak effect of nonpalatable meal was reached sooner than that for the palatable meal, yielding higher BPND values during the 51-min measurement.
Serving subject-chosen pizza allowed matching the palatable meal with subject preferences (Small et al., 2003), whereas the liquid meal provided a compromised macronutrient and volume-matched nonpalatable control. While resembling everyday food consumption, this design has two limitations. First, chewing (required for pizza) could also influence the hedonic and homeostatic responses of food on the brain (Higgs and Jones, 2013). Second, the liquid meal may have led to faster humoral and neural gastrointestinal responses, thus triggering more profound opioid release. After this initial demonstration with natural feeding conditions, future studies could compare opioid release following directly matched palatable versus nonpalatable meals such as milkshake (Stice et al., 2008) to provide a finer grained analysis of the effects of mere palatability of foods on opioid release under a controlled setting. Nevertheless, we stress that neither of these limitations counter our argument that feeding may trigger opioid release in the absence of hedonia.
Conclusions
We conclude that food consumption causes a robust and widespread cerebral opioid release in comparison with the fasted state. Nonpalatable liquid nutrition, however, caused stronger opioidergic responses than palatable pizza, thus the observed effects do not reflect the hedonic properties of the meal. These data highlight the role of the endogenous opioid system in human feeding but suggest that the opioidergic system contributes to feeding even in the absence of hedonia.
Footnotes
The study was conducted within the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases and was supported by the Academy of Finland (Grants #304385 and #283320; and Grant #251125to L.N.). J.J.T. was supported by a personal grant from the Finnish Cultural Foundation. We thank the staff of Turku PET Centre for their help with data collection.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Lauri Nummenmaa, Turku PET Centre, c/o Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20520 Turku, Finland. latanu{at}utu.fi
