Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Stopping Inflammation in Stroke: Role of ST2/IL-33 Signaling

Antoine Drieu, Sara Martinez de Lizarrondo and Marina Rubio
Journal of Neuroscience 4 October 2017, 37 (40) 9614-9616; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-17.2017
Antoine Drieu
1Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, INSERM UMR-S U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (PhIND), Cyceron, 14000 Caen, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Martinez de Lizarrondo
1Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, INSERM UMR-S U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (PhIND), Cyceron, 14000 Caen, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina Rubio
1Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, INSERM UMR-S U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (PhIND), Cyceron, 14000 Caen, France, and
2Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation (DRCI), Caen University Hospital CHU Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Ischemic stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, according to data from the World Health Organization. It results from interruption of blood flow caused by in situ thrombus (blood clot) formation or embolization. Along with other mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of stroke, postischemic inflammation accounts for brain cell death in the acute and subacute stages (Dirnagl et al., 1999). Over the past 20 years, many studies have focused on inflammatory responses triggered after ischemic stroke, with the aim of ameliorating stroke outcome. However, initial attempts to use anti-inflammatory treatments in acute ischemic stroke failed (del Zoppo, 2010). These failures may be explained by the nature of immune cells in stroke: on the one hand, they participate in the progression of postischemic injury; on the other hand, they mediate poststroke repair and regeneration.

The dual nature of the immune response to stroke is exemplified by microglia, the resident macrophages in the brain parenchyma. Microglia actively survey the surrounding environment by protracting and retracting their processes; and after acute brain injury, they undergo dramatic morphological and phenotypic changes. Specifically, when activated by injury-associated molecules, microglial cells change from having branched processes to becoming amoeboid phagocytic cells, which express novel surface antigens and produce mediators that orchestrate the inflammatory response of the brain (Perego et al., 2011). Individual microglial cells can adopt a large spectrum of activated phenotypes ranging from proinflammatory (M1 phenotype) to anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective (M2). Although microglial cells can encompass a broad spectrum of phenotypes between the M1 and M2 extremes, the M1-M2 dichotomy is generally considered as a useful framework to understand and manipulate the functional status of microglial cells.

The mechanisms driving phenotypic changes of microglia remain poorly understood and represent a potential therapeutic target to both limit brain injury and promote brain repair. Clues about this regulation might come from the study of peripheral macrophages that also adopt a range of phenotypes. One such regulatory molecule is the cytokine IL-33, a member of the interleukin-1 (IL-1) cytokine family. IL-33 exerts a neuroprotective role by promoting the shift of macrophage polarization from M1- to M2-type, reducing the levels of proinflammatory mediators and increasing the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-1 (Jiang et al., 2012; Pomeshchik et al., 2015). IL-33 binds to its specific receptor ST2. Although several papers have reported the neuroprotective role of IL-33 in stroke (Korhonen et al., 2015; Pomeshchik et al., 2015), the importance of IL-33/ST2 signaling cascade on microglial phenotype had never been addressed before.

Yang et al. (2017) investigated the potential beneficial effects of the activation of ST2 receptors via IL-33 in the switch of microglial cell phenotype from a proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotype after ischemic stroke and asked whether activation of this pathway decreases the ischemic lesion volume. To do so, they used ST2 knock-out mice subjected to two different models of stroke. In both models, ST2-deficient mice had larger lesion volumes than wild-type mice. This deleterious effect was accompanied by neurobehavioral deficits (neuroscore and sensorimotor tests; e.g., rotarod, adhesive removal, and cylinder tests) at different times after stroke onset.

To identify the cells involved in the protective effects of ST2, the authors investigated which cells expressed this receptor and which secreted its ligand, IL-33. Immunohistological analyses showed that astrocytes and oligodendrocytes produce IL-33 after stroke onset. Flow cytometry and immunohistological analyses showed that ST2 receptors were expressed by astrocytes and microglial cells under physiological conditions. In addition, ST2 receptor levels were dramatically increased in these two populations after stroke. The number of ST2-positive infiltrated macrophages and neutrophils was also robustly elevated after stroke. The next step of their work was to assess the direct effects of IL-33 on microglia. In vitro (microglia-enriched cultures subjected to oxygen/glucose deprivation) and in vivo (ST2-deficient, stroke mice) data showed that the ST2/IL-33 pathway is implicated in the shift from a microglial “M1” to a “M2”-neuroprotective phenotype, by inducing the expression of M2 markers and inhibiting the expression of M1 markers (analyzed by immunohistological analyses and/or RT-PCR). Finally, the authors demonstrate, by in vitro and in vivo studies, that the neuroprotective effects of the ST2/IL-33 signaling pathway were mediated by IL-10 produced by microglial cells. In vivo experiments showed that the neuroprotective effects of IL-33 were abrogated in IL-10-deficient mice 3 d after stroke onset, whereas wild-type mice showed decreased lesion volumes when exposed to IL-33.

The discovery by Yang et al. (2017) links IL-33/ST2 signaling to the IL-10 pathway, for which downstream effects are known. IL-10 is one of the best studied anti-inflammatory cytokines produced by immune cells after brain injury (Iadecola and Anrather, 2011). IL-10 production impairs proinflammatory reactions by inhibiting cytokine production, downregulating MHC-II antigens, and decreasing NF-κB activity. In addition, IL-10 production may upregulate B-cell proliferation and antibody production (de Waal Malefyt et al., 1992). In stroke, many immune cells (including regulatory T and regulatory B cells) exert neuroprotective actions through IL-10 release (Liesz et al., 2009; Ren et al., 2011).

In contrast to previous data by Korhonen et al. (2015), Yang et al. (2017) did not observe any effect on the expression of IL-4 after IL-33 stroke-induced upregulation or in vitro IL-33 administration. IL-4 is another anti-inflammatory cytokine that has been largely reported to exert neuroprotection after stroke (Xiong et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016). These differing findings suggest that the ST2/IL-33 signaling pathway in microglia is not at the origin of IL-4 secretion because, in the work of Yang et al. (2017), IL-33-treated microglia did not express IL-4. In agreement with this hypothesis, Zhao et al. (2015) have suggested that IL-4 released from neurons and IL-33 coming from glial cells could promote a synergistic effect and exert neuroprotective effects after stroke.

To examine the temporal profile of ST2/IL-33 signaling after stroke, Yang et al. (2017) analyzed the expression of IL-33 at 1, 3, 7, and 14 d. They detected a significant increase of IL-33 in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes exclusively 1 d after stroke, after which IL-33 expression returned to basal levels. In contrast, ST2 expression was analyzed exclusively 3 d after stroke onset. At this time, expression of ST2 was significantly elevated in microglia and astrocytes. It would have been valuable to analyze the same time points for ST2 as for IL-33, especially 1 d after stroke onset, to link the expression pattern of both molecules and to explain the discrepant expression patterns of IL-33 and ST2 3 d after stroke onset.

Astrocytes have previously been shown to participate in neuroinflammatory responses (Dong and Benveniste, 2001) and can become activated (reactive) in response to many CNS pathologies, including stroke (Pekny and Nilsson, 2005). In the study by Yang et al. (2017), astrocytes were one of the sources of IL-33 1 d after stroke onset; and, like microglia, astrocytes showed an increased expression of ST2 receptors 3 d after stroke. These results suggest that astrocytes could also contribute to the beneficial effects of IL-33 and ST2-mediated signaling after stroke. This topic deserves additional studies.

Last, the results obtained by Yang et al. (2017) are in accordance with clinical findings obtained in stroke patients (Korhonen et al., 2015). Korhonen et al. (2015) studied the plasma concentration of the soluble form of ST2 (sST2), a secreted isoform generated by alternative splicing that inhibits IL-33 signaling (Hayakawa et al., 2007). Stroke patients with high plasma levels of sST2 had greater neurological deficits 3 months after stroke, suggesting that stronger inhibition of IL-33 was associated with poorer stroke outcome (Korhonen et al., 2015).

In conclusion, the results observed by Yang et al. (2017) open new venues targeting IL-33/ST2 signaling pathways for ischemic stroke treatment. To date, there is no specific therapeutic approach available to target poststroke microglial immune responses, although some candidates have been investigated only in preclinical studies. Although some of them have been applied in other disorders, exploratory research for effective agents that regulate ischemic microglial activation is still in the early stages. Given the dual function of microglial cells after stroke, therapeutic strategies targeting microglia should be fine-tuned to selectively suppress the proinflammatory responses and/or promote anti-inflammatory effects. ST2 agonist injection might be a promising target to promote microglial beneficial responses in stroke if an effective and innocuous administration mechanism is found for stroke patients.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Marina Rubio, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging for Neurological Disorders, GIP Cyceron, Bd Henri Becquerel, BP5229, 14074 Caen, France. rubio{at}cyceron.fr

References

  1. ↵
    1. de Waal Malefyt R,
    2. Yssel H,
    3. Roncarolo MG,
    4. Spits H,
    5. de Vries JE
    (1992) Interleukin-10. Curr Opin Immunol 4:314–320. doi:10.1016/0952-7915(92)90082-P pmid:1418711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. del Zoppo GJ
    (2010) Acute anti-inflammatory approaches to ischemic stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1207:143–148. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05761.x pmid:20955437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dirnagl U,
    2. Iadecola C,
    3. Moskowitz MA
    (1999) Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci 22:391–397. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01401-0 pmid:10441299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Dong Y,
    2. Benveniste EN
    (2001) Immune function of astrocytes. Glia 36:180–190. doi:10.1002/glia.1107 pmid:11596126
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hayakawa H,
    2. Hayakawa M,
    3. Kume A,
    4. Tominaga S
    (2007) Soluble ST2 blocks interleukin-33 signaling in allergic airway inflammation. J Biol Chem 282:26369–26380. doi:10.1074/jbc.M704916200 pmid:17623648
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Iadecola C,
    2. Anrather J
    (2011) The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med 17:796–808. doi:10.1038/nm.2399 pmid:21738161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Jiang HR,
    2. Milovanović M,
    3. Allan D,
    4. Niedbala W,
    5. Besnard AG,
    6. Fukada SY,
    7. Alves-Filho JC,
    8. Togbe D,
    9. Goodyear CS,
    10. Linington C,
    11. Xu D,
    12. Lukic ML,
    13. Liew FY
    (2012) IL-33 attenuates EAE by suppressing IL-17 and IFN-gamma production and inducing alternatively activated macrophages. Eur J Immunol 42:1804–1814. doi:10.1002/eji.201141947 pmid:22585447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Korhonen P,
    2. Kanninen KM,
    3. Lehtonen Š,
    4. Lemarchant S,
    5. Puttonen KA,
    6. Oksanen M,
    7. Dhungana H,
    8. Loppi S,
    9. Pollari E,
    10. Wojciechowski S,
    11. Kidin I,
    12. García-Berrocoso T,
    13. Giralt D,
    14. Montaner J,
    15. Koistinaho J,
    16. Malm T
    (2015) Immunomodulation by interleukin-33 is protective in stroke through modulation of inflammation. Brain Behav Immun 49:322–336. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.013 pmid:26111431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Liesz A,
    2. Suri-Payer E,
    3. Veltkamp C,
    4. Doerr H,
    5. Sommer C,
    6. Rivest S,
    7. Giese T,
    8. Veltkamp R
    (2009) Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke. Nat Med 15:192–199. doi:10.1038/nm.1927 pmid:19169263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Zhao S,
    4. Zhang H,
    5. Cai W,
    6. Cai M,
    7. Ji X,
    8. Leak RK,
    9. Gao Y,
    10. Chen J,
    11. Hu X
    (2016) Interleukin-4 is essential for microglia/macrophage M2 polarization and long-term recovery after cerebral ischemia. Stroke 47:498–504. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012079 pmid:26732561
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Pekny M,
    2. Nilsson M
    (2005) Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Glia 50:427–434. doi:10.1002/glia.20207 pmid:15846805
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Perego C,
    2. Fumagalli S,
    3. De Simoni MG
    (2011) Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 8:174. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-174 pmid:22152337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pomeshchik Y,
    2. Kidin I,
    3. Korhonen P,
    4. Savchenko E,
    5. Jaronen M,
    6. Lehtonen S,
    7. Wojciechowski S,
    8. Kanninen K,
    9. Koistinaho J,
    10. Malm T
    (2015) Interleukin-33 treatment reduces secondary injury and improves functional recovery after contusion spinal cord injury. Brain Behav Immun 44:68–81. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2014.08.002 pmid:25153903
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ren X,
    2. Akiyoshi K,
    3. Dziennis S,
    4. Vandenbark AA,
    5. Herson PS,
    6. Hurn PD,
    7. Offner H
    (2011) Regulatory B cells limit CNS inflammation and neurologic deficits in murine experimental stroke. J Neurosci 31:8556–8563. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1623-11.2011 pmid:21653859
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Xiong X,
    2. Xu L,
    3. Wei L,
    4. White RE,
    5. Ouyang YB,
    6. Giffard RG
    (2015) IL-4 is required for sex differences in vulnerability to focal ischemia in mice. Stroke 46:2271–2276. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008897 pmid:26130091
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Liu H,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Ye Q,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Yang B,
    7. Mao L,
    8. Zhu W,
    9. Leak RK,
    10. Xiao B,
    11. Lu B,
    12. Chen J,
    13. Hu X
    (2017) ST2/IL-33-dependent microglial response limits acute ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 37:4692–4704. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3233-16.2017 pmid:28389473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Sun G,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Edwards NJ,
    6. Aronowski J
    (2015) Neuronal interleukin-4 as a modulator of microglial pathways and ischemic brain damage 35:11281–11291. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1685-15.2015 pmid:26269636
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (40)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 40
4 Oct 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stopping Inflammation in Stroke: Role of ST2/IL-33 Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Stopping Inflammation in Stroke: Role of ST2/IL-33 Signaling
Antoine Drieu, Sara Martinez de Lizarrondo, Marina Rubio
Journal of Neuroscience 4 October 2017, 37 (40) 9614-9616; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Stopping Inflammation in Stroke: Role of ST2/IL-33 Signaling
Antoine Drieu, Sara Martinez de Lizarrondo, Marina Rubio
Journal of Neuroscience 4 October 2017, 37 (40) 9614-9616; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-17.2017
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Amyloid Precursor Protein Can Cause Changes in Neuronal Firing Rates via Axon Initial Segment
  • Unraveling the Mechanisms Underlying Disordered Sleep in Alzheimer's Disease
  • The ESCRT Pathway's Role in Prion Diseases and Beyond
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.