Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleResearch Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

T-Cell Mediation of Pregnancy Analgesia Affecting Chronic Pain in Mice

Sarah F. Rosen, Boram Ham, Shannon Drouin, Nadia Boachie, Anne-Julie Chabot-Dore, Jean-Sebastien Austin, Luda Diatchenko and Jeffrey S. Mogil
Journal of Neuroscience 11 October 2017, 37 (41) 9819-9827; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2053-17.2017
Sarah F. Rosen
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boram Ham
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon Drouin
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shannon Drouin
Nadia Boachie
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Julie Chabot-Dore
2Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Dentistry and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Sebastien Austin
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luda Diatchenko
2Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Dentistry and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey S. Mogil
1Department of Psychology and Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effect of pregnancy on persistent pain and its sensitivity to reversal by minocycline. A, B, Mechanical allodynia produced by CFA (A) and SNI (B) is reversed by intrathecal minocycline (MCL) in male and early-pregnant mice (14 ± 2 d before parturition; P−14), but not nulliparous or postweaning (7 ± 1 d postweaning and 28 d postparturition; P28) female mice. Late-pregnant mice (2 ± 2 d before parturition; P−2) display no mechanical allodynia. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) prepregnancy (baseline; BL), 3 d after CFA (pregnancy/CFA+3), or 7 d after SNI (pregnancy/SNI+7), and 10–120 min after injection of MCL; n = 7–9 mice/condition. C, CFA produces thermal hyperalgesia in nulliparous female but not late-pregnant (P−2) mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal latency (s) prepregnancy (BL) and 3 d after CFA (CFA+3); n = 8–10 mice/condition. D, CFA produces spontaneous pain in nulliparous female but not late-pregnant (P−2) mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM Mouse Grimace Scale score prepregnancy (BL) and 1 d after CFA (CFA+1); n = 7–8 mice/condition. In all cases, male and nulliparous female mice were tested with delays between baseline and subsequent testing equivalent to late-pregnant mice. E, LPS produces allodynia in male and early-pregnant (P−14) mice, but not nulliparous and late-pregnant (P−2) mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM bilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) at baseline (BL) and 1–24 h after injection of LPS; n = 6–8 mice/condition. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with CFA+3 (in graph A), SNI+7 (in graph B), or BL (in graphs C–E). ● p < 0.05 compared to all other groups at the same time point. ●●●p < 0.001 compared with all other groups at the same time point.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Hormone and opioid dependence of pregnancy analgesia. A, B, Simultaneous adminstration of estradiol and progesterone (HSP) produces abolition of mechanical allodynia from CFA (A) and SNI (B). Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) at baseline (BL), after ovariectomy (OVX) and osmotic minipump (Pump) implantation, and 14 d after SNI or 3 d after CFA (+14 in both cases); n = 6 mice/hormone group. C, D, Intrathecal injection of naloxone reveals “hidden” mechanical allodynia after CFA (C) or SNI (D). Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) prepregnancy (BL), on day 3 after CFA at P−2 (pregnancy/CFA+3), or day 7 after SNI (SNI+7) and day 25 after SNI at P−2 (pregnancy/SNI+25), and 15–120 min after injection of drug; n = 6–9 mice/drug group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with +11 (graph A), +OVX (graph B), CFA+3 (graph C), or SNI+25 (graph D). ●● p < 0.01 compared to all other groups at the same time point. ●●●p < 0.001 compared with all other groups at the same time point.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    T-cell dependence of pregnancy analgesia. A, B, Progressive attenuation of SNI-induced mechanical allodynia during pregnancy, and reinstatement after parturition, in CD-1 (A) but not nude (B) mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral (Ipsi.) and contralateral (Contra.) hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) at baseline (BL), at day 7 after SNI or sham surgery (SNI+7), and at various time points before (P−x) and after (P+x) parturition; n = 6–8 mice/genotype/surgery. Purple shading indicates duration of pregnancy. C, Attenuation of SNI-induced mechanical allodynia during pregnancy in C57BL/6 but not Rag1−/− mice. Symbols as in A; n = 6 mice/genotype. D, Late-pregnant nude mice display CFA allodynia, indicating a loss of pregnancy analgesia. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) at prepregnancy (BL) and on day 3 after CFA at P−2 (CFA+3); n = 7–10 mice/genotype/condition. E, Adoptive transfer of splenocytes or isolated CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from pregnant CD-1 mice into late-pregnant nude mice blocks CFA allodynia, indicating a restoration of pregnancy analgesia. Symbols as in D; n = 5–8 mice/condition. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with SNI+7 (graphs A–C) or BL (graphs D and E). In graph A, asterisks in conditions other than SNI-Ipsi. are omitted for clarity. ●●●p < 0.001 compared with all other groups at the same time point.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    δ-Opioid receptor dependence of pregnancy analgesia. A, B, Relative expression of the Oprm1, Oprd1, and Oprk1 genes in the DRG (A) and spinal cord (B) of nulliparous and late pregnant CD-1 and nude mice. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM relative expression normalized to nulliparous CD-1 mice. C, Intrathecal injection of naltrindole, but not β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA) or nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), reinstates “hidden” CFA allodynia in late-pregnant mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) prepregnancy (BL), on day 3 after CFA at P−2 (pregnancy/CFA+3), and 15–120 min after injection of drug; n = 6–9 mice/drug. D, Pregnancy analgesia is absent in late-pregnant Oprd1−/− mice. Symbols represent mean ± SEM ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (g) prepregnancy (BL), at P−7, and 3 d after CFA (P−4/CFA+3); n = 5–8 mice/genotype/condition. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with nulliparous CD-1 (graphs A and B), CFA+3 (graph C), or BL (graph D). ●●p < 0.01 compared with all other groups at the same time point.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (41)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 41
11 Oct 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
T-Cell Mediation of Pregnancy Analgesia Affecting Chronic Pain in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
T-Cell Mediation of Pregnancy Analgesia Affecting Chronic Pain in Mice
Sarah F. Rosen, Boram Ham, Shannon Drouin, Nadia Boachie, Anne-Julie Chabot-Dore, Jean-Sebastien Austin, Luda Diatchenko, Jeffrey S. Mogil
Journal of Neuroscience 11 October 2017, 37 (41) 9819-9827; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2053-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
T-Cell Mediation of Pregnancy Analgesia Affecting Chronic Pain in Mice
Sarah F. Rosen, Boram Ham, Shannon Drouin, Nadia Boachie, Anne-Julie Chabot-Dore, Jean-Sebastien Austin, Luda Diatchenko, Jeffrey S. Mogil
Journal of Neuroscience 11 October 2017, 37 (41) 9819-9827; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2053-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • adaptive immunity
  • delta-opioid
  • pain
  • pregnancy
  • T cells

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Contributions of distinct attention mechanisms to saccadic choices in a gamified, dynamic environment
  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy reveals functional rewiring between macaque motor areas following post-infarction recovery of manual dexterity
  • Ventral Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons Regulate Decision-Making or Motor Impulsivity Differentially across Learning and Biological Sex
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Contributions of distinct attention mechanisms to saccadic choices in a gamified, dynamic environment
  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy reveals functional rewiring between macaque motor areas following post-infarction recovery of manual dexterity
  • Mental Images from Long-Term Memory Differ from Perception: Evidence for Distinct Spatial Formats and Distinct Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Orientation
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.