Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Systems/Circuits

Dampened Amphetamine-Stimulated Behavior and Altered Dopamine Transporter Function in the Absence of Brain GDNF

Jaakko J. Kopra, Anne Panhelainen, Sara af Bjerkén, Lauriina L. Porokuokka, Kärt Varendi, Soophie Olfat, Heidi Montonen, T. Petteri Piepponen, Mart Saarma and Jaan-Olle Andressoo
Journal of Neuroscience 8 February 2017, 37 (6) 1581-1590; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-16.2016
Jaakko J. Kopra
2Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jaakko J. Kopra
Anne Panhelainen
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anne Panhelainen
Sara af Bjerkén
3Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauriina L. Porokuokka
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lauriina L. Porokuokka
Kärt Varendi
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kärt Varendi
Soophie Olfat
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi Montonen
2Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Petteri Piepponen
2Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Petteri Piepponen
Mart Saarma
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mart Saarma
Jaan-Olle Andressoo
1Institute of Biotechnology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jaan-Olle Andressoo
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Midbrain dopamine neuron dysfunction contributes to various psychiatric and neurological diseases, including drug addiction and Parkinson's disease. Because of its well established dopaminotrophic effects, the therapeutic potential of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been studied extensively in various disorders with disturbed dopamine homeostasis. However, the outcomes from preclinical and clinical studies vary, highlighting a need for a better understanding of the physiological role of GDNF on striatal dopaminergic function. Nevertheless, the current lack of appropriate animal models has limited this understanding. Therefore, we have generated novel mouse models to study conditional Gdnf deletion in the CNS during embryonic development and reduction of striatal GDNF levels in adult mice via AAV-Cre delivery. We found that both of these mice have reduced amphetamine-induced locomotor response and striatal dopamine efflux. Embryonic GDNF deletion in the CNS did not affect striatal dopamine levels or dopamine release, but dopamine reuptake was increased due to increased levels of both total and synaptic membrane-associated dopamine transporters. Collectively, these results suggest that endogenous GDNF plays an important role in regulating the function of dopamine transporters in the striatum.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Delivery of ectopic glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) promotes the function, plasticity, and survival of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the dysfunction of which contributes to various neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, how the deletion or reduction of GDNF in the CNS affects the function of dopaminergic neurons has remained unknown. Using conditional Gdnf knock-out mice, we found that endogenous GDNF affects striatal dopamine homeostasis and regulates amphetamine-induced behaviors by regulating the level and function of dopamine transporters. These data regarding the physiological role of GDNF are relevant in the context of neurological and neurodegenerative diseases that involve changes in dopamine transporter function.

  • amphetamine
  • cyclic voltammetry
  • dopamine
  • dopamine transporter
  • GDNF
  • striatum

Introduction

Midbrain dopamine neuron dysfunction contributes to various neurological and psychiatric diseases. Because of its therapeutic potential, ectopic application of the dopaminotrophic growth factor glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been investigated extensively in various disease paradigms, including drug addiction and Parkinson's disease. However, the success of GDNF clinical trials has varied, highlighting a need for a better understanding of GDNF's physiological role on dopaminergic system function.

Knock-out mice that lack GDNF, its binding receptor GFRα1, or its signaling receptor RET die within few hours after birth due to kidney agenesis (Marcos and Pachnis, 1996; Moore et al., 1996; Pichel et al., 1996; Sánchez et al., 1996; Enomoto et al., 1998). However, the dopamine system remains largely intact in these animals (Airaksinen and Saarma, 2002). Because the mouse dopamine system matures primarily during the first few postnatal weeks (Jackson-Lewis et al., 2000), GDNF's role in the dopamine system's postnatal development has remained unclear. Recently, using three complementary conditional genetic knock-out approaches, we found that GDNF is not required for either the development or the survival of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in adult animals (Kopra et al., 2015). However, whether GDNF is required for the normal function of dopaminergic neurons is currently unknown.

Here, we first examined whether deleting GDNF selectively in the CNS affects nigrostriatal dopaminergic system function in mice. These mice were generated by crossing Gdnf-floxed mice (Kopra et al., 2015) with Nestin-Cre mice (Tronche et al., 1999; Kramer et al., 2007), resulting in the loss of GDNF expression throughout the entire CNS in embryogenesis (Tronche et al., 1999; Kopra et al., 2015). We then measured the levels of dopamine and dopamine metabolites in various brain areas. We further examined dopamine release and dopamine transporter (DAT)-mediated dopamine reuptake in the dorsal striatum (dSTR). In addition, we examined the stimulatory effect of amphetamine in our GDNF conditional knock-out mice and measured the levels of total and synaptosomal membrane-associated DAT protein in the striatum. Finally, we studied the effect of reducing GDNF levels specifically in adult mice striata via AAV5-Cre delivery. Our results indicate that GDNF is an important regulator of both DAT function and DAT expression patterns and that a loss of brain GDNF reduces amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

The generation and genotyping of Gdnf-floxed (F/F) mice and Nestin-Cre mice was described previously (Tronche et al., 1999; Kopra et al., 2015). The mice were bred locally in the animal facility at the University of Helsinki and were maintained on a mixed genetic background (129Ola/ICR/C57BL6). The mice were housed under temperature-controlled conditions at 20–22°C in a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. Each cage contained two to five animals, which had ad libitum access to standard chow and water. All animal experiments were approved by the National Animal Experiment Board of Finland or the Umeå Ethics Committee for Animal Studies. Because the Nestin-Cre line generates robust recombination in germ cells, the floxed allele derived from the parent that carries the Nestin-Cre transgene is often constitutively recombined, resulting in a full knock-out “KO” allele (Kramer et al., 2007). Therefore, in homozygous Gdnf conditional knock-out mice, one Gdnf allele is recombined selectively in the CNS and the other Gdnf allele is recombined in all cells. Animals were bred for experiments by crossing homozygous F/F mice with heterozygous wt/F + Nestin-Cre mice. Adult homozygous male Gdnf conditional knock-out mice and littermate controls were used at the age of 10–16 weeks unless stated otherwise. Approximately half of the heterozygous (C/KO) controls (“C” denotes control allele) carried the Nestin-Cre transgene in each experiment. When Nestin-Cre was present, C denoted Gdnf wt allele in the control group. All animals and samples were analyzed together with their littermate controls in a random order.

AAV5-Cre injections.

Gdnf-floxed (F/KO) male mice and heterozygous (Wt/KO) controls aged 5–8 months received bilateral injections of AAV5-Cre viral vector (Johan Jakobsson laboratory, Lund University, Sweden) expressing the Cre recombinase under the human synapsin promoter. The mice were kept under 1.5–2% isoflurane (Attane Vet 1000 mg/g; Piramal Healthcare UK Limited) in oxygen and attached to a stereotactic frame. Lidocaine (10 mg/ml; Orion Pharma) was applied under the skin for local analgesia. A total of 1.7 × 1011 genome copies of the viral vector in Dulbecco's PBS supplied with Mg2+ and Ca2+ were injected in a volume of 1 μl into 2 different coordinates in each dSTR at a 10° angle (relative to bregma: A/P = +0.2 mm and +1.2 mm; M/L = ±2.2 mm; D/V = 3.0 mm) under isoflurane anesthesia using NanoFil syringes (World Precision Instruments) with 33 Ga blunt NanoFil needles (World Precision Instruments). After each injection, the needle was kept in place for 5 min before slowly withdrawn. Each animal received a total of four injections of the viral vector (two for each striatum). A separate group of 5-month-old female animals received only unilateral injections to measure and compare Gdnf expression in the injected and noninjected side. All mice received one injection of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) and karprofen (5 mg/kg, s.c.) at the end of the surgery to relieve pain.

Amphetamine-induced locomotion.

To measure amphetamine-induced locomotion, mice were placed individually in transparent plastic cages (24 × 24 × 15 cm) with a perforated plastic lid. The mice were allocated systematically to the experimental sessions to ensure that each session would include both knock-out mice and littermate controls. The cages were located inside an open-field activity monitor (MED Associates) that registered the animal's movements. The mice were habituated for 15 min before receiving an injection of d-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg, i.p.; Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Finland) and their locomotor activity was monitored for 60 min. Infrared photo beam interruptions were registered and collected at 5 min intervals.

Animals receiving bilateral AAV5-Cre injections were tested for 60 min of spontaneous open-field activity just before and 40 d after the stereotactic injections. One day after the second session, the mice received an injection of d-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and their activity was similarly measured. Animals were not habituated in these sessions.

Accelerating rotarod.

The accelerating rotarod test was performed on the Ugo Basile rotarod with an acceleration speed of 4–40 rpm over 5 min. The latency to fall off was recorded with the cutoff time set at 6 min (a constant speed of 40 rpm was applied during the last minute). The test was conducted on 2 consecutive days with 3 trials on each day. The mice were habituated to the room for 1 h before the start of the experiment.

Microdialysis.

A microdialysis guide cannula (MAB 4.1; AgnTho's) was inserted into the dSTR (A/P = +0.6 mm, M/L = +1.8 mm; DV = −2.2 mm) under isoflurane anesthesia. Two screws and dental cement (Aqualox; Voco) were used to affix the guide cannula to the skull. After at least 4 d of recovery, a microdialysis probe (MAB 4.9.1.Cu; AgnTho's) was inserted into the guide cannula and dialysis was started with Ringer's solution containing the following (in mm): 147 NaCl, 1.2 CaCl2, 2.7 KCl, 1.0 MgCl2, and 0.04 ascorbic acid, pH 7.4, at a flow rate of 2 μl/min. After a 2 h stabilization period, samples were collected at 15 min intervals. Extracellular dopamine levels were measured using the mean of four consecutive, stable samples. The concentration of dopamine was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Coulochem II electrochemical detector (ESA). A Kinetex 2.6u column (XB-C18; 50 × 4.6 mm; Phenomenex) was maintained at 45°C using a column heater. The flow rate of the mobile phase (0.1 m NaH2PO4, 0.1 mg/ml octanesulphonic acid, 1.0 mm EDTA, and 8% methanol, pH 4.0) was 1 ml/min. The sample (25 μl) was injected into the chromatographic system using an SIL-20AC autoinjector (Shimadzu). After the experiment, the animal was decapitated and the brain was removed and frozen. Correct placement of the probe was confirmed histologically in 90-μm-thick coronal brain sections.

Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.

At 8–11 months of age, mice were decapitated, the brain was removed, and 300-μm-thick coronal slices containing the cortex and striatum were cut on a model 7000 smz-2 vibratome (Campden Instruments) in ice-cold cutting saline containing the following (in mm): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 0.3KH2PO4, 3.3 MgSO4, 0.8 NaH2PO4, and 10 glucose. The slices were allowed to recover in a holding chamber for 1–2 h at 32°C in oxygen-bubbled (95% O2, 5% CO2) recording saline containing the following (in mm): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 26 MgSO4, 0.8 NaH2PO4, and 10 glucose. In the recording chamber, the slices were perfused continuously with 35°C oxygen-bubbled recording saline. In the in vitro amphetamine experiments, d-amphetamine hemisulfate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the perfusate at a final concentration of 5 μm after a stable baseline of stimulated transient peaks was reached. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry recordings were performed using cylindrical 5 μm carbon fiber electrodes positioned at the dSTR ∼50 μm below the exposed surface. Striatal slices were stimulated electrically using a stainless steel bipolar electrode placed ∼100 μm from the recording electrode. Square pulses 0.4 s in duration were produced using an Iso-Flex stimulus isolator triggered by a Master-8 pulse generator (A.M.P.I.). Stimulus magnitude was obtained by plotting a current–response curve to single pulse stimulations and selecting the minimum value that produced the maximum response reliably. Triangular voltage ramps from a holding potential of −450 mV to +900 mV over 9 ms (scan rate of 300 mV/ms) were applied to the carbon fiber electrode at 100 ms intervals. The current was recorded using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices), filtered through a 5 kHz low-pass Bessel filter, and digitized at 40 kHz (ITC-18 board; InstruTech). Triangular wave generation and data acquisition were controlled and the recorded transients were characterized using a computer routine in IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics) (Mosharov and Sulzer, 2005; Mosharov, 2008). Background-subtracted cyclic voltammograms obtained with 1 μm dopamine solution (dopamine-HCl; Sigma-Aldrich) were used to calibrate the electrodes. Dopaminergic terminals were stimulated with: single electrical pulses at 2 min intervals; paired stimulations delivered at fixed intervals of 60, 30, 10, and 5 s (to study paired stimulation depression); or burst stimulations of 5 pulses at 20 Hz (to study release probability at the terminals). In paired stimulations, the subsequent exocytosis is thought to be repressed by both D2 receptor-mediated autoinhibition and the time it takes for reuptake and recycle the released dopamine back into vesicles for next release (Abeliovich et al., 2000; Cragg, 2003; Senior et al., 2008).

In vivo chronoamperometry.

Mice of 7–10 months of age were used in these experiments. Recordings were performed using the Fast Analytical Sensing Technology (FAST-16) system (Quanteon) (Hoffman and Gerhardt, 1998). In brief, a 5 Hz square wave potential of 0.55/0 V was applied to a single fiber carbon electrode, causing oxidation and reduction of electrochemically active substances in close proximity to the electrode tip. Chemical reactions induce a rapid change in current recorded by the electrode and oxidation and reduction currents were integrated and averaged to 1 Hz. An increased extracellular level of electrochemically active compounds results in a detectable peak formation. Because the current recorded is directly proportional to the analyte's concentration (Scatton et al., 1988), the peak amplitude corresponds to the maximum concentration (micromolar) of dopamine recorded. The identity of the analyte recorded was determined by calculating the reduction/oxidation ratio, in which a ratio of ∼0.8 indicates dopamine (Strömberg et al., 1991). The carbon fiber electrodes were coated with Nafion to repel anions and to increase the selectivity for cations (Gerhardt et al., 1984; Nagy et al., 1985). The electrode was calibrated in 0.1 m PBS, pH 7.4, in a beaker containing ascorbic acid (20 mm) and dopamine (2 mm). The carbon fiber electrodes used in this study had a selectivity ratio >200:1 for dopamine over ascorbic acid, a <0.05 μm detection limit for dopamine, and linearity (r2) >0.997. A silver wire plated for 30 min in 1 m HCl saturated with NaCl was used as a reference electrode. The carbon fiber electrodes were mounted together with a glass micropipette (with 130–160 μm between the pipette tip and electrodes) using sticky wax. The micropipette was filled with 200 μm dopamine in 0.9% NaCl containing 20 μm ascorbic acid and connected to a micropressure system. The volume applied was determined using a stereomicroscope fitted with a reticle in one eyepiece to measure the movement of the meniscus in the micropipette (Friedemann and Gerhardt, 1992).

The animals were anesthetized with urethane (1.6–1.9 g/kg; Sigma-Aldrich), tracheotomized, and placed on a heating pad. The skull was fixed in a stereotaxic frame, the scalp was removed, and the skull bone was opened over the striatum using a drill. The Ag/AgCl reference electrode was implanted through a single burr hole caudal to the striatum. The recording electrode/micropipette assembly was lowered into the brain using a microdrive. Striatal recordings were performed at the following coordinates relative to bregma (in mm): A/P + 0.03 and +0.1, M/L +0.18 or −0.18, and at 2 different depths relative to the brain surface (2.5 and 3.0 mm). Dopamine was delivered at each striatal recording site by injecting 25–375 nl of 200 μm dopamine 3–5 times at 5 min intervals.

Brain dissection.

For Western blot analysis, brain monoamine measurements and evaluation of Gdnf mRNA expression levels, samples were obtained from the relevant dissected brain regions using a mouse brain matrix. In brief, mice were killed by decapitation and the whole brain was removed, washed in ice-cold saline for 20 s, and then placed in an ice-cold mouse brain matrix (Stoelting). Slices (2 mm thickness) were prepared to include structures such as the striatum and ventral midbrain. Samples containing the dSTR, ventral striatum (vSTR), substantia nigra (SN), and ventral tegmental area (VTA) were dissected using either a sample corer (inner diameter, 2 mm) or a scalpel. The samples were snap-frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until assayed. For HPLC analysis, all samples were weighed.

Estimation of monoamines and their metabolites.

Dopamine and its metabolites were analyzed from the dissected brain samples as described previously (Valros et al., 2015) using HPLC with electrochemical detection.

Crude synaptosome preparations and membrane protein biotinylation assay.

The dSTR was dissected as described above and cut into approximately equal-size pieces. One piece was used to measure total DAT protein levels. Membrane protein biotinylation reactions were performed using the Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit (catalog number 89881; Pierce) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Crude synaptosomes were prepared as described previously (Hallett et al., 2008). The biotinylated fraction of the synaptosome preparation was then extracted using the Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit (Pierce) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Western blot analysis.

The dSTR samples were homogenized on ice in 10 mm HEPES (pH 7.2–7.4), 1 mm EDTA, 0.3 m sucrose, protease inhibitor mixture (Complete Mini-Tabs Protease Inhibitor; Roche), and phosphatase inhibitor (PhosSTOP; Roche). Total protein concentration was measured using the Lowry method (Bio-Rad). A total of 10 or 20 μg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE to detect DAT and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), respectively. The proteins were transferred to a nylon membrane, which was washed 3 times in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 15 min and then blocked in 5% (w/v) nonfat milk in TBS-T for 1 h at room temperature (RT). To detect TH, the membranes were incubated in mouse anti-TH antibody (1:3000, MAB318; Millipore) at 4°C in blocking solution, followed by anti-mouse-HRP (1:3000, P0447; DAKO) for 2 h at RT. To detect DAT, the membranes were incubated in rat anti-DAT (1:1000, MAB369; Millipore) overnight at 4°C in blocking solution, followed by biotinylated anti-rat antibody (1:500, BA-4000; Vector Laboratories) for 2 h at RT, followed by 2 h at RT with streptavidin-HRP (1:2500, S-911; Invitrogen).

The membranes were stripped for 15 min at 70°C in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2% SDS, and 50 mm DTT, and then washed and blocked as described above. The membranes were then incubated in mouse anti-GAPDH antibody (1:10,000 or 1:1000 for total and biotinylated samples, respectively; MAB374; Millipore) for 2 h at 4°C, followed by 2 h at RT in anti-mouse-HRP (1:3000 or 1:1500 for total and biotinylated samples, respectively; P0449; DAKO). The signal was visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (kit #32106; Pierce), followed by exposure to film. The signal from the gene of interest was normalized to the GAPDH signal using ImageJ software.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and qPCR.

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer's recommendations. For complementary DNA synthesis, 500 ng of RNA was treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 min at 37°C and used immediately in the reverse transcription reaction with RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. qPCR was performed with the LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche) using SYBR Green I Master (Roche) supplied with 0.25 mm primers and cDNA corresponding to 62.5 ng of RNA in a final volume of 10 μl. Two replicates of each reaction were included in the qPCR runs. Beta actin was used as the reference gene. The following primers were used: β-actin forward: CCAGTTCGCCATGGATGAC, β-actin reverse: GAGCCGTTGTCGACGACC, Gdnf forward: CGCTGACCAGTGACTCCAATATGC, and Gdnf reverse: TGCCGCTTGTTTATCTGGTGACC. Relative Gdnf expression was calculated according to the formulation in Varendi et al. (2014), assuming that primer efficiencies for both primer pairs were 2.

Statistical analyses.

Data from the three groups were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis in the event of a significant ANOVA result. For nonhomogeneous variances, a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used, followed by Mann–Whitney U post hoc tests and Bonferroni correction. Statistical analysis for pairwise comparisons was performed using Student's t test with two-tailed distribution using the equal variance option. A one-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to analyze amphetamine-induced locomotion. The chronoamperometric data collected from multiple recording sites in the striatum were statistically homogeneous and were therefore pooled for each genotype to provide an estimate of dopamine uptake in the striatum as a whole structure, as described previously (Lundblad et al., 2009; Nevalainen et al., 2011). All summary data are reported as the mean ± SEM.

Results

Reduced response to amphetamine in the absence of brain GDNF

Because Gdnf mRNA and protein expression levels are similar between the wild-type Gdnf and floxed Gdnf alleles (Kopra et al., 2015), we refer to these two alleles collectively as the control (“C”) allele. In the presence of Nestin-Cre, the floxed Gdnf allele is referred to as “floxed allele” or “F” and the conventional Gdnf knock-out allele is referred to as “KO.” First, we challenged animals lacking GDNF in the CNS (i.e., GdnfF/KO + Nestin-Cre mice) with amphetamine, a well known stimulant. Amphetamine reverses the transit of dopamine through DAT from the cytoplasm to the extracellular space (here referred to as “dopamine efflux”), resulting in high levels of extracellular dopamine and increased locomotor activity (German et al., 2015). Heterozygous Gdnf knock-out mice (Gdnfwt/KO) and wild-type mice respond similarly to amphetamine (Gerlai et al., 2001). Interestingly, we found that homozygous mice that lack GDNF in the CNS have significantly reduced locomotion after amphetamine (1 mg/kg) injection compared with Gdnfwt/KO littermate controls (Fig. 1A). To gain mechanistic insight into this phenotype, we quantified dopamine release and reuptake at subsecond resolution using electrical stimulation and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry measurements in striatal slices obtained from adult mice. Consistent with the reduced amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion response, amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux was significantly reduced in striatal slices from mice that lack GDNF in the CNS (Fig. 1B,C). Furthermore, we found that the DAT “reversal time,” the interval between the addition of amphetamine and the reversal of dopamine transit via DAT, was significantly longer in GDNF-deficient mice (Fig. 1C,D), suggesting that, for these mice, dopamine transporters at dopaminergic terminals are less susceptible to amphetamine-induced reversal. Amphetamine also depletes dopamine from storage vesicles, which is reflected in voltammetric recordings as a steady decrease in stimulated dopamine peak currents. However, the effect of amphetamine on stimulated dopamine peaks was similar between genotypes (Fig. 1E), suggesting that amphetamine is equally effective at driving the release and redistribution of dopamine from storage vesicles regardless of the presence of GDNF.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Loss of GDNF in the brain causes an altered response to amphetamine. A, Locomotor activity was measured in mice following injection of amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.). n = 16 and 9 mice for C/KO and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA F = 4.447, p = 0.046. B, Nonstimulated DAT-mediated dopamine (DA) release (i.e., DA efflux) was measured in slices during amphetamine perfusion. n = 12, 11, and 14 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively; *p < 0.05 versus C/C (Kruskal–Wallis test). C, Example recording traces measured in the continuous presence of amphetamine in a C/C (black) and F/KO + Nestin-Cre (red) mouse; notable events are indicated. The slice was stimulated electrically every 2 min to evoke DA release/reuptake (the rapid DA transients). During continuous amphetamine perfusion, a nonstimulated slow DA signal (i.e., DA efflux) occurred due to amphetamine-induced reversal of the DAT. D, Summary of the delay between the onset of amphetamine perfusion and reversal of DAT transport function. n = 12, 11, and 14 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively; *p < 0.05 versus C/C (Kruskal–Wallis test). E, Summary of the effect of amphetamine perfusion on stimulated DA release (normalized to baseline measured before amphetamine addition). n = 12, 11, and 14 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. F, Floxed; KO, knock-out; C, control (including both wild-type and floxed alleles).

Together, the effects of amphetamine measured ex vivo and in vivo led us to hypothesize two nonexclusive consequences of a loss of GDNF in the CNS. The first hypothesis is that the function of the DAT is altered and the second is that total tissue levels of dopamine are altered.

Increased DAT activity in the striatum of GDNF-deficient mice

To test these hypotheses, we studied the details of dopamine release and reuptake ex vivo in striatal slice preparations and in vivo in anesthetized animals.

Cyclic voltammetry revealed that the levels of dopamine release induced by individual electrical pulses in the dSTR are similar between genotypes (Fig. 2A,B). However, three measures of kinetics, the half-width of dopamine reuptake (T1/2), the fall time, and TAU1, revealed that GDNF-deficient mice have more rapid DAT-mediated dopamine reuptake compared with control mice (Fig. 2C–E). In contrast, we observed no significant difference between genotypes with respect to the decay constant of the slow phase of dopamine uptake (TAU2) (Fig. 2F), paired stimulus depression of dopamine release (Fig. 2G), or dopamine release probability by bursts of stimuli (Fig. 2G).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Loss of GDNF in the brain increases dopamine uptake, but does not affect dopaminergic terminal recovery or release probability. A, Averaged, normalized single-pulse-stimulated DA release transients were measured in striatal slices obtained from a C/C (black) and F/KO + Nestin-Cre (red) mouse. The parameters shown in B–F are indicated. B–F, Summary of the parameters measured as shown in A. n = 18, 16, and 17 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. TAU1 was measured as reported by Yorgason et al. (2011). G, Striatal dopaminergic terminals were stimulated with paired pulses at the indicated intervals (60, 30, 10, or 5 s) and the ratio of the second peak to the first peak was calculated as a measure of how quickly the terminals recovered from the first stimulus. In the last bar, DA release was stimulated with a single pulse and with a 20 Hz burst of 5 pulses and the ratio of burst-induced peak to the single pulse-induced peak was calculated as a measure of release probability at the terminals. n = 6, 7, and 6 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. F, Floxed; KO, knock-out; C, control (including both wild-type and floxed alleles). *p < 0.05 versus C/C; **p < 0.01 versus C/C; #p < 0.05 versus C/KO; ##p < 0.01 versus C/KO.

To determine whether the increased DAT function measured ex vivo is also present in vivo, we measured striatal dopamine reuptake using chronoamperometry in the intact brains of anesthetized animals. We applied known quantities of dopamine close to the recording electrode. The amplitudes of the currents measured after dopamine injection were correlated with the concentration of dopamine delivered and thus reflect the rate of DAT-mediated dopamine clearance (Cass and Gerhardt, 1995). We found that the rate of dopamine clearance was increased in mice lacking GDNF in the CNS, thereby allowing less dopamine to reach the recording electrode. This was reflected by smaller currents measured during the recording (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Loss of GDNF in the brain increases DAT activity in vivo, DAT tissue levels, and DAT localization to the plasma membrane. A, In vivo chronoamperometry was measured after an intrastriatal DA injection. The amplitude of the DA signal was normalized to the amount of DA applied. n = 5 mice per group; Kruskal–Wallis test H = 10.29; p = 0.006. B, C, Total DAT protein in the dSTR was measured by Western blot, normalized to GAPDH, and plotted relative to C/C. n = 6 mice per group. D, E, DAT proteins at the cell surface were biotinylated in dSTR synaptosomes, measured by Western blot, normalized to GAPDH, and plotted relative to C/C. n = 5, 6, and 6 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. F, TH protein in the dSTR was measured by Western blot, normalized to GAPDH, and plotted relative to C/C. n = 5, 4, and 5 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. G, Basal extracellular dopamine concentration was measured in striatal dialysates. The concentration of dopamine was not corrected with in vitro recovery. n = 11, 9, and 7 for C/C, C/KO, and F/KO + Nestin-Cre, respectively. F, Floxed; KO, knock-out; C, control (including both wild-type and floxed alleles).*p < 0.05 versus C/C; **p < 0.01 versus C/C; ***p < 0.001 versus C/C; #p < 0.05 versus C/KO; ##p < 0.01 versus C/KO.

To test whether the increased DAT function in GDNF-deficient mice was due to an increase in DAT protein levels in the striatum, we used Western blot analysis to measure striatal DAT levels in the various genotypes. Compared with control mice, heterozygous GDNF-deficient mice had a slight increase in striatal DAT protein levels and homozygous GDNF-deficient mice had a much larger increase (an increase of ∼70%) (Fig. 3B,C). To investigate the potential effects of deleting GDNF on DAT cellular localization, we biotin labeled the cell surface membrane proteins in dSTR synaptosome preparations and performed Western blot analysis for DAT. We found that mice lacking GDNF in the CNS have more DAT at the cell surface compared with littermate controls (Fig. 3D,E).

Together, these data indicate that a loss of GDNF in the CNS leads to increased DAT activity in the striatum, at least partially due to increased expression and surface localization of dopamine transporters.

Loss of GDNF does not affect striatal dopamine or TH levels

Next, we investigated whether deleting GDNF expression in the CNS affects the levels of dopamine by measuring dopamine and its metabolites in the primary dopaminergic brain areas, including the dSTR and SN of the nigrostriatal tract, as well as the adjacent vSTR and VTA of the mesolimbic tract (Björklund and Dunnett, 2007). We found no significant differences between genotypes with respect to the levels of dopamine or its metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid (Table 1). Moreover, we found no change in the levels of TH protein, the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis, in the striatum (Fig. 3F). Last, we found no difference between genotypes with respect to extracellular dopamine levels measured in vivo using microdialysis (Fig. 3G).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Concentration of dopamine and its metabolites measured in the indicated brain tissues using HPLC

Together, these results indicate that CNS-specific deletion of GDNF does not affect the levels of TH, dopamine, or dopamine metabolites in the striatum nor does it affect the basal levels of extracellular dopamine.

Reduced response to amphetamine upon GDNF reduction in the striatum of adult mice

To investigate the possibility that the observed effects reflect changes in early brain development due to global GDNF deficiency in the CNS since E10.5 (Tronche et al., 1999), we reduced Gdnf expression bilaterally in the dorsal striata of adult Gdnf-floxed mice by AAV5-Cre delivery. Forty days after striatal AAV5-Cre delivery, Gdnf mRNA levels were reduced by 50% in Gdnf conditional knock-out mice (F/KO) (Fig. 4A). We have shown previously that adult GDNF reduction with AAV5-Cre does not affect striatal levels of dopamine or its metabolites (Kopra et al., 2015). Although the baseline locomotor activity was similar in both groups before the AAV5-Cre injections (Fig. 4B), 40 d after the injections, both basal (Fig. 4C) and amphetamine-stimulated (Fig. 4D) open-field activity were reduced in the AAV5-Cre-injected Gdnf-floxed mice. Subtracting the basal activity from the amphetamine-stimulated activity revealed dampened amphetamine response in these mice (Fig. 4E). Accelerating rotarod test revealed no difference between the genotypes, indicating that these mice were not suffering from a motor deficit (Fig. 4F). Cyclic voltammetry recordings in striatal slices demonstrated that, similar to GdnfF/KO + Nestin-Cre animals, amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux was reduced and DAT reversal time was increased in the AAV5-Cre-injected Gdnf-floxed mice (Fig. 4G,H). Striatal dopamine release (Fig. 4I) and reuptake (Fig. 4J–L) were not changed significantly in these mice.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Striatal Gdnf deletion in adult animals reduces responses to amphetamine. A, Unilateral AAV5-Cre injections caused 50% reduction in Gdnf mRNA levels in the dSTR of mice carrying one floxed Gdnf allele (F/KO). Their noninjected dSTR served as control. n = 6 for F/KO; Student's t test p = 0.0008. B, Baseline locomotor activity of F/KO mice did not differ from the heterozygous controls before the AAV5-Cre injections. n = 9 and 15 mice for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. C, Baseline locomotor activity of F/KO mice was reduced 40 d after the AAV5-Cre injections. n = 8 and 12 mice for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA F = 8.946, p = 0.008. D, Amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity of F/KO mice was reduced 41 d after the AAV5-Cre injections. n = 8 and 12 mice for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA F = 17.027, p = 0.001. E, Subtracting the basal activity (C) from the amphetamine-stimulated activity (D) revealed dampened amphetamine response in F/KO mice. n = 8 and 12 mice for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA F = 11.982, p = 0.003. F, Motor performance in accelerating rotarod test 52 d after the AAV5-Cre injections revealed no motor deficit in F/KO mice. n = 8 and 10 mice for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. G, H, There was less DA efflux (G) and delayed DAT reversal (H) in response to amphetamine perfusion in striatal slices of F/KO mice. n = 10 and 14 slices, for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. Student's t test p = 0.047 and p = 0.017, respectively. The level of electrically stimulated dopamine release (I) and the kinetics of the dopamine reuptake (J–L) did not differ significantly between the groups, n = 11 and 12 slices, for Wt/KO and F/KO, respectively. F, Floxed; KO, knock-out.*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 versus C/C.

Collectively, these data indicate that striatal Gdnf reduction in adult mice causes similar alterations in amphetamine responses in vivo and in brain slice preparations to CNS-wide embryonic Gdnf deletion.

Discussion

We reported recently that GDNF is not required for the development or long-term survival of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in mice (Kopra et al., 2015). However, GDNF may regulate the dopaminergic system at the level of neuronal function. Therefore, we first investigated the effects of deleting GDNF in the CNS on the function of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system using conditional Gdnf knock-out mice, in which GDNF expression is deleted selectively from the entire CNS during embryonic development. We found that GDNF is important for normal DAT function and for mediating a normal response to amphetamine. Specifically, using two independent, complementary methods, ex vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in striatal slices and in vivo chronoamperometry in intact animals, we detected faster dopamine uptake in the dSTR of GDNF-deficient mice. We also measured increased protein levels of DAT in striatal tissue and in the plasma membrane of synaptosome preparations. We found that deleting GDNF from the CNS did not affect the levels of dopamine or TH in the tissue nor did it affect the extracellular levels of dopamine. We further found that local reduction in striatal Gdnf mRNA levels in adult animals resulted in a reduced response to amphetamine, similar to embryonic deletion. These results suggest that the observed changes in DAT reversal function in GdnfF/KO + Nestin-Cre mice are not induced by developmental changes elicited by CNS-wide GDNF deletion during early embryonic development, but instead likely result from more direct GDNF effects on striatal dopaminergic axon terminals. However, dopamine reuptake remained unaltered in animals with adult GDNF reduction, suggesting that either larger reduction in GDNF levels or embryonic GDNF deletion is required to affect the reuptake kinetics.

Recently, GDNF signaling was linked to surface expression of the dopamine transporter (Zhu et al., 2015). In that study, the investigators found that reduced GDNF signaling increases DAT activity by facilitating the transporter's localization to the cell surface and, conversely, increased GDNF signaling reduces DAT activity by facilitating removal of DAT proteins from the cell surface (Zhu et al., 2015). We found increased levels of DAT at the plasma membrane in the dSTR of GDNF-deficient mice even though Zhu et al. (2015) reported that GDNF regulates DAT at the vSTR, but not at the dSTR. This apparent discrepancy may be due to the fact that the previous study did not use a conditional Gdnf knock-out strategy. In addition, we found that endogenous GDNF regulates DAT expression directly. Nevertheless, given previous studies and our current results, it is clear that the functional relationship between GDNF and DAT remains incompletely understood. To illustrate this point, in contrast to expectations based on our data and the study by Zhu et al. (2015), DAT activity is increased, not reduced, in GDNF hypermorphic mice, in which the endogenous Gdnf locus is upregulated (Kumar et al., 2015), as well as in mice that express a constitutively active GDNF receptor RET (Mijatovic et al., 2007, 2008). Therefore, although the evidence to date suggests a link between GDNF signaling and DAT function, the diversity of phenotypes observed among the various mouse models highlights the complexity of this relationship and calls for further research.

Interestingly, the DAT proteins present in the GDNF-deficient striatum were highly effective at transporting extracellular dopamine into the cytosol and were slower to undergo the amphetamine-induced reversal of dopamine transport. The consequences of these changes included reduced DAT-mediated dopamine efflux, reduced extracellular dopamine levels, and reduced amphetamine-induced locomotor responses compared with littermate controls. Given that more DAT proteins are present at the cell surface when GDNF is deleted, it is possible that, in the absence of GDNF, the larger surface DAT population responds more slowly to the reversing effects of amphetamine. Alternatively, some transporters may still reverse direction from uptake to efflux, but a sufficient number of DAT molecules may remain in the conventional (i.e., uptake) transport mode, resulting in reduced hyperlocomotion. Our finding that local GDNF reduction in the adult striatum also makes dopamine transporters less eager to allow dopamine efflux in response to amphetamine without altering dopamine release or reuptake suggests that GDNF reduction hinders DAT reversal specifically. Further insight into the involved mechanism requires future research.

We additionally observed that striatal GDNF reduction in adult mice reduced spontaneous activity in open field without influencing performance in the accelerating rotarod test. Notably, spontaneous open-field activity in GdnfF/KO + Nestin-Cre mice was unaltered (Kopra et al., 2015). Reduced basal activity observed upon adult GDNF reduction could reflect a mild nigrostriatal dopamine system dysfunction that is overcome developmentally in the animals with embryonic GDNF deletion. However, a conclusion on this will require further studies.

Although data regarding the function of endogenous GDNF are scarce, a relatively large body of evidence suggests that intracranial ectopic GDNF has widespread effects on nigrostriatal dopamine metabolism, as reviewed recently by Kramer and Liss (2015). The intracranial delivery of GDNF can increase both stimulated and amphetamine-induced dopamine release and can increase dopamine turnover (Hudson et al., 1995; Hebert et al., 1996; Hebert and Gerhardt, 1997; Georgievska et al., 2004). Our finding that deleting GDNF expression in the CNS alters neither dopamine levels nor stimulated dopamine release suggests that ectopic and endogenous GDNF exert different effects on the function of the striatal dopaminergic system. Similarly, ectopic GDNF can upregulate the expression of TH both in vitro (Theofilopoulos et al., 2001; Xiao et al., 2002) and in vivo in the striatum (Kirik et al., 2000) and this is followed by a downregulation of TH in the striatum during long-term (e.g., several months) GDNF overexpression (Rosenblad et al., 2003; Georgievska et al., 2004). We found that deleting endogenous GDNF expression in the brain did not induce a change in striatal TH protein levels, suggesting that the reported effects of GDNF on TH expression (Theofilopoulos et al., 2001; Xiao et al., 2002; Rosenblad et al., 2003; Georgievska et al., 2004) are likely specific to ectopic GDNF.

In summary, our results suggest that GDNF regulates the normal function of the dopamine transporter in the striatum and that deleting or reducing GDNF has direct functional consequences on amphetamine-induced behavior. Given that DAT function is highly relevant to a wide range of psychiatric and neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease, ADHD, depression, bipolar disorder, and addiction, future research should investigate the precise role that endogenous GDNF plays in these conditions.

Footnotes

  • J.J.K. was supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Emil Aaltonen Foundation. A.P. was supported by the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation. K.V. was supported by the University of Helsinki doctoral program Brain and Mind. M.S. was supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. J.-O.A. was supported by the Academy of Finland (Grants 136591, 140983, and 263700), the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki. We thank Susanna Wiss for technical assistance.

  • Correspondence could be addressed to Dr. Jaan-Olle Andressoo, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 9 (P.O. Box 56), Helsinki FIN-00014, Finland. jaan-olle.andressoo{at}helsinki.fi

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abeliovich A,
    2. Schmitz Y,
    3. Fariñas I,
    4. Choi-Lundberg D,
    5. Ho WH,
    6. Castillo PE,
    7. Shinsky N,
    8. Verdugo JM,
    9. Armanini M,
    10. Ryan A,
    11. Hynes M,
    12. Phillips H,
    13. Sulzer D,
    14. Rosenthal A
    (2000) Mice lacking alpha-synuclein display functional deficits in the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Neuron 25:239–252. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80886-7 pmid:10707987
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Airaksinen MS,
    2. Saarma M
    (2002) The GDNF family: signalling, biological functions and therapeutic value. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:383–394. doi:10.1038/nrn812 pmid:11988777
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Björklund A,
    2. Dunnett SB
    (2007) Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends Neurosci 30:194–202. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.006 pmid:17408759
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cass WA,
    2. Gerhardt GA
    (1995) In vivo assessment of dopamine uptake in rat medial prefrontal cortex: comparison with dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem 65:201–207. pmid:7790861
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cragg SJ
    (2003) Variable dopamine release probability and short-term plasticity between functional domains of the primate striatum. J Neurosci 23:4378–4385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Enomoto H,
    2. Araki T,
    3. Jackman A,
    4. Heuckeroth RO,
    5. Snider WD,
    6. Johnson EM Jr.,
    7. Milbrandt J
    (1998) GFR alpha1-deficient mice have deficits in the enteric nervous system and kidneys. Neuron 21:317–324. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80541-3 pmid:9728913
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Friedemann MN,
    2. Gerhardt GA
    (1992) Regional effects of aging on dopaminergic function in the Fischer-344 rat. Neurobiol Aging 13:325–332. doi:10.1016/0197-4580(92)90046-Z pmid:1522947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Georgievska B,
    2. Kirik D,
    3. Björklund A
    (2004) Overexpression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor using a lentiviral vector induces time- and dose-dependent downregulation of tyrosine hydroxylase in the intact nigrostriatal dopamine system. J Neurosci 24:6437–6445. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1122-04.2004 pmid:15269253
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Gerhardt GA,
    2. Oke AF,
    3. Nagy G,
    4. Moghaddam B,
    5. Adams RN
    (1984) Nafion-coated electrodes with high selectivity for CNS electrochemistry. Brain Res 290:390–395. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(84)90963-6 pmid:6692152
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gerlai R,
    2. McNamara A,
    3. Choi-Lundberg DL,
    4. Armanini M,
    5. Ross J,
    6. Powell-Braxton L,
    7. Phillips HS
    (2001) Impaired water maze learning performance without altered dopaminergic function in mice heterozygous for the GDNF mutation. Eur J Neurosci 14:1153–1163. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01724.x pmid:11683907
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. German CL,
    2. Baladi MG,
    3. McFadden LM,
    4. Hanson GR,
    5. Fleckenstein AE
    (2015) Regulation of the dopamine and vesicular monoamine transporters: pharmacological targets and implications for disease. Pharmacol Rev 67:1005–1024. doi:10.1124/pr.114.010397 pmid:26408528
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hallett PJ,
    2. Collins TL,
    3. Standaert DG,
    4. Dunah AW
    (2008) Biochemical fractionation of brain tissue for studies of receptor distribution and trafficking. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 1:Unit 1.16. doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0116s42 pmid:18428670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hebert MA,
    2. Gerhardt GA
    (1997) Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intranigral administration of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on aged Fischer 344 rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282:760–768. pmid:9262339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Hebert MA,
    2. Van Horne CG,
    3. Hoffer BJ,
    4. Gerhardt GA
    (1996) Functional effects of GDNF in normal rat striatum: presynaptic studies using in vivo electrochemistry and microdialysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 279:1181–1190. pmid:8968339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Hoffman AF,
    2. Gerhardt GA
    (1998) In vivo electrochemical studies of dopamine clearance in the rat substantia nigra: effects of locally applied uptake inhibitors and unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. J Neurochem 70:179–189. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70010179.x pmid:9422361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hudson J,
    2. Granholm AC,
    3. Gerhardt GA,
    4. Henry MA,
    5. Hoffman A,
    6. Biddle P,
    7. Leela NS,
    8. Mackerlova L,
    9. Lile JD,
    10. Collins F
    (1995) Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor augments midbrain dopaminergic circuits in vivo. Brain Res Bull 36:425–432. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(94)00224-O pmid:7712205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Jackson-Lewis V,
    2. Vila M,
    3. Djaldetti R,
    4. Guegan C,
    5. Liberatore G,
    6. Liu J,
    7. O'Malley KL,
    8. Burke RE,
    9. Przedborski S
    (2000) Developmental cell death in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra of mice. J Comp Neurol 424:476–488. doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000828)424:3%3C476::AID-CNE6%3E3.0.CO;2-0 pmid:10906714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kirik D,
    2. Rosenblad C,
    3. Bjorklund A,
    4. Mandel RJ
    (2000) Long-term rAAV-mediated gene transfer of GDNF in the rat Parkinson's model: intrastriatal but not intranigral transduction promotes functional regeneration in the lesioned nigrostriatal system. J Neurosci 20:4686–4700. pmid:10844038
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Kopra J,
    2. Vilenius C,
    3. Grealish S,
    4. Härma MA,
    5. Varendi K,
    6. Lindholm J,
    7. Castrén E,
    8. Võikar V,
    9. Björklund A,
    10. Piepponen TP,
    11. Saarma M,
    12. Andressoo JO,
    13. Vöikar V,
    14. Björklund A,
    15. Piepponen TP
    (2015) GDNF is not required for catecholaminergic neuron survival in vivo. Nat Neurosci 18:319–322. doi:10.1038/nn.3941 pmid:25710828
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kramer ER,
    2. Liss B
    (2015) GDNF-Ret signaling in midbrain dopaminergic neurons and its implication for Parkinson disease. FEBS Lett 589:3760–3772. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.11.006 pmid:26555190
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kramer ER,
    2. Aron L,
    3. Ramakers GM,
    4. Seitz S,
    5. Zhuang X,
    6. Beyer K,
    7. Smidt MP,
    8. Klein R
    (2007) Absence of Ret signaling in mice causes progressive and late degeneration of the nigrostriatal system. PLoS Biol 5:e39. pmid:17298183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kumar A et al
    . (2015) GDNF overexpression from the native locus reveals its role in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system function. PLoS Genet 11:e1005710. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005710 pmid:26681446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lundblad M,
    2. af Bjerkén S,
    3. Cenci MA,
    4. Pomerleau F,
    5. Gerhardt GA,
    6. Strömberg I
    (2009) Chronic intermittent L-DOPA treatment induces changes in dopamine release. J Neurochem 108:998–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05848.x pmid:19196428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Marcos C,
    2. Pachnis V
    (1996) The effect of the ret- mutation on the normal development of the central and parasympathetic nervous systems. Int J Dev Biol Suppl 1:137S–138S. pmid:9087731
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mijatovic J,
    2. Airavaara M,
    3. Planken A,
    4. Auvinen P,
    5. Raasmaja A,
    6. Piepponen TP,
    7. Costantini F,
    8. Ahtee L,
    9. Saarma M
    (2007) Constitutive Ret activity in knock-in multiple endocrine neoplasia type B mice induces profound elevation of brain dopamine concentration via enhanced synthesis and increases the number of TH-positive cells in the substantia nigra. J Neurosci 27:4799–4809. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5647-06.2007 pmid:17475787
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Mijatovic J,
    2. Patrikainen O,
    3. Yavich L,
    4. Airavaara M,
    5. Ahtee L,
    6. Saarma M,
    7. Petteri Piepponen TP
    (2008) Characterization of the striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in MEN2B mice with elevated cerebral tissue dopamine. J Neurochem 105:1716–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05265.x pmid:18248620
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Moore MW,
    2. Klein RD,
    3. Fariñas I,
    4. Sauer H,
    5. Armanini M,
    6. Phillips H,
    7. Reichardt LF,
    8. Ryan AM,
    9. Carver-Moore K,
    10. Rosenthal A
    (1996) Renal and neuronal abnormalities in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 382:76–79. doi:10.1038/382076a0 pmid:8657308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mosharov EV
    (2008) Analysis of single-vesicle exocytotic events recorded by amperometry. Methods Mol Biol 440:315–327. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-178-9_24 pmid:18369956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Mosharov EV,
    2. Sulzer D
    (2005) Analysis of exocytotic events recorded by amperometry. Nat Methods 2:651–658. doi:10.1038/nmeth782 pmid:16118635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Nagy G,
    2. Gerhardt GA,
    3. Oke AF,
    4. Rice ME,
    5. Adams RN,
    6. Szentirmay MN,
    7. Martin CR
    (1985) Ion exchange and transport of neurotransmitters in nation films on conventional and microelectrode surfaces. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 188:85–94. doi:10.1016/S0022-0728(85)80052-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Nevalainen N,
    2. Af Bjerkén S,
    3. Lundblad M,
    4. Gerhardt GA,
    5. Strömberg I
    (2011) Dopamine release from serotonergic nerve fibers is reduced in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. J Neurochem 118:12–23. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07292.x pmid:21534956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Pichel JG,
    2. Shen L,
    3. Sheng HZ,
    4. Granholm AC,
    5. Drago J,
    6. Grinberg A,
    7. Lee EJ,
    8. Huang SP,
    9. Saarma M,
    10. Hoffer BJ,
    11. Sariola H,
    12. Westphal H
    (1996) Defects in enteric innervation and kidney development in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 382:73–76. doi:10.1038/382073a0 pmid:8657307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Rosenblad C,
    2. Georgievska B,
    3. Kirik D
    (2003) Long-term striatal overexpression of GDNF selectively downregulates tyrosine hydroxylase in the intact nigrostriatal dopamine system. Eur J Neurosci 17:260–270. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02456.x pmid:12542662
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Sánchez MP,
    2. Silos-Santiago I,
    3. Frisén J,
    4. He B,
    5. Lira SA,
    6. Barbacid M
    (1996) Renal agenesis and the absence of enteric neurons in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 382:70–73. doi:10.1038/382070a0 pmid:8657306
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Scatton B,
    2. D'Angio M,
    3. Driscoll P,
    4. Serrano A
    (1988) An in vivo voltammetric study of the response of mesocortical and mesoaccumbens dopaminergic neurons to environmental stimuli in strains of rats with differing levels of emotionality. Ann N Y Acad Sci 537:124–137. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb42101.x pmid:3059919
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Senior SL,
    2. Ninkina N,
    3. Deacon R,
    4. Bannerman D,
    5. Buchman VL,
    6. Cragg SJ,
    7. Wade-Martins R
    (2008) Increased striatal dopamine release and hyperdopaminergic-like behaviour in mice lacking both alpha-synuclein and gamma-synuclein. Eur J Neurosci 27:947–957. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06055.x pmid:18333965
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Strömberg I,
    2. van Horne C,
    3. Bygdeman M,
    4. Weiner N,
    5. Gerhardt GA
    (1991) Function of intraventricular human mesencephalic xenografts in immunosuppressed rats: an electrophysiological and neurochemical analysis. Exp Neurol 112:140–152. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(91)90064-J pmid:1674693
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Theofilopoulos S,
    2. Goggi J,
    3. Riaz SS,
    4. Jauniaux E,
    5. Stern GM,
    6. Bradford HF
    (2001) Parallel induction of the formation of dopamine and its metabolites with induction of tyrosine hydroxylase expression in foetal rat and human cerebral cortical cells by brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial-cell derived neurotrophic factor. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 127:111–122. doi:10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00125-0 pmid:11334998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Tronche F,
    2. Kellendonk C,
    3. Kretz O,
    4. Gass P,
    5. Anlag K,
    6. Orban PC,
    7. Bock R,
    8. Klein R,
    9. Schütz G
    (1999) Disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the nervous system results in reduced anxiety. Nat Genet 23:99–103. doi:10.1038/12703 pmid:10471508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Valros A,
    2. Palander P,
    3. Heinonen M,
    4. Munsterhjelm C,
    5. Brunberg E,
    6. Keeling L,
    7. Piepponen P
    (2015) Evidence for a link between tail biting and central monoamine metabolism in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). Physiol Behav 143:151–157. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.049 pmid:25728243
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Varendi K,
    2. Kumar A,
    3. Härma MA,
    4. Andressoo JO
    (2014) miR-1, miR-10b, miR-155, and miR-191 are novel regulators of BDNF. Cell Mol Life Sci 71:4443–4456. doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1628-x pmid:24804980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Xiao H,
    2. Hirata Y,
    3. Isobe K,
    4. Kiuchi K
    (2002) Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor up-regulates the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase gene in human neuroblastoma cell lines. J Neurochem 82:801–808. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00993.x pmid:12358785
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Yorgason JT,
    2. España RA,
    3. Jones SR
    (2011) Demon voltammetry and analysis software: analysis of cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine signaling using multiple kinetic measures. J Neurosci Methods 202:158–164. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.001 pmid:21392532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Zhu S,
    2. Zhao C,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. Yang Q,
    5. Shao A,
    6. Wang T,
    7. Wu J,
    8. Yin Y,
    9. Li Y,
    10. Hou J,
    11. Zhang X,
    12. Zhou G,
    13. Gu X,
    14. Wang X,
    15. Bustelo XR,
    16. Zhou J
    (2015) Identification of a Vav2-dependent mechanism for GDNF/Ret control of mesolimbic DAT trafficking. Nat Neurosci 18:1084–1093. doi:10.1038/nn.4060 pmid:26147533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 37 (6)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 37, Issue 6
8 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dampened Amphetamine-Stimulated Behavior and Altered Dopamine Transporter Function in the Absence of Brain GDNF
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Dampened Amphetamine-Stimulated Behavior and Altered Dopamine Transporter Function in the Absence of Brain GDNF
Jaakko J. Kopra, Anne Panhelainen, Sara af Bjerkén, Lauriina L. Porokuokka, Kärt Varendi, Soophie Olfat, Heidi Montonen, T. Petteri Piepponen, Mart Saarma, Jaan-Olle Andressoo
Journal of Neuroscience 8 February 2017, 37 (6) 1581-1590; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Dampened Amphetamine-Stimulated Behavior and Altered Dopamine Transporter Function in the Absence of Brain GDNF
Jaakko J. Kopra, Anne Panhelainen, Sara af Bjerkén, Lauriina L. Porokuokka, Kärt Varendi, Soophie Olfat, Heidi Montonen, T. Petteri Piepponen, Mart Saarma, Jaan-Olle Andressoo
Journal of Neuroscience 8 February 2017, 37 (6) 1581-1590; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-16.2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • amphetamine
  • cyclic voltammetry
  • dopamine
  • dopamine transporter
  • GDNF
  • striatum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Identification of the Acid-Sensitive Site Critical for Chloral Hydrate (CH) Activation of the Proton-Activated Chloride Channel
  • Disentangling Object Category Representations Driven by Dynamic and Static Visual Input
  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
Show more Research Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • 2-AG-Mediated Control of GABAergic Signaling Is Impaired in a Model of Epilepsy
  • Expression of a Form of Cerebellar Motor Memory Requires Learned Alterations to the Activity of Inhibitory Molecular Layer Interneurons
  • Quantitative Fluorescence Analysis Reveals Dendrite-Specific Thalamocortical Plasticity in L5 Pyramidal Neurons during Learning
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.