Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Cannulae tip placements in PL cortex as verified on Nissl-stained sections. Modified with permission from Paxinos and Watson (2007). Bottom, Representative image of the bilateral cannulae tracks in the PL cortex. Arrows indicate where B/M or vehicle was infused through internal cannulae, which protruded 1 mm below guide cannulae.
- Figure 2.
Results from acquisition (A) and testing (B) in Experiment 1. Error bars indicate SEM. There are changes in y axes. Although groups responded similarly during acquisition, PL inactivation before testing attenuated responding in Context A (where responding had been trained), but not Context B (where responding had not been trained).
- Figure 3.
Results from acquisition (A), extinction (B), and renewal testing (C) in Experiment 2a. Error bars indicate SEM. There are changes in y axes. Groups did not differ in acquisition or extinction. PL inactivation before testing had no impact on renewal in a context where responding had not been trained, which was robust and similar between groups.
- Figure 4.
Results from acquisition and extinction (A), and renewal testing (B) in Experiment 2b. Error bars indicate SEM. There are changes in y axes. Although groups responded similarly in acquisition and extinction, PL inactivation before testing attenuated renewal in Context A and had no impact in Context B.
