Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 9 May 2018, 38 (19) i
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Esch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Neither GluN2A nor GlunN2B Is Required for LTD

Jonathan M. Wong and John A. Gray

(see pages 4462–4470)

Activation of postsynaptic NMDA receptors (NMDARs) induces either long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic strength depending on stimulation parameters. For example, high-frequency stimulation of hippocampal CA3 afferents to CA1 pyramidal neurons induces LTP, whereas low-frequency stimulation of the same afferents induces LTD. How NMDAR activation can produce opposite effects remains unknown.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Low-frequency stimulation (gray bar) induces similar amounts of LTD in control neurons (black), neurons lacking GluN2A (red), and neurons lacking GluN2B (blue). See Wong and Gray for details.

One appealing hypothesis is that the subunit composition of NMDARs influences the direction of plasticity. Most hippocampal neurons express NMDARs containing two GluN1 subunits along with two GluN2A and/or GluN2B subunits. GluN2A-containing receptors have a higher probability of opening and have faster kinetics than GluN2B-containing receptors; consequently, the charge transfer and calcium elevation resulting from activation of the two types of receptors differs. In addition, differences in the intracellular domains of GluN2A and GluN2B enable them to interact with different proteins. For example, GluN2B binds to CaMKII, an essential mediator of LTP induction. Such differences in receptor properties might favor LTP or LTD. In fact, there is good evidence that GluN2B-containing NMDARs are necessary for LTP induction. One might expect, then, that GluN2A-containing receptors promote LTD. Previous tests of this hypothesis have produced conflicting results, however (Shipton and Paulsen, 2014 Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130163).

Wong and Gray now provide strong evidence that neither GluN2A nor GluN2B is required for LTD at CA3–CA1 synapses. Whereas knocking out the obligatory GluN1 subunit in a sparse population of rat CA1 neurons prevented the induction of LTD in these neurons, knocking out either GluN2A or GluN2B had no effect on LTD. Moreover, LTD was induced in GluN2A-lacking and GluN2B-lacking neurons in both the presence and absence of a glycine-site antagonist that blocks channel opening, suggesting that NMDARs containing either subunit can support LTD regardless of current flux.

These results suggest that the subunit composition of NMDARs does not determine the direction of plasticity produced by receptor activation, at least in CA3–CA1 synapses in 2- to 3-week-old rats. What does allow NMDARs to induce opposite effects on synaptic strength remains unclear. The answer might lie in the GluN1 subunit and its interaction partners.

How Neuropeptide Y Reduces Future Excitability in Amygdala

Heika Silveira Villarroel, Maria Bompolaki, James P. Mackay, Ana Pamela Miranda Tapia, Sheldon D. Michaelson, et al.

(see pages 4505–4520)

Excessive stress can cause long-term psychological problems, including depression and anxiety. Not all people who experience intense or prolonged stress develop these disorders, however. Social support, experience dealing with mild stressors, and genetic factors help make people resilient. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is thought to play a major role in this resilience.

NPY is released during stressful experiences and it helps terminate stress responses initiated by corticotropin releasing factor (CRF). For example, whereas CRF enhances Ih (a depolarizing inward current that is activated at hyperpolarized membrane potentials) in neurons from rat basolateral amygdala (BLA), NPY inhibits Ih, thus limiting depolarization and reducing neuronal excitability. Moreover, injection of NPY into the BLA lessens the reduction in social interaction seen in rats after they are exposed to restraint stress, and this effect persists for up to 8 weeks (Sajdyk et al., 2008 J Neurosci 28:893).

Whether the long-term effects of NPY on social interactions involve Ih has been unknown. To address this, Silveira, Bompolaki, et al. injected NPY into BLA and recorded neurons in slices 2 or 4 weeks later. After 2 weeks, NPY-exposed neurons had a more hyperpolarized resting membrane potential than control neurons. Furthermore, whereas CRF increased Ih in control neurons, it did not affect Ih in neurons from NPY-treated rats. Nonetheless, Ih amplitudes were similar in control and NPY-exposed neurons, and acute NPY application hyperpolarized neurons regardless of prior treatment. At 4 weeks after injection, NPY-exposed neurons were still more hyperpolarized than normal and remained insensitive to CRF. But baseline Ih was significantly reduced at this time, and acute NPY had no effect. The reduction in Ih was attributable at least in part to reduced levels of HCN1, the channel that carries this current. Notably, knocking down HCN1 in BLA mimicked the effect of NPY injection, increasing social interaction for at least 8 weeks.

These results suggest that NPY produces long-term reductions in the excitability of BLA neurons by reducing expression of HCN1 channels. This not only results in a more hyperpolarized resting membrane potential, but also blunts the effect of CRF. The reduction in HCN1 levels appears to contribute to increases in social interaction induced by NPY treatment, and may thus help counter the effects of stress.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 19
9 May 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Teresa Esch
Journal of Neuroscience 9 May 2018, 38 (19) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Teresa Esch
Journal of Neuroscience 9 May 2018, 38 (19) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Neither GluN2A nor GlunN2B Is Required for LTD
    • How Neuropeptide Y Reduces Future Excitability in Amygdala
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.