Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Aβ-Mediated Dysregulation of F-Actin Nanoarchitecture Leads to Loss of Dendritic Spines and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Cognitive Impairments

Hossein Sanjari Moghaddam and Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
Journal of Neuroscience 27 June 2018, 38 (26) 5840-5842; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0844-18.2018
Hossein Sanjari Moghaddam
1Graduate Program, Neurology Division, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran and
2ImmunoPharmacology Network, Universal Scientific Education and Research Network, Tehran, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
1Graduate Program, Neurology Division, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, and it greatly reduces quality of life in the affected population (Anand et al., 2014). Extracellular accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular aggregation of neurofibrillary tangles are the most obvious pathological hallmarks of AD (Selkoe, 2004; Ballatore et al., 2007), but neural and synaptic loss has been suggested as key players in the development of the disease, particularly in initial stages (Ingelsson et al., 2004). It should be held in mind that AD does not result from a single pathologic mechanism, but from a combination of several converging events. Even so, among the suggested pathologic mechanisms, synaptic dysfunction has received copious attention. In this regard, evidence suggests that Aβ oligomers are the primary cause of disrupted structure and function of cortical synapses (Walsh and Selkoe, 2007). Furthermore, AD-related cognitive impairments are most strongly associated with disruptions in the structure and function of cortical synapses (DeKosky and Scheff, 1990; Scheff et al., 2007).

Membranous protrusions known as dendritic spines are the site of the majority of excitatory synaptic input to cortical neurons, and it is postulated that loss of dendritic spines is responsible for excessive synaptic demise in AD (Walsh et al., 2005). Dendritic spine morphology, plasticity, and maintenance are heavily dependent on the underlying actin cytoskeleton. Actin filaments (F-actin) are built from monomers of globular (G) actin, and some of the actin in dendritic spines can be best conceived of as a dynamic equilibrium between F- and G-actin (Kasai et al., 2003). Actin filaments are polar structures depolymerizing from one pole (pointed end) and polymerizing at the other pole (barbed end), in a process known as treadmilling. This dynamic equilibrium is essential for activity-dependent remodeling of spine structure and, therefore, synaptic plasticity (Matus, 2005; Penzes and VanLeeuwen, 2011). At the same time, the backbone of dendritic spine structure is maintained by a pool of actin filaments with different lifetimes, ranging from more stable fractions, such as cross-linked filaments, to less stable fractions, such as branched filaments (Star et al., 2002; Blanchoin et al., 2014). Therefore, the loss of synapses in AD might stem from disruption of actin dynamics in dendritic spines. Indeed, previous work (Krucker et al., 2000; Blanpied and Ehlers, 2004; Szabó et al., 2016) has shown that actin dynamics are important for both LTD and LTP, which are compromised in AD. However, it is not clear whether F-actin disassembly precedes disruption of synapses or the elimination of synapses impairs F-actin assembly. Moreover, the association between the loss of dendritic spines and AD-related cognitive impairments is not well established.

In a recent study, Kommaddi et al. (2018) scrutinized the role of F-actin disassembly in Aβ-induced dendritic spine loss and cognitive impairment. Using mice harboring AD-linked mutations (APPswe/PS1E9 mice), the authors investigated G-/F-actin equilibrium as an indicator of F-actin nanoarchitecture in dendritic spines. Synaptic terminals (synaptosomes) were extracted from the cortex of 1-month-old male AD mice. Importantly, APPswe/PS1E9 mice show no signs of AD-related pathology at this age. Nonetheless, a significant shift from F-actin to G-actin with no alteration in total actin levels was observed in APP/PS1 mice compared with controls. Thus, F-actin disassembly preceded the accumulation of Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in this AD model. The disequilibrium in G-/F-actin was also present in 9-month-old AD mice, in which substantial Aβ plaques were present, suggesting that F-actin disassembly is a continuous and possibly progressive event in the pathological development of AD. Similar to the findings in the mouse model of AD, immunoblot analysis of postmortem tissues from people with mild cognitive impairment or AD revealed a significant reduction in levels of synaptosomal F-actin. In addition to demonstrating that F-actin disassembly precedes plaque formation, this result suggests that assessment of synaptic F-actin might be of value in diagnosing and, thus, treating AD patients at a much earlier stage of the disease.

One of the most important findings of the study by Kommaddi et al. (2018) regards the possible role of disrupted F-actin nanoarchitecture in AD-related behavioral impairments. The authors used fear conditioning to study learning in AD mice. Specifically, an aversive stimulus (shock) was repeatedly delivered in an otherwise neutral context or in conjunction with a neutral sensory cue. This causes normal mice to express fear responses to the neutral context or cue (Maren, 2001). A previous study (Huang et al., 2013) showed that F-actin disassembly impaired cued and contextual fear memory. In the study by Kommaddi et al. (2018), APP/PS1 mice showed decreased freezing responses compared with control mice in the shock-paired context, suggesting that fear learning was impaired. An actin-polymerizing agent, jasplakinolide, and an actin-depolymerizing agent, latrunculin, were used to determine the role of F-actin disassembly in the observed impairment of fear learning. Jasplakinolide led to elevated freezing responses in 2-month-old APP/PS1 mice, whereas latrunculin led to decreased freezing responses in 4-month-old control mice, suggesting that intact nanoarchitecture and dynamics of F-actin are required for normal learning and memory. Consistent with this, F-actin reduction in postmortem tissue from AD patients was correlated with defects in episodic memory and working memory, providing further evidence for a role of F-actin disassembly in AD-induced cognitive impairments. Even more notably, the results from mice indicate that synaptic loss seen in AD is reversible and can be reversed with actin-polymerizing agents.

To further investigate the relationship between F-actin disruption and spine loss in cortical neurons, Kommaddi et al. (2018) analyzed cultured primary cortical neurons from APP/PS1 mice. After 10 DIV, dendritic spines were minimally altered, whereas F-actin structure was significantly diminished. By 16 DIV, both the number and morphology of dendritic spines and F-actin were altered. This suggests that F-actin disassembly preceded and likely caused dendritic spine loss in the AD mice. In addition to cortical neurons, a considerable portion of AD-related cognitive impairments are suggested to result from synaptic dysfunction in the hippocampus (Scheibel, 1979). However, Kommaddi et al. (2018) focused only on neurons from cortical regions. Hence, further studies are required to investigate possible cytoskeletal deficits in hippocampal synaptosomes, as well.

In the last part of their study, Kommaddi et al. (2018) scrutinized the interaction between actin and its major intracellular regulators, including ADF/cofilin, a negative regulator of actin polymerization, and drebrin, a positive regulator of actin polymerization (Bamburg, 1999; Bamburg and Bernstein, 2016). Dephosphorylated (active) cofilin causes a shift in G-/F-actin equilibrium by prompting the transformation of F-actin to G-actin (Bamburg and Bernstein, 2016). Phosphorylated (inactive) cofilin, p-cofilin/cofilin ratio, and drebrin were reduced in synaptosomes extracted from 1-month-old and 9-month-old AD mice, suggesting that ADF/cofilin and drebrin, as well as F-actin, are disrupted in early and later stages of AD. It is conceivable that Aβ-induced actin disassembly results from alternations in the levels and function of ADF/cofilin family members (Fig. 1). However, validation of cofilin as one of the mediators of Aβ-induced actin disassembly is missing in this study. It also remains possible that upstream proteins alter F-actin dynamics and nanoarchitecture indirectly (Penzes and VanLeeuwen, 2011).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

F-actin nanoarchitecture and two of its regulators (cofilin and drebrin) in dendritic spines. Under normal conditions, F-actin nanoarchitecture provides structural and functional support for dendritic spines (right). In Alzheimer's disease, Aβ oligomers disrupt the equilibrium between G- and F-actin, which will eventually lead to spine shrinkage and disappearance (left). The detrimental effects of Aβ oligomers on G-/F-actin equilibrium might occur through direct effects on actin monomers, or through its effects on P-cofilin/cofilin ratio and decreased levels of drebrin. Activated (dephosphorylated) cofilin catalyzes the conversion of F-actin to G-actin, whereas drebrin contributes to F-actin polymerization.

Synaptic dysfunction, particularly loss of dendritic spines, is currently recognized as a predominant pathologic event in the initial stages of AD, and it is closely correlated with AD-related cognitive impairments. The findings from cellular studies, animal models, and human postmortem brain tissue discussed herein provide strong evidence that dynamics of F-actin nanoarchitecture, specifically G-/F-actin equilibrium, along with its cellular regulators, including ADF/cofilin and drebrin, are impaired, even in early stages of AD. F-actin cytoskeleton contributes to the maintenance of dendritic spine structure and supports the scaffolding of several important synaptic proteins. Thus, Aβ-medicated F-actin disassembly likely leads to spine collapse and synaptic dysfunction. The maintenance of F-actin stability could be a promising therapeutic target in the future treatment of AD.

There are some major questions regarding Aβ-mediated F-actin disassembly that should be addressed in future studies. First and foremost, how does Aβ cause the F-actin disassembly in synaptosomes and, thus, cause spine loss? It remains to be investigated whether Aβ exerts its effects directly on F-actin nanoarchitecture or whether there are mediators linking Aβ toxicity to loss of dendritic spines. Second, in addition to Aβ, tau protein has been proposed to contribute to AD pathology. However, the connection between F-actin disassembly and tau protein pathology is unclear. Finally, the animal model of AD revealed that disruptions in F-actin nanoarchitecture could be reversed through actin polymerization agents. Actin-polymerizing agents could be potentially translated to be applicable in clinical settings. However, such agents are likely to produce severe side effects given the ubiquitous importance of the actin cytoskeleton throughout the body. Therefore, targeted treatment strategies, such as actin-polymerizing agents conjugated with antibodies directed against AD-affected neurons, could be considered in future studies to maximize the effect of actin-polymerizing agents and minimize the likelihood of possible side effects.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Hossein Sanjari Moghaddam, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, Iran. g.h.sanjarimoghaddam{at}gmail.com

References

  1. ↵
    1. Anand R,
    2. Gill KD,
    3. Mahdi AA
    (2014) Therapeutics of Alzheimer's disease: past, present and future. Neuropharmacology 76:27–50. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.004 pmid:23891641
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ballatore C,
    2. Lee VM,
    3. Trojanowski JQ
    (2007) Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:663–672. doi:10.1038/nrn2194 pmid:17684513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bamburg JR
    (1999) Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: essential regulators of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:185–230. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.185 pmid:10611961
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bamburg JR,
    2. Bernstein BW
    (2016) Actin dynamics and cofilin-actin rods in Alzheimer disease. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 73:477–497. doi:10.1002/cm.21282 pmid:26873625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Blanchoin L,
    2. Boujemaa-Paterski R,
    3. Sykes C,
    4. Plastino J
    (2014) Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. Physiol Rev 94:235–263. doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2013 pmid:24382887
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Blanpied TA,
    2. Ehlers MD
    (2004) Microanatomy of dendritic spines: emerging principles of synaptic pathology in psychiatric and neurological disease. Biol Psychiatry 55:1121–1127. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.006 pmid:15184030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. DeKosky ST,
    2. Scheff SW
    (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. doi:10.1002/ana.410270502 pmid:2360787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Huang W,
    2. Zhu PJ,
    3. Zhang S,
    4. Zhou H,
    5. Stoica L,
    6. Galiano M,
    7. Krnjević K,
    8. Roman G,
    9. Costa-Mattioli M
    (2013) mTORC2 controls actin polymerization required for consolidation of long-term memory. Nat Neurosci 16:441–448. doi:10.1038/nn.3351 pmid:23455608
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ingelsson M,
    2. Fukumoto H,
    3. Newell KL,
    4. Growdon JH,
    5. Hedley-Whyte ET,
    6. Frosch MP,
    7. Albert MS,
    8. Hyman BT,
    9. Irizarry MC
    (2004) Early abeta accumulation and progressive synaptic loss, gliosis, and tangle formation in AD brain. Neurology 62:925–931. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000115115.98960.37 pmid:15037694
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kasai H,
    2. Matsuzaki M,
    3. Noguchi J,
    4. Yasumatsu N,
    5. Nakahara H
    (2003) Structure-stability-function relationships of dendritic spines. Trends Neurosci 26:360–368. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00162-0 pmid:12850432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kommaddi RP,
    2. Das D,
    3. Karunakaran S,
    4. Nanguneri S,
    5. Bapat D,
    6. Ray A,
    7. Shaw E,
    8. Bennett DA,
    9. Nair D,
    10. Ravindranath V
    (2018) Abeta mediates F-actin disassembly in dendritic spines leading to cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 38:1085–1099. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2127-17.2017 pmid:29246925
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Krucker T,
    2. Siggins GR,
    3. Halpain S
    (2000) Dynamic actin filaments are required for stable long-term potentiation (LTP) in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6856–6861. doi:10.1073/pnas.100139797 pmid:10823894
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Maren S
    (2001) Neurobiology of Pavlovian fear conditioning. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:897–931. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.897 pmid:11520922
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Matus A
    (2005) Growth of dendritic spines: a continuing story. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:67–72. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.01.015 pmid:15721746
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Penzes P,
    2. VanLeeuwen JE
    (2011) Impaired regulation of synaptic actin cytoskeleton in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res Rev 67:184–192. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2011.01.003 pmid:21276817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Scheff SW,
    2. Price DA,
    3. Schmitt FA,
    4. DeKosky ST,
    5. Mufson EJ
    (2007) Synaptic alterations in CA1 in mild Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 68:1501–1508. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000260698.46517.8f pmid:17470753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Scheibel AB
    (1979) The hippocampus: organizational patterns in health and senescence. Mech Ageing Dev 9:89–102. doi:10.1016/0047-6374(79)90123-4 pmid:439952
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Selkoe DJ
    (2004) Alzheimer disease: mechanistic understanding predicts novel therapies. Ann Intern Med 140:627–638. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00047 pmid:15096334
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Star EN,
    2. Kwiatkowski DJ,
    3. Murthy VN
    (2002) Rapid turnover of actin in dendritic spines and its regulation by activity. Nat Neurosci 5:239–246. doi:10.1038/nn811 pmid:11850630
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Szabó EC,
    2. Manguinhas R,
    3. Fonseca R
    (2016) The interplay between neuronal activity and actin dynamics mimic the setting of an LTD synaptic tag. Sci Rep 6:33685. doi:10.1038/srep33685 pmid:27650071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Walsh DM,
    2. Selkoe DJ
    (2007) A beta oligomers: a decade of discovery. J Neurochem 101:1172–1184. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x pmid:17286590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Walsh DM,
    2. Klyubin I,
    3. Shankar GM,
    4. Townsend M,
    5. Fadeeva JV,
    6. Betts V,
    7. Podlisny MB,
    8. Cleary JP,
    9. Ashe KH,
    10. Rowan MJ,
    11. Selkoe DJ
    (2005) The role of cell-derived oligomers of abeta in Alzheimer's disease and avenues for therapeutic intervention. Biochem Soc Trans 33:1087–1090. doi:10.1042/BST20051087 pmid:16246051
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (26)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 26
27 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Aβ-Mediated Dysregulation of F-Actin Nanoarchitecture Leads to Loss of Dendritic Spines and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Cognitive Impairments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Aβ-Mediated Dysregulation of F-Actin Nanoarchitecture Leads to Loss of Dendritic Spines and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Cognitive Impairments
Hossein Sanjari Moghaddam, Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
Journal of Neuroscience 27 June 2018, 38 (26) 5840-5842; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0844-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Aβ-Mediated Dysregulation of F-Actin Nanoarchitecture Leads to Loss of Dendritic Spines and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Cognitive Impairments
Hossein Sanjari Moghaddam, Mohammad Hadi Aarabi
Journal of Neuroscience 27 June 2018, 38 (26) 5840-5842; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0844-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Normative Account of 3D Motion Perception from Natural Scenes
  • Obesity and Gut–Brain Communication: The Cholinergic-Endocannabinoid Link
  • Unraveling Pallido-Retrorubral Circuits Linking the Basal Ganglia to Limbic Areas
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.