Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Insights into the Contribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel 1.7 to Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy

Laura Bernal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 July 2018, 38 (27) 6025-6027; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0692-18.2018
Laura Bernal
Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Biología de Sistemas (Fisiología), Universidad de Alcala, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Bernal
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of antineoplastic treatments, such as paclitaxel (for review, see Mekhail and Markman, 2005). Paclitaxel exerts its effects by promoting tubulin assembly and preventing microtubule depolymerization, hence inhibiting cell division and causing cell death. Unfortunately, the effects are not restricted to tumor cells, and numbness, tingling, mechanical/thermal allodynia, and burning pain develop in ~70% of treated patients (for review, see Seretny et al., 2014). Because no effective treatment prevents or relieves this kind of neuropathic pain, dose reduction or treatment cessation is required. Even after the discontinuation of therapy, however, symptoms can persist for months.

Animal models of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy show signs of mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, cold allodynia, and heat hyperalgesia that last up to 30 d (Polomano et al., 2001). Dissociated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons from paclitaxel-treated rats show spontaneous activity that is not found in control animals (Zhang and Dougherty, 2014; Li et al. 2017). In addition, DRG neurons in paclitaxel-treated rats have higher-than-normal levels of mRNA and protein for voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 (Zhang and Dougherty, 2014; Xia et al., 2016). Notably, subcutaneous administration of low doses of tetrodotoxin (which blocks Nav1.1–1.4, Nav1.6, and Nav1.7) reduced the development of mechanical and cold allodynia in paclitaxel-treated mice (Nieto et al., 2008). Moreover, minocycline (a broad-spectrum tetracycline antibiotic) protects against neuropathy in taxol-treated rats (Boyette-Davis et al., 2011) and is thought to exert its effects through inhibition of sodium channels in primary afferents (Kim et al., 2011).

In a study recently published in The Journal of Neuroscience, Li et al. (2018) extended previous work by elucidating the specific types of DRG nociceptive neurons that show elevated expression of Nav1.7 after paclitaxel treatment. They also asked whether the function of these channels is also potentiated and assessed the contribution of the channels to mechanical hypersensitivity accompanying CIPN in rats. Finally, they obtained DRGs from patients with painful cancer-related neuropathy to further explore the role of Nav1.7 in the development of hyperexcitability and its possible role in neuropathy in humans.

To address these questions, they induced peripheral neuropathy in rats by injecting paclitaxel intraperitoneally on 4 nonconsecutive days. Consistent with previous work (Xia et al., 2016), paclitaxel treatment increased the level of Nav1.7 protein. This increase was found to be restricted to small- and medium-size nociceptive DRG neurons (mainly in peptidergic neurons, but also, to a lesser degree, in nonpeptidergic cells). The increased expression lasted for up to 14 d after the first injection, and thereafter started to decline despite persistent neuropathy. The authors also demonstrated that paclitaxel significantly increased the expression of Nav1.7 channel at the central terminals of nociceptive fibers in the spinal cord (Li et al., 2018).

Whole-cell recordings of small-size neurons (putative nociceptors) from DRG cultures from paclitaxel-treated rats revealed an increase in Nav1.7 current density. These currents also became activated at more hyperpolarized membrane potential in paclitaxel-treated neurons than in control neurons (Li et al., 2018). This increased current likely contributed to the development of spontaneous activity, which was found in 30% of the recorded nociceptors. Indeed, the specific Nav1.7 blocker Pro-TxII abolished the current and the spontaneous activity.

It is likely that the development of spontaneous activity contributes to paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain (Zhang and Dougherty, 2014; Li et al. 2017). Therefore, Li et al. (2018) explored whether the increase of the Nav1.7 channel is responsible for the mechanical hyperalgesia that developed after paclitaxel treatment. They found that intrathecal administration of Pro-TxII, either before paclitaxel treatment or after neuropathy was stablished, reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. This is in contrast with earlier studies that had failed to demonstrate attenuation of mechanical hyperalgesia in paclitaxel-treated rats after local DRG Nav1.7 blockade with a specific antibody (Xia et al., 2016). It may be that the blocking of peripheral channels is not sufficient to reduce hyperalgesia given that, as mentioned above, Li et al. (2018) detected increased expression of Nav1.7 in the spinal cord. But this would be inconsistent with a role of Nav1.7 channels in the cell body and the primary afferent.

Next, Li et al. (2018) investigated the mechanisms by which paclitaxel increases Nav1.7 expression. Previous work indicated that paclitaxel treatment increased the expression of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and its downstream signaling protein myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88; Li et al., 2014). Therefore, Li et al. (2018) asked whether signaling via the TLR4–MyD88–MAPK pathway altered Nav1.7 expression. Indeed, LPS-RS (lipopolysaccharide from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides; a TLR4 antagonist) decreased Nav1.7 channel expression in DRGs from neuropathic rats. This is consistent with the attenuation of mechanical hypersensitivity observed in knock-out TLR4 mice after cisplatin treatment (Park et al., 2014). Previous studies also suggested that paclitaxel-induced activation of TLR4 leads to increased expression and release of TNF-α in satellite glial cells (Wu et al., 2015), and that high levels of TNF-α are associated with an increase in Nav1.7 channel in DRGs in rats with diabetic neuropathy (Huang et al., 2014). Thus, this might also contribute to Nav1.7 channel upregulation in paclitaxel-induced neuropathy.

Larger-than-normal Nav1.7 currents have also been described in patients treated with paclitaxel (Chang et al., 2018). Li et al. (2018) obtained DRGs from three patients with cancer-related neuropathies and confirmed by immunohistochemistry that Nav1.7 was present in half of the nociceptors. Remarkably, the increased expression of Nav1.7 was restricted to the DRGs that innervated painful dermatomes. Moreover, spontaneous activity, which was recorded only in neurons dissociated from DRGs that innervated painful dermatomes, was abolished by Pro-TxII. Essentially, the authors demonstrated that, like CIPN rats, nociceptors from patients with cancer-related neuropathies of different etiologies are sensitized and discharge at membrane potentials at which nociceptors are usually silent due to an overexpression of Nav1.7.

In summary, Li et al. (2018) showed increased expression and function of the Nav1.7 channel in rat and human DRG nociceptors, and that this increase in expression seems to contribute to neuropathic pain symptoms. The finding that blocking Nav1.7 reduces paclitaxel-induced neuropathy is somewhat surprising, given that Nav1.7 expression declines to baseline levels after 14 d even when neuropathy persists at least for 1 more week (Li et al. 2014). But spontaneously active nociceptors are considered an indicator of peripheral sensitization, which can potentiate central sensitization. This might explain how a transient upregulation of Nav1.7 contributes to longer-lasting sensitivity. On the other hand, these results may indicate that other mechanisms contribute to CIPN. One likely contributor is the T-type calcium channel, the specific blockade of which has also been shown to prevent mechanical hypersensitivity in paclitaxel-treated rats (Li et al., 2017). TRPV4 (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) channels may also play a role, given that antisense oligodeoxinucleotides against these channels abolished mechanical hyperalgesia induced by taxol (Alessandri-Haber et al., 2004). Thus, although the study by Li et al. (2018) advocates for Nav1.7 channels as a target to limit CIPN symptoms, the effectiveness of such treatments might be limited, because of the involvement of other ion channels. Furthermore, it is likely that these findings cannot be extrapolated to all neuropathies with different origins, given that, for example, mechanical hypersensitivity is independent of Nav1.7 in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (Minett et al. 2014).

Because genetic variants of Nav1.7 channels are associated with pain syndromes, several Nav blockers are being tested in clinical trials to treat chronic pain conditions (for review, see Emery et al., 2016). Unfortunately, these trials have shown little promise and demand further study. Not only synthetic drugs but also several natural toxins have considerable therapeutic effects by blocking Nav channels; however, their specificity and side effects limit their use. Nevertheless, the search for specific Nav1.7 antagonists opens up the possibility of finding more adequate treatments to limit the positive symptoms of patients with different neuropathies.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • L.B. is supported by a FPU (Formación del Profesorado Universitario) Scholarship (Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte, Spain).

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Laura Bernal, Departimento Biología de Sistemas, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Universitario, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain. laura.bernal{at}uah.es

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alessandri-Haber N,
    2. Dina OA,
    3. Yeh JJ,
    4. Parada CA,
    5. Reichling DB,
    6. Levine JD
    (2004) Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 is essential in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in the rat. J Neurosci 24:4444–4452. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0242-04.2004 pmid:15128858
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Boyette-Davis J,
    2. Xin W,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Dougherty PM
    (2011) Intraepidermal nerve fiber loss corresponds to the development of taxol-induced hyperalgesia and can be prevented by treatment with minocycline. Pain 152:308–313. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.030 pmid:21145656
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Berta T,
    3. Kim YH,
    4. Lee S,
    5. Lee SY,
    6. Ji RR
    (2018) Expression and role of voltage-gated sodium channels in human dorsal root ganglion neurons with special focus on Nav1.7, species differences, and regulation by paclitaxel. Neurosci Bull 34:4–12. doi:10.1007/s12264-017-0132-3 pmid:28424991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Emery EC,
    2. Luiz AP,
    3. Wood JN
    (2016) Nav1.7 and other voltage-gated sodium channels as drug targets for pain relief. Expert Opin Ther Targets 20:975–983. doi:10.1517/14728222.2016.1162295 pmid:26941184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Huang Y,
    2. Zang Y,
    3. Zhou L,
    4. Gui W,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Zhong Y
    (2014) The role of TNF-alpha/NF-kappa B pathway on the up-regulation of voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 in DRG neurons of rats with diabetic neuropathy. Neurochem Int 75:112–119. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2014.05.012 pmid:24893330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kim TH,
    2. Kim HI,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Park M,
    5. Song JH
    (2011) Effects of minocycline on Na+ currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res 1370:34–42. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.038 pmid:21081117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Kosturakis AK,
    5. Jawad AB,
    6. Dougherty PM
    (2014) Toll-like receptor 4 signaling contributes to paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Pain 15:712–725. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.04.001 pmid:24755282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Tatsui CE,
    3. Rhines LD,
    4. North RY,
    5. Harrison DS,
    6. Cassidy RM,
    7. Johansson CA,
    8. Kosturakis AK,
    9. Edwards DD,
    10. Zhang H,
    11. Dougherty PM
    (2017) Dorsal root ganglion neurons become hyperecitable and increase expression of voltage-gated T-type calcium channels (cav3.2) in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain 158:417–429. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000774 pmid:27902567
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. North RY,
    3. Rhines LD,
    4. Tatsui CE,
    5. Rao G,
    6. Edwards DD,
    7. Cassidy RM,
    8. Harrison DS,
    9. Johansson CA,
    10. Zhang H,
    11. Dougherty PM
    (2018) DRG voltage-gated sodium channel 1.7 is upregulated in paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in rats and in humans with neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 38:1124–1136. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0899-17.2017 pmid:29255002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Mekhail M,
    2. Markman TM
    (2005) Paclitaxel in cancer therapy. Exp Opin Pharmacother 3:755–766. doi:10.1517/14656566.3.6.755 pmid:12036415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Minett MS,
    2. Falk S,
    3. Santana-Varela S,
    4. Bogdanov YD,
    5. Nassar MA,
    6. Heegaard AM,
    7. Wood JN
    (2014) Pain without nociceptors? Nav1.7-independent pain mechanisms. Cell Rep 6:301–312. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.033 pmid:24440715
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nieto FR,
    2. Entrena JM,
    3. Cendán CM,
    4. Pozo ED,
    5. Vela JM,
    6. Baeyens JM
    (2008) Tetrodotoxin inhibits the development and expression of neuropathic pain induced by paclitaxel in mice. Pain 137:520–531. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.012 pmid:18037242
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Park HJ,
    2. Stokes JA,
    3. Corr M,
    4. Yaksh TL
    (2014) Toll-like receptor signaling regulates cisplatin-induced mechanical allodynia in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:25–34. doi:10.1007/s00280-013-2304-9 pmid:24162377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Polomano RC,
    2. Mannes AJ,
    3. Clark US,
    4. Bennett GJ
    (2001) A painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat produced by the chemotherapeutic drug, paclitaxel. Pain 94:293–304. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00363-3 pmid:11731066
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Seretny M,
    2. Currie GL,
    3. Sena ES,
    4. Ramnarine S,
    5. Grant R,
    6. MacLeod MR,
    7. Colvin LA,
    8. Fallon M
    (2014) Incidence, prevalence, and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 155:2461–2470. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.020 pmid:25261162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Wu Z,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Wu I,
    4. Mata M,
    5. Fink DJ
    (2015) Activation of TLR-4 to produce tumor necrosis factor-α in neuropathic pain caused by paclitaxel. Eur J Pain 19:889–898. doi:10.1002/ejp.613 pmid:25388329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Xia Z,
    2. Xiao Y,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. Zhao B
    (2016) Sodium channel Nav1.7 expression is upregulated in the dorsal root ganglia in a rat model of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Springerplus 5:1738. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3351-6 pmid:27777872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Dougherty PM
    (2014) Enhanced excitability of primary sensory neurons and altered gene expression of neuronal ion channels in dorsal root ganglion in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Anesthesiology 120:1463–1475. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000176 pmid:24534904
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 27
4 Jul 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Insights into the Contribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel 1.7 to Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Insights into the Contribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel 1.7 to Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy
Laura Bernal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 July 2018, 38 (27) 6025-6027; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0692-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Insights into the Contribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel 1.7 to Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy
Laura Bernal
Journal of Neuroscience 4 July 2018, 38 (27) 6025-6027; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0692-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mixed Excitatory and Inhibitory Projections from the Basolateral Amygdala to the Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus
  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.